Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 06:30:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Scammed by betnomi (20 000 $ worth of eth and btc)  (Read 388 times)
holydarkness
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1398


Yes, I'm an asshole


View Profile
August 09, 2023, 01:34:59 AM
Merited by BitcoinGirl.Club (1)
 #21

There are some certain aspects of the forum that are not really newbie friendly, and flags are one of them. AFAIK, anyone can create a type 1 flag, so there's also the question of why no one has yet raised one.
Flag is the only one seems hard to understand for a newbie. I still get confuse myself differing the three types of flags LOLing

Quote
Regarding the old one, just because it happened some time ago doesnt mean it didnt happen; but there could be some sort of argument as to what kind of flag would fit best there. It's clear for me tho, and that's why it's still there even if inactive
I think a lot of people are still thinking if it will be good to support the flag. But I am still waiting to see a flag created by a recent victim. May be we will see one from icopress very soon, as far as I know they have not paid him the campaign money yet.

[My apology for being OOT]

It'll help to consider the type as a degree of severity, like a cancer or a burn. Stage 1 cancer and first degree burn is the lightest. Likewise, type-1 flag is the weakest, a newbie and guest warning flag. Type-2 and 3 needs a violation of agreement, one side fulfill their deal, the other side did not. Though, IMO, type-2 is a bit tricky, it's rather ambiguous as there's not --again, IMO-- a fine line that can differentiate if it's should be a type-2 or type-3.

The easiest instance that obviously belong to a type-2 rather than a type-3 is if I wrote you here right now that I'll send you some btc if you say I am the hottest guy on earth, you did, but I didn't fulfill my part of sending you fund. Though it is technically "written", everyone knows the nature of the agreement itself is casual. Thus, it belongs more to the type-2 [violation of casual or implied agreement] than a violation of written contract. The obvious case of a type-3 flag is when an invoice is involved. It's definitely a written and formal agreement, or someone defaulted a loan.

A harder and more tricky situation to differentiate, though, is cases like where a platform cheats their campaign participants by not paying. Is it a casual agreement? Is it formal?

On to the more on-topic part, I am not supporting or opposing the old flags because I am not familiar with some of them [including [Csmiami's] and I have my plate quite full these days. I find a lack of interest to get acquainted with old cases and verifies the facts myself [to fulfill the clause that I voted the flag with the best of my knowledge] to support or oppose it.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
1714242618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714242618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714242618
Reply with quote  #2

1714242618
Report to moderator
1714242618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714242618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714242618
Reply with quote  #2

1714242618
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714242618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714242618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714242618
Reply with quote  #2

1714242618
Report to moderator
1714242618
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714242618

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714242618
Reply with quote  #2

1714242618
Report to moderator
bislom
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 26, 2024, 11:03:22 AM
 #22

Betnomi scammed 20k in this case!
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!