Do star players affect the odds of a match bet?

[ethereumhunter]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Agreed. It's not really that hard to answer which made me laugh when the topic was raised. It's a no-brainer unless someone is not really that keen on sports gambling. The fact that these superstars are paid heavily means they are well-proven to players and they matter a lot for a team to win. The same thing when they are also injured as it will obviously hurt their team's chances of winning, unlike their other teammates who have a lesser impact on their team.

That is why it is important for teams to sign star players when they have the chance because they can bring their plays to higher levels.

When star players can give their best performance for their club, it can raise their club's rating to become one of the best clubs in the Saudi league. And of course, more and more sponsors will collaborate with their clubs and use their players to help with the promotion. This is another advantage the club can get because they can show the role of star players in raising their club's ranking in the Saudi league. And the clubs in the Saudi league know that their strategy of buying star players has worked well and soon, the clubs in the Saudi league will get other benefits.

[Negotiation]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Agreed. It's not really that hard to answer which made me laugh when the topic was raised. It's a no-brainer unless someone is not really that keen on sports gambling. The fact that these superstars are paid heavily means they are well-proven to players and they matter a lot for a team to win. The same thing when they are also injured as it will obviously hurt their team's chances of winning, unlike their other teammates who have a lesser impact on their team.

That is why it is important for teams to sign star players when they have the chance because they can bring their plays to higher levels.

The game pits old rivals of each team against each other that's why players prove good things to win. I agree every team uses different odds to take their games to a higher level as well as betting tips and predictions, keep up to date with the latest events in sports. Recent news often doesn't even affect betting odds when a star player gets injured how teams are making matchups and other factors all come into play when betting on the game a latest news update or two could really help.

[slapper]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Agreed. It's not really that hard to answer which made me laugh when the topic was raised. It's a no-brainer unless someone is not really that keen on sports gambling. The fact that these superstars are paid heavily means they are well-proven to players and they matter a lot for a team to win. The same thing when they are also injured as it will obviously hurt their team's chances of winning, unlike their other teammates who have a lesser impact on their team.

That is why it is important for teams to sign star players when they have the chance because they can bring their plays to higher levels.

When star players can give their best performance for their club, it can raise their club's rating to become one of the best clubs in the Saudi league. And of course, more and more sponsors will collaborate with their clubs and use their players to help with the promotion. This is another advantage the club can get because they can show the role of star players in raising their club's ranking in the Saudi league. And the clubs in the Saudi league know that their strategy of buying star players has worked well and soon, the clubs in the Saudi league will get other benefits.

When a star player shows up in his prime, you can almost see the club's rating gauge go beep beep beep, skyrocketing towards the heavens of the Saudi league. Now, if you link that to sponsors – lol, they just love a good rising star, don't they? Every step the player takes, every goal, every fancy footwork - cha-ching, there's some sponsorship money

While the star players illuminate the path to success, isn't it a bit like placing a hefty bet on a single horse in a race? You see, in my gambling days (strictly healthy and all for fun, of course), I've observed that while star players are the jackpots, sometimes it's the silent runners, the underdogs that yield the best returns. The Saudi league clubs better remember that while they enjoy their current golden goose

[Slow death]

when you say manchester united team or inter team or roma team or manchester city or arsenal or bayern are great teams people are looking at the past of these teams and what they achieved. but when the bookmakers are going to place odds for games involving these teams, the bookmakers take into account the current squad of the teams, that is the most important thing. now in the team's squad we have to see which are the best players capable of changing the state of the team when they are on the pitch.

for example: in inter milan, lautaro martinez is the team's most important player, he is the team's scorer and when he is not playing the team's chances of winning the game are very difficult, so if we have a game in which inter will play against milan and in this game inter comes from many victories and has its entire squad available but milan also comes from many games in which it won but will not have some of its good players, so the bookmakers will be giving inter as the favorite to win the game, so this is to say that the squad is what weighs most in this matter of odds, then comes the team's performance

just look at the case of roma for example, they don't have dy bala and tammy abraham, for that reason the team has been having bad results and the bookmakers even when roma is playing against a weak team have placed high odds for roma This is because the bookmakers are well aware that Roma is weakened, they don't have many of their good players available, this is another example that the squad counts a lot, when a team doesn't even have one of their good players. the team loses and the odds increase

[savetheFORUM]

~~~~~

Yea, I do agree that star players influence game odds, like I said in my first comment, but I think that they should rather be placed in the second half before football, which is usually tougher during the second half. I think that if star players are added during the second half, they can still do better because even by then, the opposite team players may have felt tired. I don't know if it's just rumors or not, but I have heard before that some times most of those big casinos usually bribe some club or those star players so that they will end up disappointing gamblers, just like you said that start players also disappoint gamblers. I agree with you.

You should know that the weekly salary of some of these star players is higher than the weekly revenue these casinos make, so I don't think that a casino can actually bribe a star player or even a club that they are a part of only so that they can manipulate the game for casinos benefit. These things happen only on lower scales like on local leagues and with local clubs and players where the players are underpaid and they take bribes and anything they get very easily.

And, you said that star players should be substituted in for the second half because the second half is more crucial and tough, but I don't completely agree with that because I think if star players manage to score some goals in the first half, the opponent team will have a very hard time levelling that up in the second half even if star players are out by then.

[BitcoinPanther]

~~~~~

Yea, I do agree that star players influence game odds, like I said in my first comment, but I think that they should rather be placed in the second half before football, which is usually tougher during the second half. I think that if star players are added during the second half, they can still do better because even by then, the opposite team players may have felt tired. I don't know if it's just rumors or not, but I have heard before that some times most of those big casinos usually bribe some club or those star players so that they will end up disappointing gamblers, just like you said that start players also disappoint gamblers. I agree with you.

You should know that the weekly salary of some of these star players is higher than the weekly revenue these casinos make, so I don't think that a casino can actually bribe a star player or even a club that they are a part of only so that they can manipulate the game for casinos benefit. These things happen only on lower scales like on local leagues and with local clubs and players where the players are underpaid and they take bribes and anything they get very easily.

It is possible for a star player to be bribed as long as the offer is big enough for the star player to consider the deal.  Money talks after all.

And, you said that star players should be substituted in for the second half because the second half is more crucial and tough, but I don't completely agree with that because I think if star players manage to score some goals in the first half, the opponent team will have a very hard time levelling that up in the second half even if star players are out by then.

Whether the star player will play or got bench depends on the coach but in regular manner Star players are in the game during the crucial hours.  But I  if the team is leading by huge margin, the coach will rest his star player giving opportunity to other players and at the same time keep the star player from any possible injury.

[molsewid]

You should know that the weekly salary of some of these star players is higher than the weekly revenue these casinos make, so I don't think that a casino can actually bribe a star player or even a club that they are a part of only so that they can manipulate the game for casinos benefit. These things happen only on lower scales like on local leagues and with local clubs and players where the players are underpaid and they take bribes and anything they get very easily.

And, you said that star players should be substituted in for the second half because the second half is more crucial and tough, but I don't completely agree with that because I think if star players manage to score some goals in the first half, the opponent team will have a very hard time levelling that up in the second half even if star players are out by then.

I agree, players for the first half can be remain for the second half. I think the odds are not really affecting the players maybe the management will also tell them not to open social media accounts or they will not use it so that it cannot affect their mental health or be demotivated. For me, if some players may be affected that is because he is aware of the odds and it affects him emotionally or they bribed the team.

[Docnaster]

Star players can 100% have a significant impact on the odds of a football game bet. Their presence or absence can influence the overall performance and outcomes of the game. Bookies and betting experts often consider the influence of star players when setting odds.

If a star player is injured or suspended the odds may change to reflect the team's potential decline in performance. On the other hand if a star player is in excellent form odds may favour their team due to the increased likelihood of success.

There is no doubt that star players changes the odds of every football betting.
Where you will notice that every player that is big enough, especially strikers changes the odds or influence the odds of gambling is when you will bet on an individual to score. If there is a greater tendency that Ronaldo will score in every match that he plays that means the probability of his team winning that much is higher from this instance. You will understand that the presence of big players especially strikers that can score goals determines the odds of every football matches.

[ethereumhunter]

When a star player shows up in his prime, you can almost see the club's rating gauge go beep beep beep, skyrocketing towards the heavens of the Saudi league. Now, if you link that to sponsors – lol, they just love a good rising star, don't they? Every step the player takes, every goal, every fancy footwork - cha-ching, there's some sponsorship money

While the star players illuminate the path to success, isn't it a bit like placing a hefty bet on a single horse in a race? You see, in my gambling days (strictly healthy and all for fun, of course), I've observed that while star players are the jackpots, sometimes it's the silent runners, the underdogs that yield the best returns. The Saudi league clubs better remember that while they enjoy their current golden goose

Hahaha, you described it well, bro. Yes, it is true that it will attract sponsors to hire star players and local players to promote their products. And that means income for everyone, the club and the players, and they will also get more money. This will make Saudi league clubs increase in popularity compared to other clubs.

Yes, the Saudi league should also prepare its local players so they can improve their performance. Moreover, they can practice matches with star players who can improve their playing skills. And if one day, the star players return to their country and are replaced by other star players, the Saudi league will still have players whose abilities and skills are equivalent to the star players.

[Wiwo]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Agreed. It's not really that hard to answer which made me laugh when the topic was raised. It's a no-brainer unless someone is not really that keen on sports gambling. The fact that these superstars are paid heavily means they are well-proven to players and they matter a lot for a team to win. The same thing when they are also injured as it will obviously hurt their team's chances of winning, unlike their other teammates who have a lesser impact on their team.

That is why it is important for teams to sign star players when they have the chance because they can bring their plays to higher levels.

When star players can give their best performance for their club, it can raise their club's rating to become one of the best clubs in the Saudi league. And of course, more and more sponsors will collaborate with their clubs and use their players to help with the promotion. This is another advantage the club can get because they can show the role of star players in raising their club's ranking in the Saudi league. And the clubs in the Saudi league know that their strategy of buying star players has worked well and soon, the clubs in the Saudi league will get other benefits.

I think the sole proponents for odds calculation is the players feature by each team and what their stand to offer against their opponents,  that is why players purchase price differs in a lot of ways,  you can't compare a team that have star players like C Ronaldo one benzema on the same team against team that have less known players that don't have any track records or winning any awards in the football industry.

Al these are the sole proponents that determine what we see in sports bookies' dashboards as odds allocations

[Yamifoud]

Star players can 100% have a significant impact on the odds of a football game bet. Their presence or absence can influence the overall performance and outcomes of the game. Bookies and betting experts often consider the influence of star players when setting odds.

If a star player is injured or suspended the odds may change to reflect the team's potential decline in performance. On the other hand if a star player is in excellent form odds may favour their team due to the increased likelihood of success.

There is no doubt that star players changes the odds of every football betting.
Where you will notice that every player that is big enough, especially strikers changes the odds or influence the odds of gambling is when you will bet on an individual to score. If there is a greater tendency that Ronaldo will score in every match that he plays that means the probability of his team winning that much is higher from this instance. You will understand that the presence of big players especially strikers that can score goals determines the odds of every football matches.

But how about if two-star players will meet in the game, who will get the higher odds? I'd think who's better to take the lead but that was too far different when their opponents have no star player. With this view of odds influence, this will also be our advantage as gamblers as we already have an idea which team will possibly win the game. I could say that there are also manipulations in gambling and casinos often gain huge betters when star players are on the field.

[famososMuertos]

I would like to take into consideration four levels of contribution in a match by a star player, and hope to see from everyone's opinion how their contribution would go to affect the outcome, odds of a game and the bet after the game is concluded. These four levels include:
*playing part of a match,
*playing a full match,
*being substituted out and
*being substituted in.

No star player is agreeably just a placebo effect on any team, and unlike Ronaldo and Messi who have influenced their new teams to attain new feats, they are expected to perform excellent service in the positions they are signed for and nothing less of that.

My question is simple, do star players really affect the odds of a bet, or wager or stake on a match, putting into consideration the four levels of contribution in a match, as I mentioned earlier?

You are asking a very basic question for the scenario in which we operate, sports betting is not something new and even a child could tell you that if the best player on their team does not come to play, they will not have a good result.

Information is everything in sports betting, so things like injuries, recovery, morale, personal life... all it is influences to performance and therefore the team, imagine if a decisive player does not play.

So, obviously yes!

[DaNNy001]

I would like to take into consideration four levels of contribution in a match by a star player, and hope to see from everyone's opinion how their contribution would go to affect the outcome, odds of a game and the bet after the game is concluded. These four levels include:
*playing part of a match,
*playing a full match,
*being substituted out and
*being substituted in.

No star player is agreeably just a placebo effect on any team, and unlike Ronaldo and Messi who have influenced their new teams to attain new feats, they are expected to perform excellent service in the positions they are signed for and nothing less of that.

My question is simple, do star players really affect the odds of a bet, or wager or stake on a match, putting into consideration the four levels of contribution in a match, as I mentioned earlier?

Obviously, star players and not only player even the absence of the coach will affect the odd of the team to win the game and also will the bookmarkers trend with it interms of altering the odds in the game for the both teams.

Odds are very crucial when it's comes to gambling especially football gambling I know for sure even the slightest information gotten about the teams in question can alters the odds of either teams.

[TelolettOm]

it certainly affects the trend of the game but it will not affect the outcome of a match. it remains to be determined how the final outcome agreement determines a winner from the gamblers. If there are stars mentioned in gambling, it will make this site even more popular, which is why several platforms always bring stars who have lots of fans.

Indeed. When there are star players on the match, people will be more interested to watch and bet on the match. The trend or popularity of the match becomes increasing easily, that's because the star players have many big fans around the world. So, it makes sense if the potential money to earn bigger when betting on the match played by the star players.

Yes, the result of the match can't guarantee by the star players. There are many cases that the team of star players got defeated by smaller teams. Especially in a football match, it is a team game. The team which can play more solidly probably win the match. The star player isn't the main reason for a team to win the match.

[Iroh]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Understandably so, star players go the extra step to contribute more than their fair share in the team to help achieve and claim the win in a game. So their presence in any game would obviously have to be taken into consideration hence having such effects on the odds of a game.

I read someone’s comment about how star players may very well affect the odds of a game, they may not necessarily affect the outcome at the end and I quite agree. We’ve seen games where top teams with the best players, being favorites and having the best odds to win the game go up against smaller clubs and lose.

[ethereumhunter]

I think the sole proponents for odds calculation is the players feature by each team and what their stand to offer against their opponents,  that is why players purchase price differs in a lot of ways,  you can't compare a team that have star players like C Ronaldo one benzema on the same team against team that have less known players that don't have any track records or winning any awards in the football industry.

Al these are the sole proponents that determine what we see in sports bookies' dashboards as odds allocations

That is what must be paid attention to if someone wants to choose a bet in the Saudi league, where he must pay attention to the factor of which star players are at which club. Usually, teams with star players will increase their betting value compared to teams that don't have star players. So maybe that's why leagues in Saudi are competing to have star players for their teams so that their teams can get added value among other teams.

And with star players on the team, it can provide the game the team owner hopes for. It looks like sports betting will be increasingly busy with the presence of star players at several clubs in Saudi. We will see it soon at the Saudi tournament, and it will get even more interesting.

[Jossque]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Agreed. It's not really that hard to answer which made me laugh when the topic was raised. It's a no-brainer unless someone is not really that keen on sports gambling. The fact that these superstars are paid heavily means they are well-proven to players and they matter a lot for a team to win. The same thing when they are also injured as it will obviously hurt their team's chances of winning, unlike their other teammates who have a lesser impact on their team.

That is why it is important for teams to sign star players when they have the chance because they can bring their plays to higher levels.

It's an easy question to answer, but sometimes things can change if luck is not on your side;
For example, Ronaldo was unexpectedly red-carded in the early minutes of the game, reducing his team's strength because he was missing, and the only thing that changed was that Ronaldo was red-carded early, reducing his team's strength both in terms of missing and in terms of attacking power going forward.
It's true that star players affect a team's odds, but you can't ignore that as anything can happen in a match.

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Understandably so, star players go the extra step to contribute more than their fair share in the team to help achieve and claim the win in a game. So their presence in any game would obviously have to be taken into consideration hence having such effects on the odds of a game.

I read someone’s comment about how star players may very well affect the odds of a game, they may not necessarily affect the outcome at the end and I quite agree. We’ve seen games where top teams with the best players, being favorites and having the best odds to win the game go up against smaller clubs and lose.

This is exactly what I'm talking about.Although it's not a decisive factor in the outcome of the match, one of the main reasons why the match is more enjoyable to watch, more goals or more excitement is because of the star players in such teams.If you underestimate your opponent, your opponent can surprise you and you will have the chance to lose to small teams as well as being a big team.You shouldn't underestimate your opponent without having everything under control.

[piebeyb]

I read someone’s comment about how star players may very well affect the odds of a game, they may not necessarily affect the outcome at the end and I quite agree. We’ve seen games where top teams with the best players, being favorites and having the best odds to win the game go up against smaller clubs and lose.

Yes, I experienced this last season where I bet on PSG where there were still several star players like Mbappe, Messi and Neymar but unfortunately they lost, since then I don't pay attention to star players in a club because that's not a guarantee, I have to look at the overall cooperation of players in a club, because just relying on one or two star players will not have an effect if all the players are not united.

A club has eleven players and all of them are influential so I don't think it's fair if the betting odds are seen from just a few star players in it, it won't really work as a betting analysis because I've tried it before and I'm sure other gambler friends also feel the same way. just like you, it is true that sometimes the favorite team does not necessarily win against a club that is not the favorite

[shinratensei_]

Let's think of it this way;
If Al Nassr didn't have Mane and Ronaldo, they wouldn't be almost heavy favorites in every match, right?
The fact that Ronaldo and Mane's names are in the starting XI every game shows that Al Nassr are heavy odds-on favorites against their opponents, which could indicate that Al Nassr can score at least 2-3 goals every game. Looking at their last games, Al Nassr have managed to score 4 goals or more, almost all of them scored by Mane and Ronaldo.

Understandably so, star players go the extra step to contribute more than their fair share in the team to help achieve and claim the win in a game. So their presence in any game would obviously have to be taken into consideration hence having such effects on the odds of a game.

It would be so strange if the star player did not have an impact on the odds. This player will be really helpful for the club. Let's take a look at how mbappe was helping PSG to win the game and that proves that if star player can even change the situation drastically.
I remember when ronaldo was also saving al nassr from losing against its opponent.

I read someone’s comment about how star players may very well affect the odds of a game, they may not necessarily affect the outcome at the end and I quite agree. We’ve seen games where top teams with the best players, being favorites and having the best odds to win the game go up against smaller clubs and lose.

Star player's contribution to the club may also affect the outcome at the end of the game but this is an unnecessary thing. There was also the time when star player is going up and down.
Anything in the football is still remain unpredictable but star player would be valued a lot caused they have dozens of exp in the football. The club's odds can be greatly affected by having someone like Messi, Ronaldo, or Mbappe make a significant contribution.

[TelolettOm]

It would be so strange if the star player did not have an impact on the odds. This player will be really helpful for the club. Let's take a look at how mbappe was helping PSG to win the game and that proves that if star player can even change the situation drastically.
I remember when ronaldo was also saving al nassr from losing against its opponent.

It is not strange, there was a case when star players didn't make a big influence (especially for the result of the game). For example PSG stats in UCL, they already failed many times winning it although they have Messi, Neymar, Mbappe, Ramos, Hakimi, Verratti, Marquinhos, and Gianluigi Donnarumma. These many star players can't help much PSG to achieve UCL trophy. Ronaldo also failed many times to help Al Nassr getting full points in SPL matches. That's one of the reasons why AL Nassr failed to win SPL title last season. So, not every time that the star players can contribute much for the team.

Anything in the football is still remain unpredictable but star player would be valued a lot caused they have dozens of exp in the football. The club's odds can be greatly affected by having someone like Messi, Ronaldo, or Mbappe make a significant contribution.

Yes, the football match basically is unpredictable. The star players (like Ronaldo, Messi, and Mbappe) is just one of the factors to determine the final result of the match. They can't guarantee the final result of the match.