Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 12:06:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Should JayJuanGee be disabled in the WO thread?
Yes - 6 (9.7%)
No - 56 (90.3%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Request: Disable JayJuanGee in the Wall Observer thread  (Read 2032 times)
DVlog
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 212


Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big


View Profile
August 29, 2023, 07:31:10 PM
 #81

Lol.

I can see that as there are several WO regulars in this thread, it is becoming a WO-style one and not a typical Meta thread, because of the overquotes for example.

I am the only one who misses JJG writing a couple of short paragraphs as is usual for him on the topic here? He hasn't even written in the other one, of which this one is a parody, I understand.

They are arguing with each other. Maybe it will be better to do that in WO as well.

I do like how JJG is super active in WO but I do not like his long neck post. His post is usually way too large to concentrate though I always got interested in reading those. Sometimes i enjoy watching some of the merit farmer's dedication to get JJG's attention in case he got a merit from him. I think it's the only board where serious people stop being serious and enjoy with each other. I am against disabling JJG's in the WO.

|     T o n T o g e t h e r     |     Saving Empowers Winning     |
Join Launchpool  >  Jan 10th - Feb 10th
●      T W I T T E R      ●      T E L E G R A M      ●      M E D I U M      ●
1714565165
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714565165

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714565165
Reply with quote  #2

1714565165
Report to moderator
1714565165
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714565165

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714565165
Reply with quote  #2

1714565165
Report to moderator
TalkImg was created especially for hosting images on bitcointalk.org: try it next time you want to post an image
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
BobLawblaw (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1824
Merit: 5551


Neighborhood Shenanigans Dispenser


View Profile
August 30, 2023, 12:36:47 PM
 #82

JJG must be destroyed.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10193


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
August 30, 2023, 08:13:06 PM
 #83


It would actually be a funny comment if you were to be merely joking... but you are not.

 Cry Cry Cry Cry

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Sandra_hakeem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 1033


Goodnight, ohh Leo!!! 🦅


View Profile WWW
August 30, 2023, 09:55:11 PM
Merited by The Sceptical Chymist (2)
 #84

JJG must be destroyed.
Buhh, wait a sec...why are you so eager about disabling Jay from the WO thread? ..like, why did you decide to make more specificities to an already emphasized topic but this time, with just one person? I mean he's not the only one involved in whatever instigations you may think  of.
I personally think 'em shit posters have only improvised overtime to have the WO thread as a liverage on merit HODLing and account development... IF YOU WANNA CAMPAIGN FOR A USER TO GET A MERIT BAN... WHATSOEVER, DOES THAT FULFILL THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE OF THE CREATION?? or atleast, does it serve the rule that says the forum MUST be made as free as possible?

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
BobLawblaw (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1824
Merit: 5551


Neighborhood Shenanigans Dispenser


View Profile
August 30, 2023, 10:05:46 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1)
 #85

why are you so eager about disabling Jay from the WO thread?

He's gayer than I am.

It's a jealously thing.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 4453



View Profile
August 31, 2023, 04:43:34 AM
Merited by BobLawblaw (50)
 #86

Merit farming ... has gotten way out of hand.

so i gave you 50 merit.

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
BobLawblaw (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1824
Merit: 5551


Neighborhood Shenanigans Dispenser


View Profile
August 31, 2023, 09:08:19 AM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1)
 #87

Merit farming ... has gotten way out of hand.
so i gave you 50 merit.

Neato. I guess I'll spend them on hats.
DYING_S0UL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 315


The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>BAN


View Profile WWW
August 31, 2023, 09:33:37 AM
 #88

JJG must be destroyed.


I don't think disabling JJG or WO is a solution. I agree WO is filled with merit farmers & shitposters. But destroying JJG? Nope. I only think this topic had to be bought up to the world. & now that you have & got the attention. The ones who previously gave out merits shouldn't give out any without any valid posts. If one deserves merit he/she should get them. But if anyone is a copy paste shitposters he/she shouldn't. Now that everyone is aware of this situation. I hope they would consider twice before meriting someone. That's how merit farming will be less & less. Look what happened after the posts. The merit farmers are less and less in WO.  Smiley

AoBT
▄▄█████████████████▄▄
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████
█████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████
The Alliance
of Bitcointalk
Translators
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███
████████████████▄
▄██
███████████████████▄
▄█
██████████████████████▄
████████████████████████
█████████████████████
████████████████████████
▀███████████████████████▀
▀███████████████████
▀███████████████████▀
███████████████▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
.
JOIN US

▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████▀▀██████▀▀██▀▀▀▀████
████████▀██████████
████▄▄▄▄▀███████
███████▄▀▄█▀▀███████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████▀████████████
▀███████████████████████▀
█████

██████████
.
HIRE US
SamReomo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 673


Top Crypto Casino


View Profile
August 31, 2023, 10:33:50 AM
Merited by The Sceptical Chymist (3)
 #89

why are you so eager about disabling Jay from the WO thread?

He's gayer than I am.

It's a jealously thing.

Now that comment make some sense because jealousy is something that can be easily shown by someone's actions. However, I must say that your actions depict more or less a fun-loving person who's considering the whole situation as a way of entertainment, but I must tell you that it isn't that much funny if you see the whole picture. The first thread was a valid concern raised by @Nutillldah and I must say that thread was a serious one while this one is more or less like a way to make fun of someone which isn't really good by any means. But, I still think that the members of WO thread and the merit sources at that thread know well that what they are doing.

Both you and JJG are among the most senior members of the forum and that's why someone with so much seniority level should not really make things in this way. JJG and other reputed members of the WO thread have replied in that thread because they were sure that they weren't doing anything that would be in any way against the rules of the forum and I'm more than sure that the rules are for every merit source not for the ones on WO thread.

Let's wind things up and lock this thread because any more discussion on this thread would hurt JJG's feelings and I don't think that attacking a reputed member like JJG just for the sake of some entertainment is good at all. It's a request to lock this thread because allowing more comments on it won't make the situation better and there is no need to continue it any further because out of 47 total votes the 42 are in favor of JJG, and that's more than enough to for us to believe that all those members want JJG to stay at WO and they all voted in favor of him.

█████████████████████████
████▐██▄█████████████████
████▐██████▄▄▄███████████
████▐████▄█████▄▄████████
████▐█████▀▀▀▀▀███▄██████
████▐███▀████████████████
████▐█████████▄█████▌████
████▐██▌█████▀██████▌████
████▐██████████▀████▌████
█████▀███▄█████▄███▀█████
███████▀█████████▀███████
██████████▀███▀██████████
█████████████████████████
.
BC.GAME
▄▄░░░▄▀▀▄████████
▄▄▄
██████████████
█████░░▄▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄██████▄▄▄▄████
▄███▄█▄▄██████████▄████▄████
███████████████████████████▀███
▀████▄██▄██▄░░░░▄████████████
▀▀▀█████▄▄▄███████████▀██
███████████████████▀██
███████████████████▄██
▄███████████████████▄██
█████████████████████▀██
██████████████████████▄
.
..CASINO....SPORTS....RACING..
█░░░░░░█░░░░░░█
▀███▀░░▀███▀░░▀███▀
▀░▀░░░░▀░▀░░░░▀░▀
░░░░░░░░░░░░
▀██████████
░░░░░███░░░░
░░█░░░███▄█░░░
░░██▌░░███░▀░░██▌
░█░██░░███░░░█░██
░█▀▀▀█▌░███░░█▀▀▀█▌
▄█▄░░░██▄███▄█▄░░▄██▄
▄███▄
░░░░▀██▄▀


▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀███▄
██████████
▀███▄░▄██▀
▄▄████▄▄░▀█▀▄██▀▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀▀████▄▄██▀▄███▀▀███▄
███████▄▄▀▀████▄▄▀▀███████
▀███▄▄███▀░░░▀▀████▄▄▄███▀
▀▀████▀▀████████▀▀████▀▀
Antisthenes
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 5

JJG AI, is an attack vector on humanity. Beware.


View Profile
September 01, 2023, 09:45:12 AM
 #90

For the record, I want to clarify my grudge with JJG.
It is not the constant repetition of its thesis, nor its extra salty cunt whilst doing so, let alone its gheyness.

It is because it pretends to be of human nature - which it absolutely is not.
Unless I’ve missed something of course - like a formal declaration of its silicon nature.

That said, of course I’m pro to its dismantle, no matter how pro Bitcoin it is or not.

What happens when taxes become a tip?
Marykeller
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 501



View Profile WWW
September 01, 2023, 06:13:10 PM
 #91

I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread or merits a particular set of people. But in all of the post replies I have read so far here, no one has given a bad remark about JayJuanGee, but rather a good remark that he merits different boards and gives out merits to the post he finds to be quality not minding the rank of the user.

R


▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀
LLBIT
  CRYPTO   
FUTURES
 1,000x 
LEVERAGE
COMPETITIVE
    FEES    
 INSTANT 
EXECUTION
.
   TRADE NOW   
Who is John Galt?
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 280



View Profile
September 01, 2023, 09:13:49 PM
Merited by BobLawblaw (3)
 #92

I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread

Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much. Cheesy
Russlenat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 906



View Profile
October 08, 2023, 09:53:06 AM
Merited by philipma1957 (26), vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1)
 #93

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one. That thread's been around even before the merit system got introduced. And if you're concerned about people using merit farming to snag a spot in a signature campaign, well, I think it's up to the campaign manager to figure out if someone truly deserves it.

Now, I don't have a ton of merits either, so sometimes when I apply for a campaign, I get that feeling that users with loads of merits are getting the nod. But I don't let it bother me, really. I just keep posting on the boards I love without any expectations of merits. If they come, they come.

The whole idea behind merit farming is to rank up or earn more merits to look appealing to campaign managers. But if you take a closer look, we don't even have to spend time investigating which accounts are legit because the moment they join a campaign, their post quality tends to shoot up. So, personally, I trust the judgment of those campaign managers – they're popular for a reason around here.

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either. It's one of the biggest threads around, and we all love to gather there when the bull run hits.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 7952



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2023, 10:59:52 AM
Merited by philipma1957 (27), BobLawblaw (3), vapourminer (1), Who is John Galt? (1)
 #94

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either.

That's... That's not how any of this works.

I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread

Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much. Cheesy

Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:

There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890



View Profile
October 08, 2023, 12:18:27 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1)
 #95

Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:

There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC



and i sang it in the same Wellerman's tune Cheesy

In addition to the conspiracy theory I mean why JJG is being targeted... because he merit's every deserving posts?

This is the beauty of his meriting spree, it's call an "equal opportunity" meriting. Irrespective of whether you are a spammer or a merit farmer or somewhat established legendary member "1" merit is for everyone who and that's all nothing more nothing less.

On Bitcointalk, he'd roam fancy-free.
No matter your gender,
Rank, or seniority tender,
One merit from JJG, you'd agree!



█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
Who is John Galt?
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 280



View Profile
October 08, 2023, 12:37:28 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #96

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one.

Indeed, on the fifth page of the thread, after the discussion has died down for more than a month, it’s the rightest time to disagree with the OP.

Since this thread was initially conducive to this, and now it has become the most relevant, OP, I haven’t figured out why yet, but I’ll also get in line to disagree with you! Cheesy

I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread

Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much. Cheesy

Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:

There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC


There was yer one on Bitcointalk forum
Who came to create this topic quorum,
He wrote a poem
Which close to the bone,
We'll see how it's stirring up the forum.
Russlenat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 906



View Profile
October 08, 2023, 12:59:05 PM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1)
 #97

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one.

Indeed, on the fifth page of the thread, after the discussion has died down for more than a month, it’s the rightest time to disagree with the OP.


My bad, I didn't even check the date of the last reply. I got caught up in my feelings because it seemed like you guys were trying to hurt JJG's feelings  Smiley, and he's one of my favorite members on the forum.  Grin Grin

By the way, since I was the one who bumped it, maybe let me have the last word, and we can wrap it up here.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10193


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 09, 2023, 01:53:44 AM
 #98

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either.
That's... That's not how any of this works.
I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread
Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much. Cheesy
Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:

There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC


It looks legit and even unbiased when you put it like that.

And, I Love the font.   Kiss  #nohomo

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one.
Indeed, on the fifth page of the thread, after the discussion has died down for more than a month, it’s the rightest time to disagree with the OP.
My bad, I didn't even check the date of the last reply. I got caught up in my feelings because it seemed like you guys were trying to hurt JJG's feelings  Smiley, and he's one of my favorite members on the forum.  Grin Grin

By the way, since I was the one who bumped it, maybe let me have the last word, and we can wrap it up here.

Don't worry.

I cannot see Bob closing this thread... and probably even moderators don't give too many shits whether it stays open or not... even though the substance of the thread is a bit childish and whiny.. but maybe it ends up playing out as a bit of somewhat innocent humor too.... that likely reflects more on the pettiness of the authors rather than any substantively important topic that they believe that they may have raised.. . just like the nutildah thread of a similar theme.. if you had not seen that one....

and. .my feelings had not really gotten hurt from these kinds of topics.. let it aire out.. even if 100% confirmed dumb...

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Poker Player
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 2011



View Profile
October 09, 2023, 09:07:51 AM
 #99

I cannot see Bob closing this thread... and probably even moderators don't give too many shits whether it stays open or not... even though the substance of the thread is a bit childish and whiny.. but maybe it ends up playing out as a bit of somewhat innocent humor too....
 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I believe that the WO regulars theymos, and consequently the moderators, have a special consideration for you. Otherwise this thread would have been moved to off-topic or something a long time ago, because I don't remember in meta which is a serious section a thread with so many jokes, starting with the title, overquotes and things that make this thread look like a split of the WO that has fallen here.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 7821


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
October 09, 2023, 07:14:54 PM
 #100

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one. That thread's been around even before the merit system got introduced. And if you're concerned about people using merit farming to snag a spot in a signature campaign, well, I think it's up to the campaign manager to figure out if someone truly deserves it.

Now, I don't have a ton of merits either, so sometimes when I apply for a campaign, I get that feeling that users with loads of merits are getting the nod. But I don't let it bother me, really. I just keep posting on the boards I love without any expectations of merits. If they come, they come.

The whole idea behind merit farming is to rank up or earn more merits to look appealing to campaign managers. But if you take a closer look, we don't even have to spend time investigating which accounts are legit because the moment they join a campaign, their post quality tends to shoot up. So, personally, I trust the judgment of those campaign managers – they're popular for a reason around here.

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either. It's one of the biggest threads around, and we all love to gather there when the bull run hits.

Here is a shit ton of merits. I just spent a half hour reading your posts they are pretty good and you have beed around a while.





Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either.

That's... That's not how any of this works.

I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread

Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much. Cheesy

Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:

There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC


Do you think that is true? or are we just kidding.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!