Changed language in history. Bought? Hacked?

[Hispo]

It is curious to see how certain people see the negative feedback as excessive, but instead see the negative feedback on my profile, which the author himself has admitted is in a grey area, as justified.

This case reminds me a lot of Naim027's case. Everybody defending him because poor guy, he only plagiarized in the past several times, and he didn't do it again, and he only sent himself some merits among his alts, but poor guy, he didn't do it again, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

In this case, as in that one, the more you stretch, the more things come out.

I have reported this case in the ban evading thread, but maybe even he will be lucky and will not be banned again, as happened with Naim027, with the moderation of this forum you never know.

Not my intention to derail the thread whatsoever, but it would be quite ironic if ultimately the legacy of our friend Naim027 was making people around here more unforgiving when comes to cases similar to his in the slightest way.

So you guys are analyzing Whatsapp chats now?
Do not mind me, just curious what you are up to and I cannot load pictures on this phone rn.

[1714562112]

1714562112

[1714562112]

1714562112

[1714562112]

1714562112

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

If he admits the truth I am think most people would remove negative feedbacks, but I don't see anything wrong with neutral feedback in this case.

Nothing wrong with the neutral [not something looks good too when there are such context there] but a red seems very aggressive. And the way bunches of people chasing the account it seems they are trying everything to justify the red because it's already left there and it has to be there.

Try to give a guy the benefit of doubt and more and more just keeps popping up. My feelings on the matter of account sales still stand though, neutral unless a reputable account is the route I would take. This particular case just gets worse every minute unfortunately.

I know I couldn't be more sure about the fact that he is making up all those stories, and it's more than likely that he bought the account, but with all due respect to the fellow DT members who tagged him negatively I don't think it's justified, if I were a campaign manager I probably wouldn't hire a bought account with the assumption that if a person can't build his own account -- he would unlikely benefit the campaign, but on what bases do I think that person is untrustworthy or a scammer?

Let's just pretend that someone manages to prove that the  "theymos" account has changed hands 7 years ago, and the real "theymos" died and passed it to his "brother", are we going to tag the account? is it really the person behind the account that matters or the account itself? to me, it feels like the tags on his account judge the person rather than the 'persona' that currently operates the account, it's like we know that the real person behind the account 1miau for example is not a serial killer in real life , we don't, but via his posts and my interactions with him, I know that his online-persona is to be trusted. So if someone proves that 1miau is a terrible person in real life -- that wouldn't change my point of view in regards to 1miau's forum persona.

Now begs the question, has martyns committed any scam or untrustworthy behavior after the day he got his hands on the account?

Everything can't be written better than this. Well said.

To answer the question, he hasn't looking from the feedback history which was empty before this topic created. So it does not warrant any red feedback. Will he scam in the future? That will be a stupid question to ask. All I see is the account is doing everything to earn from signature campaign.

[examplens]

Can your indonesian brother come here on Bitcointalk and write an indonesian post?

Isn't it interesting that two brothers in personal communication via WhatsApp do not speak in their natural (Naija) language, but in English?

If he admits the truth I am think most people would remove negative feedbacks, but I don't see anything wrong with neutral feedback in this case.

Nothing wrong with the neutral [not something looks good too when there are such context there] but a red seems very aggressive. And the way bunches of people chasing the account it seems they are trying everything to justify the red because it's already left there and it has to be there.

The biggest martyns mistake is this invented story about the brother and giving away the account, now it is much harder to defend the suspicion that it is an alt from a banned account. Certainly, the red tag is too aggressive at the moment unless the original owner appears with the claim that the account was hacked/stolen.

[Cantsay]

~~~
I asked a question,, and he replied do you have any idea how WhatsApp works,,, why you hating me and not seeing all the chats and date, please check again and help me.

Just as others have said the way your WhatsApp messages appeared made it look like you were the one that gifted the person at the other end of the conversation, and besides the chat image you provided tells us nothing because in less than 20 minutes a chat like you provided can be created.

Here is what I mean:


As you can see I can a even it's very easy to form chat, if you want I can also create the other chats you provided above. I am also change the date and time if you want me to...

Isn't it interesting that two brothers in personal communication via WhatsApp do not speak in their natural (Naija) language, but in English?

I'd say he only just made up those story to make it more convincing, I'm sure if this thread continue and more evidence are being added he'll definitely let the cat out of the bag.


App used to create the chat above : WhatsMock (on playstore)

[Poker Player]

Certainly, the red tag is too aggressive at the moment...

Well, obviously it doesn't seem aggressive to me or three other people who have left red tags.

Royse777 has been online and martyns has continued posting so I think he has explicitly or implicitly understood that he can continue in the campaign. The ban evasion issue usually takes a little more time but maybe he will get away too.

If so, I congratulate martyns, but without more data my red tag stands. I just modified it to include the ban evasion, and it wasn't because I wanted it to appear at the top, there is no other option when you modify a tag.

[holydarkness]

Not my intention to derail the thread whatsoever, but it would be quite ironic if ultimately the legacy of our friend Naim027 was making people around here more unforgiving when comes to cases similar to his in the slightest way.

So you guys are analyzing Whatsapp chats now?
Do not mind me, just curious what you are up to and I cannot load pictures on this phone rn.

Not necessarily analyzing whatsapp chat, it doesn't need a rocket science either to understand that the screenshot is a bit odd if you got a chance to see them yourself. Simplified, the screenshot of those chat are a little bit strange and didn't quite matched the current narrative. The one giving the account, as well as the chat with blackviruse, is on the right hand side of the screen, indicating that the screenshot was taken from his brother's --and blackviruse's-- phone instead of his own.

Though it is probable that he asked his brother to send the screenshot --which a bit strange because he can do it himself-- or consulted to his brother about the current issue and the brother propose to post evidences in form of screenshot which the brother send it from his side [people here might stone me alive because I gave him idea by posting this], it doesn't explain the part from blackviruse. I can't imagine I would ask a stranger to send me a screenshot of our conversation when I can do it myself.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

The biggest martyns mistake is this invented story about the brother and giving away the account, now it is much harder to defend the suspicion that it is an alt from a banned account. Certainly, the red tag is too aggressive at the moment unless the original owner appears with the claim that the account was hacked/stolen.

What do you expect? How many accounts you can name were given a chance when they admitted their mistakes. This forum does not work that way. There are some exceptional cases but from my observation I have seen many users admitted their mistakes but they never got a pass. Others were learning from it. So when someone get caught in something that is not standard practice on the forum they take their chance. It's a bad thing but if they can handle it well then all good. However, who would you blame for it? The victim or the ones who made a job to push others having fun asking stupid questions so that they can keep the tag they left. Sometimes I find it interesting that a group of users do all these all the time to keep their road clean so that no new competition come in their way and they can keep earning from the signature campaigns or build their accounts to benefit only for them.

The forum as a whole benefits when there are brotherhood and forgiveness for each others. It attracts others to join you and make you bigger. Only a few of us who know the environment well, it's a good place but ask someone who is not familiar with the community. For them it's a place which is not good for spending time as there are people who always try to devalue others and they insults other all the time. For accounts like you and me who have already established name, things are easy but ask a newbie or a lower rank member, for them it's a measurable place. They always take the insults, bad behaviors as like they have no value in the community. A group of people are making the place insecure for expanding the place.

Certainly, the red tag is too aggressive at the moment...

Well, obviously it doesn't seem aggressive to me or three other people who have left red tags.

It is aggressive. I don't think we need a vote here.

Three people left tag so far. Nothing new to say about JollyGood. You, perhaps a new invention is trying to make it a good place [questionable though] in your own way but it's not good how you are spreading things wrong way for several others. Not sure about lovesmayfamilis but you and JollyGood are aggressive for any case that pops up. I hope it does not feel you good to scratch others. There are few others from my look but let's not bring them since they are not involved in the case or did not leave a tag yet.

I imagine a place without some of you and in that case the forum as a whole would do better job. We could have more people joining in the forum and making the community even bigger. I am sorry if that hits you and hurts but it's the truth.

[dkbit98]

Sorry but you are digging your hole deeper with each new post...
Cringe story, new screenshot confusion, speaking English with late bro because wazzzup banned Naira, and more begging that is not allowed in forum.
Sir martyns If you had money to purchase this account you should be more careful and try to improve your post quality, that is very low quality.
I can't read and understand many of your posts and that goes way back looking at your post history.

[1miau]

Dear mikeywith,

while 1miau really appreciates your high quality posts on Bitcointalk, it needs to defend itself here against untrue, unproven and outrageous speculations against itself.

it's like we know that the real person behind the account 1miau for example is not a serial killer in real life , we don't...

Because (luckily), such a speculation against 1miau is wrong in 2 different ways:

We are currently in digital space here. Digital space is much different from anything else, before digital space was created.
Digital space has very distinctive characteristics, quite different from physical space, where cities, nature etc. do exist.  
And we can't commit serial killings here, maybe just murdering by words.
So, such a speculative suggestion can't be true.
Bitcointalk is a digital space.
1miau can only exist here, on the internet. It's just an imaginary, digital entity.
If digital space ceases to exist, so do we, dear mikeywith (and Bitcoin as well). It's really sad to think about it but we can't change it, dear mikeywith.  

I'll quote Lauda, in addition:

After this post, "Lauda" will cease to exist. By that I mean: The faceless virtual persona named "Lauda", who exists only in cypherspace, will become detached from its "soul", and left as an empty shell. "Lauda" has abruptly reached end-of-life. Of course, this is the inverse of the usual way of thinking.
...

This fate will also happen to 1meow one day.  
But this day is still far away, hopefully.  


Second, such an assumption is an unproven and completely fabricated claim, based purely on speculation.
1miau doesn't engage in serial killings.  
Such a claim is an outrageous defamation against 1miau and damages 1miau's great reputation here on Bitcointalk.  

Now begs the question, has martyns committed any scam or untrustworthy behavior after the day he got his hands on the account?

Engaging in account sales, where a ranked acccount is losing "its digital identity" (selling), is creating a situation, where all achievements are (or should be) meaningless.
It's not just against our digital ethics, it's also about fairness.  
Therefore, the account is losing all credibility, all achievements, as a new account should have been created.
In addition, it's causing spam and enables account sellers / scamming by account sellers.
Even if his story is true, DT needs to decide if that's still acceptable.

I have tried to give martyns a chance to tell his story but even then, his outright lies are obvious.
He should just create a new account, write good posts and earn his Merit as everyone else does.

Sorry,,but,I have to show some,private chat between me and my bro when he gifted me the account last year before my birthday.
<cut>

Sorry, but those screenshots you provided show that YOU gave access information to someone, not the other way around. (Assuming that the chats are legit and not fabricated). You probably mixed up your WhatsApp accounts and took a screenshot from the wrong one.

Exactly that and the screenshots from his Binance WhatsApp guy are also wrong way round.
So, both guys (his brother and his random Binance WhatsApp guy) just made screenshots from their conversation with martyns, sent it to him and martyns posted that as a proof here on Bitcointalk.
How likely is that? Not likely at all...
As you've said, martyns messed up and screenshottet his fabricated conversation from the wrong side.  

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

martyns messed up and screenshottet his fabricated conversation from the wrong side. 

He is stupid and clearly he does not know how to deal in this type of situation. It's obvious that the account is changed hand.

[John Abraham]

martyns messed up and screenshottet his fabricated conversation from the wrong side. 

He is stupid and clearly he does not know how to deal in this type of situation. It's obvious that the account is changed hand.

I thought he would say the screenshots were taken from his brother's side for some reason. But, I was surprised when he asked if 1miau understand how Whatsapp works. Or maybe he did not understand the question due to language barriers.

Of course, the account changed hands and he admits it. But, he came up with lies over and over. But, I am curious how the community will take such cases if they tell the truth. I read BitcoinGirl's previous post and I am curious. I don't think I've seen anyone get a chance from the community. At the same time, I did not see anyone create a thread saying they are guilty of something. Maybe because they are afraid of getting a negative tag from the DT network?

He bought the account, got exposed, and got some negative tags. The question in my head is, What if he does not come up with stories and tell the community "Yes, I bought the account". How community would react then? Give him a 2nd chance, or tag him? If the community still tags him, what is the difference between being honest and lying?

[JollyGood]

Seriously? More lies? Your feeble attempts to manipulate the truth are utterly transparent, and your credibility is non-existent.

His reputation is in tatters now because of the lies but the thing to note before that was he did have opportunities to redeem himself. It seems as though he concocted elaborate stories about how he ended up in control of the martyns accounts and he did it for the sake of attempting to gain sympathy because he wanted to use it for enrolling in signature campaigns and that is the reason why he will not be taken seriously in the forum again.
 

Stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes with your blatant falsehoods. After reading everything in this thread, I have absolutely no sympathy for you. If you had been honest from the start, you might have received a few neutral trust ratings on your account to indicate the change in account ownership. However, your dishonesty has exposed your true character. Even if we ignore your repeated attempts at ban evasion, playing the pity card has only resulted in earning you negative trust.

With a few neutral and maybe a negative trust he could have continued to post without concern and over time maybe his tags would have been removed or revised in a beneficial manner to him but as his stories were designed to seek pity rather explain the truth he lost that opportunity too. I originally left a neutral tag but revised it to negative after reading subsequent posts.

Poker Player correctly updated his negative tag to include the ban evasion part, I think I will do that too but right now I will see what else is being posted before I revise it just in case other things also need to be added.

Can your indonesian brother come here on Bitcointalk and write an indonesian post?

Isn't it interesting that two brothers in personal communication via WhatsApp do not speak in their natural (Naija) language, but in English?

Stranger things have happened  

I have tried to give martyns a chance to tell his story but even then, his outright lies are obvious.
He should just create a new account, write good posts and earn his Merit as everyone else does.

You are right, it really is as simple as that. If he creates a new account and contributes to the forum and earns merits, he will be joining signature campaigns again but how many accounts does he use in the forum?

-----------------

So what is martyns going to say about his alleged connections forum members merintishidup and dreamsnight?

[Stedsm]

People here are worried about whether the account has really changed hands or not! If yes, then is it bought or hacked?
Well, I'm seeing another story from my point of view here and I really can't explain it why, but I believe that martyns had been involved in using AI to create posts and post them here. I've spotted some broken comments, and some comments have grammatical mistakes too where it seems that he tried to tweak a bit inside the comments he got from AI and then posted them here. I'd only ask to visit his posts history and instead of looking for this Indonesian-Nigerian dilemma, you guys should also look into this and let me know your PoV.

I checked Bitcoingirl.club's comment and she told the truth that he's doing EVERYTHING to earn through signature campaigns, but use of AI to create posts is strictly prohibited here.

[GeorgeJohn]

People here are worried about whether the account has really changed hands or not! If yes, then is it bought or hacked?

Nothing to check about in that account, it's a bought account, because  you can't tell me that same person can understand two languages,at a time, from the history of the account, you will notice that something is wrong from the method of writing in the account,  the account really changed hands from the beginning, even though you have the knowledge of speaking another language very clear,  their is every tendency that you can go back to your base or your official language were you originated, but this particular account doesn't write on the local board it started life with. So the we don't have to think twice because the account really showed that not the rightful owner is managing the account.

[robelneo]

People here are worried about whether the account has really changed hands or not! If yes, then is it bought or hacked?

Nothing to check about in that account, it's a bought account, because  you can't tell me that same person can understand two languages,at a time, from the history of the account, you will notice that something is wrong from the method of writing in the account,  the account really changed hands from the beginning, even though you have the knowledge of speaking another language very clear,  their is every tendency that you can go back to your base or your official language were you originated, but this particular account doesn't write on the local board it started life with. So the we don't have to think twice because the account really showed that not the rightful owner is managing the account.

I can understand if the account shifted his interest so he goes from one interest to another and posts mostly on that section because we are evolving and learning here, but a change in language is hard to defend, you'll always go back to your local root.

I seldom post on my local board but I never think of changing my local board to another, though I can shift from one board from time to time if I happen to migrate from another country with a board here, but you never discard your local board, especially if you have an interaction on that local board, earlier in your post history.

[_BlackStar]

I checked Bitcoingirl.club's comment and she told the truth that he's doing EVERYTHING to earn through signature campaigns, but use of AI to create posts is strictly prohibited here.

Is there an officially agreed upon rule that posting using AI is a capital offense in forums? I don't think I've come across such a rule yet ^{[or have missed it],} but the campaign manager has banned AI from being used by all of its participants, specifically Royse777.

The account has changed hands ^{[possibly bought from someone from Indonesia]} but the new owner claims it was a gift from his brother. I think his reasoning isn't very credible because he's having a hard time proving it.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Registered in August in 2017--to me, that's a red flag even if it isn't to anyone else.  There were tons of accounts created in mid- to late-2017 to participate in bounties and/or otherwise spam the forum to earn money, because bitcoin was booming.  That was also around the time when I was tracking a lot of these idiots down and reporting or tagging them.

So yeah, while there may be some questions in people's minds as to whether the account changed hands, I'm not doubting it for a second.  Hell, the language change alone is a dead giveaway.  Props to OP for sniffing this guy out.

[Poker Player]

Well, I'm seeing another story from my point of view here and I really can't explain it why, but I believe that martyns had been involved in using AI to create posts and post them here. I've spotted some broken comments, and some comments have grammatical mistakes too where it seems that he tried to tweak a bit inside the comments he got from AI and then posted them here. I'd only ask to visit his posts history and instead of looking for this Indonesian-Nigerian dilemma, you guys should also look into this and let me know your PoV.

If you have any proof, such as having run their posts through an AI detector, report it to Royse777 and you may earn martyns weekly pay for it.

To prevent AI domination effective from today we are introducing an incentive for forum users. Find AI written posts on this campaign
and report to me either in public or in forum PM, please be sure you have enough reference to support the claim. For successful report
the reporter will receive the weekly payment instead of the accused campaigner. The campaigner will be removed immediately.

But you'd better hurry, because people might beat you to it.

...but use of AI to create posts is strictly prohibited here.

if you mean in the forum, not really. Many people see it wrong and there are campaign managers against it, but there is no official forum position against it, and I think it is tolerated as long as it results in a quality post.

[Stedsm]

...but use of AI to create posts is strictly prohibited here.

if you mean in the forum, not really. Many people see it wrong and there are campaign managers against it, but there is no official forum position against it, and I think it is tolerated as long as it results in a quality post.

No offense here but I'd like to ask a few questions:
Can AI really create enough quality posts for this forum?
Does AI have the capability to understand almost each question asked here?
If yes, can't AI give similar answers to more than one people sending the same query to it but at different times, and can't this create enough mess and a possibility here for such accounts to get banned for plagiarism?

I know that AI is here for our personal as well as professional upgrade, but what is the point of debating here (on this forum) if almost all the posts start to come from AI (not now but in the future maybe)? Can't we start speaking to bots instead of putting arguments against real human thoughts?

I'm not saying that use of AI should be banned/stopped on the forum but there should be limitations, and should not be allowed in campaigns at all because we get paid for our personal opinions. If someone uses AI, then all he will do is make free money using a technology's features.

[Avirunes]

I've followed a pattern (Receive Signature earning and move to some exchange or other address) and I have got some more accounts connected here:

martyns uses address: bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l here https://archive.is/GBcQi#selection-2877.19-2877.61

Now this bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l [e33e33f5bf] sends his earnings to 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS[274f2311ad] , for example: https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/129693a4cfb6743c9a6b24c0ea3b282e702c8eca6b6577ea71dde75dfa60589b and there are more

33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS [274f2311ad] hasn't sent any coins till now and has only received coins till date from multiple wallets which are linked to more accounts which are:

bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8 [ccbaee06ae] is used by blackened515 here

Current number of post (Including this one): 2505
Rank: Sr. Member
bech32 address: bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 6

(Archive: https://archive.ph/3TFyf#selection-2269.16-2269.58)


bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4 [14e77b3d9a56b11e] is used by LordHermes here

Request For a No Collateral Loan
Amount of loan: $200 USDT
Estimated Loan Duration: 60 days
USDT Receiving Address (TRC20 Binance): TGChA9qSFehkJdzCZDzhdR1DHCVhY82mMn

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm Lordhermes requesting for a loan of $200 from Darkstar
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4

HzwYWVh7fB5Ylrqs1i7QUu+HpAfkVmiOM7IojXTGysmYWAJkyaZxgoEfGmNsPit1ftb9CuF6TgwaKw19MPqfDCA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

(Archive: https://archive.ph/uOQ6s#selection-10355.9-10355.51)


bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf [8b44e93a24] is used by omgitsmehehe (low UID Account) here

Bitcointalk username: Omgitsmehehe
Segwit BTC address: bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 5

What calculator do you use to get five merits?

(Archive: https://archive.ph/MT0KW#selection-5459.20-5459.62)


I've used walletexplorer for this and according to that 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS [274f2311ad] has 71 transactions- all incoming, out of which 60 transactions have been made by the accounts mentioned above

a) bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8 [ccbaee06ae] - 39 transactions
b) bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4 [14e77b3d9a] - 13 transactions
c) bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l [e33e33f5bf] - 6 transactions
d) bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf [8b44e93a24] - 2 transactions

If you want to verify this then just click on this: 33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS [274f2311ad] and copy the identifier tag against the addresses and use the find function of browser to check this.


That's not all they also send their address in the same way to another address which I think is an address from an exchange . 1BVhf8FgxS5oNDhyCBP97tmv9P8WJYGKBs   [000177bc41]   

a) bc1qkr6f4y5egy35e0w5532jnxzgppgcqx93j6u5z4 [14e77b3d9a] has many transactions which goes back from Feb, 2021 till 23rd April 2023 (still to count no. of transactions)
b) bc1q42nl6hnt78kuum7vp8le79smtl4rytx6d8glk8 [ccbaee06ae] has good no. of transactions but not like the one above. Timeline: April, 2021 to December, 2021
c) bc1q49hwmxd4hxxx4g7xxugwptmhcx2d7l0d5pde0l [e33e33f5bf] has 1 transaction on 23rd April,2023 sending  to 1BVhf... address via TXID https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/e53f5a62d1f9aed85dd234eddcb36623a5107d9bd2d8e4811166b84afa046e68
d) bc1q6dxg7kt74kwdsfmldjdtrjvnwklpx58pprc9pf [8b44e93a24] has 6 transactions sending to 1BVhf... address. Timeline: 15th March, 2023 to 23rd April 2023


I've found another user with wallet sending to 1BVhf8FgxS5oNDhyCBP97tmv9P8WJYGKBs   [000177bc41]   address. They've dealt 2 times but what more interesting is that the user has sent/received merits also from this ring of accounts. Also this user has posted in this thread too. Although, I am not much sure about him.

There's a 1xbit participant as well. (not the one already connected, its a different one)



Anyway, I am gonna focus on these 4 accounts - blackened515, martyns, LordHermes, omgitshehe and proceed

[1] I've checked BPIP.org and here are some screenshots sending merits to each other


Merit Overview from BPIP of blackened515




Merit Overview from BPIP of martyns




LordHermes: https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1803138.html (omgitsmehehe, martyns have sent/received merits)


Merit Overview from BPIP of omgitsmehehe





[2] This is interesting and what I have seen from spammers & multi-accounts during 16-17. These users also posts quoting each other just generating posts between themselves in order to meet post quota.

With what i'm seeing in the premier league after the first game so far today,Some big teams will find it difficult to get to the top this season, imagine Liverpool drawing Fulham in their first game of the season,this really surprised me because Liverpool's odd against Fulham was very small,but they ended up seeing a draw,and I must confess the way Fulham played today,if they can continue in this kind of form,I think they will surprise people this season.
Totthenham won their first game as well as their bitterest rival Arsenal who broke their every first match jink yesterday with a 2-0 convincing win.The pressure was much on Crystal palace that they scored an own goal.

The premier league game opening is a little bit tough for big team like Liverpool that narks out a draw against Fulham, although the results isn't a better one for Jurgen Klopp as he needs to tops the table presently, afterall there would be enough teams that are willingly to compete for the new season. Games results were battling and brilliant to some extent, like Tottenham trashing Southampton 4 goals to 1, Fulham drawing Liverpool 2-2. Chelsea managing to beat Everton 1 nil. I really enjoyed every bit of the premier league.

(Archive.is: https://archive.ph/qTv88#selection-4086.6-4189.532)

Zidane is set to manage PSG next season according to reports.Zidane is seen as one of the best coaches in the world,and PSG has suffered incompetency in the aspect of the coaches that manage the club,considering the high profile players at the club.Lionel Messi,Neymar and Mbape are three big recognised names in the club,and yet,they are unable to win the champions league,therefore,it is understood that if a good coach like Zidane should manage the team,there is every possiblity that PSG will win the Champions league.PSG were not able to reach the final of the Uefa champions league final last season,and all were narrowed down to the incompetency of the manager.
Zidane will bring a new dimension of football to the club,and I believe his tenure will be the best.

Zidane is considered as an experienced coach, who can probably take PSG to the Champions League final, and possibly make them lift the Champions League trophy. Yes, we all expected them to struggle for the title last season since they had one of the strongest squad. But, Unfortunately they couldn't. Although, Zidane will have to introduce a new strategy that will enable them to resist other tough teams which they might encounter next season, and also help them in win consistently in their games.

(Archive.is: https://archive.ph/rzU9h#selection-8563.0-8571.500)


You guys will find more posts like this. I am not sure how campaign managers sees this but that's for definitely not the right way to use the forum. Clearly they are doing anything for the sake of earning money.

Who knows maybe in dire need of money they can use one account to escrow and on other one to start the deal and then scam. That's one account gone and then go to next one.

Some of these accounts have been neutral marked by JollyGood for gap in history and there has been once instance where lovesmyfamilis has poked him too at his attempt to get into campaign by increasing merit count on the application post.


My opinion: I think this is a big alt ring, Martyns is just a piece and there could be lot more. Right now my impression is that he just wants to earn as much as from signature campaigns and therefore he posts every chance he gets. Even if there is none, he creates one. I mean look at the address: https://explorer.btc.com/btc/address/33GPgbaJuSaMyBo8tuhe6HhRunptrE8xVS , there is 0.166BTC (approx $4,800) being moved to that wallet. That's not how forum is intended to be used. Is it?

In addition to that, the one I have my suspicion on has been part of the campaign for 100 weeks and believe me its a good paying campaign as I have been part of that earlier. There are some more (including 1xbit one I mentioned above) but its based on just not much strong links I guess but I am still digging on those.

Everyone should be given chance to explain themselves so I asking @blackened515, @LordHermes and @omgitsmehehe to post here to explain the situation here and will see how the community sees this.