Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi

[gunhell16]

       -   OP, you are obviously misleading the real definition of "marriage.", What you are saying is an assumption, and that is your opinion.
When you get married, isn't it said to the couple who are getting married, "Is this man or woman ready to be with you in hardship and infection, till sickness and in health, till death do as part".

Where does marriage mean you need to double your passive income? Even if a couple only has a single passive income, they can still leave together. Yes, passive income is necessary in married life, but it is only part of the responsibility of the husband or wife. This is not the real meaning of married life. So don't deceive people here in the forum just because of what you say. Maybe that's what you believe, but for the most part, it's not like that.

If the couple has both work, that is double the income.  If a person is poor and marries a rich one, that is not just a doubler but rather a jackpot.  Arranged marriage had been long practiced by people, so that statement you cited had long been breached.  So marriage as a tool to enhance one influence, network, and wealth is a normal thing.  @OP just make sound a bit bad because he directly stated the purpose of marrying others is to amass wealth.

Hehehe, I laughed at what you said here. But there is truth in your point. Because there are people who are really looking for a marriage partner to lift them out of the poverty they are facing, whether they are women or men, and one of the examples of this kind of people, most of whom I don't know, are all gold diggers. I just don't know what the man is called—maybe a gold digger boy.

But it's part of married life that you really shouldn't rely on just one source. It should be helped, especially since a couple is not rich. Although not everyone aspires to have a lot of money but a happy, simple life, the one who has his own house, land, car, and business

[1714817216]

1714817216

[ancafe]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

[dothebeats]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

First of all, I agree with you regarding rich people ensuring that their legacy continues with their kids. They have various different reasons as to why they are ensuring the future wealth of their heir (some for selfish greed while others for actual care and concern for their kids' future) there is no doubt that rich parents want to make sure that their wealth lasts for years and years of different generations. However, I do not agree with you regarding the conflict of marrying someone who has a higher economic class than us. While it may be true that it will cause social impact and possible effects due to the changes on both us and our partners, conflicts like this can happen even if we marry someone of the same economic status as us as we are merging with their world. There is no such thing as complete balance when it comes to relationships, one day we will be the ones to fill what is lacking, and some days it will be the complete opposite. There will always be someone who is getting more and someone giving more.

[darkangel11]

I have a rental property myself and it doesn't generate a lot of profit.
It's an apartment in one of the top 10 largest cities in the country. The apartment was built in the 90s so it's not that old.
So, every few years I have to remodel it, offer do some painting. 2 years ago I lied new floor tiles in the kitchen and hall. I do it all by myself because if I were to hire someone, the cost would double.
The 2021 remodeling took about 4 months of rent to pay for itself. Would've been 8 if done by a contractor...

I had a number of tenants over the years. Some were cleaner than others. One woman must have had an argument with her boyfriend because they made a hole in the bathroom door that looked like it was made with a high heel. The more properties you have the more problems they generate. When you reach 5 it becomes a normal job and you either have to hire a helper, or start working part-time to be able to meet with tenants and deal with their issues.

[Ever-young]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

This emphasis gat me, adding this in life as a plan to make a living looks like an already failed one, when we talk about this sugar daddies, which they have already makes the money which anyone need to keep a home running, if one is forced to have one why need the rest for, oh yes they are beneficial when we look at it from the monetary gain side, but when we wan to talk about it in a way for one to have future plan for them self what do you think will be faith of the woman, if the sugar daddy decides to end everything today what do you think will be next for the person.

And this so called sugar daddies also have their own bills to take care of they have family, spouse wife and children, to me I see it as a very unwise means of accumulating finance it might look like it’s going to work, but one starts failing the moment they put all their hope and survive on the shoulder of another, because if the person falls which means you will also fall.

[HONDACD125]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

It also depends on how rich people have trained their children. If the training is done in a good way, I have seen the relationships of the children of the rich with the children of the poor among relatives, and often they are very successful. If the importance of relationships is realized, then both the rich and the poor can live peacefully together.

In my opinion, the importance of money cannot be ignored, nowadays having money is very important to lead a peaceful life.Rather, not having money can also be a major reason for peace.However, if there is sincerity in relationships, then wealth and poverty should never be an obstacle and these things should never be a problem of ego.In the relationship between husband and wife, there is never competition with each other,Rather, each other is taken care of ,and it is a relationship of love and affection.

[Gallar]

~Snip
So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?

Personally, if you look at it from a man's perspective, I don't think this is good. Because if a woman has greater assets than a man (husband and wife), it is feared that the woman (wife) will be more powerful and will not respect the man (husband). In fact, being a leader in the household is normal and must be respected by the family, including the wife. So if seen from a man's point of view, it is better to avoid marrying a richer woman.

However, the story is different if seen from a woman's perspective. In my opinion, it is natural for a woman to look for a husband who is affluent or rich. Because as I explained, a husband will carry a greater burden in a household. So if you look at it from a financial perspective, it would be more natural for a woman to look for a man who is already established.

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

Having a Sugar Daddy is very interesting and very profitable. But as far as I know, it's only aimed at women. Apart from that, to be honest, sugar daddies usually have a negative view among many people. Because usually sugar daddies are men who are already established, and most of them already have families. That's why sugar daddies have negative views from people. So in my personal opinion, to earn a lot of money, it's better to work hard. Because believe me, having a sugar daddy is not always beautiful. Because in essence, in this world there is always opportunity and hope for anyone to change their financial situation. The most important thing is to stay away from the words prestige and laziness. Because these two characteristics usually become big obstacles to changes in our lives, including financial matters.

[RockBell]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

one of the main reasons people want to even get rich is because of their family and their children, as a parent the future of their children is their priority they have to make the right decision for them and guide them till they start to make their own decisions but as far as they are under their parent they must follow instruction for there own good. the rich always want their children to also get involved with their fellow rich just to secure continuity in wealth. rich people don't want their children to suffer they want them to continue in luxury and once you are involved with rich people you will even have a lot of business offers from their rich friends which is no harm we all are looking for opportunities.

I have seen a situation where if you are smart they will have interest in you and they will see you has a valuable asset there young men that have potential in them such people are always given a chance.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.

[AicecreaME]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

[dothebeats]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

Good point here and I do agree with you; hence this is why planning is important and that of course includes communicating with our significant other. If both parties know where they stand and what the plan is before, during, and after marriage then expectations will be set and roles will be given. For example, if my partner and I decided that after marriage the plan is to focus on our careers and save up for a business then we'll ensure that we take birth control pills and use protections so no unexpected pregnancy will happen that can jeopardize the plan. To put it simply, not even married couple are the same as every single one of us have our own priorities and reasons to get married.

[Litzki1990]

Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.

Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

Every parent wants their child to be a little bit better than where they are. Parents sacrifice a lot in life for the better future of their children. A poor parent wants his child to marry into a rich family but this is not the case for everyone. From such thoughts of the parents, when the child is married into a family larger than their own status, they basically try to separate the child from the child's family in various ways. If the child does not think about the parents and they are separated from the parents then he may be fine but the parents come to a certain age and go through very bad times whereas if they think about the parents and listen to the wife's family then the wife's family A distance develops with him which leads to divorce. I think that instead of looking for a high class family, one should get relatives in a family with whom one will have a lot of good relations and the son and daughter will be able to lead a very happy life.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

So passive income is all that matters to you, don't you think that the more men a woman sleeps with, the more she is likely to carry several infections and diseases that to some, money can't cure? Have you ever reason that way? Because when it comes to making passive income, the internet have made that very easy and possible to both single and married women to do both from the comfort of their home (i.e for the hardworking & industrious women). Because religion has made me to understand that adultery is a big sin, and it is the last thing I will ever want to see a marriage woman do for the sake of money.

Note: Sugar mummy/daddy fades away with time, but skill never fades away, and as such it's advisable a lady gets a skill than looking forward to doing sugar daddy as a passive income.

[Fiatless]

Hehehe, I laughed at what you said here. But there is truth in your point. Because there are people who are really looking for a marriage partner to lift them out of the poverty they are facing, whether they are women or men, and one of the examples of this kind of people, most of whom I don't know, are all gold diggers. I just don't know what the man is called—maybe a gold digger boy.

But it's part of married life that you really shouldn't rely on just one source. It should be helped, especially since a couple is not rich. Although not everyone aspires to have a lot of money but a happy, simple life, the one who has his own house, land, car, and business

But there are also rich women and men who are looking for marital partners. They don't care if they are rich or poor all they want is someone they can call their husband or wife. Getting married because of financial gains and not love and compatibility can have severe consequences. This is because money is not everything in life. It is better to have a suse that loves and respects you than to focus on money.

It is desperation or laziness that makes people focus on getting a rich partner for them to survive. Such a person will end up becoming single for the rest of their lives because they might not be fortunate to have such a partner. I also desire to get married to somebody that is financially okay but I am not searching for such a spouse. If I am lucky enough to locate such a person who also loves me, that's okay but  I will never rely on anybody to achieve my goals in life. 

[Broly46]

...heard about divorce ...married several times in their lives...

You can have as many concubines as you want. But only one is allowed to marry, it is written in laws, all other spouse that is not registered in marriage is not married. I had yet to see a guy can marry to many spouses from many different country, which also registered marital based on each individual country legislation, if this is even allowed you can see the guy could run to other country when any shit hit the fan to just escape any obligation bestowed.

...what kind of woman could handle 100 sugar daddies ...

You underestimate what a woman is capable of, woman in the past could bear up to ten children, she could easily raise ten children at once, it is very same to handle 10 sugar daddies too, it is their natural talent to be good at handling many guys.

...For free? Land ...wasn't available for free...

Every land is free. Every planet in the universe is free, even the asteroid 16 Psyche which was told to be made of gold is free, nobody would tell you to pay the price, nobody would tell you to pay a price for owning the Mars, there is no alien on the Mars would tell you to pay for the land. It is only human which would do so, because human want you to pay for PROTECTION, you pay to get security, to protect your life and property from invasion. Also the sea is free if you can live on the sea, it is still free today, may be won't be free in the future, also no animal would pay for land too, only human are required to pay for land.

... OP is trolling us ...have to work hard for their so called "passive income".

Definition, word by word, it is considered passive, because it is tax-free income, by laws, active income is highly taxed. If you ever pay taxes on your income it is active income, that include crypto trading too when you pay taxes on gain you are working for active income.

...Marrying rich seems like the best way ...

who know?

...Having a few sugar daddys doesn't classify as passive income...

The legal system decide what is passive and what is active, not some nobody like you.

...didn't have jobs that could give us a stable income, ...were together, ...stable before getting married then we would not have married ...

It is why American is always $500 unexpected spending away from going broke. Many of them can't fix a $500 money problem immediately without seeking help from loan provider.

...slowly but surely we are collecting money to pay off the subsidized housing ...

This is also why many American do not own their own houses.

...ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment...

There is true reward from love, after the finish the test with flying colour, you get to rewarded with happy ending!

...There are contract marriages and they are all accepted as marriage.

lmao, that is a fraud, but as usual when you are very gullible you always fall for the trap that is setup by the guy who give you snake oil advices.

...Money is good in marriage but it has to be balanced...

And you would trade stock during lunch break, you need the money for marriage, need the money to pay for everything!

... marriage as a business contract because that can lead to disaster...

Human need marriage, human seeking disaster, animal are confused.

... not some magic bullet to double your own income, but sharing costs, if ...

it is double the passive income, passive income is also called invisible income, because you can't see the income unless you consult a financial expert who can do cashflow statement.

Scalability, ... exchanges time for money is unscalable...right?

False, a lawyer would suggest otherwise, it has to test under Howey test. There is very few active incomes, but too many variety of passive incomes.

...homes is a major obstacle. It's expensive, right? Risk ...buy a private jet? A bit far-fetched...

just hire guy to do the job, because being passive always require someone else to lift them up for every trivial thing in life.

...real passivity when researching income streams. Is it not a complicated choice...

Just hire expert who leave school with flying colour to do the jobs, they are trained to be perfect and rarely make mistakes, they also research every market 24/7/365 and never loss to anyone who are doing the same.

[uswa56]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

Not everything is like that, it all depends on the initial planning before marriage with your partner, sometimes there are both of them working to build a more stable family economy or doing other things for income.
Children are not a barrier to any of that.

I have encountered many things at this time and I have even felt it myself that marriage will make you more motivated to earn more money to be able to meet your many needs, and this is indeed driven psychologically.
And children are not an obstacle at all, in fact children are motivation, so we cannot attribute and being a child as an excuse, then the time with children and family can be arranged, because we cannot possibly work 24 hours.

[usekevin]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marriage itself had enough expenses in our life,we use to spend huge on the marriage.In developing country the people spending nearly their 5 years of salary on their marriage.This applicable to all range income people,the high earning spend high.Low earning spend huge on the marriage.Choosing their pair is most important one,most the rich people perfectly choose the rich pair.But the poor should take the rich pair,the partner should help to settle the marriage loan.But the most of the poor people choose the poor people partner and use to spend their five year to repay the marriage loan.

[bitgolden]

I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

[savetheFORUM]

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

It depends on how someone sees life and what their moral values allow them to do. Not everyone can have multiple sugar daddies so that they can have more money to hoard for their future or whatever. Having more than one partner, even if they are temporary, is not what everyone would prefer unless they are extreme gold diggers and don't care about their body or anything and they are always ready to sleep with anyone just for the sake of money.

So, your maths might be simple but life isn't that simple for everyone. And how many people do you think can use this formula to live their lives? There won't be enough sugar daddies for everyone if they are all willing to have multiple unless all of those sugar daddies also have multiple options.

[ancafe]

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.

Passing on what is owned by the father to the child is an obligation to maintain the family breed for those who own a business. It is not easy to educate children to follow in their father's footsteps because they may have different paths and fathers must see this interest in their children so that they do not appear to be imposing their wishes. If you have several children it might be easy because one of them will definitely have something in common with their father, the father can direct his children's interest in developing another business if they are not interested in the business owned by their father.

Regarding marriage, it is different from the father's performance in forming his son to run a business, marriage must have compatibility between the two and usually it will depend on the children's assessment of the partner they choose. Therefore, before getting married, it is best to get to know your partner well so that we can live together in joy and sorrow, marriage is forever not temporary and if the partner is not chosen well divorce will occur.

[dothebeats]

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.

Passing on what is owned by the father to the child is an obligation to maintain the family breed for those who own a business. It is not easy to educate children to follow in their father's footsteps because they may have different paths and fathers must see this interest in their children so that they do not appear to be imposing their wishes. If you have several children it might be easy because one of them will definitely have something in common with their father, the father can direct his children's interest in developing another business if they are not interested in the business owned by their father.

You are absolutely right about this. Although many rich parents hope for their children to follow in their footsteps and either take over their company/business one day or take on the same path that they once chose to take, there are of course instances that these children have different dreams and goals they hope to follow. Hence, in an ideal scenario, it would be best for parents to be supportive of this while also guiding their kids to a path that will lead them to financial stability that will still keep the wealth and financial standing of the family. The very reason for this is the risk of any business/company going down if kids are forced to do something they have no care and passion for while if they know that they are being supported they may end up doing well and making a new for themselves in the industry they choose that will either add additional income for the family or create an additional business for them.