Do you agree with ChatGPT on the club that might win the premier League?

[Fesatmas]

This confirms that the GPT Chat has indeed not updated data about the abilities and situations that have occurred with several teams this season, and it indicates that for me personally not to make a bet relying on AI, because it turns out that the risk of losing is greater than winning.

But maybe what the OP is showing is a free version of AI that doesn't have data updates from its development, while I've heard that if you use a paid AI the data is more updated than a free AI like that, but I haven't tried it, has anyone tried it and the results just the same?

[1714753334]

1714753334

[1714753334]

1714753334

[1714753334]

1714753334

[1714753334]

1714753334

[1714753334]

1714753334

[1714753334]

1714753334

[piebeyb]

I've asked questions like this but the answers are always different every time so it would be strange for me to ask using Ai to guess the match is also inaccurate, chatgpt can only analyze it can't provide accurate and future predictions, chatgpt in the hands of the right person will be useful but if it's in the gambler's hands it won't work.

I don't believe in AI in predicting the English league champions this season, especially bitcoin or crypto prices, because AI is not designed to predict the future but helps to find answers to difficult questions such as breaking codes or other kinds of work, my advice is never to use AI for sports betting because it won't help anything because I've tried it before and always failed.  

[goldkingcoiner]

I think that ChatGPT is a glorified "Let me google that for you"-type of application. Just because it is AI does not mean that it can automatically replace the human mind and your own logic/gut feeling.

Basically there is no reason to trust it, especially not with your money. If you are writing an essay on something and want to do lazy/sloppy work because you are too bothered search and compile the research for yourself, then sure, you can use ChatGPT.

Liverpool is not even worth considering as they have missed their window of opportunity, if you think about it for 5 minutes, so that is proof that ChatGPT does not make accurate predictions.

[Merit.s]

AI might be right in some certain information but not in sportbet because it is programmed and don't have the functions to update itself automatically. It gathers information more about the past and not the present. Imaging AI predicting Liverpool as a club who will likely win EPL this season. Only one prediction was right which is Manchester city. Using AI for sportbet predictions is a waste of time and waste of funds because it has low information on that.

[coin-investor]

I think that ChatGPT is a glorified "Let me google that for you"-type of application. Just because it is AI does not mean that it can automatically replace the human mind and your own logic/gut feeling.

It is, its database reliant just like Google it's actually an upgraded version of Google but in this case, the answer is very specific compared to if you are using Google where you have to pick what you think is the right answer to your queries on many sites.

Liverpool is not even worth considering as they have missed their window of opportunity, if you think about it for 5 minutes, so that is proof that ChatGPT does not make accurate predictions.

Either the AI overlooked it or they have a better prediction so let us see the outcome I will be surprised if the AI turns out to be right because based on Oshondy reply

Stupid answer.


I am surprised not to see Arsenal among. Who is Manchester United and Liverpool this season when talking about Arsenal to win the league? The clubs are not just to be compared with Arsenal. Only Manchester City is mainly competing with Arsenal.

Who to win 2022/2023 EPL: Arsenal or Manchester City.

[iv4n]

Another AI-gambling thread... in some moments it looks like some people think AI has superpowers. But it's just a computer, with an incredibly huge database, and that can be helpful in predicting the future, but it's still impossible.

And I am not sure why some people are surprised by some answers from ChatGPT... always with some logical arguments I am sure that ChatGPT will have some good hits and predictions as many people do, but will it be better than average or professional predictors we will see. I wonder about how successful it can be in this field, and in my thinking, it will not pass a 50-60% success rate.

[Zilon]

AI only work on the data they are feed upon. Pay attention to their analysis the also included Liverpool who is still battling to find a spot in the Europa qualifiers zone for next season. Manchester City seems to be the only valid prediction here but still not a certainty. I will rather prefer to base my prediction based on my instinct than trust one AI that can't relate with what happens on the pitch

[Cryptomiles1]

AI doesn't really determine the real fact and how can it predict which to qualify if not getting the recent update from the previous session. One thing you should know about this AI of a thing is being coded by just an ordinary individual just like me and you, and all information displayed here are based on assumptions and probability statement which maybe right or wrong.
Such a shameless AI.

[rahmad2nd]

~snip~

Because by this A.I, you could see it chose "Manchester City" as the first club likely to win the league this season, while, Liverpool stand as the Second club likely to win the league, and Manchester United stands as the third club likely to win the league this season.

So what are your thoughts on this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not??

To be honest, I've never even used ChatGPT, so I'm just commenting according to what I know. plus, with what you present in this post.

Firstly, it looks like the data generated by ChatGPT is old data. in conclusion, what is generated by ChatGPT is not accurate. or maybe, the question that is asked is not quite right. I mean, you didn't include for the 2022/23 season. So, what you are asking is answered with random answers, not exactly according to the Premier League standings board. also, there are no other more phenomenal names presented in your Chat with AI. just a few names and one of them, Kevin De Bruyne. while Haaland as the top scorer, was not mentioned at all. in fact, he has scored 32 goals with City. while Liverpool, is in a difficult situation, Arsenal as the top standings was not mentioned.

Well, you should try to ask in more detail so that the results answered by ChatGPT are more accurate. however, if only the answer is the same. means, ChatGPT requires additional updating of the latest information.

[Bananington]

So what are your thoughts on this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not??
[/center]

ChatGPT answered to the best of it's ability and according to the data it has been fed, the data is not in real time as the human brain so it's answers cannot be completely accurate for things and events that can become unpredictable due to a new development. That is why the human brain remains the best.

[Huppercase]

So what are your thoughts on this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not??
[/center]

What if Haaland were to suffer an injury in their upcoming match? Considering he has been their primary player, how would they handle the remaining matches? The AI is limited by the data it has been given and cannot provide answers to unknown variables. Its responses are based solely on current information. However, I don't understand why the Bot or AI didn't they say Arsenal instead, I think the bot is beefing Arsenal and might as well be a Manchester City fan  , we are bringing this cup to Emirate and the world will rejoice with us after 20 years of not winning the Premier League in England.

[ethereumhunter]

ChatGPT cannot be used as a reference to get accurate data because it still needs further development. Therefore, I'm not keen on using ChatGPT to help with my work. And I can't imagine how ChatGPT will develop in the future, especially if the AI project can be more advanced than now. So you better find the data yourself without using ChatGPT because the answers can be inaccurate and can't help you.

[Pierre 2]

I feel like chatgpt is still at learning phase when it comes to predictions. When I read its text I felt like I am reading some random article about top premier league teams. I am sure it pulled data from some very generic football articles so made very generic commentary. In other words, it needs more statistical data, literally a way to understand how football mechanically works to give us better predictions. And as other stated, its data ends at 1.5 year ago. I feel like chatgpt devs may be using its brain to predict outcomes already but its not reliable for us, end users. Also Arsenal, where it is? honestly.

[Zlantann]

AI only work on the data they are feed upon. Pay attention to their analysis the also included Liverpool who is still battling to find a spot in the Europa qualifiers zone for next season. Manchester City seems to be the only valid prediction here but still not a certainty. I will rather prefer to base my prediction based on my instinct than trust one AI that can't relate with what happens on the pitch

AI has some attributes of human intelligence but it will never replace humans. These responses came from outdated information which makes it clear that AI just assembles information gotten from different sources. The machine totally skipped information on Arsenal which is the main contender for the title and included a team that improved its performance recently. It mentioned Manchester City players like Riyad Mahrez that have not been having a good season and failed to mention their main player Erling Haaland. Sometimes time I wonder how people depend on these machines to predict matches or even carry out trade speculations. They are never dependable.

[Aikidoka]

I tried it myself to ask the same question again to ChatGPT but I did get another answer, It says that Manchester City and Liverpool performed well in the last season and this season, but also ChatGPT says that it can't predict the future as an AI language model. I think it's so stupid to ask this AI to predict games, as it won't give you for sure the right answer but It would give you the answer based on the data that it searches from it and probably they're just outdated data.

I won't recommend anyone to depend on it's predictions as they're not accurate at all.

[el kaka22]

We need to remember that this is coming from behind, it is not the current model, which means that according to ChatGPT, there is no Haaland in the team, we need to remember that. At the end of the day if it says United has a chance to win, hell if it says Liverpool has a chance to win, and it says Liverpool has Mane, we can just see that it is just too back in history and not recent.

This season there are two teams that can win it, either Arsenal or City will win it, there is no other option, that's it. You do not need an AI to tell you that, and you can predict who will win it by flipping a coin and that would be as true as anything else, because there is no way to know which one will win based on anything else, it's just a guesswork.

[madnessteat]

~snip~

ChatGPT is not artificial intelligence, it's just a program that receives some data from the user and can make some conclusions, and there are already many examples on the internet where ChatGPT makes mistakes. I would not use ChatGPT in trading, betting, because it's very risky to rely on the program. Learn to analyze the information yourself and draw conclusions.

[rhomelmabini]

There are way too many factors AI can't explain. So, no it won't be able to predict the outcome on Premiere League, if it does it would only be some kind of coincidence kind of prediction. Well, we can't say AI will be the same this way in the coming years, it's being trained and could be more intelligent than ever.

AI now is everywhere and many industries are trying to integrate these AI's into their system, obviously because it is cost-effective but sports betting is something that is out of its reach, it can predict some games correctly but it cannot perfect the art of sports analysis, I'm sure these AI will not predict of upsets and will always rely on database provided information.
But I never rule out that in the future they will try to be better so we'll see if there are comprehensive reports and predictions where the AI can accurately predict, and this will cause excitement for sports bettors.

It wouldn't be perfect but for predictions purposes and just rely at data I think it will be a useful tool to have something to rely on. But, it would be too boring if most would rely on AIs for predictions it would likely loose the excitement in the end.

[Casdinyard]

Since it runs on statistics and analysis, it paints a logical picture of what prompts you provide. Thus, this leads me to believe what ChatGPT says.

There's no reason not to believe it, it throws strong points and presents a pretty clear prediction based on the current parameters set by the outside world, otherwise it wouldn't really give answers like that.
I myself believe that Manchester City will win this league. They have a pretty consistent record and is the defending champion as stated by ChatGPT. They have a pretty solid lineup that will certainly make a killing in the field. So my money's on them, as for Liverpool and MU, I don't think they have as high a chance as Manchester City, they're yet to prove that they are within MC's ballpark.

[Rigon]

Due to the recent use of A.I in assisting man's job, it just came to my mind this morning that what if I try to ask ChatGPT about which club is liken to win the premier league match this season and this is what I got shown down below..

So what are your say on this, is ChatGPT right or wrong on the 3 clubs it suggested and the reasons given below??

Because by this A.I, you could see it chose "Manchester City" as the first club likely to win the league this season, while, Liverpool stand as the Second club likely to win the league, and Manchester United stands as the third club likely to win the league this season.

So what are your thoughts on this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not??

I never think it's reasonable to make such a decision with Chat GPT. Here Chat GPT publishes results based on pre-collected information. If I go to bet here I will never bet considering this chat gpt. Because I will compare between two teams and I will bet there according to my decision. Here the chat GPT has announced Liverpool and Manchester City as candidates as they were in the top spot last season. So you never consider this Chat GPT decision as the right decision. If you think so then you must be one of the fool kingdom.