Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi

[harapan]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marriage is far different from what you may seem it is. And I  quote you wrong it is not and will not be a means of doubling ur income or whatever.it was design for a special purpose to pro-create,for understanding, to be as a help meets to your spouse and to ascertain this fact is where the man needs to double whatever income just to meets up to the needs and wellbeing of the family.
But if that's  means one need to have a thousand sugar daddy's,buying a private jet and sport car and so on just to meet up that needs
 then its fine.

Peradventure before you got into the marriage,you must have made lots of income and properties what will you call that.so is it now a means of doubling anything!?

[Vaskiy]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

Marriage in relation with finance is the mutual contract that makes two persons of to get united. Both of them used to share what is available with them and help each other in each and every decision unlike the earning capability. This is the real definition, but not many follow it, as the earning gives both of them individuality and independence.

[Mr.right85]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

Some means by which loans have been abused! It happens no doubt and this is caused mainly by societal and peer pressure.
There comes an age one would get to and they get pressured by society to start a family even without the necessary resource lifeline and funds to finance a family. Loans are to be repaid and when not invested in some profit oriented business, it becomes just debt to you. Either way, you lose by paying an uninvested loan.

The unfortunate situation is that, most individuals no longer repay loans, following the non collateral nature of the system in recent times but your sure to have it spoil your credit score.

Marriage isn’t an investment or a profit oriented institution and as such, taking loans to get married isn’t the best of ideas.

[Fortify]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

While financial benefits are nice, they should be the last thing you consider when going into marriage. Not only that they can equally go the other way and work against you. If you are a high earner and your spouse is not, it can open you up to all sorts of financial obligations in the long run - especially if things went wrong. It's a strange list you've put together comparing it to a rental. There is no free ride in life for the vast majority of people out there and both people in the relationship should be happy with the earning potential of each other. That will make things much more peaceful, especially when you add children into the mix when the time is right, because it may be cheaper for one partner to stay off work to look after them.

[ancafe]

You are absolutely right about this. Although many rich parents hope for their children to follow in their footsteps and either take over their company/business one day or take on the same path that they once chose to take, there are of course instances that these children have different dreams and goals they hope to follow. Hence, in an ideal scenario, it would be best for parents to be supportive of this while also guiding their kids to a path that will lead them to financial stability that will still keep the wealth and financial standing of the family. The very reason for this is the risk of any business/company going down if kids are forced to do something they have no care and passion for while if they know that they are being supported they may end up doing well and making a new for themselves in the industry they choose that will either add additional income for the family or create an additional business for them.

Every parent will definitely support their child even though the child's interests and desires are different and forcing children to follow their wishes if they do not have the same interests is the wrong decision. This is the reality of life among rich parents who have businesses that need to be passed on to their children. Every child definitely has different interests and skills so forcing people's wishes does not necessarily produce good results. A parent's job is only to guide and if they intend for their child to follow in their steps, provide guidance when they start to be able to take responsibility for you and give the child the freedom to determine the choices.

Character can be formed and it is not impossible that if a child previously didn't like his father's business, he will turn into liking it. It depends on how a father can guide and shape this character so that when he becomes the heir to the business he owns he doesn't go bankrupt because his skills are not there. The role of parents is important because children will follow the habits of their parents and if a father has a wise way of educating a child will definitely want to listen.

[slapper]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

While financial benefits are nice, they should be the last thing you consider when going into marriage. Not only that they can equally go the other way and work against you. If you are a high earner and your spouse is not, it can open you up to all sorts of financial obligations in the long run - especially if things went wrong. It's a strange list you've put together comparing it to a rental. There is no free ride in life for the vast majority of people out there and both people in the relationship should be happy with the earning potential of each other. That will make things much more peaceful, especially when you add children into the mix when the time is right, because it may be cheaper for one partner to stay off work to look after them.

monetary gains? They're good and they're wonderful, but when considering marriage, they shouldn't take precedence. Marriage is more, much more than just a financial transaction. It has to do with love, fidelity, and collaboration. And indeed, depending on individual wages, financial dynamics can alter, sometimes substantially. If one earns more, it may result in commitments, some of which may not be advantageous in the long run

Your comparison with a rental? Very interesting; fascinating. But life, life isn't about free rides. The majority of individuals work very, very hard to obtain what they have. Relationship partners should be extremely at ease with one another's financial situation. It's about mutual respect and comprehension. And while children are playing? The financial environment is fundamentally changing. Even though one partner might have to stay at home, the decision should be mutual. It's not just about the money; it's also about respect, love, and trust amongst people

[Nerdy doctor]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

People living in developing countries aren’t the only ones guilty of having excessively big and expensive weddings especially when they cannot afford it.
A lot of people worldwide go into debts after borrowing money from wherever to fund a big and expensive wedding ceremony intended to leave a lasting impression on everyone who was present.

People who borrow money in order to have an expensive wedding are likely doing it morefor the benefit of others and sadly, a good number of them are getting married for what they stand to benefit from the Union.

[HajiBagi]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

I have seen many people who have married without having a good job that will put food on their table but after marriage they become successful people and having a well paying job that can provide for all their needs. Some wives are blessings to some men because as a man after marriage you will start having some things that you didn't have before, you will start achieving some goals you didn't expect. No matter how you identify as a guy, as soon as you realise you are an adult or learn anything about relationships, you need to realise that you have obligations to fulfil.

The most essential thing for a man to do is get married because it gives him the opportunity to have children and determine who will inherit his property. As a male, dying young and unmarried is equivalent to not living out your dreams. I'm not saying that we should get married even if we are incapable of doing so, but I do want us to realise that as men, we cannot say that we must accomplish all of our goals before we marry because nobody achieves all of their goals in life. Therefore, whenever we have the chance to wed, we should take it. However, before we do, try to understand the person with whom we are in a relationship.

[fullhdpixel]

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

I think it also depends on where you are from. In certain countries, a working lady or even a man might get paid leave when they are about to become parents, for the mother since she will be in labor and the father so that he can take care of the mother and the child. However, that's not the case everywhere, because sometimes you might need to simply leave your job in such a situation if you are a working lady and there are no incentives given by the company.

A lot of females also stop working after they get married, maybe because their husbands ask them to do so since they know they can take care of everything and they should just stay at home, take care of the children and the household chores while they work and earn and they live a happy married life.

[Hamphser]

It depends on the person you are marrying to. I worked in a place before where there was a couple and they got married there, they benefited from all the things that they could, and then they got pregnant as well, and she worked until 7th month or so if I am not wrong, and had 6 months break, 2 months of pregnancy and 5 months while taking care of the baby and recovering.

I think that was a good deal, she didn't even come to work and still got paid, and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away. Sure they had a babysitter that took care of the baby, or a nurse, I do not know what they are called when you take  care of a baby, but they had one like that, but they still had two incomes and a great package for leaving the work while not even working for the last 6 months. I would say that if you could end up with a marriage like that, the income situation should not be all that bad and could be helpful.

I think it also depends on where you are from. In certain countries, a working lady or even a man might get paid leave when they are about to become parents, for the mother since she will be in labor and the father so that he can take care of the mother and the child. However, that's not the case everywhere, because sometimes you might need to simply leave your job in such a situation if you are a working lady and there are no incentives given by the company.

A lot of females also stop working after they get married, maybe because their husbands ask them to do so since they know they can take care of everything and they should just stay at home, take care of the children and the household chores while they work and earn and they live a happy married life.

Totally depends on the situation because if you do see that you as a man or husband on which you do notice out that your earnings arent really that enough to sustain your living with your family then this is the time that your wife would really be making out decisions on having some work. It would really be something that really talks about decision making in between husband and wife and for the sake of your kids future then
it would really be just that right that both of you would really be that needing to work but as much as possible us husbands doesnt really like for our wifes to have to do the work and this is what happened in my situation and the rest of husbands out there that they would really be just asking for their wives to be focusing on their own home rather than on going into office. We men do really loves or preferred on seeing
our wives at our own home and doesnt really do the hard work to support the family but of course it would really be that depending if your earning is really that sufficient enough for daily needs or living then
it wont really be that an issue.

There are really that moments where financial problems do kicks in because there are really situations in life that we do experience something like this and this is why as much as possible
we should really be making investments and businesses on which we could really be able to avoid these kind of hardship in life since you do know that you could
really be having that back up funds whenever shit things happen.

[pawel7777]

(...) and then she quit, which made her get severance package that was a good amount and find a job somewhere else right away.

You don't get a severance package if you quit. By design, severance pay is meant to be a financial compensation for being laid off by the employer.

A lot of females also stop working after they get married, maybe because their husbands ask them to do so since they know they can take care of everything and they should just stay at home, take care of the children and the household chores while they work and earn and they live a happy married life.

That's not really what happens in the western countries. It's very rare for a woman to stop working just because she got married. Some would choose to stay at home after giving birth, but usually, they would just try to balance life/work by getting less demanding, often part-time jobs. Which kind of works well, especially when kids are old enough to go to school (in the UK, it's 4-5 years old) and there's no need for a woman to just sit at home all day. Especially now, when you can also work remotely.

[wallet4bitcoin]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Quite a scary analysis, most of the pointers aren't possible considering the numbers, sugar daddies and all.

On a more serious note, it is ideal to have some sorth of passive income before marriage as this relieves you of financial pressure but I don not reckon your percieved "sugar daddy" idea to be a part of the equation. Work hard to earn a living. Its no rocket science, people are doing it, you too can do same. You don not necessarily need to be amongst the world's wealthiest men but you can live above the average life if you work hard enough.

[Patrol69]

Marriage means taking on an additional responsibility. A single person cannot think the way a married person thinks because a married person has the responsibility of a family on his shoulders and some people depend on him. In the case of a married man, not only does he have to pay the wife's expenses, but after marriage a son has to take care of his wife besides taking care of his parents and if they have a son or daughter, he also has to provide for them. Marrying without a good source of income and having children without saving is foolish. So a man must think about these things before getting married. He should not have married at this time so that he never felt after marriage. We must find multiple sources of money as well as our savings to have a happy life after marriage.

[harapan]

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

Marriage to me doesn't seem like a great achievement without been financially stable.Of course nobody wants to be caught in the web of been stuck in a debt or being controlled by a woman(wife).Its good to know  what you need in life and then work hard to achieve it.
Just like wanting to get married,a house or a car.So without hardwork or any source of income how do you intend to achieve all these.
 Marriage requires money,been married also requires money;is not like an investment platform that you'll wish to benefit from it,you're not going to trade your spouse or either ways are you?never.
  Moreover,marriage is a lifetime contract that needs deep understanding and commitment so let's choose wisely.

[sekalitas]

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

It depends on your goals, actually. If your goal is money and marrying a wealthy person seems like the solution, you must understand the value you bring to the relationship that would make them want to marry you. It would be fortunate if you could also genuinely earn their love.

However, I believe relying on a sugar daddy or sugar mommy is neither healthy nor sustainable in the long run. While the financial benefits might seem appealing, it's unpredictable. What if your benefactor's spouse is someone you cannot afford to antagonize? Moreover, without any emotional attachment, you'll likely experience increasing heartbreak

[junder]

In a third world country marriage itself a big expense. In my locality rich parents used to organise the marriage of their kids in a much grand manner. The same is followed by the common people, in particular the middle class people. Here these people get like loans and out of debts organise the marriage in a grand way. This makes the marriage itself a money associated thing. In my locality the guy used to work hard and make enough money to meet the marriage expenses.

People living in developing countries aren’t the only ones guilty of having excessively big and expensive weddings especially when they cannot afford it.
A lot of people worldwide go into debts after borrowing money from wherever to fund a big and expensive wedding ceremony intended to leave a lasting impression on everyone who was present.

People who borrow money in order to have an expensive wedding are likely doing it morefor the benefit of others and sadly, a good number of them are getting married for what they stand to benefit from the Union.

That's true, holding a celebration or wedding party does require quite a lot of money. I myself am not married, but of course I have a friend who is married so I was curious about the amount he spent on holding a wedding party, and after I found out I was surprised, I thought this price would continue to rise as time went by. and also in my opinion weddings should be celebrated (if you can afford it). because in my country, even though you can get married without a celebration, the prestige of the woman's family is usually the problem, they are embarrassed if the wedding is not celebrated.

Therefore, as men, we must be able to make a lot of money to celebrate our wedding later. Even though there are some women who don't mind if their wedding isn't celebrated, it's still possible that their family will object, even though I think paying for the wedding party costs a lot of money in just a short time, I thought about what if the costs for the wedding party were used for investing or buying a house is clearly for the good in the future However,  it cannot be hidden from the fact that weddings in general should be celebrated with a party. However, in my opinion, borrowing money for wedding expenses should not be done. If you really want to celebrate your wedding with a party, then we have to work hard to make a lot of money for the wedding, not by taking out loans.