How does AI gambling sound?

[Bushdark]

You are right, but it is worth remembering that AI does not have human intuition, empathy and emotion, and it can make mistakes in the context of human behaviour and perception. Furthermore, the AI is not always able to understand the context.

it is true that AI does not have the human feeling and has the ability to make mistakes but this could be based on the way it was programmed or due to some bugs. Artificial intelligence is a good innovation that will help our society to be make work more easier but the disadvantage is that it is going to replace the job of many persons and people would not be able to get the kind of jobs they used to get. This is a trend and we might see that this trend could become more smarter than us with time.

In fact, the AI's answers are just a collection of knowledge without any emotion.

It does not have emotions and that is one of the things that makes it different from humans.
This trend is gonna be sophisticated soon and people are going to take this advantage and solve so many problems making life easier.

[buwaytress]

We already use a form of AI in dice bots, and really, if you want to use AI against the house, the only way it'd presumably work, is against a bad dealer.

Funny meme I wanted to share but not a suitable format (and probably not true) but a guy supposedly creating a lazy bot to just all-in on every hand. Won it all apparently as all other bots on the table just kept folding (probably because they wouldn't all-in right from the start!

[danadc]

In my opinion, of course, it will be necessary to prohibit participation in the AI ​​game if the probability of his winning is really 70% or more.  Or even if it is slightly above 50%, the consequences for the gambling industry will also be catastrophic.  
Even now, even on our forum, signature campaign  managers write all the time that they are struggling with posts created by AI.  And sometimes they even give bonuses to those who accurately guess and recognize a post written by AI.  And it is absolutely right that such countermeasures are applied even on our forum.  

Needless to say, all casinos are already seriously concerned about the use of AI in games and are looking for ways to block such players and other measures to counter AI in games on their platforms.  
Most likely, this will lead to recognition and a complete ban on the use of AI in casino gambling.

Even we gamblers wouldn't want AI to invade the gambling business and ruin its essence of it because if that happens, it won't be fun anymore. Things should stay the way they are, they should improve but should completely change from one thing to another. Gambling is meant to be for humans and it should be done by humans as well, what's the fun in using an AI model that gambles for you even if you are winning?

But again, some people won't have the same mindset and they would think of doing anything only to get profit, but casino businesses will surely find a way to counter this attack if it happens in the future and I'm in favor of this and don't want AI to intervene in this area.

Actually, it depends on how you used your data come from the AI, people want to beat the current system with their strategy, and people create software just to let them play their games without hassle like automatic bets, auto spin and run and make a bet, those are now indicated to the gambling casino itself.
If you are talking about the AI used for data gathering it's now effective because you can build knowledge and strategy to beat the game itself and even the opponents. Additionally, on it the gambling casino is now making a new feature which is detected if the player is a bot or not the reason why they implement those accounts who has suspicious activity.

Right now there must be many looking for the best AI algorithm to be able to beat a game in the casino, that is something that cannot be Avoided, even if they manage to make good progress, it can be assumed that they will try to win to a casino with its AI game, of course I imagine that now the casinos have many ways to have security to avoid this type of abuse, now it is quite a Challenge for the security of the casinos, the truth is that I would not like to be in the position of one of the Computer engineers of the casinos , because Everything that happens is their Responsibility.

[Odusko]

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

You are right, but it is worth remembering that AI does not have human intuition, empathy and emotion, and it can make mistakes in the context of human behaviour and perception. Furthermore, the AI is not always able to understand the context.

In fact, the AI's answers are just a collection of knowledge without any emotion.

Even though AI can act fast on inputs it still can not fit into gambling properly because the development and the programming of the AI are limited and it cant act outside that program unlike humans that can calculate and take actions on games when necessary such as cashing out a reward in the middle of the games AI can not do much so they made it limited in its features.
I don't see how AI can ever fit into humans' apace in gambling and come out with a result that can be said to be positive.

[South Park]

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

You are right, but it is worth remembering that AI does not have human intuition, empathy and emotion, and it can make mistakes in the context of human behaviour and perception. Furthermore, the AI is not always able to understand the context.

In fact, the AI's answers are just a collection of knowledge without any emotion.

Even though AI can act fast on inputs it still can not fit into gambling properly because the development and the programming of the AI are limited and it cant act outside that program unlike humans that can calculate and take actions on games when necessary such as cashing out a reward in the middle of the games AI can not do much so they made it limited in its features.
I don't see how AI can ever fit into humans' apace in gambling and come out with a result that can be said to be positive.

An AI is not your average piece of software, it is true that software created by humans cannot do anything which is outside of its programming, however an AI is different, think of it as a piece of software that evolves on its own, so once it finds out something which does not fits its model instead of just skipping it and do nothing about it, it will include on its model the next time it analyzes the data it has seen, which is what makes AI so powerful to solve difficult problems which would be almost impossible to solve for your average programmer.

[TheGreatPython]

Same as other sports. An AI can always check the previous statistics of each horse based on its record online. Horse racing usually uses the same horse or producer in every race. But an AI has limited use in this kind of match because animals condition is very hard to rate compared to human players.

An AI can be applied to almost any sport as long as there's data available for analysis.

This is why those thinking they can somehow let an AI do all the work for them and earn a fortune while they gamble are just dreaming needlessly, however an expert gambler could in fact improve their results significantly as they could be able to notice details that are impossible for the AI to find out on its own, so combining an AI and a human can produce better results than just using either of them, a combination which is already taking place in other fields and which is proving to be the most efficient way to move forward on those fields.

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

I don't understand what you mean by a human teaching an AI about how human logic works and how can an AI model be able to feel or understand emotions, an AI is created with coded algorithms and is trained using data that is also available in written or coded form, so I don't see any possibility in that for a human to teach the AI how human logic works and how it can read and detect or even understand human emotions and stuff.

An AI model can only act like a robot because that is what it is, it cannot go beyond that, and even if we find a way through that, we are not yet there, and it will still take a lot of time for us humans to reach that time when we can include emotions in these models.

[Blitzboy]

`

I don't understand what you mean by a human teaching an AI about how human logic works and how can an AI model be able to feel or understand emotions, an AI is created with coded algorithms and is trained using data that is also available in written or coded form, so I don't see any possibility in that for a human to teach the AI how human logic works and how it can read and detect or even understand human emotions and stuff.

An AI model can only act like a robot because that is what it is, it cannot go beyond that, and even if we find a way through that, we are not yet there, and it will still take a lot of time for us humans to reach that time when we can include emotions in these models.

I understand your viewpoint. Its binary, a world of ones and zeros, right? But AI extends beyond mere code. Yes, AI' foundation is algorithmic, similar to us. Arent our neurons firing patterns that shape thoughts? Instructing AI on human rationale or emotions isnt akin to making a dog meow. It's about crafting algorithms adept enough to discern patterns, mirroring our brain's functionality. Hence, it's called Machine Learning.

While they cant experience emotions as we do, AI can identify and react to emotional cues through pattern recognition. A smiley indicates happiness, a tear signifies sadness - its about recognizing patterns, not true emotional comprehension. AI might be machines, but they're advancing beyond traditional robotic definitions. Progress takes time. We're in perpetual motion, incessantly innovating. That's the essence of humanity.

[Fredomago]

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

You are right, but it is worth remembering that AI does not have human intuition, empathy and emotion, and it can make mistakes in the context of human behaviour and perception. Furthermore, the AI is not always able to understand the context.

In fact, the AI's answers are just a collection of knowledge without any emotion.

Even though AI can act fast on inputs it still can not fit into gambling properly because the development and the programming of the AI are limited and it cant act outside that program unlike humans that can calculate and take actions on games when necessary such as cashing out a reward in the middle of the games AI can not do much so they made it limited in its features.
I don't see how AI can ever fit into humans' apace in gambling and come out with a result that can be said to be positive.

An AI is not your average piece of software, it is true that software created by humans cannot do anything which is outside of its programming, however an AI is different, think of it as a piece of software that evolves on its own, so once it finds out something which does not fits its model instead of just skipping it and do nothing about it, it will include on its model the next time it analyzes the data it has seen, which is what makes AI so powerful to solve difficult problems which would be almost impossible to solve for your average programmer.

That's valid, it's improving the workaround and yes possible that he can excel with the things that he's being program, after gathering more details it can update itself and learn about what's the best fit for its answer something that ordinary program can't do as it's just relying with how it does program, AI might help but still human knowledge will be the main resources.

Different views and opinions, as we will witness things after some time. It's the future that will conclude if how AI will be in terms of
any businesses that it incorporate the system.

[danadc]

All the bets that can be made with robots that have AI for what is being talked about cannot be successful in winning, because there is no programming that can be stronger than that of the casino software , and that sounds very challenging and with very unlikely that an AI can defeat it , I have interacted with chatgpt and when asked questions about games of chance, it says that it does not have the programming to do it or to take it to a real plane, that it is not programmed for that. I see the AI that they are presenting very weak, if there are things it can solve Quickly but others that people are Interested in Cannot.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Same as other sports. An AI can always check the previous statistics of each horse based on its record online. Horse racing usually uses the same horse or producer in every race. But an AI has limited use in this kind of match because animals condition is very hard to rate compared to human players.

An AI can be applied to almost any sport as long as there's data available for analysis.

This is why those thinking they can somehow let an AI do all the work for them and earn a fortune while they gamble are just dreaming needlessly, however an expert gambler could in fact improve their results significantly as they could be able to notice details that are impossible for the AI to find out on its own, so combining an AI and a human can produce better results than just using either of them, a combination which is already taking place in other fields and which is proving to be the most efficient way to move forward on those fields.

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

I don't understand what you mean by a human teaching an AI about how human logic works and how can an AI model be able to feel or understand emotions, an AI is created with coded algorithms and is trained using data that is also available in written or coded form, so I don't see any possibility in that for a human to teach the AI how human logic works and how it can read and detect or even understand human emotions and stuff.

An AI model can only act like a robot because that is what it is, it cannot go beyond that, and even if we find a way through that, we are not yet there, and it will still take a lot of time for us humans to reach that time when we can include emotions in these models.

Very correctly said, and I very much agree with everything you said aside the concluding part you said or assume it is possible to build Ai that exhibit emotion same way humans do but that we have not arrived at such a time..

To be sincere with you, I don't think there will ever be a time we will arrive at a time where Ai can feel, touch and behave the same way humans do, humans will always be humans while bot will always be bot, and in what ever form they used including for gambling, bots will always have some limits compared to humans, humans are dynamic, we all are created to feel and react in different ways and forms, this is a level bots can never attain no matter how sophisticated the tech behind it becomes.

[Odusko]

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

You are right, but it is worth remembering that AI does not have human intuition, empathy and emotion, and it can make mistakes in the context of human behaviour and perception. Furthermore, the AI is not always able to understand the context.

In fact, the AI's answers are just a collection of knowledge without any emotion.

Even though AI can act fast on inputs it still can not fit into gambling properly because the development and the programming of the AI are limited and it cant act outside that program unlike humans that can calculate and take actions on games when necessary such as cashing out a reward in the middle of the games AI can not do much so they made it limited in its features.
I don't see how AI can ever fit into humans' apace in gambling and come out with a result that can be said to be positive.

An AI is not your average piece of software, it is true that software created by humans cannot do anything which is outside of its programming, however an AI is different, think of it as a piece of software that evolves on its own, so once it finds out something which does not fit its model instead of just skipping it and do nothing about it, it will include on its model the next time it analyzes the data it has seen, which is what makes AI so powerful to solve difficult problems which would be almost impossible to solve for your average programmer.

The question is can it truly evolve on its own, can AI actually act outside what is written in its programming codes?
I doubt the possibility of that and if we must be sincere to ourselves we should already know that several limitations come with this development, there is no doubt that it is relatively new and the world is embracing it as one of the developments that will really revolutionize the way tasks are accomplished.
But what place the AI will occupy in the gambling market is what we can not ascertain in reality.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

But what place the AI will occupy in the gambling market is what we can not ascertain in reality.

Well, I am not against this AI stuff, but just as I would always tell my friend, I don't really think AI can get better than human gamblers. but until it is really tasted and proven, then we will keep living in the deem light. Normally, these AIs would be programmed with limits to get to in gambling, and I don't think they would also have emotions to say they are going to be gambling with emotions just like some gamblers do, but these AIs are definitely going to have some limitations. What I feel a bit sure about is that It would not gamble with emotions, and it's going to know when to stop gambling, but it definitely cannot cheat the casino system.

[dezoel]

I don't understand what you mean by a human teaching an AI about how human logic works and how can an AI model be able to feel or understand emotions, an AI is created with coded algorithms and is trained using data that is also available in written or coded form, so I don't see any possibility in that for a human to teach the AI how human logic works and how it can read and detect or even understand human emotions and stuff.

An AI model can only act like a robot because that is what it is, it cannot go beyond that, and even if we find a way through that, we are not yet there, and it will still take a lot of time for us humans to reach that time when we can include emotions in these models.

I understand your viewpoint. Its binary, a world of ones and zeros, right? But AI extends beyond mere code. Yes, AI' foundation is algorithmic, similar to us. Arent our neurons firing patterns that shape thoughts? Instructing AI on human rationale or emotions isnt akin to making a dog meow. It's about crafting algorithms adept enough to discern patterns, mirroring our brain's functionality. Hence, it's called Machine Learning.

While they cant experience emotions as we do, AI can identify and react to emotional cues through pattern recognition. A smiley indicates happiness, a tear signifies sadness - its about recognizing patterns, not true emotional comprehension. AI might be machines, but they're advancing beyond traditional robotic definitions. Progress takes time. We're in perpetual motion, incessantly innovating. That's the essence of humanity.

Well, I wouldn't say that is impossible, of course, it's possible for an AI model that can see and identify patterns but I wouldn't say that they can as good as humans in understanding emotions. Humans have different natures and different ways to show emotions, not every person sheds tears when they are sad or about to cry, and not everyone smiles only when they are happy. What if a person is faking a smile? Would an AI be able identify that? No.

I know that the world is evolving at an unstoppable speed and so are technology and science, but to be able to achieve things like these, we will still need to be more knowledgeable to be able to bring more perfection to our inventions.

[piebeyb]

But what place the AI will occupy in the gambling market is what we can not ascertain in reality.

Well, I am not against this AI stuff, but just as I would always tell my friend, I don't really think AI can get better than human gamblers. but until it is really tasted and proven, then we will keep living in the deem light. Normally, these AIs would be programmed with limits to get to in gambling, and I don't think they would also have emotions to say they are going to be gambling with emotions just like some gamblers do, but these AIs are definitely going to have some limitations. What I feel a bit sure about is that It would not gamble with emotions, and it's going to know when to stop gambling, but it definitely cannot cheat the casino system.

AI will not deceive the casino system because the casino will also use AI to fight it, after all it would not be fun if AI vs AI in the casino, there is no challenge of emotional feelings in gambling it is not very interesting to play let alone look at, current or future technology has not Of course, it can help humans in terms of making money, for example playing gambling.

AI will be limited in its capabilities at this time or later, of course they will not be programmed to exceed the limits of human capabilities too, after all, what's the fun of using AI technology in gambling, in my opinion, it doesn't really look interesting, let alone fun, it will definitely be boring using it.

[Distinctin]

AI will be limited in its capabilities at this time or later, of course they will not be programmed to exceed the limits of human capabilities too, after all, what's the fun of using AI technology in gambling, in my opinion, it doesn't really look interesting, let alone fun, it will definitely be boring using it.

That simply means they are useless when it comes to gambling. To increase our chances of winning, we should be the ones to develop our skills because relying on AI will likely lead to long-term losses. In my opinion, AI can be used in sports betting to provide information and statistics, but that data alone is useless if we cannot analyze it in our favor.

If AI were very useful in gambling, casinos would probably be threatened by it, but honestly, I haven't heard much about that.

[danadc]

AI will be limited in its capabilities at this time or later, of course they will not be programmed to exceed the limits of human capabilities too, after all, what's the fun of using AI technology in gambling, in my opinion, it doesn't really look interesting, let alone fun, it will definitely be boring using it.

That simply means they are useless when it comes to gambling. To increase our chances of winning, we should be the ones to develop our skills because relying on AI will likely lead to long-term losses. In my opinion, AI can be used in sports betting to provide information and statistics, but that data alone is useless if we cannot analyze it in our favor.

If AI were very useful in gambling, casinos would probably be threatened by it, but honestly, I haven't heard much about that.

I also see the way AIs have to play in a casino as useless, simply, they don't have enough level to be able to do it effectively, and I don't know if they will ever beat the software System of a casino, some are talking about it. the factor of randomness and that is something that is very difficult to determine or how to beat, when there are different factors of randomness it is almost impossible for a person to determine how to win and the exact moment in a game , it may be that in a sports game if ,but a game System is Hard.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

after all, what's the fun of using AI technology in gambling, in my opinion, it doesn't really look interesting, let alone fun, it will definitely be boring using it.

LOL, I will take that to be your assumption, because definitely it's still going to be very fun for some people, and by the way, I think the reason for this gambling AI might be that it could give a better win than a human, and if it works like that, then believe me, gambling will turn into another cool business for gamblers because they will most likely use the AI because it will give them a better result. Just imagine if you are a gambler and you have something that helps you win all the time. I know you will use it, so that's just how it will be with the AI in view. If it's a better result for gamblers, then it will be widely adopted by gamblers.


Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

[Fredomago]

AI will be limited in its capabilities at this time or later, of course they will not be programmed to exceed the limits of human capabilities too, after all, what's the fun of using AI technology in gambling, in my opinion, it doesn't really look interesting, let alone fun, it will definitely be boring using it.

That simply means they are useless when it comes to gambling. To increase our chances of winning, we should be the ones to develop our skills because relying on AI will likely lead to long-term losses. In my opinion, AI can be used in sports betting to provide information and statistics, but that data alone is useless if we cannot analyze it in our favor.

If AI were very useful in gambling, casinos would probably be threatened by it, but honestly, I haven't heard much about that.

I also see the way AIs have to play in a casino as useless, simply, they don't have enough level to be able to do it effectively, and I don't know if they will ever beat the software System of a casino, some are talking about it. the factor of randomness and that is something that is very difficult to determine or how to beat, when there are different factors of randomness it is almost impossible for a person to determine how to win and the exact moment in a game , it may be that in a sports game if ,but a game System is Hard.

The fact that casino will also adjust and will use the same system to make sure that update with the system will not be exploit by any means even AI system should not have that edge, a business that will surely be protected by a system that continue to give them decent profits, maybe if in anyhow, just in case AI learn things with the use of online resources, it may take time but also adjustment will happen maybe just maybe in a short span AI will manage to give some good advance information but along the way,

the system will be updated and for sure it will be on the side of the developers who provide services for the gambling owners.

[Blitzboy]

I don't understand what you mean by a human teaching an AI about how human logic works and how can an AI model be able to feel or understand emotions, an AI is created with coded algorithms and is trained using data that is also available in written or coded form, so I don't see any possibility in that for a human to teach the AI how human logic works and how it can read and detect or even understand human emotions and stuff.

An AI model can only act like a robot because that is what it is, it cannot go beyond that, and even if we find a way through that, we are not yet there, and it will still take a lot of time for us humans to reach that time when we can include emotions in these models.

I understand your viewpoint. Its binary, a world of ones and zeros, right? But AI extends beyond mere code. Yes, AI' foundation is algorithmic, similar to us. Arent our neurons firing patterns that shape thoughts? Instructing AI on human rationale or emotions isnt akin to making a dog meow. It's about crafting algorithms adept enough to discern patterns, mirroring our brain's functionality. Hence, it's called Machine Learning.

While they cant experience emotions as we do, AI can identify and react to emotional cues through pattern recognition. A smiley indicates happiness, a tear signifies sadness - its about recognizing patterns, not true emotional comprehension. AI might be machines, but they're advancing beyond traditional robotic definitions. Progress takes time. We're in perpetual motion, incessantly innovating. That's the essence of humanity.

Well, I wouldn't say that is impossible, of course, it's possible for an AI model that can see and identify patterns but I wouldn't say that they can as good as humans in understanding emotions. Humans have different natures and different ways to show emotions, not every person sheds tears when they are sad or about to cry, and not everyone smiles only when they are happy. What if a person is faking a smile? Would an AI be able identify that? No.

I know that the world is evolving at an unstoppable speed and so are technology and science, but to be able to achieve things like these, we will still need to be more knowledgeable to be able to bring more perfection to our inventions.

Isnt contradiction the mother of evolution? Your view on AI's emotional limitations is stimulating, yet I beg to differ on a few grounds. Your stand seems rooted in a rigid conception of AI potential. What's "unachievable" now might be the norm tomorrow. Recall the era when autonomous vehicles were a fantasy? Glance at the present.

Emotion AI is in its infancy. Current models might struggle to separate real smiles from feigned ones, but they're on their way. With machine learning maturing and more diverse training data, interpreting emotional nuances gets better. I'd venture that in a half-decade, we'll witness AI rivaling human accuracy in emotional perception. So, keep your eyes peeled. AI's future may stun us all

[piebeyb]

AI will be limited in its capabilities at this time or later, of course they will not be programmed to exceed the limits of human capabilities too, after all, what's the fun of using AI technology in gambling, in my opinion, it doesn't really look interesting, let alone fun, it will definitely be boring using it.

That simply means they are useless when it comes to gambling. To increase our chances of winning, we should be the ones to develop our skills because relying on AI will likely lead to long-term losses. In my opinion, AI can be used in sports betting to provide information and statistics, but that data alone is useless if we cannot analyze it in our favor.

If AI were very useful in gambling, casinos would probably be threatened by it, but honestly, I haven't heard much about that.

Yeah right, right now the only good thing to use is using chatgpt to analyze and predict for sports betting besides that it's not really gambling using AI, but people think you can beat the casinos with this technology, I think it will be difficult because as said it is necessary deep and crazier development in the future, but either way it wouldn't be as much fun playing casino using AI technology.

To be honest, so far sports betting has been very helpful with chatgpt and AI technology now we can make it easier to get additional information from there to analyze matches, even so AI cannot help us choose a match and team to bet on they are only designed for now provide statistics and analysis only nothing more. but people have thought beyond that.