Can this be effective against the increasing numbers of gamblers?

[Sanitough]

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Advertising never ends on the internet. Even if the casino is not welcome here in bitcointalk such the 1xbit, we still could see them on different crypto sites because the crypto adnetworks welcome them.

 Social media is use more in this time, so even if they forbid the influencers and bloggers promote those casinos and sportbetting platforms.

In that aspect you are absolutely right, the publicity does not end there, consequently the casino you name is known to be one of those with the biggest scams in the world, and it is only necessary to show, all the evidence is there, but now so that the number of players can continue to grow, there is nothing better than offering something in return, to keep them there and make them defend the casino at the worst times, I think it is an investment, there are many ways, rewards with social networks, with the things that can be devised, but they have to give something, something in exchange for work.

[Reatim]

good catch there mate , though front print is important  but we know that Camera Angle nowadays is 360 degrees meaning even in the armpit still the advertisement is visible so there is no really sense this at all.
and talking about premier league? all the biggest banners are all over the place , adding those tv advertisement .
maybe they are just cleaning their hands but gambling and sports are always go together and this is all about money.

Advertisements, promotions, sponsorships are always attached to a team or sports match because so far, a sports match is one match that is always of interest to many people to watch, even almost all people in this world have their own preferences in every existing sporting event.
It's only natural that advertising has succeeded in getting enthusiasm from many people because in advertising a match, the implementing team will do many things to get more viewers.
It is true that sports and betting are two different options, but they always go hand in hand where every sports match there must be a bet behind it.
Betting in sports cannot be stopped or limited because it has a large enough money circulation, even greater than what is generated in the sporting event.

while others wanted just to enjoy the game yet many are also wanted  to get piece of cake from the event that is why betting takes place .
but if we will pay attention , sports are turning into gambling nowadays and the essence of the game is gone instead the gamble is what mostly are looking.
I think that this type of advertising must end and yes let gamble take place somewhere and not in the time of the game.

[romero121]

Advertising never ends on the internet. Even if the casino is not welcome here in bitcointalk such the 1xbit, we still could see them on different crypto sites because the crypto adnetworks welcome them.

 Social media is use more in this time, so even if they forbid the influencers and bloggers promote those casinos and sportbetting platforms.

In that aspect you are absolutely right, the publicity does not end there, consequently the casino you name is known to be one of those with the biggest scams in the world, and it is only necessary to show, all the evidence is there, but now so that the number of players can continue to grow, there is nothing better than offering something in return, to keep them there and make them defend the casino at the worst times, I think it is an investment, there are many ways, rewards with social networks, with the things that can be devised, but they have to give something, something in exchange for work.

Yes, that's just a part of promotion. The platforms have got more other ways to promote the platform. The sporting authority have made the decisions. It is to get exhibited from 2025/26 which is almost 2 years from now. Even the change of members on the authority could make changes. Nothing much changes, only the sponsor amount from the specific team gets decreased. The market is big, so that the business owners will find an alternate way to keep the gamblers active as well attract new ones.

[tusandii]

-snip-

while others wanted just to enjoy the game yet many are also wanted  to get piece of cake from the event that is why betting takes place .
but if we will pay attention , sports are turning into gambling nowadays and the essence of the game is gone instead the gamble is what mostly are looking.
I think that this type of advertising must end and yes let gamble take place somewhere and not in the time of the game.

Yes it's the same as getting pleasure from watching the game but also having the advantage of winning the bet.
Not only for now, but for a long time, sport has become one of the venues that is used for betting and this has become a kind of culture in various parts of the world.
After all, no one can stop the betting of every sports match because it is a field of income by some people.
You can't get rid of gambling advertisements at sporting events, because this gambling advertisement provides big profits for the organizers of sporting events, in fact, each team also has sponsors from several gambling sites, which are usually printed on the jerseys of the players.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Advertising never ends on the internet. Even if the casino is not welcome here in bitcointalk such the 1xbit, we still could see them on different crypto sites because the crypto adnetworks welcome them.

 Social media is use more in this time, so even if they forbid the influencers and bloggers promote those casinos and sportbetting platforms.

In that aspect you are absolutely right, the publicity does not end there, consequently the casino you name is known to be one of those with the biggest scams in the world, and it is only necessary to show, all the evidence is there, but now so that the number of players can continue to grow, there is nothing better than offering something in return, to keep them there and make them defend the casino at the worst times, I think it is an investment, there are many ways, rewards with social networks, with the things that can be devised, but they have to give something, something in exchange for work.

Yes, that's just a part of promotion. The platforms have got more other ways to promote the platform. The sporting authority have made the decisions. It is to get exhibited from 2025/26 which is almost 2 years from now. Even the change of members on the authority could make changes. Nothing much changes, only the sponsor amount from the specific team gets decreased. The market is big, so that the business owners will find an alternate way to keep the gamblers active as well attract new ones.

Considering that advertising pays for itself, at a time when all advertising starts , it will have a community and will have many people eager for the site to be very good , obviously the community wants something in return, usually it is money, generating/work is mainly what many are looking for, and these people will give anything to Defend the site, that's why I say , if a community is built with effort, there is nothing else to Show that what is required here is that jobs are offered so that they can have Access to everything, and this is Protection to the platform, but if the casino or platform stops Giving benefits to that Community, everything will go to the Floor , I have seen that some Platforms work like this.

[slapper]

~snip~

Considering that advertising pays for itself, at a time when all advertising starts , it will have a community and will have many people eager for the site to be very good , obviously the community wants something in return, usually it is money, generating/work is mainly what many are looking for, and these people will give anything to Defend the site, that's why I say , if a community is built with effort, there is nothing else to Show that what is required here is that jobs are offered so that they can have Access to everything, and this is Protection to the platform, but if the casino or platform stops Giving benefits to that Community, everything will go to the Floor , I have seen that some Platforms work like this.

Online gambling platform advertising, like all types of digital marketing, is always developing. It's a little like meme culture in that it's always changing and hard to define. Sure, some teams might see a drop in their sponsoring, but most companies can weather the storm. It's like trying to defeat a boss character in a video game; they constantly manage to come back.

Building a strong community in support of a platform isn't a picnic, but once it's done, it can't be stopped. However, there is still a catch: this collective strength is dependent on the advantages it enjoys. If a service provider turns off certain features, users may abandon the platform faster than a dying Wi-Fi connection. However, it's amazing to see how platforms can attract users and grow in popularity, like seeing a tweet go viral in real time.

[ethereumhunter]

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

Eliminating gambling is not easy because many people have used it to make money but still don't understand that gambling is not a place to make money. Maybe the government can reduce bookies but it will be difficult for them to eliminate them because gambling places can move from place to place. Maybe the government can try to give understanding to people not to gamble too often or reduce the time they gamble so they can control themselves more. And as long as there are still lots of promotional advertisements about gambling, it can make the number of gamblers increase and in the future, it will also increase the number of people who are addicted to gambling.

[tusandii]

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

Eliminating gambling is not easy because many people have used it to make money but still don't understand that gambling is not a place to make money. Maybe the government can reduce bookies but it will be difficult for them to eliminate them because gambling places can move from place to place. Maybe the government can try to give understanding to people not to gamble too often or reduce the time they gamble so they can control themselves more. And as long as there are still lots of promotional advertisements about gambling, it can make the number of gamblers increase and in the future, it will also increase the number of people who are addicted to gambling.

Gambling has existed for a long time from our ancestors so it is impossible to be able to stop gambling, especially for those who are already gamblers.
The government understands that it is also impossible to stop gambling because it has been proven that in several countries there are many that prohibit gambling, but the citizens of these countries continue to gamble secretly and most of them gamble online.
Gambling is an activity that has mushroomed in all walks of life and knows no age because this is a way for someone to make a fortune quickly even though thinking of getting rich from gambling is not a good thing.

[len01]

Eliminating gambling is not easy because many people have used it to make money but still don't understand that gambling is not a place to make money. Maybe the government can reduce bookies but it will be difficult for them to eliminate them because gambling places can move from place to place. Maybe the government can try to give understanding to people not to gamble too often or reduce the time they gamble so they can control themselves more. And as long as there are still lots of promotional advertisements about gambling, it can make the number of gamblers increase and in the future, it will also increase the number of people who are addicted to gambling.

indeed reducing the number of gamblers or limiting gambling will be very difficult whereas gambling has existed since ancient times in the past and until now nothing can stop someone from continuing to gamble. for me gambling is like freedom, anyone can do it freely as long as it is responsibly and nothing can limit this.

yes, it's true that as long as gambling advertisements are still around, the number of gamblers will certainly increase, but the question is, who can stop all of this?
even though any advertisements or promotions related to gambling are stopped, advertisements from one person to another will definitely continue. for example, gambling ads no longer exist and only you know about gambling, while your friends know you get big wins from gambling, so they ask and you answer if the money is the result of gambling. surely your friends will be interested and try to gamble.

[Findingnemo]

If all those premier league clubs forbids the use of gambling sponsorship then it's lose for them not to the company because the sponsorship company will always find a way to advertise their brand and in this internet era its more cheaper to reach people than paying huge chunk to the players and clubs.

This won't affect the adoption of gambling to any level but only clubs will suffer if they don't find alternative sponsors for which they forbids earlier.

[retreat]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

Well, surely betting platforms will get around this by doing advertising in other ways, maybe they will rent a stadium and make that their name? maybe, or various other marketing techniques. So in my opinion what is being done by the premier league is not effective in reducing the number of gamblers, instead it will make gambling platforms more creative to be able to promote their services.

[macson]

snip

Eliminating gambling is not easy because many people have used it to make money but still don't understand that gambling is not a place to make money. Maybe the government can reduce bookies but it will be difficult for them to eliminate them because gambling places can move from place to place. Maybe the government can try to give understanding to people not to gamble too often or reduce the time they gamble so they can control themselves more. And as long as there are still lots of promotional advertisements about gambling, it can make the number of gamblers increase and in the future, it will also increase the number of people who are addicted to gambling.

there are countries that legalize gambling and there are also those that legalize it but from the OP's writing ^{(which alludes to UK)} it's really funny to see countries that legalize gambling but try to get rid of gambling from there by prohibiting sports clubs from accepting sponsorship from gambling sites.  countries that legalize gambling should tighten their rules against the gambling business such as by forcing them to give more money for the treatment of citizens who become addicted to gambling ^{(or other solutions)}, so the citizens' freedom is not disturbed by the rules set by the government.

[ethereumhunter]

Gambling has existed for a long time from our ancestors so it is impossible to be able to stop gambling, especially for those who are already gamblers.
The government understands that it is also impossible to stop gambling because it has been proven that in several countries there are many that prohibit gambling, but the citizens of these countries continue to gamble secretly and most of them gamble online.
Gambling is an activity that has mushroomed in all walks of life and knows no age because this is a way for someone to make a fortune quickly even though thinking of getting rich from gambling is not a good thing.

They can stop gambling because it depends on their intention to stop gambling or whether they still want to gamble. If they want to stop, they can try it, and with a strong desire to quit, they can stop gambling. The government can only provide information about the dangers of gambling and urge them not to gamble; it all depends on the people.

If people cannot limit their gambling, they will get addicted to gambling sooner or later. And when that happened, it would be difficult for them to heal without effort or desire. Maybe they need to go to a rehab center to help them overcome their gambling addiction.

indeed reducing the number of gamblers or limiting gambling will be very difficult whereas gambling has existed since ancient times in the past and until now nothing can stop someone from continuing to gamble. for me gambling is like freedom, anyone can do it freely as long as it is responsibly and nothing can limit this.

yes, it's true that as long as gambling advertisements are still around, the number of gamblers will certainly increase, but the question is, who can stop all of this?
even though any advertisements or promotions related to gambling are stopped, advertisements from one person to another will definitely continue. for example, gambling ads no longer exist and only you know about gambling, while your friends know you get big wins from gambling, so they ask and you answer if the money is the result of gambling. surely your friends will be interested and try to gamble.

As long as they can be responsible for themselves, they can gamble, but it will depend on where one lives. If he lives in a country where gambling is prohibited, he should not try gambling, even if it is in an online casino. The risk is that if he gets caught by the authorities, he could get a sentence, maybe prison.

Gambling advertisements will still exist but it depends on each person's response. He wouldn't be tempted to try the commercial if he were okay with seeing it. But the problem is that we have seen many people who are tempted to try gambling. And over time, they become addicted to gambling which is difficult to cure.

there are countries that legalize gambling and there are also those that legalize it but from the OP's writing ^{(which alludes to UK)} it's really funny to see countries that legalize gambling but try to get rid of gambling from there by prohibiting sports clubs from accepting sponsorship from gambling sites.  countries that legalize gambling should tighten their rules against the gambling business such as by forcing them to give more money for the treatment of citizens who become addicted to gambling ^{(or other solutions)}, so the citizens' freedom is not disturbed by the rules set by the government.

Banning sports clubs from accepting sponsorship from gambling sites does not mean eliminating gambling. Maybe they think there are so many diehard fans for the sports club that if the sports club receives sponsorship from a gambling site, the diehard fans will see it and they will be attracted to play gambling. Maybe tightening the rules on the gambling business will help reduce the number of people who want to gamble and lower the rate of people who are addicted to gambling. But the government should also have a rehabilitation center for people addicted to gambling so that gambling addicts know where to go if they have a gambling addiction.

[Zilon]

Removing  gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts will not reduce gambling because the spectators and fans are already used to gambling before and during matches so it will be like a medicine after death syndrome and a sort of eye service rendition. But come to think of it if the premier league decides to remove this gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts will they also do same in their official sites and monthly bulletins, their social media handles and forums?

[Doan9269]

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

Eliminating gambling is not easy because many people have used it to make money but still don't understand that gambling is not a place to make money. Maybe the government can reduce bookies but it will be difficult for them to eliminate them because gambling places can move from place to place. Maybe the government can try to give understanding to people not to gamble too often or reduce the time they gamble so they can control themselves more. And as long as there are still lots of promotional advertisements about gambling, it can make the number of gamblers increase and in the future, it will also increase the number of people who are addicted to gambling.

Let's be real here, the first scene on this is that gambling can never be eliminated, the second one is that the government cannot control, moderate or regulate gambling in general, the only chances whereby they make some stands with the online casinos is when they require them to go on by license, every other decisions either coes from the gambling platforms or the gambker himself, but know that the gambling platforms cannot implement what will not work to their own favour and against the wish of their customers the gamblers.

[Josefjix]

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

Gambling will never be completely eradicated from the globe, especially in sports, where huge numbers of fans are extreme frantic gamblers, bordering on addiction. They're growing on a daily basis, with the old ones informing the new ones about gambling, and from trying only one round, two to three rounds followed, and before a week was through, a total of 30 to 40 rounds were already triggered.  We understand how these things work; the only way out is to either decrease gambling to a minimum or to reduce the amount of money bet on games. Gambling with extra non-budget funds serves no purpose to increase tension.

[ethereumhunter]

Let's be real here, the first scene on this is that gambling can never be eliminated, the second one is that the government cannot control, moderate or regulate gambling in general, the only chances whereby they make some stands with the online casinos is when they require them to go on by license, every other decisions either coes from the gambling platforms or the gambker himself, but know that the gambling platforms cannot implement what will not work to their own favour and against the wish of their customers the gamblers.

The government can only regulate casinos by its rules, while casinos also have rules to regulate gamblers. So the government cannot get rid of gambling because if the government closes down all the casinos, there must be underground casinos that will continue to operate. After all, people will not be able to stop gambling, especially those already addicted to gambling. And it is true that casinos will look for what is profitable for them so that their business can continue running well.

[slapper]

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

Eliminating gambling is not easy because many people have used it to make money but still don't understand that gambling is not a place to make money. Maybe the government can reduce bookies but it will be difficult for them to eliminate them because gambling places can move from place to place. Maybe the government can try to give understanding to people not to gamble too often or reduce the time they gamble so they can control themselves more. And as long as there are still lots of promotional advertisements about gambling, it can make the number of gamblers increase and in the future, it will also increase the number of people who are addicted to gambling.

Let's be real here, the first scene on this is that gambling can never be eliminated, the second one is that the government cannot control, moderate or regulate gambling in general, the only chances whereby they make some stands with the online casinos is when they require them to go on by license, every other decisions either coes from the gambling platforms or the gambker himself, but know that the gambling platforms cannot implement what will not work to their own favour and against the wish of their customers the gamblers.

It's a bitter sweet symphony, this life - many see gambling as their golden ticket, yet its track record is littered with tales of empty pockets. Trying to stifle bookies is like playing a losing game of whack-a-mole – we know that’s a recipe for disaster.

And yeah, when you claim that the puppet masters seem to have lost their strings. Online casinos sporting fancy licenses is just like putting lipstick on a pig. It's a fact we need to digest – casinos aren't here to run soup kitchens. Their prime directive is to fill their coffers, no sugarcoating it.

Our ace in the hole? Enlightenment. Let's blow the lid off the pitfalls, extend a lifeline to those tangoing with addiction. Why play firefighter when we can be architects of a future sans fire? Prevention, my friend, trumps cure any day of the week.

[Doan9269]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

Do you think gambling is still under this myopic view that got affected by the branding they inscribed on their jersey during the match, or the advertisement made to popularize the whole show, some things are nothing but a funny attempts because as far as gambling is concerned today, if they removed this display on their shirts the sponsors names doesn't increase or reduce gambling, moreover it having a large number of spectators or fans is what gambling and sports in general needed, advert or no advert people will gamble as they want.