Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi

[Broly46]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

[1715489108]

1715489108

[1715489108]

1715489108

[1715489108]

1715489108

[Antotena]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Your quote is too theoretical than reality.

You can't define how people who single handedly make their money to live their life in your own imagination. If 1 sugar daddy is what please them, so be it. If you want 10 or 100 and you are happy, we are all happy in your regards.

[Yamane_Keto]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

[stompix]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

And in other news gold bars bearing apple trees are for sale at Walmart for 99 cents!
Let's assume everyone marries and gets five rental properties so we have 4 billion couples renting out 20 billion properties to 40  billion people..

I think somewhere in this there is a tiny mistake in the planning that just like the Death Star will bring everything down in a split second..
Oh yeah, here it is:

China's 1.4 billion population can't fill the country's millions of empty homes

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

But why stop there, 1 million sugar daddies, so she will have exactly 20 seconds in the year for each one of them (assuming we don't count sleep). Let's go to 1 trillion sugar daddies because there are one quadrillion rich old people in this world.

[Broly46]

...can't define...

Of course I can inject you with vaccine and you would live a life of vaccination. There is nothing you can do!

...doubling the money...

Then you are missing out of so much gain, doubling is too slow, guy are looking at multi-magnitude multiplier gain, 10x-100x at least!

...start your financial life early...reach the financial well-being...

yup, must do it early, start to hunting down sugar daddy, add the number quickly!

...choosing the wrong wife...

Too bad the old system is an obsolete mess, it is just too slow btw. Need some revamp!

...gold bars bearing apple trees..tiny mistake in the planning...

Bruh, that is why equality must not happens, the rich get richer and own nearly all estate, as usual real estate is the estate owned by just one king! Just one king! Not as much as 4 billions couples!

...why stop there... go to 1 trillion...

Because there is bottom neck, the process from meeting up and filtering out require some massive undertaking and time consuming, obviously dating apps does sweeten the deal for a little bit, but it is still far too slow and full of bottom neck between the each sweeping left and right, it need a more efficient automation. Someone should make sugar daddy deal much easy to access. But you would see how there is many authorities trying hard to add more restrictions to make the deal not happening.

[avikz]

Dear op, it all depends what kind of life you want to live. Keeping multiple sugar daddy's can be your cup of tea but many wouldn't like that. A lot of people would like to settle down in life live a family life. Not everything is done for money.

Having passive income is important though. It can be achieved through rental income, business investments etc. More passive income you have, the better. That's obviously true! But different people have different ways. And some have only two ways! You know what I mean.

[uchegod-21]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

I want to digress a bit and talk about what marriage is about and my understanding of it before I will have of discussion centering on passive income and sugar daddy of thing.
Choosing a life partner goes beyond physical looks. Both parties must consider their compatibility level and of course their tolerance level. It will be too bad to end up with a partner you cannot tolerate their excesses or the partner cannot tolerate yours.

My partner should have some traits that will be able to sustain the union. Everyman definitely needs a woman that can stand in for him during meetings and other functions when he is unavoidably unavailable  and not some queens who have only beauty and curves to offer.

A man does not need to double his passive income as you said in OP because of marriage, rather you can make your friend to start getting a passive income to help the family.

[romero121]

Marriage have got different definition depending on the people. To me marriage is finding the right soul and leading life in all ups and downs. Finance is part of life, and with most of the marriages money used to be a problem. Mutual respect unlike the earning ability increase the love for each other. Marrying a person for financial benefits is not good. The right way is to make plans and succeed financially.

Every human agonize for some appreciation and moral support whenever we feel low. Marrying the right person makes it happen, and growing together is very enjoyable. Hardships can be shared and solutions can be got. As suggested starting the financial life at the earliest helps you better when you're looking for a person to share the rest of your life and there is no need of looking passive income out of marriage.

[Queentoshi]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Marry rich does not only reference marrying someone who is already financially comfortable and have enough for luxury and extra. A rich man and a rich woman can also be a person with a very flourishing potential and mindset, someone who may not already have the evidence of riches, but from their efforts and doings, you can tell that they will end up with the evidence of riches if they continue.

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

[el kaka22]

I am not sure about what that marriage thing, I do not really get that idea to be fair. But that doesn't mean that I can't talk about rental property. I can however say that rental doesn't really have to mean a house, not like you can't buy a house, but you do not "have to" buy a house, you could always end up buying something else and you could make that profit some other way as well.

For example, if you have a huge storage that you could rent out, not a warehouse but like a big size storage then you could end up doing that too and you could make a profit that way. I get that it may not be all that great or anything like that but you could always end up with anything that benefits you that way. You could rent anything really, I know a friend of my dad that rented construction equipment for example, he didn't even used them, he had a parking lot deal with someone and just put all those machinery there and then rented it every month to someone.

[mindrust]

Sounds like somebody has read “Rich dad poor dad” recently. Yes owning real estate and collecting rent is a way to build passive income but it is not as easy as it sounds. You still need to have a decent starting point which is your job. If your paycheck isn’t big enough, you won’t be saving enough money to buy your first house. You know what they say about making millions, the first one is always the hardest to make. If your first house will take 20 years of hard work, then something don’t make sense here especially if you don’t live in your own house already… It is because the house you live in isn’t an asset or a liability. It is a need. If that’s the case with you, you should probably start with investing in stocks first.

[Accardo]

The good thing about existence is choice. The way things work, depends on the actions of people. Some marry for business and contract marriages thrive in our society. Families have saved men in times of trouble. And bounce them back to a financial free life condition. Its not completely a bad decision to marry. At first, it'll look too expensive, but soon the whole thing will be less stressful, when the body adapts to the new lifestyle. They've been situation where the man would depend on the extended family for business ideas and money allocation. Marrying rich for both parties is favorable to the different families in unique ways. If a man finds refuge and kindness from her woman's family, he can go ahead and marry her. Riches come differently, that's why people make money through abstract ways. Every good thing also appears with a disadvantage. Other may be making or fixing a stress free financial ideas through their family, while another will lose what they've worked all their life, because of a bad family. So, whatever you feel works for you, may be wrong for the next person. I do not agree to a good percentage, your advise or idea. Doing our research is also in marriages. The western world introduced courtship, for discovering the details of your to be wife. Any woman that think Sugar dafdy will enrich them, they're doing to themselves no favor. The trauma of having multiple sugar daddies can affect the woman in future. Whether they luckily and finally fell into a rich family. They will be bad progress on the life of the woman in the family. Which may affect the entire family. One bad egg spoils the rest of the other eggs. Hence, ideas as that, belong to the ones I say no to. It's not a good idea. The woman may develop a PTSD.

[South Park]

Sounds like somebody has read “Rich dad poor dad” recently. Yes owning real estate and collecting rent is a way to build passive income but it is not as easy as it sounds. You still need to have a decent starting point which is your job. If your paycheck isn’t big enough, you won’t be saving enough money to buy your first house. You know what they say about making millions, the first one is always the hardest to make. If your first house will take 20 years of hard work, then something don’t make sense here especially if you don’t live in your own house already… It is because the house you live in isn’t an asset or a liability. It is a need. If that’s the case with you, you should probably start with investing in stocks first.

And that is where the problem lies, buying a house is the largest expenditure the average person will make during their lives, and it can take them decades to pay it, in order to buy a second, third and even more houses then this person needs earn a lot of money already before they even buy those houses, which in a way makes kind of redundant the act of buying houses to get passive income, then for the average person it seems to make more sense to buy assets that are not only cheaper but that they can move faster, since in this way they can accelerate significantly the rate at which they can generate profits.

[348Judah]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Either you are married or not, try as much as possible to increase your passive income source, this is not what we should only say by ordinary words of mouth, we must take decision in it and act adequately to make sure we don't rely on a single entity as our financial source, it's not about being married as well, we also needed to make provisions for future miscellaneous under unforseen circumstances.

[pawel7777]

I'm failing to understand what's the essence of your topic. You're making it sound like by simply getting married, you no longer have to work and rental properties start falling from the sky.
Try to do a bit better explaining your thoughts.

I don't know why you're mixing a great concept of marriage with some "sugar daddy" degenerate bullshit.

As for marriage, I believe it's statistically proven that married people are doing better than unmarried in terms of  how high their income is, and I believe it was also true even for people who divorced. Correlation doesn't have to mean causation though and it could be due to the fact that people who are willing to commit to a marriage are also more likely to commit to other things, like career and getting qualifications.

[Quidat]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

I didnt expect on what i have read up though and im that surprised on mentioning about "SUGAR DADDIES" .. LOOOOOL!

If you are a whore and who do loves to s*ck and get pounded by d*ck then go ahead get multiple sugar daddies but you are really that needing to have that one quality on which
being beautiful and sexy/attractive because you wont really be able to reach this goal if you are ugly. 

I do agree with those rental or passive incomes though but basing up on the illustration and example above then paying up ammortization on something which is really that
expensive and might take years to complete then it would really be risky because not all the time that we do have clients or to those people who do rent.
1 cut-off then it would bring a disaster into your monthly amort on which i wont really be that focusing  that much when it comes to those wants or not really much
needed but i do agree that aiming for multiple property is really that something ideal.

[SatoPrincess]

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Sounds like something Robert Kiyosaki would say. Unfortunately some of Kiyosaki’s theories do not work the way you would expect them to. A third rental to fund your private jet now that’s BS. Making money isn’t that easy, motivational speakers and “experts” in financial markets only tell their followers what they think the people want to hear.

[panganib999]

I don't think this kind of topic warrants any form of discussion. All for the sole fact that this insinuates that every marriage is either an attempt at gold-digging or a sugar-parent setup. Which it is not. And while I stand by the thinking that you should approach every relationship with the mind of a businessman, sometimes you gotta draw the line especially if it's marital affairs. Plus this is just a little exploitative isn't it? You're taking someone's hard earned money to further your goals albeit to make more money.

[topbitcoin]

It's like this... if we talk about marriage, we don't just talk about finances and we don't just talk about mutual love, apart from that, the whole thing about marriage is to unite a frequency, a commonality in thinking and harmonize a goal so that we can have the same goal. And marriage is not once for a lifetime, where if in fact in the middle of the road a problem occurs because it is no longer on the same frequency and no longer has the same goal then it is not a problem if you have to end a relationship and go back to looking for someone who can truly be the same. frequency and have the same purpose.

And what the OP said is only intended for lazy people, who are trying to find shortcuts to gain financial freedom.

[JoyMarsha]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Not actually one should be financially rich before getting married, but let it be that the person can be able to cater for themselves and the person they are marrying.

Marriage is not something to walk into not mentally or financially ready to go about what's inside it. As it is in marriage, money is not the focus before getting married but it plays a big role in the peace and unity of the home. That's how we also say that love is not enough but the financial capabilities of both parties that want to be husband and wife. For both to succeed in the marriage they can learn to join hands together without placing the responsibility to provide for the family on one person.

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

The higher the sugar daddy, the higher the expenses of taking drugs for infections, to maintain, and look good for them all. The money got from the sugar daddies will be spent on unimportant things. By the end of the flirt life, one will live and grow old empty-handed without achieving any meaningful thing in her life.

[bhadz]

Working hard isn't a myth, I know that there are people who have been working smart and they're living a good life. But don't ignore what the hard-working people do. I understand and agree with the logic about getting your rental property or any business or asset that generates money passively to sustain any other activities or assets and businesses you have. It's a common thing for the rich folks but not applicable to the normies and plebs who are living paycheck to paycheck. The logic about marrying rich is actually happening in many parts of my country and it's like a norm these days but this is only for women who wants to have a shortcut in life to have a decent living. But it's all up to you to decide if that's your take and way to go to enjoy life. And going back to rentals and passive income, it's truly one of the wonders of this world.

[poodle63]

this is such simple minded statement, you yourself can increase your passive income without even having the two, there are many ways to increase your passive income though its difficult.
also gold digging and marrying rich people also have their own disadvantage, do you ever think that sometime you can't bear emotionally being in different level with the ones you marries.
its always better if you could make your own fortune and stand on your own, then you will realize thats truly financial independency is, by relying on the other people you also prepare to have some condescending gesture.
its not all about rainbow when it comes to marriage.

[chaser15]

Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

If possible too before marriage, try not to lived in a rent house and try to found a way to  have your own house.

Marriage should be planned properly and not just you loved each other.

[lombok]

Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

If possible too before marriage, try not to lived in a rent house and try to found a way to  have your own house.

Marriage should be planned properly and not just you loved each other.

That's right, mental, religious and financial readiness are the most important things in my opinion. We don't just get married and let our hands go, there are many things that must be done after marriage and the most important thing is that we can work together with our partner as best as possible to build the family's future. Financial management must also be done carefully to avoid crises in the family. Because if there is a financial problem, no one will want to help.

[killerfrost]

(...)

And what is the purpose of the problem here?
Although these references seem convincing, they are clearly just one part, and we have billions of issues that are intertwined as well as diametrically opposed.

What should you do before having passive income?
Perhaps each of us will have our own answers, some kind of profit story leap, like the opportunistic options we know about. And adding the sugardaddy issue here doesn't seem to have much to do with it, individual behavior accounts for a small percentage of the perspective of living with desires.

[Adbitco]

Don't you think this post belong to the offtopic section?

Well, looking into marriage of nowadays things has really changed during time of our fathers marriage weren't the way women takes it now.. Like from the African country especially Nigeria then people marry when you have enough farmland planted with Yam, Plantain, Banana's. They are married peacefully even most of them ends up marrying two wives and many more, but talks of women of nowadays you must be extremely Rich to be able to take good care of them especially when it comes of demand and needs one must make sure he provides those things to avoid their wife or woman looking outside or even cheating on them, and this could bring or results into serious problem within the families. So for one to marry today he needs those things you mentioned to be able to own a family at least having a good job that is paying their bills can as well take a good wife who is understandable.

[crwth]

Your economic powers would increase if you have multiple sugar daddies. Hence you have multiple sources of income. If you have that then it would be really right to have multiple properties then when you buy those properties that would be your income that could lessen your sugar daddies then focus on one sugar daddy and be married to him.

Is that the game plan for the ladies?

[Lida93]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

It's either you want to have a sugar daddy or daddies that will serve as source of income to you but you better be ready to bear these cost with your private part at the beck and call of each sugar daddy. And I just wonder how anyone like that can be able to serve in the coincidence of where about three sugar daddies requesting to have you at the same night over when you're not ubiquitous. 
That's why the contrast of marriage and the sugar daddy nonsense talk doesn't match in this context marriage is an institution that two people consciously walk in and being a married woman or man doesn't create a barrier or makes live tough for you not to achieve your goals in life. And you don't have to marry rich to live your dream live, both couples can work together and achieve a better life for themselves happily.

[Broly46]

...multiple sugar daddy's can be your cup of tea but many wouldn't like that...

That is false, having multiple of everything is always great, having multiple kids, having multiple property, having multiple gadget. having multiple daddy???

...Not everything is done for money...

Please give an instance, I would only trust you when you live in a jungle and have your own farm land. In the urban city there is scarcity of everything, no food no water no river no wild animals, you are left with little choice.

...More passive income you have, the better...some have only two ways!

Not true, many are not time tested, passive income from loyalty such as content creators, musician, copyright are some of the burden to avoid. Very few time tested passive income, many do not know them.

...Choosing a life partner goes beyond physical looks...compatibility ...cannot tolerate yours...

You would never beat the chad!

... beauty and curves to offer.

You would never win, you would get jealous!

... does not need to double his passive income ... start getting a passive income to help ...

You are missing out!

[/quote]

...Marriage have got different definition ...Finance is part of life, ... to make plans and succeed financially.

I remember getting this advice, the financial adviser love to quote this too!

...As suggested starting the financial life at the earliest helps ...no need of looking passive income out of marriage.

Must begin as early as possible, must be loss to peer pressure! Also must not missing out!

... who is already financially comfortable ...with a very flourishing potential and mindset, ...you can tell that they will end up ... riches if they continue.

Woohoo! It is possible to get rich! Just work hard!

...That is unhygienic...

Make sure to have medical check up often. To prevent disease.

...but you do not "have to" buy a house...

It has to be the house, sugar daddy and house come hand in hand, they need each other. No house no sugar daddy!

...if you have a huge storage ... You could rent anything really,...

It doesn't help to double the passive income, then it is not good. Also none of them seem assisting sugar daddy culture too.

...has read “Rich dad poor dad” recently.

Nope, I stop reading the book for decades, I do not know what is his new tricks in his new books but I don't think there is anything ground breaking to read. He is nothing more than selling book for jokes and offer nothing else.

...owning real estate and collecting rent is ...not as easy as it sounds...

May be working hard for money is easier!

...the first one is always the hardest to make...

Do you mean to beat the house? It is not even possible btw lmao.

...the house you live in isn’t an asset or a liability... investing in stocks first...

Lmao, I can't believe gullible investors are still having faith on old tricks! So stock would make a come back and refund me!

...At first, it'll look too expensive, ...will be less stressful, when the body adapts to the new lifestyle.

After the stress test, now reborn to a new person!

...Riches come differently...appears with a disadvantage...

Finally! you can beat the house to get rich!

... Any woman that think Sugar dafdy will enrich them, they're doing to themselves no favor...

They are missing out!

...may develop a PTSD...

horrible!

... buying a house is the largest expenditure the average person...

sugar daddy can too venturing into house, double the passive income both on house and sugar daddy! Double the effects!

to make more sense to buy assets that are not only cheaper but that they can move faster...accelerate significantly the rate at which they can generate profits.

You can't beat the born rich by being too slow!

...as possible to increase your passive income source...

Yup, strictly passive income, many got confused to being passive, working hard is definitely not passive income btw.

...also needed to make provisions for future miscellaneous under unforseen circumstances.

Ahhhh! Yes, Elon Musk must have well prepare for it, especially the recession! truly visionary!

[Jawhead999]

After all it depends on someone financial status and the woman he want to marry.

If a man isn't rich, he should find a woman who willing to work too. However if a man is rich, he can choose any woman and it will not cause a problem for him since he can marry anyone.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

Lol, the women would die because her cunt can't able to survive from 100 dicks. Not to mention there's a drama and many risks of disease or violence from open relationship.

[Broly46]

...simply getting married, you no longer have to work and rental properties start falling from the sky...

It is tiring to mental gymnastics on trivial thing like this. Okey, you want to work hard for marriage, that is your choice, poor people choose to be poor they truly deserve it.

...marriage with some "sugar daddy"...

Also rental and passive income, many failed to see.

... Correlation doesn't have to mean causation ... more likely to commit to other things, like career and getting qualifications...

Here we goes again! Water is wet!

... im that surprised on mentioning about "SUGAR DADDIES" ...

Do you see the terms going parabolic on the social trend???

...loves to s*ck and get pounded by d*ck then go ahead ...
being beautiful and sexy/attractive

Why look at the flop side? Is it also a trade to survive on the fittest test. Look at the flip side
first sugar daddy would fund my fine dining
second sugar daddy fund branded handbag
third sugar daddy fund necklace
fourth sugar daddy fund diamond ring
fifth sugat daddy fund the saloon
...
100th sugar daddy fun my wanderlust disney land!!

...paying up ammortization on ...might take years to complete...

Just get a sugar daddy to pay for you lmao!

...aiming for multiple property is really that something ideal...

Having more sugar daddy for multiple property too! One sugar daddy can make one loan, 100 sugar daddy for one hundred loan!!

...Robert Kiyosaki would say...motivational speakers and “experts” in financial markets only ...people want to hear.

Obviously it is a joke. Why trying hard to try to beat the house.

...an attempt at gold-digging or a sugar-parent setup.

Ohhh, sugar-parent setup, quite catchy I would say, I think it is one step ahead of sugar daddy phemonena. But sugar-parent setup is totally acceptable social norms, which parent didn't setup their kids to go to school? To secure the benefit of passive income generated by this happy ending setup.

...just a little exploitative isn't it? You're taking someone's hard earned money...

It is not hard earned money btw, it all come and goes quickly, if it is hard it would not have to devalue so quickly, how much value have loss to the hard earned dollar! -99.9%?

...is not once for a lifetime, ... is only intended for lazy people, who are trying to find shortcuts...

It is truly spot on. It is not once for a lifetime, how many times have someone told you "it is once in a lifetime?"

...Marriage is not something to walk into not mentally or financially...

just don't marry rich.

...taking drugs for infections, to maintain, and look good for them all... By the end of the flirt life, one will live and grow old empty-handed...

Also very soon hit the walls and get mad. It is all too predictable, to a point big banker are betting big money on it and winning big every single time? Also the rich get richer guy keep doubling down on it too? Would you want to beat the house again? Can you even stand a chance to beat them?

[0t3p0t]

Well this depends on the financial status of the couple. If only one of them has income and that is enough for them I think they will survive crisis. But things will change if the expense is increasing just like having a baby or any liabilities. If things are not enough we double the strategy and effort to earn more. As a single person I have nothing to worry about the expense because I can control it myself. I don't spend my money to what I wanted to have, just my needs is enough. Even though my income is low, I still manage to survive from crisis. Marriage is not my priority for now because I can see it as liability and I am not ready for that.

[pawel7777]

Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

Disagree. There's nothing wrong with getting married and starting family early in life, if anything, it can increase your wealth overtime. The idea that you shouldn't have children until you have 2 cars, min 3 bedroom house and six-figures income is a myth and one of the main reasons for plummeting birth rates in the west.
Raising a child doesn't have to be expensive, the main problem is the time not money. But if your wife is happy to prioritise children over work in the first years, and if you have extended family to help you if needed - there's no reason to delay the decision to have kids.
What it often does, it changes your mentality (from a boy to a man) and gives you a huge motivation boost. Unless you're some shit-bag terrified of responsibility that is.

[Litzki1990]

Getting married means taking over the entire responsibility of another person. When a man is unmarried he can go as he pleases or spend money as he pleases but when he is married the responsibility falls on his shoulders to take care of his wife. A married person needs to purchase food, clothing, cosmetics or other items separately. People usually decide to get married at a point in their income when they feel they can afford another person. On the other hand, if someone indulges in extravagance in addition to getting married, then the cost for him doubles. In addition to spending money on the wife, the house owner has to pay a separate amount for the house rent every month. The money spent on house rent is worthless because you are not getting anything in return. If you can build your own house with a loan instead of staying in a rented house, it is much better to live there, not to spend money unnecessarily every month.

[avp2306]

Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

Disagree. There's nothing wrong with getting married and starting family early in life, if anything, it can increase your wealth overtime. The idea that you shouldn't have children until you have 2 cars, min 3 bedroom house and six-figures income is a myth and one of the main reasons for plummeting birth rates in the west.
Raising a child doesn't have to be expensive, the main problem is the time not money. But if your wife is happy to prioritise children over work in the first years, and if you have extended family to help you if needed - there's no reason to delay the decision to have kids.
What it often does, it changes your mentality (from a boy to a man) and gives you a huge motivation boost. Unless you're some shit-bag terrified of responsibility that is.

Agree with this since there's no guarantee for other to get a better life even if they marry late since its the same responsibilities especially you still need to take care your girlfriend and buy his needs when you are in relationship. Its only up for us on how we double our efforts since we have many chance to get rich whatever status we are on and the one we nee to do is to be strategic to find opportunities also we know on when we should get out on our comfort zone to try the risk on doing things that can be beneficial to us in future.

If young generation would like to marry at younger age that's fine for me since they can still bond with their kids while they are strong and you can't do that if you are old.

[Miles2006]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

Perfectly said, choosing the right wife matters alot. Starting your financial life early is just like building a house and definitely the end result will be good.
Some homes fail to meet there family needs and put the blame on whatever. Forgetting that everything needs planing, planing at an early age is just the best. Marriage cannot stop someone from meeting his goals

[BitDane]

Working hard isn't a myth, I know that there are people who have been working smart and they're living a good life. But don't ignore what the hard-working people do. I understand and agree with the logic about getting your rental property or any business or asset that generates money passively to sustain any other activities or assets and businesses you have. It's a common thing for the rich folks but not applicable to the normies and plebs who are living paycheck to paycheck. The logic about marrying rich is actually happening in many parts of my country and it's like a norm these days but this is only for women who wants to have a shortcut in life to have a decent living. But it's all up to you to decide if that's your take and way to go to enjoy life. And going back to rentals and passive income, it's truly one of the wonders of this world.

Working hard is a myth for lazy people because they don't believe in it or most probably they are avoiding it.  Lazy people prefer to become leeches so they planned to get married to a wealthy partner so that they can become wealthy without doing anything.

Even smart people work hard in order to get the wealth that they desired.

I don't mind early or late marriages but it should be planned.  Future of the family should be planned so that they can be prepared on whatever hardship that may come to their family.

[justdimin]

There's nothing wrong with getting married and starting family early in life, if anything, it can increase your wealth overtime. The idea that you shouldn't have children until you have 2 cars, min 3 bedroom house and six-figures income is a myth and one of the main reasons for plummeting birth rates in the west.
Raising a child doesn't have to be expensive, the main problem is the time not money. But if your wife is happy to prioritise children over work in the first years, and if you have extended family to help you if needed - there's no reason to delay the decision to have kids.
What it often does, it changes your mentality (from a boy to a man) and gives you a huge motivation boost. Unless you're some shit-bag terrified of responsibility that is.

Agree with this since there's no guarantee for other to get a better life even if they marry late since its the same responsibilities especially you still need to take care your girlfriend and buy his needs when you are in relationship. Its only up for us on how we double our efforts since we have many chance to get rich whatever status we are on and the one we nee to do is to be strategic to find opportunities also we know on when we should get out on our comfort zone to try the risk on doing things that can be beneficial to us in future.

If young generation would like to marry at younger age that's fine for me since they can still bond with their kids while they are strong and you can't do that if you are old.

True, but when you get married the money becomes both of yours and it becomes a lot more important to care. I have seen it plenty of times, I have married friends and I have single friends with girlfriends, the difference is huge. When you have a girlfriend at the very start things are cheaper, because you do not have a home that you have to pay for, and having a home means bills, food, any unexpected costs etc etc, and of course having some fun too, so having a girlfriend at the very start is usually better because they do not try to charge all that much early on and if they do most people just break off the relationship.

However, the longer you are girlfriend with someone, they realize that your money is not their money and they could just spend your money instead, keep asking for stuff, trying to see how much they can spend without actually spending a dime, they can get all the items they wish, basically they use your credit card is a way to fulfill their amazon wishlist. This isn't everyone by the way, just the examples that I saw, and the moment you get married, your money becomes their money too and they stop spending it like crazy, and start to be more careful about it.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Everything depends on the people and the family in which each member of the future family grew up and was raised. It is impossible to predict and calculate your entire life. Very successful people may experience cases of bankruptcy, unexpected human factors, deterioration in health, and so on. If a person is endowed with decency and has an understanding that it is necessary to work since the future of their family depends on him or her, everything will be fine. Even if people are poor, with the right mindset, they will always have a chance for a better life.

It’s strange to read how you propose to choose wives here. If your wife is rich, then you will always be reproached for being poor. Therefore, do not choose wives like horses, but take a closer look at the person, just like women; you should not rush to get married as soon as you have a husband. Stick to the expression, “It’s better to be with no one than with just anyone.”

Marriage does not mean doubling capital; it means one common capital, with the full respect of the spouses for each other.

[Ziskinberg]

Looks like you're a fan of the 'rental' approach, huh? Well, it's easy to talk about earning through passive income, but not everyone has the means to do that. For one, it requires capital, and not everyone can afford to start a business. That's why most of us are working for companies, earning a salary. Sure, we work hard in those businesses we don't own because we're hoping for promotions and salary increases.

It's a journey, my friend. Having a business mindset is crucial. We can start with working, gain experience, and save up capital to eventually venture into business. That's the right path. But, not everyone has the capability or opportunity, so they choose to keep working until retirement.

[Strongkored]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Marrying a rich person to be able to guarantee a life makes sense. but do many rich people want to marry someone whose economic status is very different? when you are just someone from a low economic family and can marry a rich person it's like a fairy tale, and you know stories like that will rarely happen, because basically someone will marry someone whose economic background is not much different because that is their friendship circle, and when If you think marriage can increase your income then you are making marriage a business transaction, which is quite stupid in my opinion.

[posi]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Marrying a rich person to be able to guarantee a life makes sense. but do many rich people want to marry someone whose economic status is very different? when you are just someone from a low economic family and can marry a rich person it's like a fairy tale, and you know stories like that will rarely happen, because basically someone will marry someone whose economic background is not much different because that is their friendship circle, and when If you think marriage can increase your income then you are making marriage a business transaction, which is quite stupid in my opinion.

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

[SmartGold01]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

With my belief I won't encourage any outstanding woman out there to go have sugar daddy's as means of generating a livelihood, as a married woman if your husband is not supporting the family now shouldn't mean you go out there to messed yourself up because of money. Take a look at me for instance I bolding say I don't solely depends on my husband for money or what I want to do with money it is only the lazy type can thoroughly rely on their husband to make money.

Sincerely speaking we both equal part to share in the family and not only putting load  into a man for all you needs, okay what of if your husband are not there to be found, won't you keep training your children and support them financially?
You will and your husband would be very proud of you anywhere he is and he knows he has a hard working woman can never take you for granted, he will care and cherished for having a woman like you because you always supportive to the family.

[bayu7adi]

It's like being dependent on others, and having someone else responsible for your life, isn't it? It's quite disheartening, because when someone loses their beauty, they'll slowly wither away without anyone willing to provide them with passive income.

This isn't true passive income, like seeking out a wealthy partner and constantly asking for money. That's incredibly cheap. The best form of passive income comes from one's own hard work, and it's important to realize that each individual is responsible for their own life, rather than relying on a wealthy person to accompany them.

I understand that women are often attracted to wealth, but it won't instantly control a rich man, even if her beauty is extraordinary. Gold diggers always use the term "realistic" as a shield to secure a partner, because they're embarrassed to be seen as materialistic or cheap

[Lorence.xD]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Marrying a rich person to be able to guarantee a life makes sense. but do many rich people want to marry someone whose economic status is very different? when you are just someone from a low economic family and can marry a rich person it's like a fairy tale, and you know stories like that will rarely happen, because basically someone will marry someone whose economic background is not much different because that is their friendship circle, and when If you think marriage can increase your income then you are making marriage a business transaction, which is quite stupid in my opinion.

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

I think we could call it as a marriage for convenience, though we could say that but some relationship and love has progress. You could say that a person married a man who is rich while she's a middle class, but maybe the reason is she's getting to know the person. I mean we don't need to be judge mental to someone cause we might misunderstand their intention. It's common nature for people to find a partner that are independent which is pretty realistic. Still there's true love that even you have nothing, they would be on by your side until you reach your goals in life. Securing your future especially to your kids with an independent parner is a wise thign to do.

[BitcoinTurk]

Marriage is definitely not something that causes passive income to double because not everyone has the same income or assets. For example, one side may have several rented houses while the other side may not have or have fewer houses. In other words, it wouldn't be correct to conclude that passive income will double with marriage since not everyone's financial situation is the same.

Moreover, considering that there are people who marry more than once in today's conditions, unfortunately, marriage isn't something we can do only once in our lives. For this reason, it wouldn't be correct to think that marriage will happen once in our entire lives.

On the other hand, it is necessary to consider marriages made for love, obtaining citizenship and money. For example, some marriages are made with one-sided love to obtain the citizenship of a specific country in line with the interests of one side, some marriages are made with one-sided love for money by having a rich spouse and some marriages are made with truly two-sided love. In other words, every couple's marriage actually takes place based on various reasons and in some cases it is quite difficult to understand why the sides got married.

In summary, it wouldn't be correct to make a general comment about every marriage especially to state that passive income doubles. Since this situation varies depending on various conditions, making a single general comment doesn't help to reach a correct conclusion.

[bhadz]

Working hard isn't a myth, I know that there are people who have been working smart and they're living a good life. But don't ignore what the hard-working people do. I understand and agree with the logic about getting your rental property or any business or asset that generates money passively to sustain any other activities or assets and businesses you have. It's a common thing for the rich folks but not applicable to the normies and plebs who are living paycheck to paycheck. The logic about marrying rich is actually happening in many parts of my country and it's like a norm these days but this is only for women who wants to have a shortcut in life to have a decent living. But it's all up to you to decide if that's your take and way to go to enjoy life. And going back to rentals and passive income, it's truly one of the wonders of this world.

Working hard is a myth for lazy people because they don't believe in it or most probably they are avoiding it.  Lazy people prefer to become leeches so they planned to get married to a wealthy partner so that they can become wealthy without doing anything.

Even smart people work hard in order to get the wealth that they desired.

There's always the comparison between working hard and working smart. But honestly, both of them are the same in the sense that both are not lazy and they work no matter what their styles are, right? Those who have taken their riches worked hard and smart on it but there are some exceptions and those are those lottery winners. Maybe they also worked hard on it as they've never stopped betting on it, so that's persistence and luck.

I don't mind early or late marriages but it should be planned.  Future of the family should be planned so that they can be prepared on whatever hardship that may come to their family.

It must be planned and since it's related to marriage, those who are marrying to get out of poverty. Well, people have got description about them.

[JunaidAzizi]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

I don't know how you can double your passive income by getting married to someone.  In marriage, a lot of money is spent and if you are pointing out that she can do a job for you then it is very less cases in which a lot of women prefer a housewife then a working woman.

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Yeah, I agree with it rental properties make you rich in a short time period and when you increase the number you are increasing your income in rental properties loss is very low and its return is high. But it requires good experience.

Having multiple sugar daddies seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed for more than ten years while marriage and rental have existed for thousands of years.

A single woman can hardly handle up to 5 men per day approximately. But the money she earns is not beneficial for her as she spends a good amount on her looking and also on the hospital expenses because she has more chances of infection. The rest of the money she left would be used on home expenses and this woman I think will not improve her financial system by the last when she will be aged and her demand will be nothing it will make her bow to slavery. So its better to do something else that supports her in her last days rather than this sugar daddy.

[macson]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

your sentence at the end is a very real thing, there are many successful people out there who married good and wise women, marrying the right person is luck.  Marriage is something that is required by every religion, the aim is so that we don't do negative things out there and also so that our lives are more organized both in terms of time and also mentally.  avoid marrying a woman who likes to lie, is mercenary, too possessive, childish and also not yet mentally stable.

[philipma1957]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

And in other news gold bars bearing apple trees are for sale at Walmart for 99 cents!
Let's assume everyone marries and gets five rental properties so we have 4 billion couples renting out 20 billion properties to 40  billion people..

I think somewhere in this there is a tiny mistake in the planning that just like the Death Star will bring everything down in a split second..
Oh yeah, here it is:

China's 1.4 billion population can't fill the country's millions of empty homes

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

But why stop there, 1 million sugar daddies, so she will have exactly 20 seconds in the year for each one of them (assuming we don't count sleep). Let's go to 1 trillion sugar daddies because there are one quadrillion rich old people in this world.

Okay there are 31,536,000 seconds  in a year. So if she never eats or sleeps or goes to the bathroom she could give each guy 31 seconds

Reality is  owning  10 homes and renting them can be done. It does not always mean a profit. Homes flood homes, burn and people do not always pay the rent.

It is work to take care of all that. I suppose if you give a guy a job taking care of 9 homes and let him live in the 10th one maybe it can work out for you.

[Broly46]

... have multiple sugar daddies. ...buy those properties that would be your income that could lessen ...on one sugar daddy and be married to him.

Is that the game plan for the ladies?

Lmao, you think your shaming tactics could work on me? It might be for high IQ obedient good guy, not on shameless guy. lmao!

...able to survive from 100 dicks. ...drama and many risks of disease or violence...

You should one up your shaming tactics, it is so ineffective lmao, you think you can stop me from begging with such lowly shaming? That is cute!

And what is the purpose of the problem here?
...have billions of issues...

lmao, it is you looking for business out of billions of issues, Yeah  finding busy-ness on problems, getting busy, very busy, and make yourselve look good!

What should you do before having passive income?
...And adding the sugardaddy issue ...have much to do with it, ...

So much for being very concern about billions of issues but avoiding very crucial and pressing issue... like planned!

[WatChe]

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

[Gozie51]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

This looks like taking a swipe on the women folks but not sure if you are talking about the single ladies, the married or about to. But definitely the sugar daddy is for the women. Are you saying they are busy chasing after sugars and leaving crypto investment for the guys? 

More seriously, having a fulfilled live in marriage depends on the financial inflow whether married or not. The woman who only wants to be rented and never contributes to the maintenance of the home is certainly not aware of the realities of the modern day living.

[dezoel]

I was very intrigued with the title of this thread so I clicked on it and I was right because you said it was only a myth. Maybe there is a tiny percentage of couple who can go against it because both of them (husband and wife) are already successful and have became more successful when they joined together as one.

If there were mostly true about your statement that is to work hard because a married life is not easy. Marriage can happen more than once. Have you heard of annulment? But I don't encouraged it. Only uncontented couple can commit it. We should love our partner for sickness and health, just like on what we oath in the altar.

[bitgolden]

It's like being dependent on others, and having someone else responsible for your life, isn't it? It's quite disheartening, because when someone loses their beauty, they'll slowly wither away without anyone willing to provide them with passive income.

This isn't true passive income, like seeking out a wealthy partner and constantly asking for money. That's incredibly cheap. The best form of passive income comes from one's own hard work, and it's important to realize that each individual is responsible for their own life, rather than relying on a wealthy person to accompany them.

I understand that women are often attracted to wealth, but it won't instantly control a rich man, even if her beauty is extraordinary. Gold diggers always use the term "realistic" as a shield to secure a partner, because they're embarrassed to be seen as materialistic or cheap

I agree, I wouldn't be able to live with someone who takes care of me, don't get me wrong I would love it if my spouse earns a lot of money, she can make as much money as she possibly could, I wish she made millions of dollars, there is nothing wrong with that, it is not about making more, it is about not being able to make anything yourself.

If you have an income even from your family, like lets say your family has a few houses you rent and make money from, that would be still fine while you are basically doing nothing, but I feel like I have put SOME money on the table. I call it "bill guy", because it means I am capable of paying the bills, the water bill, heater, mobile phones, the netflix and other stuff, I keep paying for the monthly stuff, that alone would be good enough.

If you are capable of doing that then you are going to be able to do a lot more and you could be able to tell your spouse to make as much as possible in that case. But no way in world where she makes all the money and I bring in zero.

[pawel7777]

Reality is  owning  10 homes and renting them can be done. It does not always mean a profit. Homes flood homes, burn and people do not always pay the rent.

It is work to take care of all that. I suppose if you give a guy a job taking care of 9 homes and let him live in the 10th one maybe it can work out for you.

Owning 10 rental properties is possible, but it cannot serve as a general lifestyle choice to the masses. By definition, only a small minority can pull that off in the same time.
And yeah, it's not as passive as many would think, especially if you want to manage it yourself. Of course, you could use a property management agency, but the more responsibilities you cede on them, the bigger their cut will be and the greater the risk they could screw you over i.e. by inflating repair bills etc.

[Smartvirus]

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

If you’re from my part of the world, then you would realize that even your kids are a resource you can build on to have them give you returns when you don’t have enough energy ti keep up.

I buy the idea in quote but, majority of the people in our world never gets it that rossy. Not because they aren’t putting in their best or the resources ain’t available for them but, when shits ain’t working, it just isn’t.

Now, would you rather advise they never get married and keep pushing for success that never comes or to continue their life in another dimension?

There are those that dreamed of driving fast cars and never got the money to buy it themselves but rather invested in Human Resources as there kids and have those kids buy it for them.
There are more than one sides to it but the reality is, you never can tell which way would work best for every individual and we are out here testing life on different plains.

[icalical]

People who think that renting properties/real estate all easy is the one who never actually doing it. It's the same as doing other businesses, you need manage the money, you need manage your employee, you also need to think about the maintenance, and it could get worse if you have a problematic tenant. If a person has try to do renting real estate, they might even disagree to call it passive income

[dothebeats]

I already saw this post earlier and failed to see the logic of the post so I decided to look at it again later, and now that I am back I still fail to see the main point of this. What's the message? What's the correlation between having sugar daddies to being married? Are you saying that the key to having financial stability is to get married? If so, millions of us could have been millionaires and billionaires by now.

[Broly46]

...for plummeting birth rates in the west...

More people to fund the booming rent market!

Raising a child doesn't have to be expensive, the main problem is the time not money.

Time is cheap! Shocking!

...gives you a huge motivation boost. Unless you're some shit-bag terrified of responsibility that is...

Lmao you would trade stock and crypto during lunch break while I'm laughing my ass dumping on you!

...myth for lazy people because ...they are avoiding it...to become leeches ...become wealthy without doing anything...

Think you can stop me from creating snake oil(fake stock/fake commodity/fake bill) out of thin air and dump it on gullible guy all over the place?

...Even smart people work hard in order...

Smart people look like a total punch bag to me, perfect to drain them up without unwanted baggages! Sweet!

...married friends and I have single friends with girlfriends, the difference is huge...just break off the relationship...

I come for the laugh!

...they can get all the items they wish, basically they use your credit card ... becomes their money too ...

It is too late, you have no recourse.

It's like being dependent ... It's quite disheartening, ...loses their beauty, they'll slowly wither away ...passive income.

You can't stop me from begging! No enough of shaming would work.

This isn't true passive income, ... incredibly cheap...

Do you have doubt on a trick that has worked for thousands of years? It is time tested very effective trick btw. It is a no money down trade.

...The best form of passive income comes from one's own hard work, ...rather than relying on ...

Hardwork? Just make it automate.

...always use the term "realistic" ... they're embarrassed to be seen as materialistic or cheap

Embrassing beggars lmao!

...marriage for convenience,...

Why you do shame.

...Securing your future especially to your kids...

marry rich! born rich!

...a lot of money is spent...

Great! You are ensuring rich get richer, by doing exactly as planned.

...rental properties loss is very low and its return is high. But it requires good experience...

Must have 20 years experience by hr dep.

...can hardly handle up to 5 men per day approximately. ...not beneficial ....spends ...on her looking ...on the hospital expenses ...not improve her financial ...aged and her demand will be nothing ....

We are immune to whore shaming lmao! Not gonna stop the begging!

...in a year... she could give each guy 31 seconds

Not doing it one by one, it is too slow. Ten guys at once!

...people do not always pay the rent...

Rent has always been profitable, for thousands of years, solid track record,  you had to be sucker to screwed them up lmao.

... I suppose if you give a guy a job taking care of 9 homes ...

Why not! Lmao, I could spend the rest of time to sipping fine wine on the beach, travelling on my yacht and jet to new land, and flirt as much as I could!

... Are you saying they are busy chasing after sugars and leaving crypto investment for the guys?  ...

Lmao you would trade crypto during lunch break!

...not aware of the realities of the modern day living...

Not gonna stop begging!

... you said it was only a myth...

Surprise!

...Maybe there is a tiny percentage of couple who can go against it...

I would make sure to screw them up after I located and identify them through kyc and identity espionage!!

... Marriage can happen more than once. Have you heard of annulment?...

Cheating? We have even more unfair advantages!

...Owning 10 rental properties is possible, ....
And yeah, it's not as passive as many would think,...

Need 30 years work experience btw.!

[Yogee]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

This looks like taking a swipe on the women folks but not sure if you are talking about the single ladies, the married or about to. But definitely the sugar daddy is for the women. Are you saying they are busy chasing after sugars and leaving crypto investment for the guys? 

You'll be surprised about the number of simps out there that are paying allowances or sponsoring trips and rents. These ladies don't have to chase since there are already a lot of platforms where they can just "sit" pretty and men will come to them. They'll just post hot and sexy pictures on their instagram and get multiple offers on their DMs. Social media has created a bubble economy for a lot of these women - it's easy money.

[Porfirii]

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

you both go find a hotel.

Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example.

And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties.

[davis196]

But marriage can only happens once in a life,

You haven't heard about divorce? Some people had married several times in their lives.

one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

100 sugar daddies=prostitution if you ask me. Can you tell me what kind of woman could handle 100 sugar daddies at once? I want to meet her.

Boomers got their land for free. You have to pay for land

For free? Land was cheaper decades ago, but it definitely wasn't available for free. In which country do you live?

I have the feeling that OP is trolling us with this post.

In summary. Passive income isn't passive. You have to work hard for "passive income". Even the gold diggers and prostitutes have to work hard for their so called "passive income".

[Mauser]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marrying rich seems like the best way to set yourself up for life without having to worry about money again. As long as you get some children together you don't need to worry about a prenup. This is mainly in place to prevent you from getting a divorce after a few years and taking 50% of his money. The thing is that it's a decision on how you are going to spend the rest of your life, some people might choose love and happiness over money. Having a few sugar daddys doesn't classify as passive income in my opinion, you still have to work for it and make the men happy. Also this only works when you are young, nobody is going to pay for your companionship when you are 40. Eventually you are going to have to live of your own money.

[Renampun]

Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

reflecting on my experience with my partner, we initially didn't have jobs that could give us a stable income, but we still believed that when we were together, all problems would be resolved slowly and now we can still live safely with our two children even though we haven't arrived yet. have a stable income, we are independent and do not depend on our parents, we are sure that if we thought about being stable before getting married then we would not have married until now because we are not yet financially stable.

If possible too before marriage, try not to lived in a rent house and try to found a way to  have your own house.

Marriage should be planned properly and not just you loved each other.

It's difficult to be able to buy your own house when you come from a simple family and don't have a lot of inheritance, especially in a city with quite a lot of people, so renting a house is the only option you have to take, until now my little family and I are still renting in a simple house, slowly but surely we are collecting money to pay off the subsidized housing issued by our country's government in installments.

[wajik-tempe]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

[Gozie51]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

But the realities of things happening to our faces is that growing up incidences have all changed now. There are contract marriages and they are all accepted as marriage. Marriage that was for death do part now has expiring dates set by both parties by consent, such marriage are either to achieve some financial goals and that goes to show how values have been eroded because of the chase of money. Some people don't value the happiness of being together but only what money can provide whether happiness or not. Money is good in marriage but it has to be balanced.

[Fortify]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

As others have said, you shouldn't simply see marriage as a business contract because that can lead to disaster. It's an additional perk that comes out of a loving relationship and should only be considered that way. It is also not some magic bullet to double your own income, but sharing costs, if both people in the marriage work can bring down your expenses considerably. Also, if one partner decides to stay home and actively maintains a household or looks after children, it can make life much easier for both.

[slapper]

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

you both go find a hotel.

Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example.

And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties.

Scalability, scalability, scalability - it's a crucial aspect when considering sources of income, isn’t it? Indeed, every job that exchanges time for money is unscalable. Even little jobs like answering calls or texts demand your time and attention, right?

The initial capital needed to own rental homes is a major obstacle. It's expensive, right? Risk comes next. Find reputable tenants? Will home values rise? The venture is not passive due to many issues and risks. Getting rich enough to buy a private jet? A bit far-fetched.

Your insights emphasize the necessity of scalability and real passivity when researching income streams. Is it not a complicated choice?

[posi]

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

I said "money can't buy happiness but it can maintain happiness", that's just an understatement. And if we speak frankly, what you say is not wrong, but many people still do not believe that happiness today is determined by money, the more money you have, the more opportunities you have to choose a partner.

Marriage was once considered sacred, but today it has also been corrupted by the development of society when money plays an important role in almost every corner of society, love cannot be excluded. Nowadays without money, there will definitely be no love.

[Asuspawer09]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

If you going to marriage for sure you gonna need more funds since you starting a family and that just means soon your gonna have a child and having a child needs a big amount of funds so that you can provide for your child's needs, not to mention since your gonna need to do it on your own and your spouse because you're gonna be apart from your parents so you're not gonna get any support from them anymore.  We are all going to realize how hard life is when we are the ones who need to pay bills, like water, electricity, internet, etc. Even though you feel like you have a good enough job already it's not going to be enough for the most part.

Rental property for sure if one of the most difficult things to achieve since it is just so expensive and could eat up a big percentage of your salary but for sure its going to be necessary since your not living with your parents anymore, there was no cheat that you can do, probably your gonna need to buy your own property first just to avoid renting, so probably what you can do is save a lot of money, invest while you still can and make a lot of sources of your income while your still not marriage.

Sure if we are just talking about finances, maybe the more sugar daddy the more passive income as well, and the more you going to earn, I mean it's gonna work as long as you earn.

[CODE200]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

If you going to marriage for sure you gonna need more funds since you starting a family and that just means soon your gonna have a child and having a child needs a big amount of funds so that you can provide for your child's needs, not to mention since your gonna need to do it on your own and your spouse because you're gonna be apart from your parents so you're not gonna get any support from them anymore.  We are all going to realize how hard life is when we are the ones who need to pay bills, like water, electricity, internet, etc. Even though you feel like you have a good enough job already it's not going to be enough for the most part.

Rental property for sure if one of the most difficult things to achieve since it is just so expensive and could eat up a big percentage of your salary but for sure its going to be necessary since your not living with your parents anymore, there was no cheat that you can do, probably your gonna need to buy your own property first just to avoid renting, so probably what you can do is save a lot of money, invest while you still can and make a lot of sources of your income while your still not marriage.

Sure if we are just talking about finances, maybe the more sugar daddy the more passive income as well, and the more you going to earn, I mean it's gonna work as long as you earn.

In short, do not take another responsibility if you are not done with another responsibility or if you are not ready yet. And what I mean when I said ready, is not just being financially prepared but as well as being mentally, physically, and emotionally stable. Also, everyone of us has a different view about marriage some see it as a sacred thing and others do not find marriage as something that is serious. And marrying someone for solely about financial gains and not really about love is kind of heartbreaking.
But as from what I have seen here, this is a win-win situation from both parties. The sugar daddy will have someone to take care for him, and his spouse got what she wanted. As simple as that. But isn't that a dream for all? having financial freedom without having to work at all.

[barisbilgili]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

In building a relationship, of course both of them have the same goals to achieve and if they have different opinions on achieving their goals, of course both of them will separate and look for their own happiness. If both of them can respect each other in their relationship, of course they will be able to achieve their happiness very easily, but if they marry only to take one-sided benefits, of course this will not last long.

[uneng]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Not today, but it has always been like this. Marriages are partnerships heavily related to financial gains, status maintenance or acquision, power disputes and in least place, "love". Marriages are games of personal and clans' interests. Since the stone age it's happening: women would focus marrying the best hunter, strongest or richest man inside the primitive society.

Then later kings and nobles only married their daughters to another noble ones to add wealth to their kingdoms.

Nowadays hypocrisy plays a big role as it didn't exist anymore, so some foolish people marry thinking they are doing this for love, rather they are just going to be used and abused by the other side.

[Latviand]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

Well, that's not really the point of the post although I do agree, I think what OP means is that there's a perks to having a relationship with someone and tying the knot to that bond. Of course what you're saying is important but we have to be a realist here, I am sure that people don't want to marry just with love and other romantic stuff, they want security too.

[philipma1957]

But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

I said "money can't buy happiness but it can maintain happiness", that's just an understatement. And if we speak frankly, what you say is not wrong, but many people still do not believe that happiness today is determined by money, the more money you have, the more opportunities you have to choose a partner.

Marriage was once considered sacred, but today it has also been corrupted by the development of society when money plays an important role in almost every corner of society, love cannot be excluded. Nowadays without money, there will definitely be no love.

No money no love 💕 sad thing to think. But likely true.

At the very least some money is needed.

Food shelter and being in a kind of safe crime zone all help.

I look at the world and see so violence in so many places it is very sad. I also think it hinders love 💗.

So some money for love is kind of true.

[Sebas.tian]

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

Once you are wealthy in a particular environment, I think there is nothing you cannot solve to have financial freedom because you can use money to get what you want at the moment which is very common among the wealthy people all over the world.  Don't forget that your passive income will determine, if you are qualified to marry at the moment or not because marriage is not met for suffering, and it shouldn't be a thing you will be hurry to Join when you know you are not capable yet.  If you don't have this money as a youth, I will advise you to struggle to get this money because it will attract so many things to you that will make you to live a good life through out your days.

[bittraffic]

Join the rat race and climb up. You can't just go straight up without consequences. Marrying a rich partner means slavery as well.

Don't think the rich partner will do the cooking and carry your burden ass the whole time.  If they see you just watching TV all your time when they get home, they will ask what you did the whole day. You better prepare a good answer because she/he will kick your ass for being useless.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

       -   OP, you are obviously misleading the real definition of "marriage.", What you are saying is an assumption, and that is your opinion.
When you get married, isn't it said to the couple who are getting married, "Is this man or woman ready to be with you in hardship and infection, till sickness and in health, till death do as part".

Where does marriage mean you need to double your passive income? Even if a couple only has a single passive income, they can still leave together. Yes, passive income is necessary in married life, but it is only part of the responsibility of the husband or wife. This is not the real meaning of married life. So don't deceive people here in the forum just because of what you say. Maybe that's what you believe, but for the most part, it's not like that.

[CarnagexD]

we live in capitalist world everything and anything need money so yes even you are not married yet you do need money when you married I actually agree to double or even triple our current passive income to support our wife and the children but the fact is build one passive income is crazily hard. I categorized Passive income for someone who didnt need to work or work with little effort and still get money. To achieve this you need more a lot of money

Right. Marriage is not for everyone but getting rich can be. I mean there are people who are certain that they dont want to get married but I doubt there are people who didnt think of having more money. That’s why regardless of getting married or not, it is important to have passive income that can help you to provide for yourself. There may be couples who date while still being short on money but they choose to grow together and there maybe others who choose to stay single until established but I believe that both kinds prefer to have income before settling right?

It shouldnt even be an argument. Why enter a marriage and sustain life with a partner if you dont even have enough income to provide for yourself.

[kingvirtus09]

There are people who get married out of time or without preparation, and the only thing they do is stand up for what they have done and accept the fate that they already have a family and that married life is also prepared.

So the OP is probably referring to double your passive income, which should be for married people who are not ready or don't have the right time. Especially for young people who are not old enough or mature enough. And it's a difficult situation for that kind of person to partner with. So the marriage lawyer should really be prepared, to be honest.

[summonerrk]

~~~

The author's thoughts are confused and mixed, it is written in a heavy syllable that I am not sure that I fully understood the idea that the author wanted to express. But I think the point is to discuss how your active and passive incomes are changing. Well.
Embezzlement: women do not want to pay for themselves, as a rule, you will need to pay for food and utilities if your woman is not a careerist. She will spend money only on herself. Positive: She will most likely share the mortgage payment with
you. Plus she will clean and cook, so anyway ... be prepared for a lot of spending.

[KiaKia]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

Good advice, but I want you to know that it's all risky, people do change in an instant, someone who you know for the past years can become something else and they will look like a total stranger to you, it's luck for a man to get a good woman this days, even if they are good at first, in time changes might come.

Marriage is a matter of choice, I have seen people that get married and they both decide not to get kids and instead, they should take their times, the man said he isn't ready for kids yet as he comes from a poor background and it looks like a curse in their family, they are poor and all they do is bring kids into this world without looking at their financial status, he claimed his fell apart because of financial status and he doesn't want the same to happen to him.

To my surprised the wife accepts too, and she dropped her own reasons that having kids comes with such pressure and stress, that her own father and mother married for six years because they decided to give birth to her, she said they took their time and things get better before they decide to have kids.

Today many people don't reason this way, the best thing is to understand each other and try to know what you both want, people are bringing kids into the world today as if kids are bread you just buy down the street.

[Y3shot]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

Looking into the Financial aspect chateria in marriage does not mean one is just focusing on money alone.  Apart from love their ate other things people desire in marriage like respect, some physical qualities which can be beauty or handsomeness and other  things and I don't think if one puts Finance as a desire in marriage I don't see it to be bad and it doesn't mean their is no love too. Everyone wants a good life and if people will choose Financial stability as one of their requirements in marriage or getting a partner their is nothing wrong about it, we all know what we want.

[coolcoinz]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

... Thought many Ukrainians before 2022
Now there's no properties and no jets. They and their sports cars are refugees in Poland

Going blind into rental properties isn't the answer. You have to consider a number of things before you waste your money on a house.

I'd also change the quote a bit.
First property buys you nothing, it barely makes any money. I have a rental property and I had to spend 10k and put in some work to fix it before I was able to rent it out. Now after all the bills and taxes it pays about 1k a month. It's been 1.5 years so I've made about 5k profit from the whole thing. Mind you, a minimum wage job pays 20k a year.

If you had 2 properties like that and combined the profit, you'd be getting minimum wage income that would take years to buy a new sports car, unless you want a Miata or something like that.

[dothebeats]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

Looking into the Financial aspect chateria in marriage does not mean one is just focusing on money alone.  Apart from love their ate other things people desire in marriage like respect, some physical qualities which can be beauty or handsomeness and other  things and I don't think if one puts Finance as a desire in marriage I don't see it to be bad and it doesn't mean their is no love too. Everyone wants a good life and if people will choose Financial stability as one of their requirements in marriage or getting a partner their is nothing wrong about it, we all know what we want.

Outside of the original post, I generally agree with you. Marriage these days shouldn't be compared to back then when everything is about love. These days we have to use both our mind and heart. Despite needing feelings and emotional connection with the significant other to maintain commitment and a harmoinous relationship, we cannot ignore the fact that we also require or look for other things. Moreover, these days with the state of the economy and just how important financial stability is, it isn't bad for an individual to look for a significant other who either have an already established financial stability or is already on the way there as it ensures them that they will have a good future together, including their future family. Being a gold digger and being practical have a distinct line that separates them from each other.

[serjent05]

       -   OP, you are obviously misleading the real definition of "marriage.", What you are saying is an assumption, and that is your opinion.
When you get married, isn't it said to the couple who are getting married, "Is this man or woman ready to be with you in hardship and infection, till sickness and in health, till death do as part".

Where does marriage mean you need to double your passive income? Even if a couple only has a single passive income, they can still leave together. Yes, passive income is necessary in married life, but it is only part of the responsibility of the husband or wife. This is not the real meaning of married life. So don't deceive people here in the forum just because of what you say. Maybe that's what you believe, but for the most part, it's not like that.

If the couple has both work, that is double the income.  If a person is poor and marries a rich one, that is not just a doubler but rather a jackpot.  Arranged marriage had been long practiced by people, so that statement you cited had long been breached.  So marriage as a tool to enhance one influence, network, and wealth is a normal thing.  @OP just make sound a bit bad because he directly stated the purpose of marrying others is to amass wealth.

[Fatunad]

Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

Looking into the Financial aspect chateria in marriage does not mean one is just focusing on money alone.  Apart from love their ate other things people desire in marriage like respect, some physical qualities which can be beauty or handsomeness and other  things and I don't think if one puts Finance as a desire in marriage I don't see it to be bad and it doesn't mean their is no love too. Everyone wants a good life and if people will choose Financial stability as one of their requirements in marriage or getting a partner their is nothing wrong about it, we all know what we want.

Outside of the original post, I generally agree with you. Marriage these days shouldn't be compared to back then when everything is about love. These days we have to use both our mind and heart. Despite needing feelings and emotional connection with the significant other to maintain commitment and a harmoinous relationship, we cannot ignore the fact that we also require or look for other things. Moreover, these days with the state of the economy and just how important financial stability is, it isn't bad for an individual to look for a significant other who either have an already established financial stability or is already on the way there as it ensures them that they will have a good future together, including their future family. Being a gold digger and being practical have a distinct line that separates them from each other.

Love is the foundation but that foundation would become that weak and broken if finances arent managed well and thats the truth nowadays. Love would be nothing if you cant provide shelter and food or doesnt been able to provide those basic needs which for your family to be able to live. Sooner or later then your wife would definitely leave you if you couldnt really be able to support those things. Women nowadays becomes already that smart on which one of their main criterias on choosing someone to marry with is into those people who could really be able to make them give a good life in terms of finances. Love would really be second priority but somewhat im not really that generalizing all since not all women does really always check out about this stuff and there are ones who are really that getting inlove and doesnt prioritize about mans richness but in todays society then those numbers are really just less.

If you are a family guy and able to see and notice that your earnings arent really that enough anymore or something short then it would really be just that fine that you should really be finding to need
some extra income to support on what your family needs because marriage life and having kids needs to raise is never been easy and a life time commitment on which means that
being smart on finding other source is something that would really be that recommended on doing so.

[pawel7777]

Love is the foundation but that foundation would become that weak and broken if finances arent managed well and thats the truth nowadays. Love would be nothing if you cant provide shelter and food or doesnt been able to provide those basic needs which for your family to be able to live. Sooner or later then your wife would definitely leave you if you couldnt really be able to support those things.

If foundation becomes weak because of other factors, maybe it wasn't a good foundation at all. Foundation, by definition, is supposed to be something solid and should keep all other things together.
"Falling in love" is probably the worst reason to get married, as that feeling will wear off over time and you might find yourself sharing life with someone with completely different core values and goals. Real love is developed over time and is not based solely on sexual attraction.
If your relationship is built on strong, common values and on mature love rather than on the teenagers' idea of it, then it's not going to fall apart upon hitting financial difficulties, but quite the opposite, it will make both sides more determined to sort-out the problem.

[bayu7adi]

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

What if one has a spouse with significant property assets and generates substantial passive income? It may seem like a tempting prospect for a gold digger. However, a man who enters a relationship solely because of his wealth may find it challenging to discover true love, as a love triangle often emerges in such relationships – between the man, the woman, and the money.

True love is crucial, where a partner remains committed, even when one is sick or facing hardships, helping them rise again. A gold digger has the potential to accelerate the demise of their wealthy spouse and tends to prioritize money.

If I were to suggest investing in real estate, it's not a bad idea. Ensure you have ample funds and conduct thorough location research to maximize ROI quickly.

[JeffBrad12]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Going blind into rental properties isn't the answer. You have to consider a number of things before you waste your money on a house.

if only its all that rainbow with rental properties, the truth is, as a landlord someone would also need to think to mantain building if they rented a house to someone.
also the fact that there's no guarantee there's gonna be someone renting our house if we have the property. there are so many people with the same thoughts process, the only benefit is if we become landlord in a country with unaffordable housings like what happened in canada then it will be beneficial. because the economics seem to side on the landlords.
otherwise, despite the profit, sometime, there's just many problems needs to be solved.

[ancafe]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

It depends on what kind of rich family you marry into, because not all rich people look at wealth when marrying their child to someone else. However, actually marrying someone who is much richer than us will feel uncomfortable because if we don't have a much bigger opinion than him it will make us have no self-esteem, especially since our partner is a career woman. The essence of marriage is to build a happy household and a partner is willing to accompany us in building financial strength together, not just wanting to enjoy the results after achieving great success.

Therefore we don't have to marry rich people or vice versa, but we have to look for a partner who can accept each other's shortcomings. Building finances with your partner is much better because we will encourage and pray for each other. If a partner doesn't want to do that then that partner is not worth keeping because he will never be willing to live from scratch with us.

[slapper]

Love is the foundation but that foundation would become that weak and broken if finances arent managed well and thats the truth nowadays. Love would be nothing if you cant provide shelter and food or doesnt been able to provide those basic needs which for your family to be able to live. Sooner or later then your wife would definitely leave you if you couldnt really be able to support those things.

If foundation becomes weak because of other factors, maybe it wasn't a good foundation at all. Foundation, by definition, is supposed to be something solid and should keep all other things together.
"Falling in love" is probably the worst reason to get married, as that feeling will wear off over time and you might find yourself sharing life with someone with completely different core values and goals. Real love is developed over time and is not based solely on sexual attraction.
If your relationship is built on strong, common values and on mature love rather than on the teenagers' idea of it, then it's not going to fall apart upon hitting financial difficulties, but quite the opposite, it will make both sides more determined to sort-out the problem.

As you so beautifully described a foundation as robust and unyielding, it deserves further contemplation. Many agree that a foundation, whether in relationships or finance, should be strong and sturdy. In theory, it should survive many stresses and forces without losing stability or integrity

Your observation that “falling in love” may not be the best basis for marriage, especially financially, is astute. Marriage involves both emotional and economical components. That's right. Thus, entering into such a relationship should be done with caution and foresight to ensure that the basis is not founded on ephemeral feelings but on something more lasting

Isn't real love, which evolves and solidifies, like financial stability and prosperity? It goes through life's ups and downs, victories and hardships, abundance and scarcity. Thus, when a partnership based on mature love and shared values has financial obstacles, it should strengthen the resolve to overcome them

[HONDACD125]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

It depends on what kind of rich family you marry into, because not all rich people look at wealth when marrying their child to someone else. However, actually marrying someone who is much richer than us will feel uncomfortable

Therefore we don't have to marry rich people or vice versa, but we have to look for a partner who can accept each other's shortcomings. Building finances with your partner is much better because we will encourage and pray for each other. If a partner doesn't want to do that then that partner is not worth keeping because he will never be willing to live from scratch with us.

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

[pawel7777]

Isn't real love, which evolves and solidifies, like financial stability and prosperity? It goes through life's ups and downs, victories and hardships, abundance and scarcity. Thus, when a partnership based on mature love and shared values has financial obstacles, it should strengthen the resolve to overcome them

Exactly. The part of the problem lies with linguistics, we slap the same term ("love") on two different feelings that are distant to each other (short-lived lust Vs. long-term bond).

I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Meaning you would be happy to position yourself as a "gold digger" and marry someone just for their wealth and to live in luxury? If so, that's sad. Putting consumption as the top value of your life will backfire badly most of the time.

[dothebeats]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Going blind into rental properties isn't the answer. You have to consider a number of things before you waste your money on a house.

if only its all that rainbow with rental properties, the truth is, as a landlord someone would also need to think to mantain building if they rented a house to someone.
also the fact that there's no guarantee there's gonna be someone renting our house if we have the property. there are so many people with the same thoughts process, the only benefit is if we become landlord in a country with unaffordable housings like what happened in canada then it will be beneficial. because the economics seem to side on the landlords.
otherwise, despite the profit, sometime, there's just many problems needs to be solved.

I was waiting for someone to mention this and there you finally are. I completely agree with you regarding this and perhaps OP forgot this part of rental properties and reality in general. No business or investment goes well without effort and maintenance. Earning a lot of property means higher taxes, bigger responsibility, and a lot more money needed for the maintenance of each house or rental property. Perhaps this is why a lot of rental properties are now transitioning to short-term rentals or even Airbnb, the maintenance can be too much as tenants move in and out frequently which in turn guarantees lesser wear and tear on the property.

Nevertheless, it is obvious that OP is only focusing on the excessive positive side of rental properties and has lost ground on reality.

[Broly46]

...even your kids are a resource...

And your kid would start hating you en mass, they all know and hate how boomer expect you to repay the national debt lmao!

...majority of the people... never gets it...when shit ain't working, it just isn't...

Welcome to reality!

...you never can tell which way would work best...

game is rigged, house always win, why even confused about which is best?

...renting properties/real estate all easy is one who never...

lmao, need 99 years working experience, must have rich parent backing, must be royal descendent. Really! Working hard for money is so much easier, just forget rent seeking, just forget doing what the rich guy enjoy doing!

...What's the message?...

I'm bored.

...key to having financial stability is to get married?...

It is always about reaching new achievement, you look for security in life, such as security in better living condition, better health, clean air, clean water, tasty food, and most importantly, happy ending forever! You should look for new achievement, unlock all of them to achieve self actualization! It doesn't matter if it goes against traditional roles.

...simps... paying allowances or sponsoring trips...

What... it is an eye opener, btw we should be grateful internet has been doing its charm to empowering the very human nature.

...it's easy money...

It used to be easy. But the competition is insane today.

...income are not scalable... To me, that's not passive income...

You don't have much choice btw. Or you rather work for sweatshop for minima wage getting lock inside warehouse for long hours. It is passive, as it has flexible schedule, it has the option to reject offers.

...rental property you have to buy it first...

What else can you do? lmao.

...won't be able to get a private jet... just renting three...

It is certainly possible, but it could wipe most of the passive income, not a good plan for some fainted hearts who need very high security in life and very risk aversive, not to forget the cost of everything has came down quite a lot due to higher production efficiency, low cost jet can be made with less durable materials yet low maintenance. Just look at how new Russian tank and jet are falling apart quickly in the battle zone.

[Fatunad]

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Going blind into rental properties isn't the answer. You have to consider a number of things before you waste your money on a house.

if only its all that rainbow with rental properties, the truth is, as a landlord someone would also need to think to mantain building if they rented a house to someone.
also the fact that there's no guarantee there's gonna be someone renting our house if we have the property. there are so many people with the same thoughts process, the only benefit is if we become landlord in a country with unaffordable housings like what happened in canada then it will be beneficial. because the economics seem to side on the landlords.
otherwise, despite the profit, sometime, there's just many problems needs to be solved.

I was waiting for someone to mention this and there you finally are. I completely agree with you regarding this and perhaps OP forgot this part of rental properties and reality in general. No business or investment goes well without effort and maintenance. Earning a lot of property means higher taxes, bigger responsibility, and a lot more money needed for the maintenance of each house or rental property. Perhaps this is why a lot of rental properties are now transitioning to short-term rentals or even Airbnb, the maintenance can be too much as tenants move in and out frequently which in turn guarantees lesser wear and tear on the property.

Nevertheless, it is obvious that OP is only focusing on the excessive positive side of rental properties and has lost ground on reality.

Married life does mean that you should need to find and sustain yourself specially on providing the needs of your family. When it comes to passive income then nothing beats out when it comes to real estate.
We do know on what are really that advantages on having properties on which you could really be able to flip out buy and sell or would really be having those kind of rents and this is something that would really be that ideal but ofcourse we do know that the capital needed for this kind of venture is never been cheap and this is why even how much we do really like this kind of idea or business then due to cost or value then not all would really be having the chance on doing so.

Love is the foundation but that foundation would become that weak and broken if finances arent managed well and thats the truth nowadays. Love would be nothing if you cant provide shelter and food or doesnt been able to provide those basic needs which for your family to be able to live. Sooner or later then your wife would definitely leave you if you couldnt really be able to support those things.

If foundation becomes weak because of other factors, maybe it wasn't a good foundation at all. Foundation, by definition, is supposed to be something solid and should keep all other things together.
"Falling in love" is probably the worst reason to get married, as that feeling will wear off over time and you might find yourself sharing life with someone with completely different core values and goals. Real love is developed over time and is not based solely on sexual attraction.
If your relationship is built on strong, common values and on mature love rather than on the teenagers' idea of it, then it's not going to fall apart upon hitting financial difficulties, but quite the opposite, it will make both sides more determined to sort-out the problem.

Yes, you are right but we know in todays society on which love could really be learnt up and would really be that be able to learn to love someone as long they do have the money or finances.
Yes, is not a true love but when it comes to other womens mindset on which its better to have a secure future rather than on minding their feelings which i could say that i've known some
of my friends  which is like this which it is really just that a shame on having that kind of standard or ways of living or on how they do treat up themselves.

[Iroh]

I already saw this post earlier and failed to see the logic of the post so I decided to look at it again later, and now that I am back I still fail to see the main point of this. What's the message? What's the correlation between having sugar daddies to being married? Are you saying that the key to having financial stability is to get married? If so, millions of us could have been millionaires and billionaires by now.

The OP, if I understood enough, was going on about how your passive income should be a lot higher than your expenses. Then invited discussions if marriage to a rich individual or keeping rich boyfriends around should be classified as having a passive income since gifts that are mainly funds are coming in perhaps regularly.

Passive income are funds mostly generated from having investments/a business that has started bringing in returns. Marrying for money or giving yourself to whoever would fund a certain lifestyle aren’t passive incomes and won’t bring financial security.

[Stedsm]

Lol I couldn't stop laughing, dear OP.
So you mean there is no hard work?
The only truth about your rental property part is that, only those riches who suck the blood out of poor people and pay them their hard-earned money are the ones who create properties for themselves. Actually, they create empires, so they don't give a damn about renting that property to earn anything because they know how to get their work done through others' efforts while themselves sitting in an AC room, watching their employees do the job for them. Only those who know how to take work from others can succeed in buying properties for themselves and their families (and maybe rent it to someone).

I've got friends who collectively bought a property on loan, then they kept repaying the loan out of the rent for 5 years, then they bought another house and again did the same but this time, they repaid it earlier because of 2 houses' rent (and some out of their pockets). However, you need luck here as well to find the best property in an area where you'll get a tenant looking for the same and gets it in his/her budget.

And about the marriage part, what has that to do with passive income? I'm shocked. If you think that your wife is an investment, then I believe you seriously need a break. And yeah, if she's an earner like you, then it all depends upon how you guys manage your money and the most important thing - understanding between you two.

[gunhell16]

       -   OP, you are obviously misleading the real definition of "marriage.", What you are saying is an assumption, and that is your opinion.
When you get married, isn't it said to the couple who are getting married, "Is this man or woman ready to be with you in hardship and infection, till sickness and in health, till death do as part".

Where does marriage mean you need to double your passive income? Even if a couple only has a single passive income, they can still leave together. Yes, passive income is necessary in married life, but it is only part of the responsibility of the husband or wife. This is not the real meaning of married life. So don't deceive people here in the forum just because of what you say. Maybe that's what you believe, but for the most part, it's not like that.

If the couple has both work, that is double the income.  If a person is poor and marries a rich one, that is not just a doubler but rather a jackpot.  Arranged marriage had been long practiced by people, so that statement you cited had long been breached.  So marriage as a tool to enhance one influence, network, and wealth is a normal thing.  @OP just make sound a bit bad because he directly stated the purpose of marrying others is to amass wealth.

Hehehe, I laughed at what you said here. But there is truth in your point. Because there are people who are really looking for a marriage partner to lift them out of the poverty they are facing, whether they are women or men, and one of the examples of this kind of people, most of whom I don't know, are all gold diggers. I just don't know what the man is called—maybe a gold digger boy.

But it's part of married life that you really shouldn't rely on just one source. It should be helped, especially since a couple is not rich. Although not everyone aspires to have a lot of money but a happy, simple life, the one who has his own house, land, car, and business

[ancafe]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

[dothebeats]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

First of all, I agree with you regarding rich people ensuring that their legacy continues with their kids. They have various different reasons as to why they are ensuring the future wealth of their heir (some for selfish greed while others for actual care and concern for their kids' future) there is no doubt that rich parents want to make sure that their wealth lasts for years and years of different generations. However, I do not agree with you regarding the conflict of marrying someone who has a higher economic class than us. While it may be true that it will cause social impact and possible effects due to the changes on both us and our partners, conflicts like this can happen even if we marry someone of the same economic status as us as we are merging with their world. There is no such thing as complete balance when it comes to relationships, one day we will be the ones to fill what is lacking, and some days it will be the complete opposite. There will always be someone who is getting more and someone giving more.

[darkangel11]

I have a rental property myself and it doesn't generate a lot of profit.
It's an apartment in one of the top 10 largest cities in the country. The apartment was built in the 90s so it's not that old.
So, every few years I have to remodel it, offer do some painting. 2 years ago I lied new floor tiles in the kitchen and hall. I do it all by myself because if I were to hire someone, the cost would double.
The 2021 remodeling took about 4 months of rent to pay for itself. Would've been 8 if done by a contractor...

I had a number of tenants over the years. Some were cleaner than others. One woman must have had an argument with her boyfriend because they made a hole in the bathroom door that looked like it was made with a high heel. The more properties you have the more problems they generate. When you reach 5 it becomes a normal job and you either have to hire a helper, or start working part-time to be able to meet with tenants and deal with their issues.

[Ever-young]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

This emphasis gat me, adding this in life as a plan to make a living looks like an already failed one, when we talk about this sugar daddies, which they have already makes the money which anyone need to keep a home running, if one is forced to have one why need the rest for, oh yes they are beneficial when we look at it from the monetary gain side, but when we wan to talk about it in a way for one to have future plan for them self what do you think will be faith of the woman, if the sugar daddy decides to end everything today what do you think will be next for the person.

And this so called sugar daddies also have their own bills to take care of they have family, spouse wife and children, to me I see it as a very unwise means of accumulating finance it might look like it’s going to work, but one starts failing the moment they put all their hope and survive on the shoulder of another, because if the person falls which means you will also fall.

[HONDACD125]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

It also depends on how rich people have trained their children. If the training is done in a good way, I have seen the relationships of the children of the rich with the children of the poor among relatives, and often they are very successful. If the importance of relationships is realized, then both the rich and the poor can live peacefully together.

In my opinion, the importance of money cannot be ignored, nowadays having money is very important to lead a peaceful life.Rather, not having money can also be a major reason for peace.However, if there is sincerity in relationships, then wealth and poverty should never be an obstacle and these things should never be a problem of ego.In the relationship between husband and wife, there is never competition with each other,Rather, each other is taken care of ,and it is a relationship of love and affection.

[Gallar]

~Snip
So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Personally, if you look at it from a man's perspective, I don't think this is good. Because if a woman has greater assets than a man (husband and wife), it is feared that the woman (wife) will be more powerful and will not respect the man (husband). In fact, being a leader in the household is normal and must be respected by the family, including the wife. So if seen from a man's point of view, it is better to avoid marrying a richer woman.

However, the story is different if seen from a woman's perspective. In my opinion, it is natural for a woman to look for a husband who is affluent or rich. Because as I explained, a husband will carry a greater burden in a household. So if you look at it from a financial perspective, it would be more natural for a woman to look for a man who is already established.

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

Having a Sugar Daddy is very interesting and very profitable. But as far as I know, it's only aimed at women. Apart from that, to be honest, sugar daddies usually have a negative view among many people. Because usually sugar daddies are men who are already established, and most of them already have families. That's why sugar daddies have negative views from people. So in my personal opinion, to earn a lot of money, it's better to work hard. Because believe me, having a sugar daddy is not always beautiful. Because in essence, in this world there is always opportunity and hope for anyone to change their financial situation. The most important thing is to stay away from the words prestige and laziness. Because these two characteristics usually become big obstacles to changes in our lives, including financial matters.

[RockBell]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

one of the main reasons people want to even get rich is because of their family and their children, as a parent the future of their children is their priority they have to make the right decision for them and guide them till they start to make their own decisions but as far as they are under their parent they must follow instruction for there own good. the rich always want their children to also get involved with their fellow rich just to secure continuity in wealth. rich people don't want their children to suffer they want them to continue in luxury and once you are involved with rich people you will even have a lot of business offers from their rich friends which is no harm we all are looking for opportunities.

I have seen a situation where if you are smart they will have interest in you and they will see you has a valuable asset there young men that have potential in them such people are always given a chance.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.

[AicecreaME]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

[dothebeats]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

Good point here and I do agree with you; hence this is why planning is important and that of course includes communicating with our significant other. If both parties know where they stand and what the plan is before, during, and after marriage then expectations will be set and roles will be given. For example, if my partner and I decided that after marriage the plan is to focus on our careers and save up for a business then we'll ensure that we take birth control pills and use protections so no unexpected pregnancy will happen that can jeopardize the plan. To put it simply, not even married couple are the same as every single one of us have our own priorities and reasons to get married.

[Litzki1990]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

Every parent wants their child to be a little bit better than where they are. Parents sacrifice a lot in life for the better future of their children. A poor parent wants his child to marry into a rich family but this is not the case for everyone. From such thoughts of the parents, when the child is married into a family larger than their own status, they basically try to separate the child from the child's family in various ways. If the child does not think about the parents and they are separated from the parents then he may be fine but the parents come to a certain age and go through very bad times whereas if they think about the parents and listen to the wife's family then the wife's family A distance develops with him which leads to divorce. I think that instead of looking for a high class family, one should get relatives in a family with whom one will have a lot of good relations and the son and daughter will be able to lead a very happy life.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

So passive income is all that matters to you, don't you think that the more men a woman sleeps with, the more she is likely to carry several infections and diseases that to some, money can't cure? Have you ever reason that way? Because when it comes to making passive income, the internet have made that very easy and possible to both single and married women to do both from the comfort of their home (i.e for the hardworking & industrious women). Because religion has made me to understand that adultery is a big sin, and it is the last thing I will ever want to see a marriage woman do for the sake of money.

Note: Sugar mummy/daddy fades away with time, but skill never fades away, and as such it's advisable a lady gets a skill than looking forward to doing sugar daddy as a passive income.

[Fiatless]

Hehehe, I laughed at what you said here. But there is truth in your point. Because there are people who are really looking for a marriage partner to lift them out of the poverty they are facing, whether they are women or men, and one of the examples of this kind of people, most of whom I don't know, are all gold diggers. I just don't know what the man is called—maybe a gold digger boy.

But it's part of married life that you really shouldn't rely on just one source. It should be helped, especially since a couple is not rich. Although not everyone aspires to have a lot of money but a happy, simple life, the one who has his own house, land, car, and business

But there are also rich women and men who are looking for marital partners. They don't care if they are rich or poor all they want is someone they can call their husband or wife. Getting married because of financial gains and not love and compatibility can have severe consequences. This is because money is not everything in life. It is better to have a suse that loves and respects you than to focus on money.

It is desperation or laziness that makes people focus on getting a rich partner for them to survive. Such a person will end up becoming single for the rest of their lives because they might not be fortunate to have such a partner. I also desire to get married to somebody that is financially okay but I am not searching for such a spouse. If I am lucky enough to locate such a person who also loves me, that's okay but  I will never rely on anybody to achieve my goals in life. 

[Broly46]

...heard about divorce ...married several times in their lives...

You can have as many concubines as you want. But only one is allowed to marry, it is written in laws, all other spouse that is not registered in marriage is not married. I had yet to see a guy can marry to many spouses from many different country, which also registered marital based on each individual country legislation, if this is even allowed you can see the guy could run to other country when any shit hit the fan to just escape any obligation bestowed.

...what kind of woman could handle 100 sugar daddies ...

You underestimate what a woman is capable of, woman in the past could bear up to ten children, she could easily raise ten children at once, it is very same to handle 10 sugar daddies too, it is their natural talent to be good at handling many guys.

...For free? Land ...wasn't available for free...

Every land is free. Every planet in the universe is free, even the asteroid 16 Psyche which was told to be made of gold is free, nobody would tell you to pay the price, nobody would tell you to pay a price for owning the Mars, there is no alien on the Mars would tell you to pay for the land. It is only human which would do so, because human want you to pay for PROTECTION, you pay to get security, to protect your life and property from invasion. Also the sea is free if you can live on the sea, it is still free today, may be won't be free in the future, also no animal would pay for land too, only human are required to pay for land.

... OP is trolling us ...have to work hard for their so called "passive income".

Definition, word by word, it is considered passive, because it is tax-free income, by laws, active income is highly taxed. If you ever pay taxes on your income it is active income, that include crypto trading too when you pay taxes on gain you are working for active income.

...Marrying rich seems like the best way ...

who know?

...Having a few sugar daddys doesn't classify as passive income...

The legal system decide what is passive and what is active, not some nobody like you.

...didn't have jobs that could give us a stable income, ...were together, ...stable before getting married then we would not have married ...

It is why American is always $500 unexpected spending away from going broke. Many of them can't fix a $500 money problem immediately without seeking help from loan provider.

...slowly but surely we are collecting money to pay off the subsidized housing ...

This is also why many American do not own their own houses.

...ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment...

There is true reward from love, after the finish the test with flying colour, you get to rewarded with happy ending!

...There are contract marriages and they are all accepted as marriage.

lmao, that is a fraud, but as usual when you are very gullible you always fall for the trap that is setup by the guy who give you snake oil advices.

...Money is good in marriage but it has to be balanced...

And you would trade stock during lunch break, you need the money for marriage, need the money to pay for everything!

... marriage as a business contract because that can lead to disaster...

Human need marriage, human seeking disaster, animal are confused.

... not some magic bullet to double your own income, but sharing costs, if ...

it is double the passive income, passive income is also called invisible income, because you can't see the income unless you consult a financial expert who can do cashflow statement.

Scalability, ... exchanges time for money is unscalable...right?

False, a lawyer would suggest otherwise, it has to test under Howey test. There is very few active incomes, but too many variety of passive incomes.

...homes is a major obstacle. It's expensive, right? Risk ...buy a private jet? A bit far-fetched...

just hire guy to do the job, because being passive always require someone else to lift them up for every trivial thing in life.

...real passivity when researching income streams. Is it not a complicated choice...

Just hire expert who leave school with flying colour to do the jobs, they are trained to be perfect and rarely make mistakes, they also research every market 24/7/365 and never loss to anyone who are doing the same.

[uswa56]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

Not everything is like that, it all depends on the initial planning before marriage with your partner, sometimes there are both of them working to build a more stable family economy or doing other things for income.
Children are not a barrier to any of that.

I have encountered many things at this time and I have even felt it myself that marriage will make you more motivated to earn more money to be able to meet your many needs, and this is indeed driven psychologically.
And children are not an obstacle at all, in fact children are motivation, so we cannot attribute and being a child as an excuse, then the time with children and family can be arranged, because we cannot possibly work 24 hours.

[usekevin]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marriage itself had enough expenses in our life,we use to spend huge on the marriage.In developing country the people spending nearly their 5 years of salary on their marriage.This applicable to all range income people,the high earning spend high.Low earning spend huge on the marriage.Choosing their pair is most important one,most the rich people perfectly choose the rich pair.But the poor should take the rich pair,the partner should help to settle the marriage loan.But the most of the poor people choose the poor people partner and use to spend their five year to repay the marriage loan.

[bitgolden]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

[savetheFORUM]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

It depends on how someone sees life and what their moral values allow them to do. Not everyone can have multiple sugar daddies so that they can have more money to hoard for their future or whatever. Having more than one partner, even if they are temporary, is not what everyone would prefer unless they are extreme gold diggers and don't care about their body or anything and they are always ready to sleep with anyone just for the sake of money.

So, your maths might be simple but life isn't that simple for everyone. And how many people do you think can use this formula to live their lives? There won't be enough sugar daddies for everyone if they are all willing to have multiple unless all of those sugar daddies also have multiple options.

[ancafe]

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.

Passing on what is owned by the father to the child is an obligation to maintain the family breed for those who own a business. It is not easy to educate children to follow in their father's footsteps because they may have different paths and fathers must see this interest in their children so that they do not appear to be imposing their wishes. If you have several children it might be easy because one of them will definitely have something in common with their father, the father can direct his children's interest in developing another business if they are not interested in the business owned by their father.

Regarding marriage, it is different from the father's performance in forming his son to run a business, marriage must have compatibility between the two and usually it will depend on the children's assessment of the partner they choose. Therefore, before getting married, it is best to get to know your partner well so that we can live together in joy and sorrow, marriage is forever not temporary and if the partner is not chosen well divorce will occur.

[dothebeats]

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.

Passing on what is owned by the father to the child is an obligation to maintain the family breed for those who own a business. It is not easy to educate children to follow in their father's footsteps because they may have different paths and fathers must see this interest in their children so that they do not appear to be imposing their wishes. If you have several children it might be easy because one of them will definitely have something in common with their father, the father can direct his children's interest in developing another business if they are not interested in the business owned by their father.

You are absolutely right about this. Although many rich parents hope for their children to follow in their footsteps and either take over their company/business one day or take on the same path that they once chose to take, there are of course instances that these children have different dreams and goals they hope to follow. Hence, in an ideal scenario, it would be best for parents to be supportive of this while also guiding their kids to a path that will lead them to financial stability that will still keep the wealth and financial standing of the family. The very reason for this is the risk of any business/company going down if kids are forced to do something they have no care and passion for while if they know that they are being supported they may end up doing well and making a new for themselves in the industry they choose that will either add additional income for the family or create an additional business for them.

[harapan]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marriage is far different from what you may seem it is. And I  quote you wrong it is not and will not be a means of doubling ur income or whatever.it was design for a special purpose to pro-create,for understanding, to be as a help meets to your spouse and to ascertain this fact is where the man needs to double whatever income just to meets up to the needs and wellbeing of the family.
But if that's  means one need to have a thousand sugar daddy's,buying a private jet and sport car and so on just to meet up that needs
 then its fine.

Peradventure before you got into the marriage,you must have made lots of income and properties what will you call that.so is it now a means of doubling anything!?

[Vaskiy]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

Marriage in relation with finance is the mutual contract that makes two persons of to get united. Both of them used to share what is available with them and help each other in each and every decision unlike the earning capability. This is the real definition, but not many follow it, as the earning gives both of them individuality and independence.

[Mr.right85]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

Some means by which loans have been abused! It happens no doubt and this is caused mainly by societal and peer pressure.
There comes an age one would get to and they get pressured by society to start a family even without the necessary resource lifeline and funds to finance a family. Loans are to be repaid and when not invested in some profit oriented business, it becomes just debt to you. Either way, you lose by paying an uninvested loan.

The unfortunate situation is that, most individuals no longer repay loans, following the non collateral nature of the system in recent times but your sure to have it spoil your credit score.

Marriage isn’t an investment or a profit oriented institution and as such, taking loans to get married isn’t the best of ideas.

[Fortify]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

While financial benefits are nice, they should be the last thing you consider when going into marriage. Not only that they can equally go the other way and work against you. If you are a high earner and your spouse is not, it can open you up to all sorts of financial obligations in the long run - especially if things went wrong. It's a strange list you've put together comparing it to a rental. There is no free ride in life for the vast majority of people out there and both people in the relationship should be happy with the earning potential of each other. That will make things much more peaceful, especially when you add children into the mix when the time is right, because it may be cheaper for one partner to stay off work to look after them.

[ancafe]

You are absolutely right about this. Although many rich parents hope for their children to follow in their footsteps and either take over their company/business one day or take on the same path that they once chose to take, there are of course instances that these children have different dreams and goals they hope to follow. Hence, in an ideal scenario, it would be best for parents to be supportive of this while also guiding their kids to a path that will lead them to financial stability that will still keep the wealth and financial standing of the family. The very reason for this is the risk of any business/company going down if kids are forced to do something they have no care and passion for while if they know that they are being supported they may end up doing well and making a new for themselves in the industry they choose that will either add additional income for the family or create an additional business for them.

Every parent will definitely support their child even though the child's interests and desires are different and forcing children to follow their wishes if they do not have the same interests is the wrong decision. This is the reality of life among rich parents who have businesses that need to be passed on to their children. Every child definitely has different interests and skills so forcing people's wishes does not necessarily produce good results. A parent's job is only to guide and if they intend for their child to follow in their steps, provide guidance when they start to be able to take responsibility for you and give the child the freedom to determine the choices.

Character can be formed and it is not impossible that if a child previously didn't like his father's business, he will turn into liking it. It depends on how a father can guide and shape this character so that when he becomes the heir to the business he owns he doesn't go bankrupt because his skills are not there. The role of parents is important because children will follow the habits of their parents and if a father has a wise way of educating a child will definitely want to listen.

[slapper]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

While financial benefits are nice, they should be the last thing you consider when going into marriage. Not only that they can equally go the other way and work against you. If you are a high earner and your spouse is not, it can open you up to all sorts of financial obligations in the long run - especially if things went wrong. It's a strange list you've put together comparing it to a rental. There is no free ride in life for the vast majority of people out there and both people in the relationship should be happy with the earning potential of each other. That will make things much more peaceful, especially when you add children into the mix when the time is right, because it may be cheaper for one partner to stay off work to look after them.

monetary gains? They're good and they're wonderful, but when considering marriage, they shouldn't take precedence. Marriage is more, much more than just a financial transaction. It has to do with love, fidelity, and collaboration. And indeed, depending on individual wages, financial dynamics can alter, sometimes substantially. If one earns more, it may result in commitments, some of which may not be advantageous in the long run

Your comparison with a rental? Very interesting; fascinating. But life, life isn't about free rides. The majority of individuals work very, very hard to obtain what they have. Relationship partners should be extremely at ease with one another's financial situation. It's about mutual respect and comprehension. And while children are playing? The financial environment is fundamentally changing. Even though one partner might have to stay at home, the decision should be mutual. It's not just about the money; it's also about respect, love, and trust amongst people

[Nerdy doctor]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

People living in developing countries aren’t the only ones guilty of having excessively big and expensive weddings especially when they cannot afford it.
A lot of people worldwide go into debts after borrowing money from wherever to fund a big and expensive wedding ceremony intended to leave a lasting impression on everyone who was present.

People who borrow money in order to have an expensive wedding are likely doing it morefor the benefit of others and sadly, a good number of them are getting married for what they stand to benefit from the Union.

[HajiBagi]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

I have seen many people who have married without having a good job that will put food on their table but after marriage they become successful people and having a well paying job that can provide for all their needs. Some wives are blessings to some men because as a man after marriage you will start having some things that you didn't have before, you will start achieving some goals you didn't expect. No matter how you identify as a guy, as soon as you realise you are an adult or learn anything about relationships, you need to realise that you have obligations to fulfil.

The most essential thing for a man to do is get married because it gives him the opportunity to have children and determine who will inherit his property. As a male, dying young and unmarried is equivalent to not living out your dreams. I'm not saying that we should get married even if we are incapable of doing so, but I do want us to realise that as men, we cannot say that we must accomplish all of our goals before we marry because nobody achieves all of their goals in life. Therefore, whenever we have the chance to wed, we should take it. However, before we do, try to understand the person with whom we are in a relationship.

[fullhdpixel]

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

I think it also depends on where you are from. In certain countries, a working lady or even a man might get paid leave when they are about to become parents, for the mother since she will be in labor and the father so that he can take care of the mother and the child. However, that's not the case everywhere, because sometimes you might need to simply leave your job in such a situation if you are a working lady and there are no incentives given by the company.

A lot of females also stop working after they get married, maybe because their husbands ask them to do so since they know they can take care of everything and they should just stay at home, take care of the children and the household chores while they work and earn and they live a happy married life.

[Hamphser]

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

I think it also depends on where you are from. In certain countries, a working lady or even a man might get paid leave when they are about to become parents, for the mother since she will be in labor and the father so that he can take care of the mother and the child. However, that's not the case everywhere, because sometimes you might need to simply leave your job in such a situation if you are a working lady and there are no incentives given by the company.

A lot of females also stop working after they get married, maybe because their husbands ask them to do so since they know they can take care of everything and they should just stay at home, take care of the children and the household chores while they work and earn and they live a happy married life.

Totally depends on the situation because if you do see that you as a man or husband on which you do notice out that your earnings arent really that enough to sustain your living with your family then this is the time that your wife would really be making out decisions on having some work. It would really be something that really talks about decision making in between husband and wife and for the sake of your kids future then
it would really be just that right that both of you would really be that needing to work but as much as possible us husbands doesnt really like for our wifes to have to do the work and this is what happened in my situation and the rest of husbands out there that they would really be just asking for their wives to be focusing on their own home rather than on going into office. We men do really loves or preferred on seeing
our wives at our own home and doesnt really do the hard work to support the family but of course it would really be that depending if your earning is really that sufficient enough for daily needs or living then
it wont really be that an issue.

There are really that moments where financial problems do kicks in because there are really situations in life that we do experience something like this and this is why as much as possible
we should really be making investments and businesses on which we could really be able to avoid these kind of hardship in life since you do know that you could
really be having that back up funds whenever shit things happen.

[pawel7777]

(...) and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away.

You don't get a severance package if you quit. By design, severance pay is meant to be a financial compensation for being laid off by the employer.

A lot of females also stop working after they get married, maybe because their husbands ask them to do so since they know they can take care of everything and they should just stay at home, take care of the children and the household chores while they work and earn and they live a happy married life.

That's not really what happens in the western countries. It's very rare for a woman to stop working just because she got married. Some would choose to stay at home after giving birth, but usually, they would just try to balance life/work by getting less demanding, often part-time jobs. Which kind of works well, especially when kids are old enough to go to school (in the UK, it's 4-5 years old) and there's no need for a woman to just sit at home all day. Especially now, when you can also work remotely.

[wallet4bitcoin]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Quite a scary analysis, most of the pointers aren't possible considering the numbers, sugar daddies and all.

On a more serious note, it is ideal to have some sorth of passive income before marriage as this relieves you of financial pressure but I don not reckon your percieved "sugar daddy" idea to be a part of the equation. Work hard to earn a living. Its no rocket science, people are doing it, you too can do same. You don not necessarily need to be amongst the world's wealthiest men but you can live above the average life if you work hard enough.

[Patrol69]

Marriage means taking on an additional responsibility. A single person cannot think the way a married person thinks because a married person has the responsibility of a family on his shoulders and some people depend on him. In the case of a married man, not only does he have to pay the wife's expenses, but after marriage a son has to take care of his wife besides taking care of his parents and if they have a son or daughter, he also has to provide for them. Marrying without a good source of income and having children without saving is foolish. So a man must think about these things before getting married. He should not have married at this time so that he never felt after marriage. We must find multiple sources of money as well as our savings to have a happy life after marriage.

[harapan]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

Marriage to me doesn't seem like a great achievement without been financially stable.Of course nobody wants to be caught in the web of been stuck in a debt or being controlled by a woman(wife).Its good to know  what you need in life and then work hard to achieve it.
Just like wanting to get married,a house or a car.So without hardwork or any source of income how do you intend to achieve all these.
 Marriage requires money,been married also requires money;is not like an investment platform that you'll wish to benefit from it,you're not going to trade your spouse or either ways are you?never.
  Moreover,marriage is a lifetime contract that needs deep understanding and commitment so let's choose wisely.

[sekalitas]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

It depends on your goals, actually. If your goal is money and marrying a wealthy person seems like the solution, you must understand the value you bring to the relationship that would make them want to marry you. It would be fortunate if you could also genuinely earn their love.

However, I believe relying on a sugar daddy or sugar mommy is neither healthy nor sustainable in the long run. While the financial benefits might seem appealing, it's unpredictable. What if your benefactor's spouse is someone you cannot afford to antagonize? Moreover, without any emotional attachment, you'll likely experience increasing heartbreak

[junder]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

People living in developing countries aren’t the only ones guilty of having excessively big and expensive weddings especially when they cannot afford it.
A lot of people worldwide go into debts after borrowing money from wherever to fund a big and expensive wedding ceremony intended to leave a lasting impression on everyone who was present.

People who borrow money in order to have an expensive wedding are likely doing it morefor the benefit of others and sadly, a good number of them are getting married for what they stand to benefit from the Union.

That's true, holding a celebration or wedding party does require quite a lot of money. I myself am not married, but of course I have a friend who is married so I was curious about the amount he spent on holding a wedding party, and after I found out I was surprised, I thought this price would continue to rise as time went by. and also in my opinion weddings should be celebrated (if you can afford it). because in my country, even though you can get married without a celebration, the prestige of the woman's family is usually the problem, they are embarrassed if the wedding is not celebrated.

Therefore, as men, we must be able to make a lot of money to celebrate our wedding later. Even though there are some women who don't mind if their wedding isn't celebrated, it's still possible that their family will object, even though I think paying for the wedding party costs a lot of money in just a short time, I thought about what if the costs for the wedding party were used for investing or buying a house is clearly for the good in the future However,  it cannot be hidden from the fact that weddings in general should be celebrated with a party. However, in my opinion, borrowing money for wedding expenses should not be done. If you really want to celebrate your wedding with a party, then we have to work hard to make a lot of money for the wedding, not by taking out loans.