❤️ BitcoinCasino.to - Guide & Reviews - 1400+ Crypto Casinos List

[BitcoinCasino.to]

I just went to your site to check truly if you have reviews for 1400+ casinos just as you have claimed and indeed I found the list there, but something caught my attention.

For example, Duelbits.com I had to check the review of the casino I'm currently promoting and found several things I'll like you to clear up for me. First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

We haven't yet tested Duelbits (as in creating an account, depositing, playing various games, withdrawing winnings or talking to their support) and hence we haven't been able to review or give them a rating either.

We have just listed them, along with other casinos we are yet to test and review, with the basic information we have collected so far (name, URL, year of establishment, license, crypto/fiat payments) as a freely accessible database to anyone who's interested.

Once we have properly tested and reviewed a casino we'll mark it as reviewed and, if the conclusion was positive, we'll add them to one or several lists with actual recommendations.

[1714606113]

1714606113

[1714606113]

1714606113

[1714606113]

1714606113

[1714606113]

1714606113

[decodx]

Once we have properly tested and reviewed a casino we'll mark it as reviewed and, if the conclusion was positive, we'll add them to one or several lists with actual recommendations.

Can you explain the criteria you use to rank casinos on your website's front page and other lists? While I recognize some names, there are others that I am not familiar with and I'm not sure how popular they are.

On the other hand, there are casinos which are very popular but I don't understand why they are not on your lists. I guess what I am really asking is how you decide which casinos to include in the rankings?

[notblox1]

Now, we would humbly like to ask this great community for some feedback so we can improve the website further and make it even more useful.

I visited your website and I noticed many well known crypto gambling websites and casinos are missing from there, and I dont know most of the website listed right now.
Lets first start with Sportsbet that is most active in bitcointalk forum and it has best reputation here, than there is Stake casino also missing from your website.
Few more casinos I can remember and used before are Betnomi, Livecasino, Cloudbet and others.
You can find many of them if you search in forum Gambling board.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

Once we have properly tested and reviewed a casino we'll mark it as reviewed and, if the conclusion was positive, we'll add them to one or several lists with actual recommendations.

Can you explain the criteria you use to rank casinos on your website's front page and other lists? While I recognize some names, there are others that I am not familiar with and I'm not sure how popular they are.

On the other hand, there are casinos which are very popular but I don't understand why they are not on your lists. I guess what I am really asking is how you decide which casinos to include in the rankings?

Great question!

So as many of you know several of the most well-known and highly regarded crypto casinos have been around for about 5 to 10 years at this point.

During this time they have been consistently tested and reviewed about by every imaginable guide and comparison site, and discussed in forums like this one, of course.

If we only reviewed and listed a handful of the top brands we would probably just end up rehashing a lot of known information without really bringing anything new to the table. We'd have no real raison d'être.

Also, if you study search trends you'll realize that the more mature a particular gambling market becomes, the more demand grows for new experiences (both games and sites). We're starting to see this in the crypto gambling space as well.

So we simply felt that there was a gap to fill here and so we've been testing and reviewing both established top brands and some new brands.

However the new brands haven't been completely random up to this point. Normally the operator/program has had some kind of track record with other casinos and several brands are fiat/crypto hybrids.

Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

[Mate2237]

Only Fortunejack that is on this forum that I saw on your website.

I saw like two casinos that running signature and Avatar Campaigns in the forum. Such as: FortuneJack with Winz. io. The op site is okay and one thing I also discovered in the website is, they are doing two projects at once. The project of casino website Review and their personal website of casinos gambling. And the op has to do more to create more popularity in the forum. The way they arrange the site is nice, though I have seen such service by other companies as well. But I am not hearing from them again. I am not even hearing from gamblingbro again.

[CryptSafe]

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

I noticed same too while going through the list of the casinos on their website. Then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.


@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

Only Fortunejack that is on this forum that I saw on your website.

The op site is okay and one thing I also discovered in the website is, they are doing two projects at once. The project of casino website Review and their personal website of casinos gambling.

Happy to hear that you thought that the website is OK, but I'm not sure which other project/website you're referring to? Just to be clear we're not casino operators.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

I noticed same to then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.

@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

[CryptSafe]

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

I will also say this give room for visitors visiting your website to see and read the reviews. The comments and words should be organic and not edited by team to suit their outcome of course if that happens, you know how disastrous it would be on your website and supposed casino. so it would be in your own interest not to try doing such and lastly, this idea as i have suggested earlier would go a long way in putting your website on main stream if you can be able to compare reviews between various casinos and giving a unique result after going through various stages of  review scale measurement. The output would definitely be useful for gamblers to draw and make their conclusions and final results.

[TimeTeller]

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

I noticed same to then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.

@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

That would be nice. Your review should be based on your actual experience rather than just copying someone else's work.
It may take time to come up with a comprehensive review but this will give more substance to your project.
And newcomers may find it useful if you would be transparent and honest about your experience on the site.
There are a lot of casino and sportsbooks to review but you have all the time to do your work, unless this project is a solo one.
I also believe once the team will review the top casinos found in the forum, they will soon find out that they may have new set of top rated crypto casinos.

[decodx]

<...>
Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

I appreciate that you have taken the feedback from this thread into consideration.  I agree that, by testing and reviewing both established top brands and newer brands, you will be able to provide a more comprehensive overview of the market and offer readers a wider range of options to choose from. Just be careful with casinos that have a dubious reputation or a history of problems. This is important because there are many scammers out there who want to take advantage of people and it’s your responsibility not to provide them with free advertising.

You can also use the feedback from this forum to find out which brands our members like most. I'm sure they will appreciate it if you included their suggestions in future articles!
Keep up the good work!

[Cantsay]

I really like OP's supper activeness in this thread it's a prove that they are ready for business unlike some sites that just come to the forum, create their ANN thread and then disapear or reply comments/suggestions here once every week. If you continue like this I'm sure you are going to get some more suggestions that will help your review site better than the current site.

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.

[Bitinity]

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.

It works well for me both in full screen and reduced size of my browser. It is missing for me if I reduced the size too much (50%).


Welcome to OP in this crypto gambling community, I havent explored your review site much I'm impressed it with the quality of your website. It looks simple but eye-catching and easy to navigate. Honestly I'm shocked to see that you have 1400+ list of crypto casinos. I have to bookmark your site to check what is new and maybe I can find new interesting offer from casinos that I have never used before.

[decodx]

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.

I believe it could be related to the resolution of your screen. Personally, on my desktop in full-screen mode, I can see all the menu items without any issues. However, when I reduce the window size, I do encounter the problem you described.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

I will also say this give room for visitors visiting your website to see and read the reviews. The comments and words should be organic and not edited by team to suit their outcome of course if that happens, you know how disastrous it would be on your website and supposed casino. so it would be in your own interest not to try doing such and lastly, this idea as i have suggested earlier would go a long way in putting your website on main stream if you can be able to compare reviews between various casinos and giving a unique result after going through various stages of  review scale measurement. The output would definitely be useful for gamblers to draw and make their conclusions and final results.

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. As mentioned we would want and need permission to aggregate ratings from others and we'd have to think a bit about how it would be best implemented (if we got it). But it would indeed be useful for players.

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.

Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

I noticed same to then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.

@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

That would be nice. Your review should be based on your actual experience rather than just copying someone else's work.
It may take time to come up with a comprehensive review but this will give more substance to your project.
And newcomers may find it useful if you would be transparent and honest about your experience on the site.
There are a lot of casino and sportsbooks to review but you have all the time to do your work, unless this project is a solo one.
I also believe once the team will review the top casinos found in the forum, they will soon find out that they may have new set of top rated crypto casinos.

It's not a solo project but we're a small team and hence it takes time to do it properly. But we'd rather take our time than churn out generic descriptive (or even AI generated) content that some others unfortunately do these days.

Regarding our recommendations you're likely right; our lists will probably change over time. However, the most important thing is that players can learn whether or not they can generally trust a particular casino. Besides that there will always be subjective opinions about things like the look and feel of the brand, the game selection, various features, bonus structures etc.

<...>
Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

I appreciate that you have taken the feedback from this thread into consideration.  I agree that, by testing and reviewing both established top brands and newer brands, you will be able to provide a more comprehensive overview of the market and offer readers a wider range of options to choose from. Just be careful with casinos that have a dubious reputation or a history of problems. This is important because there are many scammers out there who want to take advantage of people and it’s your responsibility not to provide them with free advertising.

You can also use the feedback from this forum to find out which brands our members like most. I'm sure they will appreciate it if you included their suggestions in future articles!
Keep up the good work!

We heed your warning and that's why we've enabled comments for every brand review as well. We'll look into any feedback we receive through comments, or through this forum or in private.

We will also look into how we can possibly incorporate player feedback from Bitcoin Talk directly into the reviews as well. It's not obvious how to fairly aggregate and present an "average" opinion but we'll give it a thought.

Thank you for helping us improve.

I really like OP's supper activeness in this thread it's a prove that they are ready for business unlike some sites that just come to the forum, create their ANN thread and then disapear or reply comments/suggestions here once every week. If you continue like this I'm sure you are going to get some more suggestions that will help your review site better than the current site.

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.

Thank you for the encouragement and the bug report, we'll look into this right away. As others have already mentioned it seems to be related to the menu going out of bounds at a certain resolution.

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.

It works well for me both in full screen and reduced size of my browser. It is missing for me if I reduced the size too much (50%).


Welcome to OP in this crypto gambling community, I havent explored your review site much I'm impressed it with the quality of your website. It looks simple but eye-catching and easy to navigate. Honestly I'm shocked to see that you have 1400+ list of crypto casinos. I have to bookmark your site to check what is new and maybe I can find new interesting offer from casinos that I have never used before.

"Simple" and "easy to navigate" were two of the main things that we were going for so really happy to hear that that was your first impression. There are definitely more flashy sites out there but we think that our users care more about the actual substance.

Also appreciate the welcome messages and constructive feedback so far. Warms your heart a bit after putting in many hours of work to build something.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[tusandii]

First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.

In the previous response the OP said that they haven't done any testing on Duelbits so it's only natural that there aren't any reviews on this one gambling site yet.
After all in this forum there are many gambling sites listed so it takes them time to do the testing and provide reviews on every casino that is on the list.
By the way, the idea that you convey is quite good where from each casino review site you can see a different and more real about the reviews in each casino.
Maybe this idea can be considered by the OP and the working team.

[dimonstration]

At first glance on the title. I read the name of this review site as Bitcasino. Even with after multiple scan on your thread gives me same impression that this is Bitcasino that makes me interested what’s inside.

The review site is neat and easy use unlike other low class review site that full of ads all over the webpage. It’s good to see that OP is active here and I hope to add more casino that is active here in forum rather than those that is not available here.

If possible you can create a category for casino with ANn thread on Bitcointalk and none so that it can be easily distinguished by readers since casino that active here is more trusted since they are easy to approach with casino concerns.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

At first glance on the title. I read the name of this review site as Bitcasino. Even with after multiple scan on your thread gives me same impression that this is Bitcasino that makes me interested what’s inside.

The review site is neat and easy use unlike other low class review site that full of ads all over the webpage. It’s good to see that OP is active here and I hope to add more casino that is active here in forum rather than those that is not available here.

If possible you can create a category for casino with ANn thread on Bitcointalk and none so that it can be easily distinguished by readers since casino that active here is more trusted since they are easy to approach with casino concerns.

Yesterday, based on feedback in this thread, we added a "+ BitcoinTalk Thread" note as a feature next to these casinos in our lists. Hopefully that should make it pretty easy to distinguish them.

However, we could also create a separate page with a unique list that only includes casinos with ANN threads. We'll get to work on that.

[Haunebu]

Number 1 : Bitstarz? Seriously? This alone dismisses this site as a proper crypto casino comparison site frankly speaking. Anyone with a half-decent brain is aware of the fact that Bitstarz is a shady site through and through.

Also, I couldn't find any proper reviews when I clicked on various sites in the list. I recommend avoiding this site until these issues get fixed.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

Number 1 : Bitstarz? Seriously? This alone dismisses this site as a proper crypto casino comparison site frankly speaking. Anyone with a half-decent brain is aware of the fact that Bitstarz is a shady site through and through.

Also, I couldn't find any proper reviews when I clicked on various sites in the list. I recommend avoiding this site until these issues get fixed.

Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.

The current sorting shouldn't be perceived as the definite or final list as we still have many, many more casinos to review. We will also try to mix older and more established casinos with newer ones, as explained previously in the thread.

But now that you can hopefully find the reviews you can check them out and hopefully learn more about our reasoning.

Now regarding Bitstarz, our own experiences have been very positive and, as you're probably aware, most other major comparison sites (e.g. BCKings, Gosu, CoinGambling, BBC etc) have given them favorable to very favorable reviews so in that sense our rating is very consistent with the current consensus.

Having said that, we have read and noted the criticism that they have received as well. It seems like most issues are related to some players gambling from expressively restricted regions and occasionally getting issues with KYCs and/or withdrawals. However, similar issues have been reported on occasion with most of the larger and popular operators. Very few (if anyone?) with any substantial market share has zero complaints.

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.

But we have noted your opinion and respect it, of course. Thanks for letting us know.