❤️ BitcoinCasino.to - Guide & Reviews - 1400+ Crypto Casinos List

[bittraffic]

Anyone who have been in the forum for years have read about BitStarz reputation and users  accusing them. And since you mentioned you first need to talk to a casino before you give your review I guess there is a done deal happening. Just an impression that others could also have.

But I can understand if its meant for users not from around here and the casino doesn't have withdrawal fee and some free spin upon registration. Still attractive to new users.

[1714620256]

1714620256

[1714620256]

1714620256

[1714620256]

1714620256

[1714620256]

1714620256

[1714620256]

1714620256

[Haunebu]

Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.

I checked the site on my mobile and I clicked on the reviews button in the drop-down menu which led me to the same list on the homepage where a couple of points were specified. Clicking on it led me to the site. Are the reviews just those points?

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.

Bitstarz is regarded as a scam site within this forum due to definitive proof against them.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.

I checked the site on my mobile and I clicked on the reviews button in the drop-down menu which led me to the same list on the homepage where a couple of points were specified. Clicking on it led me to the site. Are the reviews just those points?

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.

Bitstarz is regarded as a scam site within this forum due to definitive proof against them.

On mobile the column names won't be visible. Click on the casino name below a star rating to see the detailed review. The logo and Play button links to the casino itself, the casino name (in plain text) links to our review.

Since we take feedback from seasoned members here seriously we have just removed Bitstarz from our primary lists while we are re-evaluating everything that has been written on Bitcoin Talk about them up until this point.

Our review of them will technically remain live in the meantime but won't be easily accessible.

[Learn Bitcoin]

There could be several different reasons for this but the most common one is that we simply haven't talked to them yet (either due to time constraints on our end -- or someone not getting back to us when reaching out).

The good ones, including Stake, should hopefully all be up there very soon.

Thank you for the feedback!

Does it mean you have indexed and ranked the casino based on your opinion? I mean, which casinos offer you the best affiliate commission, and you listed them on the home page. Whoever did not respond to you did not list them on the home page. You have listed 29 casinos, and I don't think I have heard those names except for a few (Maximum five). That's mean you got a better commission offer from them, and you ranked them based on your benefits. Would you mind telling us what kind of review we can expect from you? I've seen review sites ask for reviews from users and they rank them based on users review.

[wiss19]

Welcome to the forum.
Your website looks good, and I hope the reviews are honest and unbiased as you say, but I'm surprised not to see some of the big names of the industry in there, like Stake.com which is the number 1 casino and sportsbook platform at the moment, and you say you've reviewed and added over 1,400 casinos accepting cryptocurrencies and I think you should have covered the top ones too in that.

Anyway, as a player if you ask me, I would probably want to know if a casino is trustworthy or not, I know my deposit will go through successfully but whether I will also be able to withdraw my winnings if I manage to get any is what a review should cover.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

There could be several different reasons for this but the most common one is that we simply haven't talked to them yet (either due to time constraints on our end -- or someone not getting back to us when reaching out).

The good ones, including Stake, should hopefully all be up there very soon.

Thank you for the feedback!

Does it mean you have indexed and ranked the casino based on your opinion? I mean, which casinos offer you the best affiliate commission, and you listed them on the home page. Whoever did not respond to you did not list them on the home page. You have listed 29 casinos, and I don't think I have heard those names except for a few (Maximum five). That's mean you got a better commission offer from them, and you ranked them based on your benefits. Would you mind telling us what kind of review we can expect from you? I've seen review sites ask for reviews from users and they rank them based on users review.

Good and very valid questions, thanks for bringing them up so we can clarify.

Our lists are currently based on a number of factors such as the review score, the click-through rates of the visitors, the conversion rate of the visitors, the freshness of the brand, the overall reputation of the brand and more. It's not fixed forever and we'll be moving things around based on both data and user feedback.

While compensation as a ranking factor could theoretically make sense the commissions usually doesn't differ that much and so it's more interesting to observe which casinos our visitors choose and ultimately stick with.

If we recommend terrible casinos the visitors likely won't convert anyway and so it wouldn't matter what the commission is. Plus, they would start losing trust in the site. That's why we're asking for feedback and take it very seriously.

We'll always be open to reviewing our methodology but we think it makes sense at this point at least.


With regards to our selection of brands it's been covered earlier in the thread but just to recap:

Since we have identified over 1400 casinos and are reviewing them manually we've had to prioritize the order in which we work through them. So far we've tried to mix some very established, well known and generally acclaimed brands with some newer and less known brands.

The main reason for this is that we wouldn't serve much of a purpose (in our opinion, at least) if we just listed exactly same brands as others.

There's also players actively looking for new brands and/or information about a particular new brand. In those cases we can offer more value than just review no. 387 of a brand that everyone already knows.

As for user reviews we think that those are a good idea and that's why we have enabled visitor comments on every review now. We'll consider to adding user ratings (e.g. 1-5 stars) as well but we'd need to make sure that they aren't abused by operators trying to boost their own brands (or shoot down competitors). So far it seems to work pretty well for Gosu (as an example) though so we're open to the idea.

Feel free to check out our existing reviews to get an idea for what you can expect more of in the future.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

Welcome to the forum.
Your website looks good, and I hope the reviews are honest and unbiased as you say, but I'm surprised not to see some of the big names of the industry in there, like Stake.com which is the number 1 casino and sportsbook platform at the moment, and you say you've reviewed and added over 1,400 casinos accepting cryptocurrencies and I think you should have covered the top ones too in that.

Anyway, as a player if you ask me, I would probably want to know if a casino is trustworthy or not, I know my deposit will go through successfully but whether I will also be able to withdraw my winnings if I manage to get any is what a review should cover.

We have identified and listed the basics about 1400 casinos but not yet tested and written reviews of all of them.

As you say, you need to know (at a minimum!) that withdrawals will go through and the entire process of signing up, depositing, playing, withdrawing, testing customer support, documenting the process and formatting and publishing a review simply takes time for each.

We also want to cross-check with forums like Bitcoin Talk and other reputable reviewers so we haven't missed anything.

Happy to hear that you liked the look of the site. Stake will hopefully be added soon.

[Mahdirakib]

@OP, you have done a great job. The good thing is that you are publishing the review after testing a casino. Judging by the "List of all Crypto Casinos", you have tested and published the review of 40 casinos only until now. I hope the tested casinos list will be bigger soon. Anyway, I don't see the reason of keeping 'URL' column in that list. The 'year' column stands for the date of launch of the casinos, isn't it? There are some wrong date of launch of some casinos in that column. You should recheck the full list. I have only highlighted 3 casinos in the screenshot, but I found the wrong launch date of more casinos.

[bitbollo]

I noticed that many reputable sites are not listed on the main page for casinos that accept bitcoins
but above all 1400 casinos?!? I have not seen all these reviews/list, where I can find it?!?

If you want to test all 14000 ... (that is something really hard and complex to be done, sites can change their status, etc etc) you must be careful because you may encounter many scams and above all "selective scams".
Some sites could recognize and make you withdraw without problems meanwhile they are just scam.

[khaled0111]

Great job bitcoincasino's team!
Reviewing 1400+ casino is too much work, I didn't even know there were that many crypto casinos!
To be honest, I didn't take a deep look at your website but I can ensure you that i'll do it as soon as I can.
It's always a pleasure to discover a new reviews website.

[Nrcewker]

What are the most important things that you want to learn from a casino review?

First of all we need to understand is that if the casino is legit and have good reputation. A gambler needs a gambling site to be honest and fair in his games. Moreover the casino also needs to be good in customer support in case of any problems arise in the site. If the site requires KYC or they are allowed in my country or not, these information should also be mentioned in the review. At last if possible share any ongoing contest or bonus they are running and mention it’s requirements.

[avp2306]

What are the most important things that you want to learn from a casino review?

First of all we need to understand is that if the casino is legit and have good reputation. A gambler needs a gambling site to be honest and fair in his games. Moreover the casino also needs to be good in customer support in case of any problems arise in the site. If the site requires KYC or they are allowed in my country or not, these information should also be mentioned in the review. At last if possible share any ongoing contest or bonus they are running and mention it’s requirements.

This is so basic since we can determine a casino is reputable easily since for sure all the discussion happen in the thread can be a basis to anyone since for sure people share their sentiments or experience to determine what is current status of the casino. If we look at here we can say that all post is positive so meaning Bitcasino is excellent on delivering good platform to forum users here.

If we compare to other one which is also well known scam casino their thread has been actively criticize and been receive a lot of negative post against them.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

@OP, you have done a great job. The good thing is that you are publishing the review after testing a casino. Judging by the "List of all Crypto Casinos", you have tested and published the review of 40 casinos only until now. I hope the tested casinos list will be bigger soon. Anyway, I don't see the reason of keeping 'URL' column in that list. The 'year' column stands for the date of launch of the casinos, isn't it? There are some wrong date of launch of some casinos in that column. You should recheck the full list. I have only highlighted 3 casinos in the screenshot, but I found the wrong launch date of more casinos.

Thank you for highlighting these, their years of establishment have now been updated along with some others. The 1400+ list could have more inaccuracies but everything should be correct in the reviews since it's normally double or triple checked at that stage.

The reasons for discrepancies is that there's sometimes mismatches between various sources (About pages vs ANN threads vs third-party databases or other reviews vs domain registration dates that are actually later than claimed launched dates etc) but we'll make sure to quickly adjust anything that is inaccurate.

I noticed that many reputable sites are not listed on the main page for casinos that accept bitcoins
but above all 1400 casinos?!? I have not seen all these reviews/list, where I can find it?!?

If you want to test all 14000 ... (that is something really hard and complex to be done, sites can change their status, etc etc) you must be careful because you may encounter many scams and above all "selective scams".
Some sites could recognize and make you withdraw without problems meanwhile they are just scam.

Agreed, and that's why we clearly state: "The goal is to maintain a complete database and source of reference, so we're neither recommending every single casino on this list nor implying that they are to be trusted. On the contrary, many of these online casinos are likely not to be trusted." on the 1400+ page.

We will keep testing and adding the reputable casinos to the pages which actually contains recommendations.

What are the most important things that you want to learn from a casino review?

First of all we need to understand is that if the casino is legit and have good reputation. A gambler needs a gambling site to be honest and fair in his games. Moreover the casino also needs to be good in customer support in case of any problems arise in the site. If the site requires KYC or they are allowed in my country or not, these information should also be mentioned in the review. At last if possible share any ongoing contest or bonus they are running and mention it’s requirements.

Agreed. Country restrictions will always be a bit tricky since some operators are allowing access through VPN and some aren't - but some of those who are might occasionally claim issues with it later at withdrawal.

We obviously try to test for this but since we never know for sure how and when it's being applied we need to cross check with more sources, like feedback on this forum and other professional reviews, to form a general opinion.

[decodx]

Great job bitcoincasino's team!
Reviewing 1400+ casino is too much work, I didn't even know there were that many crypto casinos!
To be honest, I didn't take a deep look at your website but I can ensure you that i'll do it as soon as I can.
It's always a pleasure to discover a new reviews website.

To clarify, they didn't actually review 1400 online casinos. What they actually did was compile a list of nearly 1400 casino-related domain names. Many of these casinos are no longer operational, and some of the domains simply serve as mirror sites for the same casinos.

So, while the number may seem impressive at first glance, you shouldunderstand that the actual count of functional and unique online casinos may be significantly lower than the stated figure. And when it comes to the reviews and full casino descriptions, it seems that there are approximately 40 available in total.

[entebah]

So, while the number may seem impressive at first glance, you shouldunderstand that the actual count of functional and unique online casinos may be significantly lower than the stated figure. And when it comes to the reviews and full casino descriptions, it seems that there are approximately 40 available in total.

but i just wondering how they make the list for Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casinos 2023 because a lot of websites that from the list that i don't know.
is it just based on which website you reviewed first? or are there any other criteria?

[decodx]

So, while the number may seem impressive at first glance, you shouldunderstand that the actual count of functional and unique online casinos may be significantly lower than the stated figure. And when it comes to the reviews and full casino descriptions, it seems that there are approximately 40 available in total.

but i just wondering how they make the list for Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casinos 2023 because a lot of websites that from the list that i don't know.
is it just based on which website you reviewed first? or are there any other criteria?

I already asked them that same thing a little while ago. They don't seem to have any specific criteria, or maybe they just don't want to share them.

Here is what they replied:

Great question!

So as many of you know several of the most well-known and highly regarded crypto casinos have been around for about 5 to 10 years at this point.

During this time they have been consistently tested and reviewed about by every imaginable guide and comparison site, and discussed in forums like this one, of course.

If we only reviewed and listed a handful of the top brands we would probably just end up rehashing a lot of known information without really bringing anything new to the table. We'd have no real raison d'être.

Also, if you study search trends you'll realize that the more mature a particular gambling market becomes, the more demand grows for new experiences (both games and sites). We're starting to see this in the crypto gambling space as well.

So we simply felt that there was a gap to fill here and so we've been testing and reviewing both established top brands and some new brands.

However the new brands haven't been completely random up to this point. Normally the operator/program has had some kind of track record with other casinos and several brands are fiat/crypto hybrids.

Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

[SamReomo]

Great job bitcoincasino's team!
Reviewing 1400+ casino is too much work, I didn't even know there were that many crypto casinos!
To be honest, I didn't take a deep look at your website but I can ensure you that i'll do it as soon as I can.
It's always a pleasure to discover a new reviews website.

To clarify, they didn't actually review 1400 online casinos. What they actually did was compile a list of nearly 1400 casino-related domain names. Many of these casinos are no longer operational, and some of the domains simply serve as mirror sites for the same casinos.

So, while the number may seem impressive at first glance, you shouldunderstand that the actual count of functional and unique online casinos may be significantly lower than the stated figure. And when it comes to the reviews and full casino descriptions, it seems that there are approximately 40 available in total.

I agree with you because reviewing of 1400 online casinos isn't a child's play and can't be done in a short span. In order to review a casino you'll have to test the review for 1-7 days depending on the structure and quality of the casino. You will have to test many of the games the casino is offering and you'll have to spend enough money for the testing. Even, if you are good at testing then still you'll have to give it proper time because in a review all the details are to ne added.

I don't even think that there are 1400 online casinos out there which are working and providing service. Because most of those casinos might be set to scam the people, and only few good ones in the list would be the legit casinos that are truly working to entertain and server the gamblers. The OP should list all those sites which are truly providing valuable services, and only those sites should be reviewed in the initial stage. In the top list only the best online casinos should be placed not the ones who have been known for their shady business.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

but i just wondering how they make the list for Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casinos 2023 because a lot of websites that from the list that i don't know.
is it just based on which website you reviewed first? or are there any other criteria?

I already asked them that same thing a little while ago. They don't seem to have any specific criteria, or maybe they just don't want to share them.

I believe that the current selection has been explained in the thread but let me know if it's still unclear. We're also currently in the process of reviewing several more of the most well known brands so you should see them soon.

I agree with you because reviewing of 1400 online casinos isn't a child's play and can't be done in a short span. In order to review a casino you'll have to test the review for 1-7 days depending on the structure and quality of the casino. You will have to test many of the games the casino is offering and you'll have to spend enough money for the testing. Even, if you are good at testing then still you'll have to give it proper time because in a review all the details are to ne added.

I don't even think that there are 1400 online casinos out there which are working and providing service. Because most of those casinos might be set to scam the people, and only few good ones in the list would be the legit casinos that are truly working to entertain and server the gamblers. The OP should list all those sites which are truly providing valuable services, and only those sites should be reviewed in the initial stage. In the top list only the best online casinos should be placed not the ones who have been known for their shady business.

Yes, you got it right regarding the process itself. We understand that we currently miss several brands that really deserve to be acknowledged but we'll get to them as soon as possible.

We obviously want to avoid promoting anyone that is generally known for being shady (we're currently re-reviewing the feedback on Bitstarz, as mentioned) but we'll want to list some lesser known brands that we've had a good experience of.

[CryptSafe]

We obviously want to avoid promoting anyone that is generally known for being shady (we're currently re-reviewing the feedback on Bitstarz, as mentioned) but we'll want to list some lesser known brands that we've had a good experience of.

Preventing shady casinos from existing and helping to showcase genuine and quality casinos I believe is one of the major reasons why reviews are done and I stand to be corrected if I am wrong but  from observations, I have seen a good review feedback from your website on a shaddy casino well known for their negative attitude and here you are telling us you talk with casinos before you review them and I ask you a question, who in the best place is better option asking questions about a casino? Are the casinos the ones patronizing their games? Who in the next place do you think should be able to respond to questions as regards to user experience of a casino.

Asking a casino some questions about their services is like you making them be a judge in their own case which is not right and you do not expect an honest feedback or response from them because they would want to seal up their loopholes making them look alright and reliable when in the real sense they are not. I think the idea of asking casino questions is not ok to go buy because you would never get an honest answer from them but rather public opinion for instance gamblers who have patronized the casino can be in a better position to say something. If there is anything a review site should possibly want from a casino I guess it should be their policies, terms and conditions of service. These would help set the records for them while the gamblers do the sayings on their experience with the casino.

[BitcoinCasino.to]

We obviously want to avoid promoting anyone that is generally known for being shady (we're currently re-reviewing the feedback on Bitstarz, as mentioned) but we'll want to list some lesser known brands that we've had a good experience of.

Preventing shady casinos from existing and helping to showcase genuine and quality casinos I believe is one of the major reasons why reviews are done and I stand to be corrected if I am wrong but  from observations, I have seen a good review feedback from your website on a shaddy casino well known for their negative attitude and here you are telling us you talk with casinos before you review them and I ask you a question, who in the best place is better option asking questions about a casino? Are the casinos the ones patronizing their games? Who in the next place do you think should be able to respond to questions as regards to user experience of a casino.

Asking a casino some questions about their services is like you making them be a judge in their own case which is not right and you do not expect an honest feedback or response from them because they would want to seal up their loopholes making them look alright and reliable when in the real sense they are not. I think the idea of asking casino questions is not ok to go buy because you would never get an honest answer from them but rather public opinion for instance gamblers who have patronized the casino can be in a better position to say something. If there is anything a review site should possibly want from a casino I guess it should be their policies, terms and conditions of service. These would help set the records for them while the gamblers do the sayings on their experience with the casino.

If you're referring to Bitstarz, yes, our review was positive because our own experience has been positive. It's also one of the oldest and most popular crypto casinos and has been reviewed positively by most major review sites (BCKings, Gosu, CoinGambling, BBC), as we've previously pointed out.

If you choose any major crypto casino and google their brand name + "scam" you will find numerous claims, even if the casino is generally considered legitimate. Try it with Stake for example. Illegitimate claims can make it difficult to identify legitimate claims and popular operators all get them.

Having said that we have already removed Bitstarz while we're re-reviewing their particular claims.

Also, our reviews are not based on what a casino tells us about themselves but based on our experiences actually playing at the casino.

Hope that clarifies things.