Basically almost every bitcoiner is in for accumulation committing certain amount of investment with a timeline to it. It could be for short term or long term plan.
Some investors starts with a short term in mind then later progresses to a long term arising from a reassessment on how they were unable to meet up their planned portfolio target with the initial short term frame.
For it's healthy when people set an accumulation target in accordance to their financial strength, as doing otherwise by acting like you're in a competition with other investors you may end up uncontrollably investing all you have got (what I term hyper-investment) with nothing left in hand to solve other pressing financial needs/demands putting yourself under pressure where you may have to alter the total amount you have invested, jeopardizing your plans.
You also risk investing beyond what you can afford to lose which is not what any wise bitcoin investor would do. Bitcoin accumulation is not supposed to be a stressing and self-pressured process but some persons doing it in that way thinking they had arrived late to bitcoin and have to meet up, but that's all a fallacy. With bitcoin you're never late, you only arrived at your right time.
What are your own thoughts on wrong ways you think people follow in bitcoin accumulation.
For a moment I understand your speech in the third person, then it seems that it is your experience but it does not fully materialize that this is your experience, I say this because one can read and refer to others, but that does not imply that it is your experience on the subject.
For example, which investors? You... because you say that investors commit, mainly bitcoiners, that is a mention of a sensation or possibly you read it, because personal experience as you relate is not.
Then, as everyone follows his plans, they can only be a reference, and from there take the best ideas, if there are any, since what you see badly does not necessarily mean that it does not work.