🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[GiftedMAN]

Casinos will always ask for KYC information from their players when I they find out that one of their players is either cheating nor trying to do money laundering. Truly must casinos that are genuine at offering no KYC services for gamblers are actually good at what they do and will not ask for verification from players except they suspected that something is wrong.
There are only few casinos that provide this kind of service for gamblers and majority will ask for KYC verification for their users.

If casinos suspect anything like cheating from their customers they can decide to ask for kyc if they have not asked that before but in a situation where they have all the details of the customers and they still do not want the customers to to have access to their accounts it becomes a problem. In the casse of money laundering, the casinos have the right to investigate the account of the customers to ensure they do not use them to launder money which could be a big problem to them but where there is no issues it becomes a bad decision to the casino if they decide to ask for kyc when they are a non kyc casinos but they do this to withhold the winning of the customers.

[Gentle_Soul]

he is running an affiliate website, so unless the casino affiliate deal is profitable for him, he doesn't care whether a casino is true NO KYC or not.

This makes logical sense to be honest but I can't confirm if that is the whole truth. Assuming you are correct, I don't find that idea perfect for a platform that is championing No KYC in casino business. The right thing would have been to list every verified and confirmed no KYC casinos irrespective of whether their affiliate program is robust or not. As long as every platform have some form of reward for affiliate marketing so there is no reason not to list any genuine no KYC platform. So, I believe that they will review and add the casino in a matter of time.

Is it right for non kyc casinos to request kyc from defaulters? I know they can void winnings or block defaulters from having access to their accounts but isn't it against their policy to be promoting non kyc then request for it later, although i feel they have right when it comes to defaulters but I just want to be sure.

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.
For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

[Pmalek]

For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

Change the way you think about identity verification at crypto casinos. On one side you should put casinos that require KYC and where you know that you will be asked to verify yourself. On the other side, put crypto casinos where you will maybe be required to undergo KYC. That's it.

You can add a third and much smaller group if you want, and that one should consist of truly no KYC casinos that aren't licensed and thus there is no regulator requiring them to verify their players. Add to that group also those gambling sites that mention in their T&Cs that KYC will never be requested.

[virasog]

Change the way you think about identity verification at crypto casinos. On one side you should put casinos that require KYC and where you know that you will be asked to verify yourself. On the other side, put crypto casinos where you will maybe be required to undergo KYC. That's it.

I wished it were that simple, but unfortunately, it is not. I do not say that all KYC casino aren't scam and all the non-KYC casino are scam but there are some bad fishes and they usually will block the big withdrawals and ask for KYC and then never approve the KYC so that they do not have to process the withdrawals. This way they keep running the casino, process small withdrawals and use KYC as a tool to scam selectively. 

That is the reason some people prefer to do KYC early one after making the account even on the Non-KYC casino to avoid such issues. But yeah the scam casino can still stop your withdrawals even if we have KYC passed.

[Barikui1]

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.
For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

Take a look at your highlighted statement again and the first paragraph, don't you think that you are contradicting yourself?
Because most casinos always say that their casino is not a mandatory kyc casino, but kyc will be demanded if they suspect any fraudulent activity from your account, so it's just like saying one thing, but when they sense something fishy going on, kyc must be demanded for safety measures, that's what it is bro.

[khaled0111]

Take a look at your highlighted statement again and the first paragraph, don't you think that you are contradicting yourself?

I don’t see much contradiction in what he said, to be honest.
In the first sentence, he talked about casinos that ask for kyc when they suspect the user is cheating, but in the second sentence, he talked about casinos that enforce identity verification before withdrawals (for all users), even if there is no suspicion.
So, he was basically trying to highlight how two casinos that promote themselves as non-kyc can operate differently.

[mitchr4]

...
All regulated casinos have KYC because not only casinos have to pay taxes but also must pay taxes the gamblers that wins money in casino.
But nobody likes to pay taxes, not players not casinos.

That makes sense, but I think KYC exists mainly for AML purposes. The tax part is more of a side effect rather than the primary reason. But still, nobody likes to pay taxes and that's exactly why No-KYC casinos are so attractive. Players just want to avoid those transaction records being exposed, mainly for privacy reasons.

[arwin100]

...
All regulated casinos have KYC because not only casinos have to pay taxes but also must pay taxes the gamblers that wins money in casino.
But nobody likes to pay taxes, not players not casinos.

That makes sense, but I think KYC exists mainly for AML purposes. The tax part is more of a side effect rather than the primary reason. But still, nobody likes to pay taxes and that's exactly why No-KYC casinos are so attractive. Players just want to avoid those transaction records being exposed, mainly for privacy reasons.

Its not all about taxes, since those regulated casinos been required to do KYC main to possible prevent those fraudulent activities like money laundering scheme and make sure the casino still in compliant with the law.

Taxes is not actually main intention because government provably have different programs to mandate the casino to pay their obligations to them. Understandable that no one actually like to pay taxes but they cannot do anything since this is part of making gambling industry legal.

[MainIbem]

Take a look at your highlighted statement again and the first paragraph, don't you think that you are contradicting yourself?

I don’t see much contradiction in what he said, to be honest.
In the first sentence, he talked about casinos that ask for kyc when they suspect the user is cheating, but in the second sentence, he talked about casinos that enforce identity verification before withdrawals (for all users), even if there is no suspicion.
So, he was basically trying to highlight how two casinos that promote themselves as non-kyc can operate differently.

Yeah they have their different mode of operation but I prefer a casino that's very transparent and act accordingly to their TOS not the ones that would claim to be KYC free but later request for it even when a customer didn't cheat or go against their TOS just because maybe the person won a huge offer.

[mvdheuvel1983]

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.
For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

Don't you think it's complicated for a non kyc casino to suddenly demand for kyc verification from her customers because they suspect suspect something that is unusual, a non kyc casinos should do better instead of demanding a mandatory kyc from customers when they suspect a customer but they can come up with something else since they do not support kyc which is the reason why most people decide to use them because they do not what to reveal their identity online.

A casino that supports KYC can go ahead to demand KYC from customers anytime since it is boldly written that they support kyc but if the customers have already done their verification then there's no need to ask them to do it again.

[Joy- maker]

If casinos suspect anything like cheating from their customers they can decide to ask for kyc if they have not asked that before but in a situation where they have all the details of the customers and they still do not want the customers to to have access to their accounts it becomes a problem. In the casse of money laundering, the casinos have the right to investigate the account of the customers to ensure they do not use them to launder money which could be a big problem to them but where there is no issues it becomes a bad decision to the casino if they decide to ask for kyc when they are a non kyc casinos but they do this to withhold the winning of the customers.

Casinos request for KYC Even when they clearly stated on their platforms that they are KYC free, but they do request for customers to verify themselves sometimes when they notice suspicious activity, large withdrawal and compliance with regulations. And at this point any customer who refuse verification may be denied withdrawal or restricted. Always Remember this, casinos believe that, before anyone will register on their platforms the person must have agreed to their terms and condition and also to the once that may apply later as time goes on.  

[maydna]

If casinos suspect anything like cheating from their customers they can decide to ask for kyc if they have not asked that before but in a situation where they have all the details of the customers and they still do not want the customers to to have access to their accounts it becomes a problem. In the casse of money laundering, the casinos have the right to investigate the account of the customers to ensure they do not use them to launder money which could be a big problem to them but where there is no issues it becomes a bad decision to the casino if they decide to ask for kyc when they are a non kyc casinos but they do this to withhold the winning of the customers.

Casinos request for KYC Even when they clearly stated on their platforms that they are KYC free, but they do request for customers to verify themselves sometimes when they notice suspicious activity, large withdrawal and compliance with regulations. And at this point any customer who refuse verification may be denied withdrawal or restricted. Always Remember that, casinos believe that, before anyone will register on their platforms the person must have agreed to their terms and condition and also to once that may apply later as time goes on.  

If customer don't wants following casinos rules, they can search for other casinos. But they will get almost the same rules so they will difficult to skip that process.

Casino don't wants trouble happens to their business so they must make sure that they still control it. They don't want customers steal their money so casinos asks customers doing KYC to check everything.

Customers should be ready if that happens to them so they will verify it and they can continue withdrawal process.

[adultcrypto]

Is it right for non kyc casinos to request kyc from defaulters? I know they can void winnings or block defaulters from having access to their accounts but isn't it against their policy to be promoting non kyc then request for it later, although i feel they have right when it comes to defaulters but I just want to be sure.

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.
For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

Please learn not to be too comfortable with KYC because you might be performing KYC with clear intentions but you can't guarantee what they will do with your data. There are many ways KYC can work against you if it lands in the wrong hands and the notable ones is selling them to criminals who can use them for crimes you know nothing about. Apart from this, enforcing KYC goes against the essence of bitcoin which makes for privacy. Hence, you should try as much as you can to avoid KYC because it really do not have any advantage to you.

[Rockson1]

Don't you think it's complicated for a non kyc casino to suddenly demand for kyc verification from her customers because they suspect suspect something that is unusual, a non kyc casinos should do better instead of demanding a mandatory kyc from customers when they suspect a customer but they can come up with something else since they do not support kyc which is the reason why most people decide to use them because they do not what to reveal their identity online.

A casino that supports KYC can go ahead to demand KYC from customers anytime since it is boldly written that they support kyc but if the customers have already done their verification then there's no need to ask them to do it again.

I do not think there is anything complicating anywhere so far they suspected something not like trying to use it as an excuse to either delay or restrict a gambler from withdrawing his winning, do not get wrong here, if I may ask you which other way can you suggest for non kyc to go about a situation like this if it occurs, of course I understand that the reason why many gamblers will always opt for non kyc casinos is because they will not want their identity to be known by anyone but in the case fraud or any suspicious stuff, don't you think casinos should act differently at that moment to save their head, though I'm just asking.

[Donneski]

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.
For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

Take a look at your highlighted statement again and the first paragraph, don't you think that you are contradicting yourself?
Because most casinos always say that their casino is not a mandatory kyc casino, but kyc will be demanded if they suspect any fraudulent activity from your account, so it's just like saying one thing, but when they sense something fishy going on, kyc must be demanded for safety measures, that's what it is bro.

I don’t really see a contradiction from what he said though. No KYC in practice usually means smooth access unless your account triggers red flags. From what I know, that’s the standard across many crypto casinos and it’s more about security than changing the rules midway. The problem only starts when that line is abused to delay payouts unnecessarily.

[Franklyn-wood]

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.
For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

Take a look at your highlighted statement again and the first paragraph, don't you think that you are contradicting yourself?
Because most casinos always say that their casino is not a mandatory kyc casino, but kyc will be demanded if they suspect any fraudulent activity from your account, so it's just like saying one thing, but when they sense something fishy going on, kyc must be demanded for safety measures, that's what it is bro.

I don’t really see a contradiction from what he said though. No KYC in practice usually means smooth access unless your account triggers red flags. From what I know, that’s the standard across many crypto casinos and it’s more about security than changing the rules midway. The problem only starts when that line is abused to delay payouts unnecessarily.

KYC is important not just to the casino company but also to individuals, it helps for easy access to rectify issues online mostly when it's about payments or other forms of transactions that needs the customers information to process it.
We most times look at the other way round when we are talking about KYC, it's very important to have a complete record before engaging in any online registration whether or not it is required from you .

[Wakate]

Casinos request for KYC Even when they clearly stated on their platforms that they are KYC free, but they do request for customers to verify themselves sometimes when they notice suspicious activity, large withdrawal and compliance with regulations. And at this point any customer who refuse verification may be denied withdrawal or restricted. Always Remember that, casinos believe that, before anyone will register on their platforms the person must have agreed to their terms and condition and also to once that may apply later as time goes on.  

If customer don't wants following casinos rules, they can search for other casinos. But they will get almost the same rules so they will difficult to skip that process.

Casino don't wants trouble happens to their business so they must make sure that they still control it. They don't want customers steal their money so casinos asks customers doing KYC to check everything.

Customers should be ready if that happens to them so they will verify it and they can continue withdrawal process.

It is true and there is no way gamblers can escape from most of those trap terms and conditions casinos do make so that they can catch us from a different interpretations. Even if a gambler leave a casino and go for the next one, it will also look like the same and this is to make sure that they don't get caught in case when their players sue them to court, it will be less likely for the player to win them.
Casino rules can be very manipulative and this is to those casinos that have intention to scam maybe in the future.

[Bushdark]

Toshi.bet is a true No KYC Crypto Casino. Can't see the casino in your list. Would you mind taking a look and list it?

Yes I think you are right but I have not taken my time to play bet there which I know I will not fail to run some bets there as time goes on. They have both sportbook and casino games with high RTP which can increase gamblers winning rate.
There are only few No KYC casinos on this forum that will not bother gamblers about forceful KYC verification process. KYC casinos will always ask you and if you failed to complete it, your fund will be frozen.

"no-kyc" casinos do it too, but only when they want to or they think you are sus

I have not seen much complaints about Non KYC casinos stressing their users about a compulsory KYC verification except if they are scam or if they are trying to seek for the deanonymity of a player that looks suspicious due to their pattern of playing and how quick they are making profits.

 Non KYC cainsos may ask for your information is the need arises but it is a different case for a KYC casinos that will freeze your funds because you are not able to submit your information to be used to check who you really are.

[Ruttoshi]

Yeah they have their different mode of operation but I prefer a casino that's very transparent and act accordingly to their TOS not the ones that would claim to be KYC free but later request for it even when a customer didn't cheat or go against their TOS just because maybe the person won a huge offer.

This is why a NoKYC casino should write it in their ToS that they can ask customers for KYC if it's needed so that, customers wouldn't feel bad when the casino ask you after winning big or later switch from a NoKYC casino to a KYC one. I know that due to government regulations this can happen.

I prefer casino reputation than a NoKYC casino because I love transparency.

[Zwei]

If there is need for kyc especially for a suspected fraud then I don't see it as a problem but I'm really comfortable with a compulsory kyc as  compulsion in all casinos.

answer this for me then. how is sending your KYC info going to prove you did or didn't do "fraud"? it's just a BS excuse.
also, what does "suspected of fraud" even mean? the casino should have all the data they need, so they either know you did some kind of fraud or they don't.

in case they do, then they can just block the account and confiscate the balance or whatever terms they had the player agree to when making an account.

For a casino to advertise no kyc and later make kyc a compulsion for withdrawal procedures is just not proper it's either kyc or no kyc

that's why no one should trust adverts at face value.