🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Gentle_Soul]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

Is this even possible, they claim you are a wrong doer then you also counter by setting terms of how you will proceed with the KYC to clear these problems ?? I don't think these guys are flexible as this, and besides even if they agreed to these terms how would you know that they won't share this data with a third party ?? Definitely no guarantees..

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter.

Point of correction, KYC isn't limited to big amounts.. even an amount as low as a $100 withdraw can put a player on the spotlight unfortunately.. so let's just pick our platforms correctly..

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

[mitchr4]

...

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

It's not always about big amounts. Small transactions can also trigger KYC depending on how the platform's security system works. If the activity looks suspicious, even a small withdrawal can still get flagged. In the no KYC casino, their system doesn't only look at the transaction amount there are other factors that can trigger it and that really depends on each casino's own policy.

[khaled0111]

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

That’s true but mitchr is also correct as it’s not always about how huge the deposited or withdrawn amount is.
Any suspicious activity will trigger kyc even if you try to deposit or withdraw a tiny amount.
For example, if you deposit a few bucks and the casino's security or anti-cheating system detects that the address you deposited from has a high AML risk score then you will most likely be asked to verify your identity and may even be asked about the source of your funds. So, you need to be ready for that.

[MainIbem]

Point of correction, KYC isn't limited to big amounts.. even an amount as low as a $100 withdraw can put a player on the spotlight unfortunately.. so let's just pick our platforms correctly..

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

It's mostly triggered by big money wim or deposit and that's cause they usually suspect money laundering when a very huge amount is deposited by a customer or new customer but it's never limited to small amounts cause sometimes change of IP could cause them to request KYC from customers too, especially if the casino doesn't support the use of VPN. Let's also consider some security reviews like in a case when a particular customer constantly change or request for forgotten password, it could make the casino become suspicious of acc hack and request KYC.

[maydna]

Point of correction, KYC isn't limited to big amounts.. even an amount as low as a $100 withdraw can put a player on the spotlight unfortunately.. so let's just pick our platforms correctly..

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

It's mostly triggered by big money wim or deposit and that's cause they usually suspect money laundering when a very huge amount is deposited by a customer or new customer but it's never limited to small amounts cause sometimes change of IP could cause them to request KYC from customers too, especially if the casino doesn't support the use of VPN. Let's also consider some security reviews like in a case when a particular customer constantly change or request for forgotten password, it could make the casino become suspicious of acc hack and request KYC.

Suspicion will be the reason for casinos to request KYC from us although we don't do anything wrong. We can't do anything but follow their request if we want to still playing there. But we also have an option to leave the casino if we don't want to do KYC. That is our choice and casinos can't force us to do KYC but some people choose to do KYC although they think that is not fair for them. We can ask the casino what triggers someone to do KYC so we can clear for that and avoid the things that can lead us to do KYC if we don't want. But following the regulation, KYC will be mandatory in the future.

[adultcrypto]

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

There are tendency for casinos to scrutinize big winnings as well as big withdrawals but you should also know that when a player wins consistently, even if it is small amounts, such a player will be investigated and one of the ways may be to enforce KYC if other internal games playing patters yields no result. Casinos are in the business to make profits so when a player wins consistently, they spoil a lot of this for the casinos from a business perspective. It is just important to remain clean as a player, that is the only way to be sure that winnings will continue to be received without surprises.

[Donneski]

If you are using a No KYC casino and you encounter withdrawal issues, you do not need to expose your personal details for the matter to be resolved rather if you contact their customer service which will be made available, they will likely ask you to explain yourself and the problems you have encountered so they will try to rectify the problems without making your personal datas or information visible to the public. In a situation where your information is required for your issues to be resolved it's important you note that they can do that but they will not let anyone have access to it.

Is this even possible, they claim you are a wrong doer then you also counter by setting terms of how you will proceed with the KYC to clear these problems ?? I don't think these guys are flexible as this, and besides even if they agreed to these terms how would you know that they won't share this data with a third party ?? Definitely no guarantees..

While using a no KYC casino to play games it is expected to note that in irrespective of whatever happens while withdrawing from the platform, they should not request for any KYC because that is their standing policy except for the case of a suspicious transaction involving a huge amount of money that triggered their security system to stop the process of withdrawal that is when the attention of the security department would be visible on that matter.

Point of correction, KYC isn't limited to big amounts.. even an amount as low as a $100 withdraw can put a player on the spotlight unfortunately.. so let's just pick our platforms correctly..

You are correct kyc isn't only limited to big amounts but I have and discovered that most cases where kyc is required is usually during a transaction that has to do with larger amounts. So I feel like kyc even if in some cases it can be required with small amounts but then its more required dealing with larger amounts.

The thing is a lot people have this misconception that "No Kyc" means a lifetime pass when it actually means "No Kyc at registration". Most of these gambling sites have security software running in the background at all time so when you try to engage in anything that it's strange to them, they automatically ask that you provide your ID, sometimes, you're required to do so even in small transactions.

[Wakate]

It is understandable why those casinos with no presence here are not that popular. The community tends to patronise casino's and exchange which are fully present and active here because they believe that they can be able to communicate with the representative whenever anything comes up. They have access to the representative to easily and quickly report their complaints compared to the online support which they are not too sure if they could give them attention satisfactorily.  It is believed that casinos present here are of good reputation and are likely reliable because they have a name to protect for their brand so they would try everything possible to make sure that they are up and doing to avoid being called out by members because if that happens, they would definitely be out of the market as members would not want to have anything doing with them.

Your explanation is on point and I hope these casino team will understand why they ought to have a presence here on Bitcointalk which can be seen as a contact between players that have complaints and the casino team.
Those casinos that have a presence here will be easy to contact if any person has complaints here about their games and services.
I have trust in casinos that their presentatives are present here so players can easily reach out to them for enquiries.

[Y3shot]

It is possible for a player to be unfairly penalized by a casino or wrongly accused, but I believe most times it is actually due to some errors or little mistakes and to me the first thing to do when in this kind of situation, is not just calling and dragging them on social media platforms and online platforms. The first thing to do, is to complain the Situation to their customer support services and see how it can be resolved. if the casino is believed to be good and reputable casino, I believe the issue can be handled from there. But when your complaint is not attended to and nothing is done about it, then the other option can be as you’ve mentioned by calling them out and they will also try to come forth and clear their name by resolving the issue.

When gamblers have issues like this, in most cases I blame the gamblers because the reason why gamblers get into issues like this is that they don't have the patience to read the information that the casino has, and they end up getting into terrible problems with the casino. If a casino is not giving what they are supposed to offer, customers have the right to call them out because a casino is a service that is supposed to provide all services to customers.

[arwin100]

The thing is a lot people have this misconception that "No Kyc" means a lifetime pass when it actually means "No Kyc at registration". Most of these gambling sites have security software running in the background at all time so when you try to engage in anything that it's strange to them, they automatically ask that you provide your ID, sometimes, you're required to do so even in small transactions.

This misconception can be corrected in first place if they put correct information towards that their KYC rules. If they just put that No KYC thing on their header, many people will just immediately assume that their casino is not implementing that requirements.

That's why its kinda misleading to put that word, while in fact they are writing about possible requirement if they request a user to undergo with this process.

With those cases happen and many cases hide this information's, its really better for people to read the TOS to avoid having those unwanted KYC surprises.

[panjul07]

The thing is a lot people have this misconception that "No Kyc" means a lifetime pass when it actually means "No Kyc at registration". Most of these gambling sites have security software running in the background at all time so when you try to engage in anything that it's strange to them, they automatically ask that you provide your ID, sometimes, you're required to do so even in small transactions.

I do not think it is a misconception but it is more about different point of view when it comes to a term "NoKYC".
In general understanding, NoKYC should be No at all means that KYC wont be asked lifetime.
However, in marketing point of view, NoKYC is only a marketing gimmick to attract players who cares about privacy.
Basically it is reasonable if people expect no kyc at all once a casino claim themselves to be a NoKYC casino but from the casino side, they will still have the right to ask KYC at anytime.

[BADERO]

Your explanation is on point and I hope these casino team will understand why they ought to have a presence here on Bitcointalk which can be seen as a contact between players that have complaints and the casino team.
Those casinos that have a presence here will be easy to contact if any person has complaints here about their games and services.
I have trust in casinos that their presentatives are present here so players can easily reach out to them for enquiries.

Yeah, I totally agree that a casino is more trusted if it is active here on Bitcointalk, but players still need to stay vigilant and keep themselves updated before depositing to any casino. We’ve seen many exit scams from casinos that had been reputable for years