🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Mr Reporter]

Web3 casinos are growing very fast and they might dominate gambling but it will take a very long time. The KYC requirement and the high risk of centralized platform poses are part o things making people go with Web3 gambling. I play in web2 casinos sometimes when I feel they are great. The only problem I see in them is that users connecting wallet to a wrong platform may lead to serious losses.

But sooner or later, Web3 gambling site could asking members doing KYC especially if the regulator monitor them closely and the site becoming centralized and no longer decentralized. With the good services from the casino itself, the chance growing their business will be big so that will attract attention from the regulator to start monitoring their business. Their members will ask why but the casino can't do much except follow the regulators.

Well the correct answer is the even now they have started it already well for now it not much too popular like that but i feel it will happen sooner or later…well how well t do you think it going to drop attention? Well for now it might not be worth it, well if am correct it might only attract crypto den gems to hate KYC…

Already we have seen some some big web3 gambling companies start off since the 2020 tip dates…

[Ronsbit]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

[maydna]

~snip~

Well the correct answer is the even now they have started it already well for now it not much too popular like that but i feel it will happen sooner or later…well how well t do you think it going to drop attention? Well for now it might not be worth it, well if am correct it might only attract crypto den gems to hate KYC…

Already we have seen some some big web3 gambling companies start off since the 2020 tip dates…

I don't know but that depend on the situation where many centralized casinos and people wants more freedom so they will moves to decentralized casinos and web3 could be their choice.

That will only a matter of time before exploding and fills in gambling industry. If people don't get comfortably from existing casinos, they will search for the other options including try the new casinos even they don't experienced.

That will change the face of online gambling to looks different.

[Odohu]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter.

In theory, your argument is right but in reality, it does not always work that way. There are many reasons a no KYC casino may ask for KYC especially when it has to do with their TOS being violated. Running a casino is not always easy because there are a lot of people who are constantly looking for opportunity to exploit the casino, the only way to check that is to enforce KYC where necessary. In addition, the authorities might also force the casinos to show records of monitoring money laundering and other illicit activities.

[ultrloa]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter.

In theory, your argument is right but in reality, it does not always work that way. There are many reasons a no KYC casino may ask for KYC especially when it has to do with their TOS being violated. Running a casino is not always easy because there are a lot of people who are constantly looking for opportunity to exploit the casino, the only way to check that is to enforce KYC where necessary. In addition, the authorities might also force the casinos to show records of monitoring money laundering and other illicit activities.

This is really how those NO KYC claims will get defeated, since the time will really came that the casino would ask this. Especially if they want to verify something, this is the reason why I don't believe on No KYC claims marketed by the casino. Because eventually if you read their TOS they hide it their the real situation that will happen to their players.

Its not easy to operate a casino, because they provably have many things need to consider. But if the casino have lots of experience for running such business for sure that they have an idea on how to combat exploits and other illegal matters on their casino.

[MainIbem]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter.

In theory, your argument is right but in reality, it does not always work that way. There are many reasons a no KYC casino may ask for KYC especially when it has to do with their TOS being violated. Running a casino is not always easy because there are a lot of people who are constantly looking for opportunity to exploit the casino, the only way to check that is to enforce KYC where necessary. In addition, the authorities might also force the casinos to show records of monitoring money laundering and other illicit activities.

I wonder why someone would think that they'll violate a casinos terms of service then expected them not to take drastic measures, they'll keep to their own terms by maintaining the No KYC policy but once they find anything suspicious that relates with fraud or money laundering from any customer then they'll have to ask for KYC from such customer. Every casino have a policy that customers should learn to abide to so they don't end up facing the consequences of going against the casinos policy whether they support No KYC or not.

[Gentle_Soul]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

That's exactly how it is supposed to be but most times some of this casinos tend to just raise alarms even when everything is in order maybe probably you won a hug sum and wants to withdraw they just step in and begin to think that there is a theft on the account, have seen circumstances where a casino put a restriction on an account simply because the person won a certain amount and wants to withdraw then started saying that someone already logged into the same account using the detail and that was how all the funds got lost so I think it should always be spelt out and they should always abide by there own policies.

[khaled0111]

have seen circumstances where a casino put a restriction on an account simply because the person won a certain amount and wants to withdraw then started saying that someone already logged into the same account using the detail and that was how all the funds got lost so I think it should always be spelt out and they should always abide by there own policies.

Can you point to a single case where something like this has happened?
I'm really curious because I have been very active on the scam accusation board but I have never seen this happen. A casino might accuse a user of multi-accounting, but I have never seen a case where a casino withholds a user’s funds simply because they believe someone else was in control of the user’s account. That’s a bit strange!

[Franklyn-wood]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

That's exactly how it is supposed to be but most times some of this casinos tend to just raise alarms even when everything is in order maybe probably you won a hug sum and wants to withdraw they just step in and begin to think that there is a theft on the account, have seen circumstances where a casino put a restriction on an account simply because the person won a certain amount and wants to withdraw then started saying that someone already logged into the same account using the detail and that was how all the funds got lost so I think it should always be spelt out and they should always abide by there own policies.

The person involved in this should go through the policy of the casino, they must have stated it in there, that in situations like this KYC would be needed to be able to certify that he was the owner of the account for the safety of the client and the image of the casino.
If truly someone logged in to that acount previously before he logged in into the account the casino in the securing that account might require kyc. The amount won also might be against the policies of the casino. Reading through the policy to know if truly he has defaulted before taking any decisions concerning the casin.

[Sarah Jordan]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

Since this is a NoKYC platform and I am not obligated to provide any personal details. I think my withdrawal issue shouldn't involve a large or suspicious amount, and it has not been flagged by the security department. I expect this to be resolved on your end using the information available to you on the platform.

Furthermore your stance should be based on these:
You are not providing personal details.
The issue is small and routine.
It is their responsibility to fix it.
They have all they need on their side to resolve it.

[BADERO]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter.

In theory, your argument is right but in reality, it does not always work that way. There are many reasons a no KYC casino may ask for KYC especially when it has to do with their TOS being violated. Running a casino is not always easy because there are a lot of people who are constantly looking for opportunity to exploit the casino, the only way to check that is to enforce KYC where necessary. In addition, the authorities might also force the casinos to show records of monitoring money laundering and other illicit activities.

The regulatory pressure is real too and even the offshore ones have to show some kind of monitoring for AML these days, or they risk getting leaned on. So no KYC is often just marketing until the numbers get big enough that their risk system (or compliance team) kicks in

[arwin100]

have seen circumstances where a casino put a restriction on an account simply because the person won a certain amount and wants to withdraw then started saying that someone already logged into the same account using the detail and that was how all the funds got lost so I think it should always be spelt out and they should always abide by there own policies.

Can you point to a single case where something like this has happened?
I'm really curious because I have been very active on the scam accusation board but I have never seen this happen. A casino might accuse a user of multi-accounting, but I have never seen a case where a casino withholds a user’s funds simply because they believe someone else was in control of the user’s account. That’s a bit strange!

This is really strange incident and I don't encounter someone posted same like issues here in Bitcointalk.

But I don't see any reliable information about if it already happens on a crypto casinos. If there's a casino using that excuse it shows that they are really crazy for dropping that reasoning and its just show how bad their casino for trying to avoid paying the winnings of their players.

That case is really questionable.

[Hazink]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

Some casinos say that they are no KYC casinos in promotion and on their front page, but when you go down to read through their ToS you will notice they have it on their ToS, the full right to ask for KYC whenever they suspect something, which that includes even when you want to make a large withdrawal It's on them to decide what they find suspicious and if you want to avoid such experience better to avoid using casino of such be with full KYCed casino if you must than to fall into such fraud act carried out by those who claims not to ask for KYC.

[tbct_mt2]

Some casinos say that they are no KYC casinos in promotion and on their front page, but when you go down to read through their ToS you will notice they have it on their ToS, the full right to ask for KYC whenever they suspect something, which that includes even when you want to make a large withdrawal It's on them to decide what they find suspicious and if you want to avoid such experience better to avoid using casino of such be with full KYCed casino if you must than to fall into such fraud act carried out by those who claims not to ask for KYC.

It's marketing strategy as they try to advertise their casinos as no KYC for getting new users while in fact, in their ToS, there are terms about special reasons to trigger KYC on their casinos.

Special situations can be defined very vaguely and openly enough in ToS, so that such casinos can pull their KYC cards against users anytime. This is not like a fair way with users, as many people don't spend time for checking FAQs and ToS, so if they quickly believe in what is advertised by such shady casinos, later they will have problems with KYC and accounts as well as funds might have issues too.

[Rockson1]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

Some casinos say that they are no KYC casinos in promotion and on their front page, but when you go down to read through their ToS you will notice they have it on their ToS, the full right to ask for KYC whenever they suspect something, which that includes even when you want to make a large withdrawal It's on them to decide what they find suspicious and if you want to avoid such experience better to avoid using casino of such be with full KYCed casino if you must than to fall into such fraud act carried out by those who claims not to ask for KYC.

This has also exposed further the reason and the importance of reading through casinos TOS to know what to expect at anytime, with what you have stated, this should be a good insight for gamblers to understand that even though a casino is saying that they are NoKyc, there should be confirmation to that, but I think a Nokyc casino can ask for KYC when a situation calls for that, in a situation where the regulatory body ask that the account of a player should as a matter of urgency be investigated, as much as I know, casinos don't just operate on their own unless the shady ones that present different lies to scam players

[JoyceBTC]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

It has actually come to a point where I don’t believe any casino has no KYC because even those that claim no KYC along the line or during some withdrawals they will still ask for it.
They just use no KYC as a marketing strategy to attract lot of customers since they know much people will be attracted to use a no KYC casino, which is less stressful and faster to use and since there are also a lot of gamblers that try avoiding casinos that ask for KYC. Even most of no KYC casinos include the request of KYC in their TOS but since most gamblers fail to read TOS, we conclude KYC will not be required.

[Mandoy]

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter. Then one can be required to provide some details or information which is necessary that they comply to get their money if they are genuine. Aside from this, even when discussing with customer service,  you are not expected to give any details about you to them because it is a no KYC platform so they will have to handle the situation in a way that best suits resolving the complaints at that moment since it doesn't involve a huge amount and it didn't attract the attention of the security department.

Some casinos say that they are no KYC casinos in promotion and on their front page, but when you go down to read through their ToS you will notice they have it on their ToS, the full right to ask for KYC whenever they suspect something, which that includes even when you want to make a large withdrawal It's on them to decide what they find suspicious and if you want to avoid such experience better to avoid using casino of such be with full KYCed casino if you must than to fall into such fraud act carried out by those who claims not to ask for KYC.

This has also exposed further the reason and the importance of reading through casinos TOS to know what to expect at anytime, with what you have stated, this should be a good insight for gamblers to understand that even though a casino is saying that they are NoKyc, there should be confirmation to that, but I think a Nokyc casino can ask for KYC when a situation calls for that, in a situation where the regulatory body ask that the account of a player should as a matter of urgency be investigated, as much as I know, casinos don't just operate on their own unless the shady ones that present different lies to scam players

While I would agree that No KYC is not a term to be taken as a given without reading the casino's Terms of Service. There are casino promotions that do not require it.I agree that No KYC shouldn't always be taken for granted. As there are casino promotions that don't require it either. There are platforms that claim to be an no-KYC platform. But they still may ask for verification in the case of suspicious activity, compliance concerns, and unusually large withdrawals. But that doesn't mean they are necessarily scams; many online casinos are licensed and bound by more regulations and anti-money laundering protocols. It's all about transparency. Players should be aware of the situations in which KYC might be asked and avoid any unpleasant surprises when it will be time to withdraw winnings.

[Wakate]

While I would agree that No KYC is not a term to be taken as a given without reading the casino's Terms of Service. There are casino promotions that do not require it.I agree that No KYC shouldn't always be taken for granted. As there are casino promotions that don't require it either. There are platforms that claim to be an no-KYC platform. But they still may ask for verification in the case of suspicious activity, compliance concerns, and unusually large withdrawals. But that doesn't mean they are necessarily scams; many online casinos are licensed and bound by more regulations and anti-money laundering protocols. It's all about transparency. Players should be aware of the situations in which KYC might be asked and avoid any unpleasant surprises when it will be time to withdraw winnings.

No KYC casinos are under the jurisdiction of the government and even though their license allow them to ask for simple information from their players that do not mean that they will not ask for more information from players that their activities looks very suspicious. Many cheaters and scammers especially the money launders often take advantage of the no KYC casinos hoping that the casino team will not ask for their information making huge deposits from hacked wallets to bypass the government interference in their transactions. No KYC casinos can get themselves in problem if law officials find frequent transactions that linked to a no KYC casino.

[CroverNo01]

You all have made great points on the issue of KYC  but the truth is that, regardless of how strict or not a casino chooses to be with their KYC an its terms, I'm on the opinion that, they should always include it in their terms and services, so that players can always read and understand before choosing to use their platform and except a casino is shady or trying to hide something I think tho terms should be very clear in their  T and C

[GiftedMAN]

You all have made great points on the issue of KYC  but the truth is that, regardless of how strict or not a casino chooses to be with their KYC an its terms, I'm on the opinion that, they should always include it in their terms and services, so that players can always read and understand before choosing to use their platform and except a casino is shady or trying to hide something I think tho terms should be very clear in their  T and C

Have you come across any casino without terms and conditions? I guess the answer is now, users are the ones that usually don't have time to either read or look at it they simply click the agreed button and go on to use the casino then when there is an issue you see them regretting their actions. I know that some casinos have a way of adjusting their terms of service just to favour them but before the registration of any casino I believe they have their terms of service they can't do without it cause players will use it against them if there is a case in the future.