marry rich: marry fiat rich or crypto rich, which is better?

[Lorence.xD]

Why would you need to marry someone based on their financial? Marriage isn't also from love of course you'll need some financial support for both of you of you're partner. Marriage is not something you do just for you convenience but also to support one another with emotional, physical and etc.

If I were to answer your options it's still depends and hilarious. Both are rich in different currencies in short they are both rich in different methods of earning money. It doesn't matter what is their status. As long it can support you on your needs then it's fine.

[1715126384]

1715126384

[1715126384]

1715126384

[1715126384]

1715126384

[1715126384]

1715126384

[evader11]

OP has a funny point of view with boredom, it's funny to bring marital love with material criteria. Perhaps people in this sense should re-examine themselves with what they are missing, without having and then searching for it until satisfied, there are other problems following.
The problem of the thought OP makes me laugh when I try to imagine that when I get married, I will see if that person has property or not . And honestly I wouldn't get married for that. There are so many problems in this life connected by very contradictory connections, I wonder if they have enough time to realize that they are actually wasting their time on such things, forever. look at material things or fame.

I don't think that's funny, and that's what's happening in our society today. If you are a handsome guy but you don't have a job with a high income, your family is not rich, and you are a poor guy. I'm pretty sure no girl will date you, let alone marry you. This may sound harsh, but it is true, and it is happening worldwide, there is no such thing as coming together and living together with love without money. The legend of love without money has ceased to exist today. You should be realistic and adapt to that.

I believe you have a viewpoint on relationships and the significance of financial stability in current society. Financial stability is a characteristic that some people consider when choosing a partner because it affects many elements of life, including living standards, future planning, and security. It is crucial to emphasize, however, that not everyone favors financial position over everything else in a relationship.

[cafee_orange]

I will ask the OP again, do you have to wait for the rich to get married?
if you expect to be rich with Crypto or Fiat then maybe you have to get married at a later age, and that is also not sure your wedding day.
I think you have a strange point of view when it comes to marriage, you need to know that marriage is not as complicated as you think.
if there is a desire to get married do not have to wait for the rich. just do your wedding with as much money as you can.
but if you have both that is better, and even if you have none it will not burden you

[bangjoe]

Why would you need to marry someone based on their financial? Marriage isn't also from love of course you'll need some financial support for both of you of you're partner. Marriage is not something you do just for you convenience but also to support one another with emotional, physical and etc.

If I were to answer your options it's still depends and hilarious. Both are rich in different currencies in short they are both rich in different methods of earning money. It doesn't matter what is their status. As long it can support you on your needs then it's fine.

What is clear maybe he thinks that people in this forum have a materialistic mindset so that they offer thoughts like that, OP needs to realize that even though we are here talking about investment profits, trade, economic progress and other things related to financial freedom, it doesn't mean we will choosing a woman/boy to be a life partner depending on their wealth, it is an old or old way of thinking.

Even if I am faced with two choices, also between those who are rich in crypto or Fiat, in my opinion it is not important to be my basis for choosing because basically between the two they are rich people, why should I bother choosing between them because the most important thing is the character and nature of the partner us, as long as he wants to do good in crypto or other fields it doesn't matter.

[tjtonmoy]

Be rich yourself. Then it becomes a personal choice which one you want to be. Let's think this for a second. If you want to be a fiat rich, you can marry either fiat rich or crypto rich. If you marry a fiat rich person, you won't have to do anything. But if you marry a crypto rich, you will just have to convert that to fiat. It's the same other way around. So I don't think this will need any further explanation.

And coming to the main point here, do you really want to rely on others? So my advice is, you choose what you want to be and work hard to become that. Then other people will rely on you. If you are successful in doing so, you will have your own free wills. I think marrying someone and expecting something from them which they are not will cause more problem in the long run. Hope you understand.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Some people who are only eager to marry a rich person are sometimes considered gold diggers. That's because some ladies may not want to work but only become fully dependent on their husbands, which is not the right thing to do. If perhaps two people are in a relationship and the man just has one source of income, which is his job, while the woman is also working, later, if the man wants to grow wealthy, he can definitely make other investments, and if he is a fan of Bitcoin or crypto, he can also channel some investment into crypto. So apparently, some real marriage did not just happen with the girl being a gold digger, but with both parties starting from somewhere in their small salary income and finally getting married. After they are married, they have more decisions to make, so they decide to invest in other things that could give them a large financial cushion.

Practically, someone who is rich in fiat can also be rich in cryptocurrency if they decide to extend their investment into it. Also, someone who is rich in crypto is already rich in fiat because they can convert their crypto to fiat any time they need the money. For example, imagine someone who has about 100 bitcoins. Because the person is rich, he can convert one or two to fiat if he wants and still have more bitcoins left. If it's someone who is also rich in fiat, let's say $1 billion or more, they can also purchase Bitcoins.

So, back to your question: when you say someone is rich in crypto or fiat, do you have any specific net worth? If not, then I have given you a better example above.

And also, people should marry out of love and not because of money or material things.

[Casdinyard]

First off, What the hell. Why are you going to depend on your future spouse for your future stability? that's just belligerent and irresponsible on your part, and a little selfish too coz now you'd have to put the trouble of tending to yourself in the future to your husband/wife. That's just stupid.

But let me humor your question for a bit. Suppose you'd be given the chance to marry between someone who's fiat rich and someone who's cryptocurrency rich. I'd be practical and pick Fiat Rich. With its long-running stability, and the fact that Inflation works for the Rich, it just means that I'd get safety nets after safety nets, ensuring that I have a future to rely on. Which couldn't be said when it comes to cryptocurrency. The price of crypto is unstable, you could become cryptocurrency rich today and live in a cardboard box in abject poverty tomorrow, which doesn't happen in fiat rich people.

[uneng]

To marry someone based on their wealth will only bring sadness and pain on long term, because money isn't the decisive factor in a relationship to make it work. I believe any kind of passional relationship is moved by three basic pillars which maintain it for a long time. They are:

Physical attraction;
Moral attraction;
Intellectual attraction.

If you have those three pillars inside a relationship everything else comes right after, including money and patrimony which can be built together, side by side. It's very admirable when the couple is united around the same goals and thrive in life helping each other.

[bettercrypto]

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.

This your conception is contradictory, marriage should be exceptional in this perceptions,  because neither you are poor in or not if you want to marry you definitely get married, and secondly a fiat rich person and crypto rich person will still arrive in same destination when you come in terms of marital life, so either you are a billionaire or not you will still marry only if you wishes, but I don't know the aspect you are classifying it, weather its in the aspect female been rich or male been rich. And note, that not every rich person that will because of its rich and got married with thousands of women, that scope is individually perceptions and we are not meant to generalise it to anyone who are rich. So from my findings I comprehend that women and also men marry according to their choice, some people can be couples due to the source of your generated income, so it's obvious. So these, is also applicable to both side either male or female none is exempted in the aspect of choosing a partner.

Me too, I also don't get the op's point in what he is saying here, I just understand that even if we want to marry a rich person if the rich person doesn't want us that is also useless.

     That means, we can only get married if we want to and we are ready and most of all we also want to get married to be together for life, that's how simple it is to understand, right? It's hard when you marry a rich man but there's no love that develops, it's really useless.

[kaseygriffin]

Right from the OP's first point, I saw the limitation of the material perspective on relationship life. It's funny when people who are too attached to material things take it as their ideal of life, to me it's simply a tool that connects people to love each other, support each other,... Actually, people who just look at material wealth and use it to reach out to me then I'll respond to them by saying I only consider it trash if you can't use it to benefit people, don't just use it to demonstrate luxury and wealth.
Marrying for material things, it is not sustainable, it is simply a blur of the immediate lack and when they are satisfied with it, they will again look to other things to satisfy their needs.

[Despairo]

I'm surprised to see many people are saying marrying someone because of money isn't good when the problem is about financial.

Yeah if we look at the statistic, financial problem isn't the top reason why someone broke their marriages, but those reasons are related with financial. Actually you can buy someone heart by using money, if your wife want to go holiday, want to live in a big house, want to go everywhere, want to eat anything she like or want to wear any luxury clothes, you can give her money to enjoy that.

You can buy commitment and infidelity using money, you can prevent from conflict using money, young or old don't have any difference when you have money.

Lack of commitment 75%
Infidelity or extramarital affairs 60%
Too much conflict and arguing 58%
Getting married too young 45%
Financial problems 37%
Substance abuse 35%
Domestic Violence 24%
Lack of support from family 18%
Health problems 17%
Religous Differences 13%
Little or no premarital education 13%

[DrBeer]

In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being forever alone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.

Excuse me, I'll ask an uncomfortable question - and you yourself, who want to get married, will certainly FOR THE RICH, what kind of value are you? Well, at least even for not very rich, or even for an ordinary man?
Since you want to "hook a rich groom" - what can you give him in return? Rich, smart, successful?
Only honestly and what is important - really valuable, what can be "beneficial" to him, as well as to the party that is trying to marry a rich man?
Here's just a list, will 5 items be enough? But only competitive advantages, because. his wealth, intelligence, success are real competitive advantages.
And so - I'm ready, I'm recording!

[Merit.s]

OP, fiat and crypto goes together. You can't spend crypto without fiat and you can't buy bitcoin without fiat. What I mean is this as long as you are rich,you can use your fiat to buy as many bitcoin as you want. If you want to buy a house with your bitcoin and the seller says he does not accept bitcoin,you have to pay him in fiat.

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich?

Riches comes from God at the right time because we can't force God to go against his will. All fingers are not equal,in the sense that it is not everyone that will be rich,because everyone has its own definition on riches. If you are looking at riches before you get married, you are a gold digger, and not a lover that want a happy home because if the riches fades off,you will also fade away from your marriage. I might be broke today but become wealthy by next year,so how will you know this. Africa is where riches is put first as priority instead of love,when they are looking for who to get married to. Which shouldn't be encourage because it useless.

[ningrum]

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.

This your conception is contradictory, marriage should be exceptional in this perceptions,  because neither you are poor in or not if you want to marry you definitely get married, and secondly a fiat rich person and crypto rich person will still arrive in same destination when you come in terms of marital life, so either you are a billionaire or not you will still marry only if you wishes, but I don't know the aspect you are classifying it, weather its in the aspect female been rich or male been rich. And note, that not every rich person that will because of its rich and got married with thousands of women, that scope is individually perceptions and we are not meant to generalise it to anyone who are rich. So from my findings I comprehend that women and also men marry according to their choice, some people can be couples due to the source of your generated income, so it's obvious. So these, is also applicable to both side either male or female none is exempted in the aspect of choosing a partner.

Me too, I also don't get the op's point in what he is saying here, I just understand that even if we want to marry a rich person if the rich person doesn't want us that is also useless.

     That means, we can only get married if we want to and we are ready and most of all we also want to get married to be together for life, that's how simple it is to understand, right? It's hard when you marry a rich man but there's no love that develops, it's really useless.

True and after all marriage is not a game which can be done whenever we are bored,
if marriage is based on wealth then it will never end,
marriage is all about loving each other so make a decision wisely.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

...it doesn't matter what he has in his possession to get wealthy; being rich is being rich, ...

the bank do not accept you to pay your debt with whatever you possess, then you aren't rich. If your name aren't on the forbes youngest list, you are too not rich.

It's kind of funny on your level of thinking @ O.P, because must all the rich people in this world be on the Forbes list?   Because one thing you just need to understand is that if a man is rich he is rich, it doesn't matter where he wishes to store his asset weather in fiat, Bitcoin or gold, in as much as he could have access to it for spending whenever he wishes to. What forbes does is to compare the names of the worlds most richest people, and not mere regular rich men. Or are you trying to insinuate that our famous player "Christiana Ronaldo" is not a rich man? Because I couldn't find his name among Forbes most richest men in the world in the link provided below. https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/

...marry solely based on their partner's financial status?...

yes, it is happy ending! happy ending is about you fantasizing about having a stable job, and you drive home to your sweet home, where your wife would welcome you with cooked meal and clean house, and you have two kids, one boy and one girl greeting you.

I bet you that marrying just for financial needs do not provide a happy ending in a marriage, as there are many other factors that contribute to a happy ending in any relationship or marriage, such as effective communication, trust & tolerance.

[Accardo]

First off, What the hell. Why are you going to depend on your future spouse for your future stability? that's just belligerent and irresponsible on your part, and a little selfish too coz now you'd have to put the trouble of tending to yourself in the future to your husband/wife. That's just stupid.

But let me humor your question for a bit. Suppose you'd be given the chance to marry between someone who's fiat rich and someone who's cryptocurrency rich. I'd be practical and pick Fiat Rich. With its long-running stability, and the fact that Inflation works for the Rich, it just means that I'd get safety nets after safety nets, ensuring that I have a future to rely on. Which couldn't be said when it comes to cryptocurrency. The price of crypto is unstable, you could become cryptocurrency rich today and live in a cardboard box in abject poverty tomorrow, which doesn't happen in fiat rich people.

I'd choose crypto wealth, that's on my own side, I'd be the the rich spouse not the other way round, marrying my wife because she got money. I'm taking on cryptocurrency because of divorce purposes, she may not know I've got some amount of crypto in my possession. So, only the physical properties can be shared.

I disagree with your reason of picking fiat over cryptocurrency. It depends on the crypto and as well the fiat. Some fiat currency can lose it values drastically too similar to some cryptocurrency. But, as for Bitcoin I don't think your views tally with my way of thinking. Even if it drops too bad, it'll definitely rise again. Believing that a person who holds Bitcoin today will go broke or poor tomorrow, however severely, is simply a lie. They have the opportunity to sell their assets if things dont sit right with them again. You sounded as if the price of Bitcoin can go to zero without any warning.

Considering that the growth of Bitcoin price depends on the number of people that holds it, like a positive feedback loop and negative feedback loop, everybody has to sell their coins to make a crypto rich man poor. And it's almost impossible, because the person during the cause of the bearish race can also decide to swap to fiat.

[inthelongrun]

What is wrong with you mate? You seemed not educated the right way. Married for me is all about happiness mate and money is not everything. I would rather stay single forever for as long as I am happy and free to roam anywhere. We were not born to impress our parents, friends, and the media. Who cares about them, I live my life my way.

Crypto and fiat can co-exist although I would prefer the former if I only have to choose 1. So I also prefer a woman that is into crypto or at least not against it. I don't care if she's rich or not because it is all about compatibility and love that will make relationships long-lasting. 

[Mauser]

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.

Interesting question, not that I have ever been in such a situation or will likely get into one. We can still dream can't we. If had two choose between the two I would probably prefer to pick fiat rich instead of crypto rich. Families who are rich with fiat money usually own a company or are majority shareholders in multiple companies. Marrying into such a family gives a lot of opportunities to make a career in their own company. The flexibilities with fiat money are much higher than with cryptos. We could easily sell a small part of the company and use the money to invest in cryptos. Vice versa it's much harder to sell your crypto portfolio and buy a successful business. Most profitable family businesses will never be sold publicly.

[Hispo]

What is wrong with you mate? You seemed not educated the right way. Married for me is all about happiness mate and money is not everything. I would rather stay single forever for as long as I am happy and free to roam anywhere. We were not born to impress our parents, friends, and the media. Who cares about them, I live my life my way.

Crypto and fiat can co-exist although I would prefer the former if I only have to choose 1. So I also prefer a woman that is into crypto or at least not against it. I don't care if she's rich or not because it is all about compatibility and love that will make relationships long-lasting.  

There is a chance OP is from a country and culture where children are supposed to live to impressed those around them and bring honor to their name.
I have seen it before, I have talked to people like that on internet. There is a good reason why in India and in other places parents from distant families set a marry up for their children even though they do not love each other.

Consider yourself lucky, since you have the freedom to choose what to do with your time, love and money. Otherwise you could be forced to marry a crypto hating woman if you were born in other place, and all for the sake of your family.  

[Gallar]

In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!

So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.

When you are about to get married, having fiat or crypto money (for example bitcoin), is actually all the same. Because all of them have the same goal in financial terms. Because basically everyone who has fiat or crypto money is sure to cover all the needs that exist in their life. Moreover, when you get married, you will definitely need a large amount of money, for the cost of renting a building and the like. But I think, if you want to get married and there is already a candidate, it's better to get married quickly. Don't wait for the economy to settle down first. Because the most important thing in marriage, is life after marriage. So if you don't have big enough capital, do it with a potluck party, as simple as possible and balance it with the money you have.

And your opinion about bitcoin, in my opinion, is not quite right. Because you think that bitcoin can only be owned by 21 million people. Even though with only 21 million bitcoins, bitcoin can be owned by people all over the world. It's not that bitcoin, which is only 21 million, can only be owned by 21 million people, such an opinion is inaccurate. Because now only people who own and invest in bitcoin, must be more than 21 million people. So you don't get the wrong idea about bitcoin.