Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi

[Yogee]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

This looks like taking a swipe on the women folks but not sure if you are talking about the single ladies, the married or about to. But definitely the sugar daddy is for the women. Are you saying they are busy chasing after sugars and leaving crypto investment for the guys? 

You'll be surprised about the number of simps out there that are paying allowances or sponsoring trips and rents. These ladies don't have to chase since there are already a lot of platforms where they can just "sit" pretty and men will come to them. They'll just post hot and sexy pictures on their instagram and get multiple offers on their DMs. Social media has created a bubble economy for a lot of these women - it's easy money.

[1714678762]

1714678762

[1714678762]

1714678762

[Porfirii]

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

you both go find a hotel.

Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example.

And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties.

[davis196]

But marriage can only happens once in a life,

You haven't heard about divorce? Some people had married several times in their lives.

one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

100 sugar daddies=prostitution if you ask me. Can you tell me what kind of woman could handle 100 sugar daddies at once? I want to meet her.

Boomers got their land for free. You have to pay for land

For free? Land was cheaper decades ago, but it definitely wasn't available for free. In which country do you live?

I have the feeling that OP is trolling us with this post.

In summary. Passive income isn't passive. You have to work hard for "passive income". Even the gold diggers and prostitutes have to work hard for their so called "passive income".

[Mauser]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marrying rich seems like the best way to set yourself up for life without having to worry about money again. As long as you get some children together you don't need to worry about a prenup. This is mainly in place to prevent you from getting a divorce after a few years and taking 50% of his money. The thing is that it's a decision on how you are going to spend the rest of your life, some people might choose love and happiness over money. Having a few sugar daddys doesn't classify as passive income in my opinion, you still have to work for it and make the men happy. Also this only works when you are young, nobody is going to pay for your companionship when you are 40. Eventually you are going to have to live of your own money.

[Renampun]

Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

reflecting on my experience with my partner, we initially didn't have jobs that could give us a stable income, but we still believed that when we were together, all problems would be resolved slowly and now we can still live safely with our two children even though we haven't arrived yet. have a stable income, we are independent and do not depend on our parents, we are sure that if we thought about being stable before getting married then we would not have married until now because we are not yet financially stable.

If possible too before marriage, try not to lived in a rent house and try to found a way to  have your own house.

Marriage should be planned properly and not just you loved each other.

It's difficult to be able to buy your own house when you come from a simple family and don't have a lot of inheritance, especially in a city with quite a lot of people, so renting a house is the only option you have to take, until now my little family and I are still renting in a simple house, slowly but surely we are collecting money to pay off the subsidized housing issued by our country's government in installments.

[wajik-tempe]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

[Gozie51]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

But the realities of things happening to our faces is that growing up incidences have all changed now. There are contract marriages and they are all accepted as marriage. Marriage that was for death do part now has expiring dates set by both parties by consent, such marriage are either to achieve some financial goals and that goes to show how values have been eroded because of the chase of money. Some people don't value the happiness of being together but only what money can provide whether happiness or not. Money is good in marriage but it has to be balanced.

[Fortify]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

As others have said, you shouldn't simply see marriage as a business contract because that can lead to disaster. It's an additional perk that comes out of a loving relationship and should only be considered that way. It is also not some magic bullet to double your own income, but sharing costs, if both people in the marriage work can bring down your expenses considerably. Also, if one partner decides to stay home and actively maintains a household or looks after children, it can make life much easier for both.

[slapper]

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

you both go find a hotel.

Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example.

And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties.

Scalability, scalability, scalability - it's a crucial aspect when considering sources of income, isn’t it? Indeed, every job that exchanges time for money is unscalable. Even little jobs like answering calls or texts demand your time and attention, right?

The initial capital needed to own rental homes is a major obstacle. It's expensive, right? Risk comes next. Find reputable tenants? Will home values rise? The venture is not passive due to many issues and risks. Getting rich enough to buy a private jet? A bit far-fetched.

Your insights emphasize the necessity of scalability and real passivity when researching income streams. Is it not a complicated choice?

[posi]

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

I said "money can't buy happiness but it can maintain happiness", that's just an understatement. And if we speak frankly, what you say is not wrong, but many people still do not believe that happiness today is determined by money, the more money you have, the more opportunities you have to choose a partner.

Marriage was once considered sacred, but today it has also been corrupted by the development of society when money plays an important role in almost every corner of society, love cannot be excluded. Nowadays without money, there will definitely be no love.

[Asuspawer09]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

If you going to marriage for sure you gonna need more funds since you starting a family and that just means soon your gonna have a child and having a child needs a big amount of funds so that you can provide for your child's needs, not to mention since your gonna need to do it on your own and your spouse because you're gonna be apart from your parents so you're not gonna get any support from them anymore.  We are all going to realize how hard life is when we are the ones who need to pay bills, like water, electricity, internet, etc. Even though you feel like you have a good enough job already it's not going to be enough for the most part.

Rental property for sure if one of the most difficult things to achieve since it is just so expensive and could eat up a big percentage of your salary but for sure its going to be necessary since your not living with your parents anymore, there was no cheat that you can do, probably your gonna need to buy your own property first just to avoid renting, so probably what you can do is save a lot of money, invest while you still can and make a lot of sources of your income while your still not marriage.

Sure if we are just talking about finances, maybe the more sugar daddy the more passive income as well, and the more you going to earn, I mean it's gonna work as long as you earn.

[CODE200]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

If you going to marriage for sure you gonna need more funds since you starting a family and that just means soon your gonna have a child and having a child needs a big amount of funds so that you can provide for your child's needs, not to mention since your gonna need to do it on your own and your spouse because you're gonna be apart from your parents so you're not gonna get any support from them anymore.  We are all going to realize how hard life is when we are the ones who need to pay bills, like water, electricity, internet, etc. Even though you feel like you have a good enough job already it's not going to be enough for the most part.

Rental property for sure if one of the most difficult things to achieve since it is just so expensive and could eat up a big percentage of your salary but for sure its going to be necessary since your not living with your parents anymore, there was no cheat that you can do, probably your gonna need to buy your own property first just to avoid renting, so probably what you can do is save a lot of money, invest while you still can and make a lot of sources of your income while your still not marriage.

Sure if we are just talking about finances, maybe the more sugar daddy the more passive income as well, and the more you going to earn, I mean it's gonna work as long as you earn.

In short, do not take another responsibility if you are not done with another responsibility or if you are not ready yet. And what I mean when I said ready, is not just being financially prepared but as well as being mentally, physically, and emotionally stable. Also, everyone of us has a different view about marriage some see it as a sacred thing and others do not find marriage as something that is serious. And marrying someone for solely about financial gains and not really about love is kind of heartbreaking.
But as from what I have seen here, this is a win-win situation from both parties. The sugar daddy will have someone to take care for him, and his spouse got what she wanted. As simple as that. But isn't that a dream for all? having financial freedom without having to work at all.

[barisbilgili]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

In building a relationship, of course both of them have the same goals to achieve and if they have different opinions on achieving their goals, of course both of them will separate and look for their own happiness. If both of them can respect each other in their relationship, of course they will be able to achieve their happiness very easily, but if they marry only to take one-sided benefits, of course this will not last long.

[uneng]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Not today, but it has always been like this. Marriages are partnerships heavily related to financial gains, status maintenance or acquision, power disputes and in least place, "love". Marriages are games of personal and clans' interests. Since the stone age it's happening: women would focus marrying the best hunter, strongest or richest man inside the primitive society.

Then later kings and nobles only married their daughters to another noble ones to add wealth to their kingdoms.

Nowadays hypocrisy plays a big role as it didn't exist anymore, so some foolish people marry thinking they are doing this for love, rather they are just going to be used and abused by the other side.

[Latviand]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

Well, that's not really the point of the post although I do agree, I think what OP means is that there's a perks to having a relationship with someone and tying the knot to that bond. Of course what you're saying is important but we have to be a realist here, I am sure that people don't want to marry just with love and other romantic stuff, they want security too.

[philipma1957]

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

I said "money can't buy happiness but it can maintain happiness", that's just an understatement. And if we speak frankly, what you say is not wrong, but many people still do not believe that happiness today is determined by money, the more money you have, the more opportunities you have to choose a partner.

Marriage was once considered sacred, but today it has also been corrupted by the development of society when money plays an important role in almost every corner of society, love cannot be excluded. Nowadays without money, there will definitely be no love.

No money no love 💕 sad thing to think. But likely true.

At the very least some money is needed.

Food shelter and being in a kind of safe crime zone all help.

I look at the world and see so violence in so many places it is very sad. I also think it hinders love 💗.

So some money for love is kind of true.

[Sebas.tian]

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

Once you are wealthy in a particular environment, I think there is nothing you cannot solve to have financial freedom because you can use money to get what you want at the moment which is very common among the wealthy people all over the world.  Don't forget that your passive income will determine, if you are qualified to marry at the moment or not because marriage is not met for suffering, and it shouldn't be a thing you will be hurry to Join when you know you are not capable yet.  If you don't have this money as a youth, I will advise you to struggle to get this money because it will attract so many things to you that will make you to live a good life through out your days.

[bittraffic]

Join the rat race and climb up. You can't just go straight up without consequences. Marrying a rich partner means slavery as well.

Don't think the rich partner will do the cooking and carry your burden ass the whole time.  If they see you just watching TV all your time when they get home, they will ask what you did the whole day. You better prepare a good answer because she/he will kick your ass for being useless.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

       -   OP, you are obviously misleading the real definition of "marriage.", What you are saying is an assumption, and that is your opinion.
When you get married, isn't it said to the couple who are getting married, "Is this man or woman ready to be with you in hardship and infection, till sickness and in health, till death do as part".

Where does marriage mean you need to double your passive income? Even if a couple only has a single passive income, they can still leave together. Yes, passive income is necessary in married life, but it is only part of the responsibility of the husband or wife. This is not the real meaning of married life. So don't deceive people here in the forum just because of what you say. Maybe that's what you believe, but for the most part, it's not like that.

[CarnagexD]

we live in capitalist world everything and anything need money so yes even you are not married yet you do need money when you married I actually agree to double or even triple our current passive income to support our wife and the children but the fact is build one passive income is crazily hard. I categorized Passive income for someone who didnt need to work or work with little effort and still get money. To achieve this you need more a lot of money

Right. Marriage is not for everyone but getting rich can be. I mean there are people who are certain that they dont want to get married but I doubt there are people who didnt think of having more money. That’s why regardless of getting married or not, it is important to have passive income that can help you to provide for yourself. There may be couples who date while still being short on money but they choose to grow together and there maybe others who choose to stay single until established but I believe that both kinds prefer to have income before settling right?

It shouldnt even be an argument. Why enter a marriage and sustain life with a partner if you dont even have enough income to provide for yourself.