[INTEREST CHECK] Alpen Coin "Scam Coin" serie 2

[Spokanistan51]

Would be in again this round for serial #23

[1715438463]

1715438463

[1715438463]

1715438463

[1715438463]

1715438463

[YodasRedRocket]

I’ll take one!  #11 if possible ✌🏼

Thanks 😎

[mortare]

game for #27.

You gonna do a game on this one to?
Maybe give the winner al the private keys so he can swipe us all  

[PreciousMetapsICT]

I will take one - any number (prefer #9 to match my other scam coin serial)

[Hookzup1]

Awesome coin good job 19 or 21 would match my yogged cards

[Xprim777]

lol I'll take one or two if there's any coins left

[MoparMiningLLC]

I am in for my same number - #10

[Cryptogreatdane]

game for #27.

You gonna do a game on this one to?
Maybe give the winner al the private keys so he can swipe us all  

Lol, wow that would make me feel Rekt. Load all the coins but give all the PKs to the winner..lol

[minerjones]

Was chatting with Mopar last night and came up with a few ideas....

Not sure how legit they are but wanted to keep the "scam" theme going

This time we load each coin with 0.001 btc as was the "load" per coin last time

We keep a set of keys to pull off the "scam" which would translate that at the first day of each week, one coins balance would be swept to the winning coin.

So it would translate to a progressive and if people are tempted to see if they have the rolling balance versus just the 0.001 btc

I know this contradicts the "no saving keys" thing...but would definitely be fun

39 weeks worth of saving said keys unless people start to peel.. if winning coin is peeled early, no more funds would get loaded to it

Use blocks to decide whose coin gets swept

Last man standing gets the pot?

And if anyone peels and sweeps - they cant win in the end



Would there another way to do this?
Any other ideas for the scam?

[MoparMiningLLC]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

[minerjones]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

[heisty]

Def interested in this one too! I’d take 1 if available.

[krogothmanhattan]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

   I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds?

   No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins.

   Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others.

[stackinsats777]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

   I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds?

   No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins.

   Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others.

I think you’re mistaken if you think the SBF losing coins have any BTC on them. Only one coin has the BTC and the rest are rekt

[krogothmanhattan]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

   I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds?

   No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins.

   Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others.

I think you’re mistaken if you think the SBF losing coins have any BTC on them. Only one coin has the BTC and the rest are rekt

   ALL the SBF coins have SATS one them ....just that one has more than other...none are REKT...or swept unless the owner decided to do that.

[MoparMiningLLC]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

You can take the pk and load it without sweeping and check balance and then just leave it alone - just saying.

[MoparMiningLLC]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

   I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds?

   No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins.

   Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others.

In the end the result is the same - one coin will be funded and the rest will be empty

[MoparMiningLLC]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

   I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds?

   No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins.

   Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others.

I think you’re mistaken if you think the SBF losing coins have any BTC on them. Only one coin has the BTC and the rest are rekt

   ALL the SBF coins have SATS one them ....just that one has more than other...none are REKT...or swept unless the owner decided to do that.

Incorrect - only one SBF coin has any funds. The rest are empty

[krogothmanhattan]

The hard part is you cant send to the winning coin until the end I think - after the first sweep, everyone could check to see if they got swept funds, if they did not they could sweep as they now know they are not the winner. So maybe every time - sweep funds to an “skam” account and whoever ends up being last one holding a balance, they win. If anyone peels/sweeps their own coin prior to the end would be out of the running then.


After reading yours again - I think we are saying the same thing @minerjones

Well... they wouldn't necessarily know since no one knows which address goes with which coin.
So we would only know that one coin got swept, but not which one

   I respect your ideas fellas....but will that mean that my coin could end up with no funds?

   No disrespect to your ideas...but I would prefer the way we did it the first time...one coin will have a large amount of Sats and the rest have a low amount...this way nobody know who has what and at least everyone will have some Sats in their coins.

   Again, I respect your ideas and I am for whatever Frank or the majority decide...but these are my two Sats on it as I want one of these coins to remind me of what this mother fucka did to me and others.

I think you’re mistaken if you think the SBF losing coins have any BTC on them. Only one coin has the BTC and the rest are rekt

   ALL the SBF coins have SATS one them ....just that one has more than other...none are REKT...or swept unless the owner decided to do that.

Incorrect - only one SBF coin has any funds. The rest are empty

  When the fuck was that decided? I was not aware!

[Eclipse33]

I am in (if coins are still available)

thankyou