He doesn't say that the code of Wasabi's open-source software is bad, he says that it's bad to use Wasabi's coordinator because you partner with BA companies.
Both are true. Yes, Wasabi is partnering with blockchain analysis company and buying the notion that coins are unequal, so they cannot be trusted. And yes, their software is flawed. I don't know with certainty if it's more of a back end or front end issue (probably both), but we frequently notice coinjoin reusing addresses in both inputs and outputs.
You are lying, and this is not the first time you've been caught lying about address reuse being a "flaw" in the software. Peter Todd explicitly debunked this accusation:
There is
KYCP which has analyzed quite a few Wasabi coinjoins and has found a bunch of weaknesses regarding collaboration and address reuse (in both inputs and outputs!), such as
this one. What is your input on this?
BlackHatCoiner, didn't you hear Peter Todd?
https://youtu.be/oPNFdhZUGmk?t=162That's not Wasabi fucking up, that's Wasabi users fucking up. Wasabi, they fundamentally, are not in a position where they can go and prevent people from installing the same seed in multiple wallets at once and using it in multiple wallets at once.
