🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[JoyceBTC]

Are people still finding it difficult to understand the difference between a referral site to a casino site? They should try to read when they come across a new thread so they do not get carried away because it the name they see cause a the name sounds different than what it represents. Apart from promoting stake.com I also use stake to gamble and not just stake I have tried some other casinos and they do give me updates though I haven't come across the one that changes it's terms of service. A good casino will update you about any changes so that you don't get confused when you fit things going south.

Reading is a problem for most people. The title of this thread was very clear. It says no KYC crypto casinos. Meaning, casinos that do not support or take KYC. If the title wasn't enough, it wont take much to click on the Ann thread that leads directly to the platform. The interface of the homepage is not similar to a crypto casino. Well, complaining about how long it takes people to understand simple things isn't the solution. The solution is to tell them what is right, even if it will take multiple times before they comprehend.

I think reading is honestly the problem to some members here. Some persons haven’t gone through their platform yet before making some assumptions and I believe it wouldn’t take anything to go through their platform, because it helps us make better decisions , avoid false assumptions and to understand the platform very well. After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

[Donneski]

I checked the Notokyc platform for some good no KYC exchanges but most of the ones I was seeing does not have a signature campaign here on the forum to be sure if they have an escrow that can guarantee users of their money. I saw different no KYC exchanges that are strange but that will not be a issue. This platform does not only have listed casinos but exchanges and also crypto sites.
Winna casino is one of the top rated casinos there and I don't really know why.

You are getting it all wrong or its typographical error. Here it is for uncork casino and not exchanges and ever since the launch of this thread I have gone through and noticed they have most of the casinos here listed there, but they all have KYC enabled on them. The only difference is that most of them don't ask for KC in an instant, which might be the reason why the platform rated it as grade A.

What you said is true. A lot of people nowadays do mistake "No KYC" for 100% anonymous. They fail to understand that many of the "No KYC" tag in these casinos are just for the registration level, the main reason they're rated in Grade A.

It's when you want to make withdrawals that their system demands for KYC before proceeding. That's why users are supposed to make their findings and know the ones that will demand KYC later and the ones that'll never ask for it.

[Barikui1]

. After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

I think it's all about the laziness of most gamblers to read the lengthy terms and conditions of these casinos. I am not going to lie, I also falls into such category on few occasions, especially when am in a hurry, because I sometimes sees it as time wasting or I will be too lazy to read everything, which is not a good thing. But if all gamblers portrays the harbit of reading everything in the terms and conditions before proceeding further, with no assumptions, it would be hard for gamblers and casinos to have issues between them.

[michellee]

. After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

I think it's all about the laziness of most gamblers to read the lengthy terms and conditions of these casinos. I am not going to lie, I also falls into such category on few occasions, especially when am in a hurry, because I sometimes sees it as time wasting or I will be too lazy to read everything, which is not a good thing. But if all gamblers portrays the harbit of reading everything in the terms and conditions before proceeding further, with no assumptions, it would be hard for gamblers and casinos to have issues between them.

That is a mistake if they don't take some time to read the TOS of the casino. They can be hurry to take the promo but without reading the TOS, that might gives trouble to them. Reading the TOS benefits them so they know the rules and avoids making mistake which can affect them later. Maybe they don't have to read all but choosing the important things that they often do. Those gamblers must realize that the TOS exist to reminds them to be careful and not breaking something prohibit by the casino.

[Leahized]

After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

It is very important for everyone to read the tos and it avoids a lot of problems. But if want any gambler, then he can contact live support to know about it.  As far as I know, if a gambler does not commit any irregularities, there will be no problem in withdrawing money. Because when i entering a new casino platform to search. Then i'm first contact CS and trying to know whether kyc is mandatory. Even though kyc is not mandatory their answer is very clear " if users ever act suspiciously, then kyc verification is required as verification"

[Wakate]

After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

It is very important for everyone to read the tos and it avoids a lot of problems. But if want any gambler, then he can contact live support to know about it.  As far as I know, if a gambler does not commit any irregularities, there will be no problem in withdrawing money. Because when i entering a new casino platform to search. Then i'm first contact CS and trying to know whether kyc is mandatory. Even though kyc is not mandatory their answer is very clear " if users ever act suspiciously, then kyc verification is required as verification"

But you know that there has been case where gamblers are being restricted from gambling because they are making too much from the casino quickly which looks like a threat to them. Casinos want to be making the money and sometimes they don't like users that have been know to be making huge money from their platform without making any loses at all.

[Gentle_Soul]

Yeah the truth is gamblers really don't take out time to read through the casino rules and also find out really necessary informations about a casino before thinking of weather to use it or not,  when you rush into using a casino without proper information about the casino what they are capable of then you definitely find out in the long run that they probably do not have the reputation and are not worth trying at that moment it might be already too late.

Many gamblers are always victims of not being able to read all that concerns a casino before they use it. Some only focus on deposit and withdrawal limits; they don’t even pay attention to other details which could easily be violated without them knowing, and when someone is unable to read casino policy, how can they have the mind and time to read about the casino review before using it? Some are rushing in because of the bonus they have been offered and don’t want to lose it.

Yeah a whole lot of times the focus is always usually drifted to only withdrawal and  deposit before using a casino which of course is the reason for most of the challenges gamblers have with casinos because they use a casino without paying close details to the necessary things that would be very useful in cause of using the casino so when it comes up later on it, it looks like the casino did not really include it in there rules and regulations meanwhile it's the user who didn't pay attention to details before using the casino. For me I prefer using casinos with a good reputation.

[arwin100]

After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

It is very important for everyone to read the tos and it avoids a lot of problems. But if want any gambler, then he can contact live support to know about it.  As far as I know, if a gambler does not commit any irregularities, there will be no problem in withdrawing money. Because when i entering a new casino platform to search. Then i'm first contact CS and trying to know whether kyc is mandatory. Even though kyc is not mandatory their answer is very clear " if users ever act suspiciously, then kyc verification is required as verification"

But you know that there has been case where gamblers are being restricted from gambling because they are making too much from the casino quickly which looks like a threat to them. Casinos want to be making the money and sometimes they don't like users that have been know to be making huge money from their platform without making any loses at all.

Only scam sites would limit their users if they are winning, I don't like to see a casino doing that on their players. Since that means they are greedy bastards and don't want their players to win.

That indicates that we are playing on wrong casinos and maybe they are doing something to limit our winnings. So if I notice that the casino I'm currently playing doing those controversial matter, I will provably quit playing on their casino. Because fairness truly matters to me and those situation that at least we have chance to win. If that feeling is absent I think there's no sense playing on that casino especially if we know we are going to lose our money in the end.

[khaled0111]

It's when you want to make withdrawals that their system demands for KYC before proceeding. That's why users are supposed to make their findings and know the ones that will demand KYC later and the ones that'll never ask for it.

Based on my experience, most casinos and service providers (reputable ones, of course) that promote themselves as no-kyc usually won't ask for identity verification not only on registration, but also when you make a withdrawal request as long as their security systems don’t flag your account as suspicious.
Ofc, some may argue that as long as they may ask for identity verification (regardless of the reason that led them to do so) then it’s not appropriate to advertise themselves as no-kyc.

[CryptSafe]

After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

It is very important for everyone to read the tos and it avoids a lot of problems. But if want any gambler, then he can contact live support to know about it.  As far as I know, if a gambler does not commit any irregularities, there will be no problem in withdrawing money. Because when i entering a new casino platform to search. Then i'm first contact CS and trying to know whether kyc is mandatory. Even though kyc is not mandatory their answer is very clear " if users ever act suspiciously, then kyc verification is required as verification"

But you know that there has been case where gamblers are being restricted from gambling because they are making too much from the casino quickly which looks like a threat to them. Casinos want to be making the money and sometimes they don't like users that have been know to be making huge money from their platform without making any loses at all.

There have been cases of such nature here on this platform in the past were members were restricted from a casino just for no reason and after much findings, it was observed that the complainant was always on a winning streak for sports betting and it became obvious what he does and in such situations, casinos becomes sceptical of such an account after they have checked and run an investigation on that account and could not find anything to hold onto but rather they restricted him from gambling on their platform. The other complaint that came was that his account was limited to the amount and multiplier so he doesn't win too big beyond what they could afford to payout. The complaints are all on reputation and Sam's board if you dig dip into them you could see it there. So what you have said is true sometimes casinos too are afraid in situations when they do not have a big bank roll, they tend to limit wins and withdrawal to safeguard themselves.

[Bushdark]

Yeah a whole lot of times the focus is always usually drifted to only withdrawal and  deposit before using a casino which of course is the reason for most of the challenges gamblers have with casinos because they use a casino without paying close details to the necessary things that would be very useful in cause of using the casino so when it comes up later on it, it looks like the casino did not really include it in there rules and regulations meanwhile it's the user who didn't pay attention to details before using the casino. For me I prefer using casinos with a good reputation.

I don't see any necessity that will be useful like you may think. Gambling is the duty of individual gambler to be responsible when gambling and to focus on other ways they can make money not only for gambling. Reading through the TOS is the duty of each player to read and anyone that is not interested can walk away from it to never complain when they go against a casino's TOS due to their lack of information about what's written in the term for players to keep an attention to every detail.

[Y3shot]

After registering on a casino and later encounter issues when trying to make withdrawal, and casinos request for KYC, which most gamblers see it as an issue because they fail to read from the beginning about the TOS of the casino.

It is very important for everyone to read the tos and it avoids a lot of problems. But if want any gambler, then he can contact live support to know about it.  As far as I know, if a gambler does not commit any irregularities, there will be no problem in withdrawing money. Because when i entering a new casino platform to search. Then i'm first contact CS and trying to know whether kyc is mandatory. Even though kyc is not mandatory their answer is very clear " if users ever act suspiciously, then kyc verification is required as verification"

If user act in a certain way and the casino demands for kyc this is a different case and this is their right because at this point they need to be sure about the user, but if a user haven't commit any offend or behave in any suspicious way the casino who claims to be no KYC have no right to ask users for kyc when it is time to withdraw. Some casino are not just transparent, they promote no kyc but it is a no kyc during registration but when it comes withdrawal they change the standard.

[Rockson1]

But you know that there has been case where gamblers are being restricted from gambling because they are making too much from the casino quickly which looks like a threat to them. Casinos want to be making the money and sometimes they don't like users that have been know to be making huge money from their platform without making any loses at all.

If casinos restrict a player because a player is having too much winning, the player will have to complain and the matter has to be investigated, although I'm not doubting that there are no shady casinos, of course casinos wants to benefit more that why if some of them abused a gambler of anything, people should not jump into conclusions because some of them can be do anything to stop a player from withdrawing their rewards, in the casino industry there are many of these characters which is why every should be careful of the casino they want to gamble with.

[mitchr4]

...
If casinos restrict a player because a player is having too much winning, the player will have to complain and the matter has to be investigated, although I'm not doubting that there are no shady casinos, of course casinos wants to benefit more that why if some of them abused a gambler of anything, people should not jump into conclusions because some of them can be do anything to stop a player from withdrawing their rewards, in the casino industry there are many of these characters which is why every should be careful of the casino they want to gamble with.

It really does not make sense for a casino to restrict a player just because of a big win. I think this is just a trick from the casino so they do not lose money. It is better to find and play on a platform that is really free from this kind of practice. Whether the casino feels cheated or not is a different matter, because the player right should still be respected if the win is fair. So there should be an investigation first to make sure the win is real, instead of restricting the account right away just because the casino does not want to lose money.

[Ronsbit]

...
If casinos restrict a player because a player is having too much winning, the player will have to complain and the matter has to be investigated, although I'm not doubting that there are no shady casinos, of course casinos wants to benefit more that why if some of them abused a gambler of anything, people should not jump into conclusions because some of them can be do anything to stop a player from withdrawing their rewards, in the casino industry there are many of these characters which is why every should be careful of the casino they want to gamble with.

It really does not make sense for a casino to restrict a player just because of a big win. I think this is just a trick from the casino so they do not lose money. It is better to find and play on a platform that is really free from this kind of practice. Whether the casino feels cheated or not is a different matter, because the player right should still be respected if the win is fair. So there should be an investigation first to make sure the win is real, instead of restricting the account right away just because the casino does not want to lose money.

I agree with your point of view here. Investigation always should be the last resort before any final verdict on an outcome if there is any doubt or suspicion. This will help settle matters amicably if both parties are fare on their paths. For unknown reasons casinos suspends account of players for no reasonable offense and most of the casino's that usually does that are casinos with little or no bankroll to support them. Instead of negotiations after a big win by a player on payment for withdrawal in tranches, they begin to at weird avoiding responsibility when they know what they ought to do. It is absord and unprofessional and all I could say is that we should as much as we can try do findings about casinos we want to play with so that withdrawal would not be an issue whenever we want to make withdrawal because this is always where the problem starts from.

[Barikui1]

It really does not make sense for a casino to restrict a player just because of a big win. I think this is just a trick from the casino so they do not lose money. It is better to find and play on a platform that is really free from this kind of practice. Whether the casino feels cheated or not is a different matter, because the player right should still be respected if the win is fair. So there should be an investigation first to make sure the win is real, instead of restricting the account right away just because the casino does not want to lose money.

Any casino that accuses any of their customer of cheating when he won big, that casino is fraudulent because when he was losing and not getting it right, they did not make any accusation, or restricted his or her account, but it's only when their is a big winning, that's when they came with an excuse to deprive the gambler of his winning, that's nothing but fraud.
Any casino that behave in such a way should be punished according to the law, and gamblers should try to stay off such casino, because what happens to mr A today, might happen to mr B tomorrow.

[Franklyn-wood]

Are people still finding it difficult to understand the difference between a referral site to a casino site? They should try to read when they come across a new thread so they do not get carried away because it the name they see cause a the name sounds different than what it represents. Apart from promoting stake.com I also use stake to gamble and not just stake I have tried some other casinos and they do give me updates though I haven't come across the one that changes it's terms of service. A good casino will update you about any changes so that you don't get confused when you fit things going south.

It's unlikely they are not able to differentiate between a casino site and a casino affiliate or referral site, it's only or mainly because they did not check the site at all. They simply see this announcement thread, see the topic title as No KYC Crypt Casinos and quickly think it as an online casino. Even the topic title is enough to reveal information, as it is about "Crypto Casinos". If people pay a little bit attention, they will realize something to discover more.

It's not a typo in Casinos in the topic title. Overall, it's only about posters who are too lazy, and only make quick posts here for their post quota in their signature campaigns.

Exactly you can easily tell the difference between a casino and a casino affiliate and Hosently, it’s not a gambler's problem cuz if you check a casino site, you’ll find games sports betting and live tables like poker and blackjack. How is it even possible to confuse the two?

Permit me to say that many are not concerned about what the name is, but are looking for a new gambling environment to gamble. So when they see no KYC crypto casino & site on the tread it is believed that there will be enough games to play and better chances of winning is there for them here. Some will not even make research to know if there are hiding laws that may later be implemented at the long run.

[adultcrypto]

What you said is true. A lot of people nowadays do mistake "No KYC" for 100% anonymous. They fail to understand that many of the "No KYC" tag in these casinos are just for the registration level, the main reason they're rated in Grade A.

It's when you want to make withdrawals that their system demands for KYC before proceeding. That's why users are supposed to make their findings and know the ones that will demand KYC later and the ones that'll never ask for it.

You seems to be exaggerating some of your ideas especially with your statement that no KYC only ends with registration in some casinos. That is not completely correct because for a casino to pride itself as no KYC,  then people should be able to register, play and withdraw without mandatory KYC requirement. This does not mean that such casino does not ask for KYC ever, they only ask for KYC when they have the need for that and this must be spelt out in their TOS as I consider that a test of their reputation.

[Promocodeudo]

Permit me to say that many are not concerned about what the name is, but are looking for a new gambling environment to gamble. So when they see no KYC crypto casino & site on the tread it is believed that there will be enough games to play and better chances of winning is there for them here. Some will not even make research to know if there are hiding laws that may later be implemented at the long run.

You're right, but a good gambler that understand that there are things that shouldn't be ignored in any gambling platforms he wants to make use of will first of all Read the Tos of the casino, that's is why it is very much adviceable for gamblers not to be too quick to conclude things, one thing we can not remove from many casinos is their suspicious behaviour, many of them are shady, some say a different thing in their Ann but when you take a close look at their Tos and read it thoroughly there might be some contradiction with that of their Ann which if a gambler is careful, they won't fall for any of those shit, mate no kyc doesn't mean that there will much game to play in such casino, why majority of gambler prefer NoKYC gambling platform is because they don't want their identity to be revealed, I mean they want everything to be secret and it might also be as a result of lack of trust because casinos can be crazy sometimes.

[Odohu]

Permit me to say that many are not concerned about what the name is, but are looking for a new gambling environment to gamble. So when they see no KYC crypto casino & site on the tread it is believed that there will be enough games to play and better chances of winning is there for them here. Some will not even make research to know if there are hiding laws that may later be implemented at the long run.

I don't know where you are getting your information from but no KYC has nothing to do with the number of games in a platform. Some KYC requiring platforms like one of the biggest casino in the forum. On the other hand, there are so many no KYC casinos that do not have too many games apart from the general slots that we all know and few of their original games. So no KYC is more of the requirement to play in a casino than the games featured in the casinos.