Bitcoin Forum
May 18, 2024, 02:47:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Should JayJuanGee be disabled in the WO thread?
Yes - 6 (9.7%)
No - 56 (90.3%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Request: Disable JayJuanGee in the Wall Observer thread  (Read 2044 times)
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10263


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 10, 2023, 01:20:04 AM
 #101

Respectfully, OP, I have to disagree with you on this one. That thread's been around even before the merit system got introduced. And if you're concerned about people using merit farming to snag a spot in a signature campaign, well, I think it's up to the campaign manager to figure out if someone truly deserves it.

Now, I don't have a ton of merits either, so sometimes when I apply for a campaign, I get that feeling that users with loads of merits are getting the nod. But I don't let it bother me, really. I just keep posting on the boards I love without any expectations of merits. If they come, they come.

The whole idea behind merit farming is to rank up or earn more merits to look appealing to campaign managers. But if you take a closer look, we don't even have to spend time investigating which accounts are legit because the moment they join a campaign, their post quality tends to shoot up. So, personally, I trust the judgment of those campaign managers – they're popular for a reason around here.

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either. It's one of the biggest threads around, and we all love to gather there when the bull run hits.
Here is a shit ton of merits. I just spent a half hour reading your posts they are pretty good and you have beed around a while.

I will review his posts later too..

Lastly, I don't think Theymos would be on board with disabling that thread either.
That's... That's not how any of this works.
I have been reading replies made on this post, to check where someone would point out where JayJuanGee is farming an account through a WO thread
Every joke has boundaries beyond which it would become not only unfunny, but simply ridiculous. So far, it seems that no one in this thread has come up with the idea to break out of these boundaries so much. Cheesy
Since this thread was recently bumped, I thought I would write a limerick about this conspiracy theory:
There once was a man named JJG
Oft he curiously did merit pee
The craftiest of scammers, he ranked up some spammers
For 20% of their campaign BTC

Do you think that is true? or are we just kidding.

Oh..? I had not even noticed the part that I would supposedly be getting a kick back from some of the forum members (spammers in nutildah-speak).. so the little riddle seems to go a bit far in terms of making that kind of an allegation (making shit up)... it is a pretty BIG allegation (and mud-slinging that could get forum members into trouble for doing things like that) to accuse another forum member of getting a kick back, even if it is just a funzies joke... and I doubt that he either has evidence and he probably does not even have any "reasonable" inferences of evidence that might exist beyond what's in his fantasy pea-brain self-righteous paranoid accusing others without evidence little noggen. (too many adjectives in a row?  I think NOT)

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 7999



View Profile WWW
October 10, 2023, 05:44:03 AM
 #102

Do you think that is true? or are we just kidding.


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7890


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2023, 04:29:41 PM
 #103

Well between nutildah, JJG and myself we have amassed more than 23,000 merits and handed

out more than 25,000 merits. With those volumes  some merits are going to bad actors some of the time.

The 8000 or so merits I have handed out have gone to more than 1000 different member. And maybe 20+ were banned. you just can't always be correct about a person .

I would like to thin JJG does not get paid feedback money for merits. I don't and I think others are like me. I would prefer to think this of JJG.

Hoping that nutildah is wrong and its just a joke.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10263


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 10, 2023, 07:15:30 PM
 #104

Well between nutildah, JJG and myself we have amassed more than 23,000 merits and handed

out more than 25,000 merits. With those volumes  some merits are going to bad actors some of the time.

The 8000 or so merits I have handed out have gone to more than 1000 different member. And maybe 20+ were banned. you just can't always be correct about a person .

I would like to thin JJG does not get paid feedback money for merits. I don't and I think others are like me. I would prefer to think this of JJG.

Hoping that nutildah is wrong and its just a joke.

It seems to me that you, philip, are giving too much benefit of the doubt to nutildah to even go along with the possibility that something like what he had said might be true without him having had shown any facts and/or actual logic - besides putting the assertion within a cute little poem.  

Since some members are not going to know these kinds of things, probably Nutildah has a bit of duty to clarify that he is full of shit, retract his statement, probably apologize and say that he will never do it again (even though that might not be true with the arrogant lil twat) and/or if he happens to have facts and/or logic to back up his bullshit likely to be disingenuine little assertion, then maybe he should set forth such facts and/or logic.. and maybe this here thread would be as good of a place as any.. or maybe starting another thread could be started.. There tends to be flexibility in these kinds of mud-slinging matters...

As sometimes "we" like to say around here (just like your mom used to say to you when a kid), "it is all fun and games until someone's eye gets poked out".. OUCH!!!!

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Who is John Galt?
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 280



View Profile
October 10, 2023, 08:17:57 PM
 #105

Hoping that nutildah is wrong and its just a joke.

If this is an example of some kind of post-irony, then I’m pretty bad at understanding such deeply veiled jokes. But now I will definitely look ridiculous and funny, regardless of who was joking in this situation and who was serious. Because explaining any jokes is definitely not what's fun.

nutildah was definitely joking.

I also hope that you were just joking as part of some post-irony, because the discussion of trading likes is somewhere beyond my understanding. This cannot be discussed in all seriousness! But it looks so convincing that if this is complex humor, where the reader must believe that it is serious, then you guys have succeeded!
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10263


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 10, 2023, 08:36:58 PM
 #106

Hoping that nutildah is wrong and its just a joke.

If this is an example of some kind of post-irony, then I’m pretty bad at understanding such deeply veiled jokes. But now I will definitely look ridiculous and funny, regardless of who was joking in this situation and who was serious. Because explaining any jokes is definitely not what's fun.

nutildah was definitely joking.

I also hope that you were just joking as part of some post-irony, because the discussion of trading likes is somewhere beyond my understanding. This cannot be discussed in all seriousness! But it looks so convincing that if this is complex humor, where the reader must believe that it is serious, then you guys have succeeded!

That's part of the problem, especially if you are telling jokes about other forum members rather than some other possibly more neutral topic (even potentially controversial).

For example, if you are telling jokes about some kind of a system, or politics, religion, sex or even bitcoin versus shitcoins, you might not even need to show whether you are joking or not because of the subject matter of the joke. 

Actually, in recent times, I have been doing this quite frequently with certain topics, including telling someone to buy a shitcoin (usually by agreeing with their seeming pumping of a shitcoin).. which surely is the opposite of what I think, and sometimes I might even feel badly about going that far with my joke.. or at least torn about if some members are going to take me seriously and buy the shitcoin.. but that does not cause me to necessarily explain the joke... just leave it and let whatever readers of the post decide what they will do... I already suggested what I think daddy dildah should do...

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7890


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2023, 08:45:02 PM
 #107

Well between nutildah, JJG and myself we have amassed more than 23,000 merits and handed

out more than 25,000 merits. With those volumes  some merits are going to bad actors some of the time.

The 8000 or so merits I have handed out have gone to more than 1000 different member. And maybe 20+ were banned. you just can't always be correct about a person .

I would like to thin JJG does not get paid feedback money for merits. I don't and I think others are like me. I would prefer to think this of JJG.

Hoping that nutildah is wrong and its just a joke.

It seems to me that you, philip, are giving too much benefit of the doubt to nutildah to even go along with the possibility that something like what he had said might be true without him having had shown any facts and/or actual logic - besides putting the assertion within a cute little poem.  

Since some members are not going to know these kinds of things, probably Nutildah has a bit of duty to clarify that he is full of shit, retract his statement, probably apologize and say that he will never do it again (even though that might not be true with the arrogant lil twat) and/or if he happens to have facts and/or logic to back up his bullshit likely to be disingenuine little assertion, then maybe he should set forth such facts and/or logic.. and maybe this here thread would be as good of a place as any.. or maybe starting another thread could be started.. There tends to be flexibility in these kinds of mud-slinging matters...

As sometimes "we" like to say around here (just like your mom used to say to you when a kid), "it is all fun and games until someone's eye gets poked out".. OUCH!!!!

But I like him in general so I want to give him the benefit of the doubt. Much as I like you in general and want to give you the benefit the doubt.

One of the issues all three of us have along with dude any loyce maybe 15 of us total is we have tons of merits given out.

I don't want to think that of the 15 top merit givers 2 or 3 or 4 of those people are dropping merits for profit in a back door deal.

@ who is John Galt I think it is tongue in cheek but that anyone does know merit farming has

occurred time and time again. I guess this thread will be some what funny and ironic while vaguely disturbing which knowing the op is what he was looking for.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Who is John Galt?
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 280



View Profile
October 10, 2023, 09:11:07 PM
 #108

@ who is John Galt I think it is tongue in cheek but that anyone does know merit farming has

occurred time and time again. I guess this thread will be some what funny and ironic while vaguely disturbing which knowing the op is what he was looking for.

Someone brings a match, but whether we allow ourselves to flare up largely depends on us too.

just leave it and let whatever readers of the post decide what they will do...

Reasonable. It's time for me to retire from this topic for a while.
Hamza2424
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1045


#SWGT CERTIK Audited


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2023, 09:23:51 PM
 #109

The whole idea behind merit farming is to rank up or earn more merits to look appealing to campaign managers. But if you take a closer look, we don't even have to spend time investigating which accounts are legit because the moment they join a campaign, their post quality tends to shoot up. So, personally, I trust the judgment of those campaign managers – they're popular for a reason around here.

Right on Track...


Smartvirus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1110



View Profile
October 10, 2023, 09:46:29 PM
 #110

I think @OP, your proposed solution is no solution at all. Disabling someone that gives just about a single merit at a time on a single post doesn’t make any good to the issue you’re making an elephant out of on the forum.

JayJuanGee remains one popular guy on the forum and that’s not solely because of his patterns to giving merits but also due to the volume of his posts too. He’s no shit poster and you can always find him making constructive arguments, openly expressing his opinions, he stays open to contrary views and ready to agree when he’s in the wrong.

Some old habits die hard and if OP or anybody else would try to link, JJG to any of the shit posting account on the forum, I’ll be in shock, iced in my core. I don’t see how such a quality poster would be reduced to reposting tweets and laying out just few words to a post, nope that ain’t JJG.

R


▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀
LLBIT
  CRYPTO   
FUTURES
 1,000x 
LEVERAGE
COMPETITIVE
    FEES    
 INSTANT 
EXECUTION
.
   TRADE NOW   
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 7999



View Profile WWW
October 11, 2023, 04:04:06 AM
 #111

nutildah was definitely joking.


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 7999



View Profile WWW
January 13, 2024, 02:38:35 PM
Merited by JSRAW (1)
 #112

I was gonna re-open my thread on the subject but remembered this one exists & is more fitting anyway.

Like, I can't believe the shamelessness of some people.

Some basic stats about the WO thread to highlight the problem

Posts in the last 30 days: 2,410
Posts excluding ChartBuddy: 1,682
Posts written by 4 BitVest sig campaigners: 169 (10% of all non-bot posts in the last month... 1 out of every 10 posts is from a BV campaigner trying to coax merits out of JJG)

BV campaigner #1:




BV campaigner #2:




The other 2 of the 4 don't post nearly as much. They, along with everyone else, seem to have gotten the memo. But not these 2. Whatever I guess.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10263


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 14, 2024, 03:16:17 AM
 #113

I was gonna re-open my thread on the subject but remembered this one exists & is more fitting anyway.

Like, I can't believe the shamelessness of some people.

Some basic stats about the WO thread to highlight the problem

Posts in the last 30 days: 2,410
Posts excluding ChartBuddy: 1,682
Posts written by 4 BitVest sig campaigners: 169 (10% of all non-bot posts in the last month... 1 out of every 10 posts is from a BV campaigner trying to coax merits out of JJG)

BV campaigner #1:


BV campaigner #2:


The other 2 of the 4 don't post nearly as much. They, along with everyone else, seem to have gotten the memo. But not these 2. Whatever I guess.

Sounds a bit vague in terms of the 4 supposed members who supposedly do not deserve merits for some or all of their posts. Maybe you can name the names of these merit recipients who supposedly did not deserve merits for their posts.... to the extent that your ongoing whining on such topic even matters?

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 7999



View Profile WWW
January 15, 2024, 02:03:31 PM
 #114

Sounds a bit vague in terms of the 4 supposed members who supposedly do not deserve merits for some or all of their posts. Maybe you can name the names of these merit recipients who supposedly did not deserve merits for their posts.... to the extent that your ongoing whining on such topic even matters?

I took you off ignore to do you the courtesy of at least replying to your question and was relieved to see you hadn't written a novel.

I didn't want to mention them by name. After all, I'm not a cruel or tacky person at heart, even if shitcoining is my main game.

But something I discovered today left me flabbergasted: BitVest sig campaigners are getting paid to post in the WO.

They are, AFAIK, the only campaign that pays for such posts, in that they have no clause that says posts in places where the signature isn't displayed won't be counted.

So they aren't just posting in the WO to collect merits from you, knowing you are by far the forum's loosest merit source. They are also getting paid for it!

Also I just want to point out that this clause doesn't seem to be enforced, whatsoever:

2. Signature Spamming that is detrimental to the discussions in threads will not count as payment. If you're reported or caught for spamming you'll be removed from this campaign after 2 strike.

Several campaign members have been tagged as spammers already and their posts deleted.

Just dumb AF. Stop incentivizing them with merits. If you insist on doing that, do it elsewhere.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10263


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 15, 2024, 04:38:12 PM
 #115

Sounds a bit vague in terms of the 4 supposed members who supposedly do not deserve merits for some or all of their posts. Maybe you can name the names of these merit recipients who supposedly did not deserve merits for their posts.... to the extent that your ongoing whining on such topic even matters?

I took you off ignore to do you the courtesy of at least replying to your question and was relieved to see you hadn't written a novel.

I didn't want to mention them by name. After all, I'm not a cruel or tacky person at heart, even if shitcoining is my main game.

You are already cruel and tacky by making vague accusations, so I suppose it is just a matter of which direction you choose to be vague and tacky.

But something I discovered today left me flabbergasted: BitVest sig campaigners are getting paid to post in the WO.

They are, AFAIK, the only campaign that pays for such posts, in that they have no clause that says posts in places where the signature isn't displayed won't be counted.

I give few shits.

So they aren't just posting in the WO to collect merits from you, knowing you are by far the forum's loosest merit source. They are also getting paid for it!

Hopefully you have reported me to theymos in order that he can consider doing something about me being the supposed problem, as perceived by you.

Also I just want to point out that this clause doesn't seem to be enforced, whatsoever:

2. Signature Spamming that is detrimental to the discussions in threads will not count as payment. If you're reported or caught for spamming you'll be removed from this campaign after 2 strike.
Several campaign members have been tagged as spammers already and their posts deleted.

Hopefully you are reporting campaign managers who you believe to be too loosey goosey with the posting requirements of their members.

Just dumb AF. Stop incentivizing them with merits. If you insist on doing that, do it elsewhere.

Fuck off with your dumb AF making up of rules in regards to some supposed standard of smerit distribution for merit source members that you believe that I need to follow or any other merit source member who might feel that they have to follow some kind of fantasy smerit sending standard that you wish were to exist.

If you have some more specifics in regards to forum members or posts that I have been meriting that you disagree with then list them here or otherwise, yet I doubt that your mere listing them is going to make too much of a difference, even though it could be possible that I could agree with you and perhaps (at my complete discretion) decide to not send smerits to that member (or those members) any more or some of the kinds of posts that you are concerned about "undeservedly" receiving merits from me and/or from other merit source members.

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
CryptopreneurBrainboss
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2268
Merit: 4172


eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2024, 07:32:52 PM
 #116

So they aren't just posting in the WO to collect merits from you, knowing you are by far the forum's loosest merit source. They are also getting paid for it!

Hopefully you have reported me to theymos in order that he can consider doing something about me being the supposed problem, as perceived by you.

Also I just want to point out that this clause doesn't seem to be enforced, whatsoever:

2. Signature Spamming that is detrimental to the discussions in threads will not count as payment. If you're reported or caught for spamming you'll be removed from this campaign after 2 strike.
Several campaign members have been tagged as spammers already and their posts deleted.

Hopefully you are reporting campaign managers who you believe to be too loosey goosey with the posting requirements of their members.

Some members are writing more than 60 posts for their requirements for the campaign weekly such members don't get their spams counted on this threads while some members their irrelevant replies on the thread are been ignored. I'm actively watching all account and anyone that get tagged for their spamming are getting removed. Just tagged and I'll do the needful. I have warned my participants and anybody spamming the forum won't be part of my campaigns anymore. Tagged (neutral is eligible to get removed, I don't have to wait for negative).

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 7999



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2024, 01:54:47 AM
 #117

Hopefully you have reported me to theymos in order that he can consider doing something about me being the supposed problem, as perceived by you.

Only you can fix the problem. But you obviously don't care... You will rank up the most useless multi-accounting scammers here if they kiss the center of your b-hole just right, because that is what matters to you most in your forum experience.

Hopefully you are reporting campaign managers who you believe to be too loosey goosey with the posting requirements of their members.

"Reporting campaign managers?" You really don't have the first clue about how any of this works. There's no point in wasting any more time on you, so back on ignore you go. None of this is for you anyway, because as you've established, you don't care to change. Its for everyone else to see what's going on and why they shouldn't emulate your behavior.



Some members are writing more than 60 posts for their requirements for the campaign weekly such members don't get their spams counted on this threads while some members their irrelevant replies on the thread are been ignored. I'm actively watching all account and anyone that get tagged for their spamming are getting removed. Just tagged and I'll do the needful. I have warned my participants and anybody spamming the forum won't be part of my campaigns anymore. Tagged (neutral is eligible to get removed, I don't have to wait for negative).

OK. Is there any chance you could consider not paying participants for posting the WO thread? Their signature isn't being displayed there anyway, after all... I really can't understand what BitVest would get out of it.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
CryptopreneurBrainboss
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2268
Merit: 4172


eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2024, 01:59:15 AM
 #118

OK. Is there any chance you could consider not paying participants for posting the WO thread? Their signature isn't being displayed there anyway, after all... I really can't understand what BitVest would get out of it.

I don't usually count pictures been sent there as they're indicated on spreadsheet as denied post but to make things easier if the campaign continues all members will be requested not to engage on the thread.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 7999



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2024, 02:23:55 AM
 #119

I don't usually count pictures been sent there as they're indicated on spreadsheet as denied post but to make things easier if the campaign continues all members will be requested not to engage on the thread.

Well, I don't want to tell people where they can or can't post. I just don't understand the purpose of counting their posts in places where their signature isn't shown. I realize their avatar is still shown. You don't have announce or change anything, but the whole purpose of disabling signatures in that thread is to deter spam posts there.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10263


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 16, 2024, 02:51:19 PM
Last edit: January 16, 2024, 03:44:58 PM by JayJuanGee
 #120

Hopefully you have reported me to theymos in order that he can consider doing something about me being the supposed problem, as perceived by you.
Only you can fix the problem. But you obviously don't care... You will rank up the most useless multi-accounting scammers here if they kiss the center of your b-hole just right, because that is what matters to you most in your forum experience.

Again.. Your supposed perception of a problem, your supposed perception of what criteria needs to be followed to send smerits and your supposed perception of supposed ONLY solutions.   You did not even point out the four members nor any of the supposed problematic posts, so how would any adjustments be made if some others, including yours truly don't even know the specifics?  To me, you seem to be just trying to create work for others so that some of us might have to kowtow to some semblance of your smerit sending criteria.. when no such thing actually exists at the moment.. You cannot get theymos to do anything about it in terms of adjusting the smerit sending rules, so then you continue to just throw out vague accusations in regards to your own vision of smerit sending criteria.  

Hopefully you are reporting campaign managers who you believe to be too loosey goosey with the posting requirements of their members.
"Reporting campaign managers?" You really don't have the first clue about how any of this works. There's no point in wasting any more time on you, so back on ignore you go. None of this is for you anyway, because as you've established, you don't care to change. Its for everyone else to see what's going on and why they shouldn't emulate your behavior.

Since you are proclaiming that you are not really even wanting to interact with me, then perhaps your goal is just to harass other members such as me, and then send messages to other members that you are going to harass them too.. so you are seeming to want to bully members into your criteria, and by the way, it does seems that some members do adjust some of their smerit sending criteria from time to time, including yours truly, but doing so merely because another member is whining about it and appealing to the public about it with such spin that he is not even pointing out specific posts and/or specific forum members engaged in the spamming seems problematic to me.. but no of course, I am somehow creating all of this problem because I am so supposedly "generous" with my smerit sending to the undeserving (and you are a party-pooping merit scrooge), and you are even suggesting that I have some kind of supposed bad intentions because I am either not cooperating with your whiny-ass requests or that I am failing/refusing to do as much due diligence as what you believe needs to be done prior to sending smerits.  

Seems like a lot of assumptions, vague finger pointing coming from your end and attempts to impose your own subjective criteria to smerit sending.

And, also one members definition of spam is quite different from another's and did the member provide any helpful information, even if the member might not have provided any of his own words or his own analysis.. but merely provided an image or a link or maybe an image, link and words from the source (that might not even be clear if the words or his own words or coming from the source).  There are newbie spammer, smerit seekers and even more senior forum members who provide these kinds of superficial short posts that hardly have any substance, and sometimes the supposed newbie spammers smerit seekers are providing better posts than some of the more senior members who are on your (nutildah's) not a problem list.   

As any of us likely realize, there frequently can be bits of dilemmas in the sending of smerits, yet I am not going to give any ground to you or to agree that there is a need to follow nutildah's vague-ass checklist, but maybe if you would like to try to contribute something productive to any forum source members who you believe are "overly" generous, you might want to consider providing a checklist of nutildah's smerit sending criteria (wish-list), and maybe at least some of us could get some positive (rather than whining) feedback from uie-pooie about potential positive actionable ways forward... instead of having your dumb ass second-guessing members who are likely already spending quite a bit of time in their own ways of contributing to the forum that just happens to differ from your own wishful preferences of how the world/forum should be.

I don't usually count pictures been sent there as they're indicated on spreadsheet as denied post but to make things easier if the campaign continues all members will be requested not to engage on the thread.
Well, I don't want to tell people where they can or can't post.

Good!  At least you are not that fucking stupid, and you realize that there are circumstances in which negative ramifications might end up resulting from your ongoing whining and harassing of mostly well-intended forum members.

I just don't understand the purpose of counting their posts in places where their signature isn't shown. I realize their avatar is still shown. You don't have announce or change anything, but the whole purpose of disabling signatures in that thread is to deter spam posts there.

Yes, and we know that you would like to disable the sending of smerits in the WO thread too.. but instead, you decide to post about your issue in this particular thread that has my name in it.. which this thread was kind-of, but not really, an exaggeration of your earlier thread that was more supposedly focusing on smerit sending and bullying of smerit sending in the WO thread..

As you can see from your below post, you claimed victory in that earlier thread since you were able to conjure up 38 yes votes and you were also able to get one merit source member (El Duderino in the case of your claimed victory) to agree to try to move in the direction of kowtowing towards your whining about supposed problems.

Poll has finally ended. 38 for Yes and 59 No. Not completely surprising, but for the 38 people who voted Yes, well let me just say I am proud of you.

There's been a considerable dropoff in merit farming in the WO since I opened this thread (although it still exists to a certain degree). I reckon I will re-open and bump it if it picks back up again.

At least Duderino seems like he's considering being more selective with merits, so that's good.

Just a reminder to all merit sources, you don't need to give away all your source merits! Ideally you are giving them out for good posts that demonstrate the slightest inkling of original thought, and not just for copy/pasted tweets about number going up, or because somebody expresses admiration for you or agrees with you. I dunno, I guess the takeaway is don't let yourself be so easily fooled and manipulated. Its happened to me a few times, nobody's perfect, but let's not consistently reward low effort copy/paste posts. It just leads to a multiplication of such posts in what is arguably the best thread on the forum.


1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!