(2) This mixer does absolutely not take 'Bitcoin from any source' like you claim, and that's the big issue here. It subjectively discriminates between coins and reserves the right to reject you from mixing.
Now I have to say that it is true that you are lying and it is beginning to be repetitive. You don't know what the source of this mixer's coins is, and you don't know how the Scoring system you mention works, you just have a slight idea and are making assumptions.
I base my statements on their own information. In case you missed it:
/disclaimer]
User may never use [banned mixer] if his activity related to:
[Big list, including, but not limited to stuff like:]
Any adult entertainment, websites & content
This means they explicitly deny you access if you 'engage in certain activities'. Which ones they are, doesn't matter. They list lots of stuff that is illegal in many places. At first thought, it may seem logical, but if you think further you should understand that it is absolutely anti-Bitcoin.
Bitcoin's core value is that it's supposed to be unstoppable, censorship-free money accepted anywhere, anytime, by anyone. Anything going against any of these terms is - by definition - anti-Bitcoin.
I think you have felt bad that your list is known to be impartial and that you omit to include other services that you know well and use this same system for years.
I'll note this only once, but you did this many times before. Throwing around wild assumptions (including, but not limited to) users' motives, makes you look very unprofessional. Let's stick to hard facts.
You confuse morality with a security or privacy issue. If you don't like something, don't use it, but don't tell others it's a problem just because you don't like it.
I like to warn other users about services that may cause them issues (frozen coins, ...) and / or harm Bitcoin.
Lastly, since you are a taint proclaiming service, I had to add you to my Blacklist of unreliable, 'taint proclaiming' Bitcoin services / exchanges.
A mixer's job is not to exchange 'dirty' coins for 'clean' coins, at least if we assume that these terms refer to a coin (not) having been used for illegal activities.
Your point of view about Bitcoin's fungibility is interesting, I cannot deny that it seems a necessity for you and other users. I will definitely go through your thread to give my opinion when I have time.
You have made me think of an option that fits what you have transmitted to me, thank you for this. And maybe build something without a scoring system as an option for all those users who want to use it. I cannot deny that many other users prefer the scoring system, but I think it would be a good idea to implement what you mention as an option and let each user decide.
Thanks for being open-minded and at least considering changes / a separate system!
Is there a real benefit for mixers?
There is not I guess because it's already known that you had this balance before and unless you proof it's gone you would still pay taxes for it.
I think that mixers is only good for other reasons but not the so promoted idea of tax runaway.
There are many very legitimate reasons for mixing; mostly centered around privacy. For instance, mixing allows you to get sender privacy. If you send someone BTC without mixing, they can see from whom you got those funds and how you spend the rest of your funds.
