🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Orpichukwu]

he is running an affiliate website, so unless the casino affiliate deal is profitable for him, he doesn't care whether a casino is true NO KYC or not.

No, this tells exactly the main point and reason why the OP has only listed some specific casinos in theirs and has ignored answering some questions on this thread about why some casinos which are obviously known to be KYC casinos are still there as No KYC. The level ratings are just some sort of way to justify himself, but as long as a casino has KYC in their TOS, it shouldn't be listed on a platform which promises to promote No KYC.

[dewez]

I think l0tt0.com should be added as well.

It is a true NO KYC Casino. It isn't even possible to complete KYC there  

I will mention @dewez here, the owner.

Heeeey.. did someone say L0TT0?

it's all true, we're dope as fuck.

[Promocodeudo]

Borrowing money to compensate gambling loses? That's a very foolish idea by people people who do it,  it's high time for people to acknowledge that gambling is not the most reliable place to make wealth since luck plays major role in it. If losers want to compensate themselves, they should start by gambling with what they can afford to lose so they don't get triggered to borrow money when they lose, taking loans to compensate themselves is like going from bad to worst.

As long as some gamblers still think that gambling is strictly for them to make quick and more money, it will be difficult for things like them to stop, when I hear things like this then I ask if those that do this aren't aware that they are suppose to gamble accordingly and it should be with amount that's within their power so that they won't think about trying to recover their losses which may not be easy s such,Isome told me that there's no good thing about gambling and I just answered him immediately that he does no know what his saying, I told him what about those that gamble for fun or entertainment, when he said that the thing that came to my mind is that, this guy may likely be among those that feel that gambling should be about winning and nothing, sorry I deviated, the thing is that we should do everything we can, to gamble responsibly.

[michellee]

That will happens to those who can't control themselves. They will tempting chasing the wins or recover their losses. But they don't have to borrow money to playing gambling because they will have more risks later especially if they lose all money. We never know what people who borrowing money from others. We can't controls what they will do especially after they have money from us. But if we know, we may think twice not to gives them money if they wants to borrow money.

It's important to ask a loanee what they intend to use they money for before giving it out, I think institutions that give out loans do request such informations from their customers too so it's not bad if individual lenders do same, atleast to be sure that the loanee is actually using the money for a good cause. Nowadays online gambling has made it tough to detect addicted gamblers cause they do it privately compared to when people go to traditional casinos and betting shops to gamble. Well you're right that we can't controls what loanees would do with the money they borrow but questioning them before giving out money matters alot.

Even if the lenders do same, asking the details information from the customers, that still not guarantee their customers would pay in the right time. If he often run from the lenders, he will leaves and not pay at the time.

If those people addicted to gambling, they will not telling to others. If they need money, they may asks to people in their circle with so many reasons. We must make sure asking their reason although they can lie to us. But we don't have to lend them the amount that we can't.

[Odohu]

he is running an affiliate website, so unless the casino affiliate deal is profitable for him, he doesn't care whether a casino is true NO KYC or not.

This make logical sense to be honest but I can't confirm if that is the whole truth. Assuming you are correct, I don't find that idea perfect for a platform that is championing No KYC in casino business. The right thing would have been to list every verified and confirmed no KYC casinos irrespective of whether their affiliate program is robust or not. As long as every platform have some form of reward for affiliate marketing so there is no reason not to list any genuine no KYC platform. So, I believe that they will review and add the casino in a matter of time.

[bitmover]

I think l0tt0.com should be added as well.

It is a true NO KYC Casino. It isn't even possible to complete KYC there 

I will mention @dewez here, the owner.

if OP adds l0tt0.com, that would maybe be the first or second real NO KYC casino on his misleading list. but i doubt he would do that.
he is running an affiliate website, so unless the casino affiliate deal is profitable for him, he doesn't care whether a casino is true NO KYC or not.

I see no problem in running an affiliate website of no kyc casinos.... but he must add true no kyc casinos, even they do not have a good affiliate deal. Otherwise it will look bad in the community

There is no reason not to add l0tt0.

[Son Of Blockchain (SOB)]

he is running an affiliate website, so unless the casino affiliate deal is profitable for him, he doesn't care whether a casino is true NO KYC or not.

This makes logical sense to be honest but I can't confirm if that is the whole truth. Assuming you are correct, I don't find that idea perfect for a platform that is championing No KYC in casino business. The right thing would have been to list every verified and confirmed no KYC casinos irrespective of whether their affiliate program is robust or not. As long as every platform have some form of reward for affiliate marketing so there is no reason not to list any genuine no KYC platform. So, I believe that they will review and add the casino in a matter of time.

Is it right for non kyc casinos to request kyc from defaulters? I know they can void winnings or block defaulters from having access to their accounts but isn't it against their policy to be promoting non kyc then request for it later, although i feel they have right when it comes to defaulters but I just want to be sure.

[Zwei]

I see no problem in running an affiliate website of no kyc casinos.... but he must add true no kyc casinos, even they do not have a good affiliate deal. Otherwise it will look bad in the community

neither do i have a problem with that (there is nothing wrong with wanting to make money as an affiliate), but the way OP is going about it is wrong for what he claims his site is about.

There is no reason not to add l0tt0.

i agree

Is it right for non kyc casinos to request kyc from defaulters?

what do you mean by defaulters?

I know they can void winnings or block defaulters from having access to their accounts but isn't it against their policy to be promoting non kyc then request for it later, although i feel they have right when it comes to defaulters but I just want to be sure.

it's the wild west out here, crypto casinos can do whatever they want, so you can never be sure. the best you can do is play at a reputable and trusted casino with a low % of unresolved or no issues.

[virasog]

Is it right for non kyc casinos to request kyc from defaulters? I know they can void winnings or block defaulters from having access to their accounts but isn't it against their policy to be promoting non kyc then request for it later, although i feel they have right when it comes to defaulters but I just want to be sure.

First of all, While the NO-KYC means that we can signup, deposit, play and withdrawals without uploading any KYC documents but that doesn't mean that they can't ask for KYC ever. Usually such casinos have a line in their terms and conditions that casino reserve the right to do KYC in exceptional circumstances.

So, with this in mind, the casino can ask KYC from defaulters too especially if the casino suspects Fraud suspicion, Bonus abuse, Large withdrawals and even Suspicious betting patterns from the gamblers.

[examplens]

he is running an affiliate website, so unless the casino affiliate deal is profitable for him, he doesn't care whether a casino is true NO KYC or not.

This make logical sense to be honest but I can't confirm if that is the whole truth.

I don't know about the casino part, but this swap widget for instant exchange that it has is an affiliate Exolix exchange. This is completely legitimate, although I'm not sure how much Exolix can be claimed to be a truly no-kyc exchange. In order for a user to receive a refund without KYC, they would have to request an AML analysis from Exolix before starting the swap. As far as I can see, there is no such thing here. So, there is a risk.