⚽️🔥🟢 Good Sport Betting manual 🟢🔥⚽️

[Russlenat]

You know what, blindly betting on low odds doesn't sound like solid betting advice at all. If that's the case, it's like saying we don't even need to bother analyzing the game or the fight because we're already pretty sure the low odds will win. I've got to stress this point because back when I was a newbie in gambling, I used to bet on those low odds all the time, and let me tell you, in the long run, it really ate away at my bankroll.

Speaking from personal experience, and I'd offer this as advice too, it's a smart move to gamble with a decent bankroll. That way, you take your gambling journey seriously and think of it as a long-term plan. It's kind of like a season in the NBA. If you manage to end up in the black, that means you've got a bright future ahead of you. Some people might not make it through the whole season, so just being profitable is already a big win, no matter how much profit you're raking in.

Then you probably only placed the bet because of the odds without any research or knowledge, then in the long run you will of course go broke, but if you do research and find good but not to high odds, you will for sure be a winner in the long run. I don't saying you should bet in 1.10 odd games, but around 1.50-2.00 odd is where I mostly looking, but the most important is the research, I am just saying instead of play a 5 game paralay with 15 in odd and rely completely on luck, it's a lot better to do a double with maybe 2-3 in odd with some research and you can minimize the luck you will be needed.

Just stick with what you think is right. If you love your method, then stick with it. Who am I to say that you should change and follow my recommendation? Personally, I haven't been successful in gambling yet, so I'm not in a position to lecture you. What I shared was only my personal perspective based on my experience, so you can choose to take it or not. Besides, gambling is very unpredictable. Your strategy may work for you but not for other gamblers, or vice versa. We really can't tell.

However, one last thing I'll mention is to be careful with parlay bets. If you become too fond of that betting strategy, you might not realize you've already lost your bankroll. Parlay bets can be fun, but based on my personal experience, they can easily wipe out your bankroll because the chances of winning are very slim.

[1714686877]

1714686877

[1714686877]

1714686877

[1714686877]

1714686877

[1714686877]

1714686877

[1714686877]

1714686877

[1714686877]

1714686877

[Botnake]

However, one last thing I'll mention is to be careful with parlay bets. If you become too fond of that betting strategy, you might not realize you've already lost your bankroll. Parlay bets can be fun, but based on my personal experience, they can easily wipe out your bankroll because the chances of winning are very slim.

Yeah, parlay can be a real sucker bets, but you don't have to take it to the extreme and wipe out your bankroll. That'd be crazy unless your entire bankroll is exclusively for parlay bets, which would probably lead you to bankruptcy sooner or later. Parlay bets offer a tempting jackpot, but remember, it's all in good fun. You might want to throw a few bucks into a parlay, but your main focus should be on the specific sports you've spent time analyzing – that's where you stand a decent chance of winning.

[tusandii]

The advice written by the OP turns out to be almost the same as my experience and it is true that if a single bet has a greater chance of winning because we will only focus on that match and do research thoroughly and in depth compared to multi bets with more than 5 clubs selected, usually there is always 1 the club that lost even though it was the favorite club, as was the case at that time, of course someone has also explained it here, even in another thread I saw someone betting with a multi bet for 8 matches and 1 match was lost and that was Manchester City which was defeated by Arsenal.
I really appreciate OP's suggestion and it really does provide greater opportunities.

[3kpk3]

Good basic tips op. However, you didn't talk much about value bets which is the best way to defeat books in the long-term though you will definitely get limited since most books hate value bettors with a passion.

Also, parlays are an awesome way to turn small amounts into big money through minimal risk and they help your accounts last longer.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Many things always invade a game, luck is the factor that can help us or against us, let's just remember the time at the World Cup in Qatar when Saudi Arabia beat Argentina, that was something that many people lost their bets on. , that was something that impacted the world, even so at that time Saudi football took a very special turn, "that is why now they are developing great talent, bringing in the best players in the world,[/b] they have many stars, the main reason for this is to That the Saudis make it available to learn all these techniques, which come from European countries, then based on this things can change at any time during a soccer match, this is what makes the difference in any game, here I don't know if good luck played in that game or not, but I know that many lost that bet that is considered safe.

I don't think the EX-best players in the worlds goes to Saudi and play in their league because Saudi Arabia won against Argentina in WC. It's more likely because Saudi throwing money bags like it was paper to the players.
Sorry to break your bubble bro, bit it's all about one and only one thing, that thing is called 💸.

If this will keep going on, you will see many more players leave. The good thing is that each country can only have one top division, so it will still be a bit limited.
But this can open up the eyes of countries around and copy this way to do things.

Personal I don't like it, but I don't cry myself to sleep. I understand if a player get a offer to make more money then he make in his whole carrier for 2-3 seasons.
Why not? Enjoy a new country and culture, then retire with double amount of money in your bank account.
And it's easy to say money isn't everything, and its true it's not, but if you been in the top league in Europe for many years and are on your last years as a active professional football player, why not..

Not at all, what I'm saying is not a bubble , I gave the example of the World Cup and that game in particular only because I thought it was appropriate to give it as an example of how all this started, clearly here things became known since CR7 left to this Country to make its fútbol, not bad, it is doing very well and I think it is an excellent way to be able to see what it is made of, if it had been left in the MU they would have burned it, now the burned one is a failure Ten Hag , this is what many are basically realizing. Now, things are About how to do so that they can have a good job because it happens on its own and I could see how some people waste great opportunities. I actually think that for now they are going to continue going to football. Saudi, and I don't think it's bad, because some players need more football just like us who are their fans, so that they can continue showing us their good football, a football that can make a difference, I think something, the more stars there are They continue to go and it is more Beneficial for Arabia and as long as they continue to treat their players badly, things are going to continue being like this, there will come a time when young players and your stars will not want to go to Madrid or Barcelona, they will want to go to Arabia , because they are more valued in every sense and even in monetary terms, that is something that cannot be covered under any circumstances.

But who loses here? Europe? Maybe, because when there are no longer incentives that make them take the best players, a UCL will no longer matter to them , in Saudi football they have Their own UCL, and little by little things are going to change, so yes, The one that will lose the most here will be Europe , will the quality of football go down ? No , but Maybe it won't go up any More , and the Next matches we'll probably see are Saudi football, so they shouldn't be so radical and harsh with the world's greatest players , they need respect and Recognition.

[_BlackStar]

-snip-

Yeah, parlay can be a real sucker bets, but you don't have to take it to the extreme and wipe out your bankroll. That'd be crazy unless your entire bankroll is exclusively for parlay bets, which would probably lead you to bankruptcy sooner or later. Parlay bets offer a tempting jackpot, but remember, it's all in good fun. You might want to throw a few bucks into a parlay, but your main focus should be on the specific sports you've spent time analyzing – that's where you stand a decent chance of winning.

Multi or parlay bets are of course very tempting for gamblers - but the success rate of winning is very low, especially if the gambler chooses more than 5 games. Parlays are fine as long as the gambler has a budget limit to try their luck - but the main focus in betting should be on the initial plan they have analyzed.

I'm not sure about parlays at all - it's just a quicker way to lose money than betting on a single game. Sometimes the teams we put on the betting slip are convincing – but generally they are very disappointing even though they are favorites in their respective matches. If I want to bet - it's only on one match instead of multi or parlay.

[LUCKMCFLY]

...

I don't think the EX-best players in the worlds goes to Saudi and play for their win Against Argentina in WC. It's more likely because Saudi throwing money bags like it was paper to the players.
Sorry to break your bubble bro, bit it's all about one and only one thing, that thing is called 💸.

I think the same, money plays the biggest role! Insanely high contracts and annual salaries tempt players to move to Arabia. I guess they plan to end their careers in S. Arabia, at least I think that most of them will quit playing after a few seasons and making tons of money. Maybe some of them will stay and contribute to the development of football there, but it will be again just for making even more money.

Yeah. Your on point here.
If you have played professional football in the best leagues in the world for many many years, probably like 12-15 years, and you see the end coming of your career and then you get a offer to make more money then you have done in your whole carrier combined for like two/three years of work over there in Saudi why not?
I think for us that love Football don't need to worry to much to be honest that the best players to the date will go there. Why? Because.... Every country only have one top/high/first league so it's no need for Saudi to try to take several hundred of players for example, Europe are and still will be the best place for Football IMO.

There is no doubt about that, Europe is the King in terms of having good competitions and being able to do great things with the players and the truth is that Europe is where everyone from childhood wants to be, in any European team it is much better I remember that Italy was the one that led the charge at one time, of course I was 12 years old and Italian football was the best, then the control went on to have the best football in Spain, and of course I remember that Spain, the clubs more popular like Barcelona, Madrid were what some famous players wanted most, I'm talking about the era of the galacticos, when in Basrcelona there was dinho, Messi.

Nowadays I think that the best football that is being played worldwide is the PL, and no one can tell me that the level there is not high, right? Of course they belong to the Frn Europe where they are still the best in football, at least in football clubs, then in this case of ideas it is likely that they will continue like this for some years, but it must be recognized that things can change, Arabia Saudi now has a good league, I see it as more competitive, it is gaining a lot of fame, and I think they can make a lot of difference, I'm not saying that it can become better than Europe at the moment, but be careful, because at the pace the Saudis are going It is something that they cannot trust, the moment will come that if they continue like this, then the younger players will want to go there, and they will not lose their level, because there is a lot of level in terms of technique, the best players have gone there, the There they buy the style of Europe, so the Arabs are betting on having the best league in the world, this is like the Japanese who have a plan, so that at a very specific time they win all the world cups, the truth is I don't know how they can do it , but in the Qatar World Cup they beat Germany, and this already means a lot, although good, I really like how they have improved, so if they have improved, why can't they do it now? We don't know the future .

[Rabata]

Last update 12th OCT 2023
Updated number 2 & 3.

This is my best tips and if you wanna start gamble on sportbetting. I am no a professional gambler, but I am good enough to not lose money on sportbetting and that's good enough for me.  

1. Always do some kind of research about the game and teams you gonna bet on.
Is some important player injured? Is a team good or bad home/away? Does a team have extra hard against a specific team?

All those advices are good in sports betting but when a gambler starts gambling he removes himself from all these things. Because when a gambler places a bet on gambling, in most cases he does not follow these advices. As a result, the losing ratio of his bet is also higher. Data analysis is also an important topic in sports betting. Where there are calculations of various things. If a gambler can research well before placing a bet, his chances of winning are greatly increased. In this type of bet, those who can bet by considering more updated information will be able to win more. However, in some cases, no research is useful in gambling, where luck plays a major role.

[slapper]

~snip~

Not at all, what I'm saying is not a bubble , I gave the example of the World Cup and that game in particular only because I thought it was appropriate to give it as an example of how all this started, clearly here things became known since CR7 left to this Country to make its fútbol, not bad, it is doing very well and I think it is an excellent way to be able to see what it is made of, if it had been left in the MU they would have burned it, now the burned one is a failure Ten Hag , this is what many are basically realizing. Now, things are About how to do so that they can have a good job because it happens on its own and I could see how some people waste great opportunities. I actually think that for now they are going to continue going to football. Saudi, and I don't think it's bad, because some players need more football just like us who are their fans, so that they can continue showing us their good football, a football that can make a difference, I think something, the more stars there are They continue to go and it is more Beneficial for Arabia and as long as they continue to treat their players badly, things are going to continue being like this, there will come a time when young players and your stars will not want to go to Madrid or Barcelona, they will want to go to Arabia , because they are more valued in every sense and even in monetary terms, that is something that cannot be covered under any circumstances.

But who loses here? Europe? Maybe, because when there are no longer incentives that make them take the best players, a UCL will no longer matter to them , in Saudi football they have Their own UCL, and little by little things are going to change, so yes, The one that will lose the most here will be Europe , will the quality of football go down ? No , but Maybe it won't go up any More , and the Next matches we'll probably see are Saudi football, so they shouldn't be so radical and harsh with the world's greatest players , they need respect and Recognition.

You made a fascinating argument concerning football's changing dynamics. The World Cup - isn't it football's pinnacle? Then CR7 moved to Saudi, which changed everything. Game-changer! Football has long been centered in Europe, but that's changing

Players desire respect, recognition, and a good salary. Saudi offers that and more. Beyond money, it's about worth and respect. Europe, especially Madrid and Barcelona, has dominated for years. But dominance ends, right? It doesn't. Adapt or change or they'll fall behind

Europe's UCL is iconic! If Saudi produces its own version with stars, fans, and money, Europe may lose its sheen. Big, big wake-up call. Europe must step up, respect, and value players. Otherwise, Saudi Arabia may be football's future

[Richbased]

~snip~

Not at all, what I'm saying is not a bubble , I gave the example of the World Cup and that game in particular only because I thought it was appropriate to give it as an example of how all this started, clearly here things became known since CR7 left to this Country to make its fútbol, not bad, it is doing very well and I think it is an excellent way to be able to see what it is made of, if it had been left in the MU they would have burned it, now the burned one is a failure Ten Hag , this is what many are basically realizing. Now, things are About how to do so that they can have a good job because it happens on its own and I could see how some people waste great opportunities. I actually think that for now they are going to continue going to football. Saudi, and I don't think it's bad, because some players need more football just like us who are their fans, so that they can continue showing us their good football, a football that can make a difference, I think something, the more stars there are They continue to go and it is more Beneficial for Arabia and as long as they continue to treat their players badly, things are going to continue being like this, there will come a time when young players and your stars will not want to go to Madrid or Barcelona, they will want to go to Arabia , because they are more valued in every sense and even in monetary terms, that is something that cannot be covered under any circumstances.

But who loses here? Europe? Maybe, because when there are no longer incentives that make them take the best players, a UCL will no longer matter to them , in Saudi football they have Their own UCL, and little by little things are going to change, so yes, The one that will lose the most here will be Europe , will the quality of football go down ? No , but Maybe it won't go up any More , and the Next matches we'll probably see are Saudi football, so they shouldn't be so radical and harsh with the world's greatest players , they need respect and Recognition.

You made a fascinating argument concerning football's changing dynamics. The World Cup - isn't it football's pinnacle? Then CR7 moved to Saudi, which changed everything. Game-changer! Football has long been centered in Europe, but that's changing

Players desire respect, recognition, and a good salary. Saudi offers that and more. Beyond money, it's about worth and respect. Europe, especially Madrid and Barcelona, has dominated for years. But dominance ends, right? It doesn't. Adapt or change or they'll fall behind

Europe's UCL is iconic! If Saudi produces its own version with stars, fans, and money, Europe may lose its sheen. Big, big wake-up call. Europe must step up, respect, and value players. Otherwise, Saudi Arabia may be football's future

It's not as if football is centered in Europe it's just that over the years, European football has been offering world class football entertainment to both the fans and the world at large.

I agree with you on players deserving respect and recognition but in the Salary area to me, I think they ought to be paid according to their performance as a club can't spend a huge amount of money on a player who offers less to the impact of the club.

Any country or continent can claim superiority in football if they can also offer a world class entertaining football that would be acceptable both by fans, football bodies and the universe

[Ojima-ojo]

The advice written by the OP turns out to be almost the same as my experience and it is true that if a single bet has a greater chance of winning because we will only focus on that match and do research thoroughly and in depth compared to multi bets with more than 5 clubs selected, usually there is always 1 the club that lost even though it was the favorite club, as was the case at that time, of course someone has also explained it here, even in another thread I saw someone betting with a multi bet for 8 matches and 1 match was lost and that was Manchester City which was defeated by Arsenal.
I really appreciate OP's suggestion and it really does provide greater opportunities.

Times without number i have selected only single bet, because with single bet tickets, my winning chanches are high and at the same time i will be betting with little or minimal risks, compared to the risk that come along with multiple beta selsctions because multiple bets will only lead to higher chances of loses since you wont to competing with many other factors that will increase your losing chances.


What I like doing most is making only single bet selections and repeating the same formula on multiple occasions and then wait to see how and where the risk take me, sometime i just don't want to lose at will, and being able to do better team analysis using this single bets formula.

[bitbollo]

Your advice sounds good! thanks for sharing.
Although it may seem banal as an activity, certain betting approaches are developed after years of play.

Years ago I also created a topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1234109.0
where I provided suggestions and tips related sports bets.
Feel free to get some inspiration if you want add to your topic it's ok!
(even if some information is similar to what you wrote )

[Haunebu]

Almost all punters are aware of these rules, but only few of them follow them religiously. Why? Because the majority go with their gut instead of thinking about rules and end up losing their money again and again.

None of this will ever change because humans are inherently greedy leading to these results. This is what makes casinos stay in business if you think about it.

[redsun114]

gambling is very unpredictable. Your strategy may work for you but not for other gamblers, or vice versa. We really can't tell.

That's a fact, it's not necessary for the same strategy to work in the same way for two or many people but it might just work for an individual, so it's important that people do what they think suits their betting pattern instead of following what others are doing to achieve good results because your strategy or betting pattern might be better for you.

However, one last thing I'll mention is to be careful with parlay bets. If you become too fond of that betting strategy, you might not realize you've already lost your bankroll. Parlay bets can be fun, but based on my personal experience, they can easily wipe out your bankroll because the chances of winning are very slim.

People often go for parlays because they know they can get very high multipliers with them, but they ignore the fact that they can also lose all the money if one of the matches turns out to be a loss, and I've seen that happening with people where they won all the matches and lost the parlay just because of a single loss.

[Russlenat]

-snip-

Yeah, parlay can be a real sucker bets, but you don't have to take it to the extreme and wipe out your bankroll. That'd be crazy unless your entire bankroll is exclusively for parlay bets, which would probably lead you to bankruptcy sooner or later. Parlay bets offer a tempting jackpot, but remember, it's all in good fun. You might want to throw a few bucks into a parlay, but your main focus should be on the specific sports you've spent time analyzing – that's where you stand a decent chance of winning.

Multi or parlay bets are of course very tempting for gamblers - but the success rate of winning is very low, especially if the gambler chooses more than 5 games. Parlays are fine as long as the gambler has a budget limit to try their luck - but the main focus in betting should be on the initial plan they have analyzed.

I'm not sure about parlays at all - it's just a quicker way to lose money than betting on a single game. Sometimes the teams we put on the betting slip are convincing – but generally they are very disappointing even though they are favorites in their respective matches. If I want to bet - it's only on one match instead of multi or parlay.

Winning parlay bets is often seen as a measure of how good you are at gambling. Some say it's like throwing your money away, but if you can come up with a different outcome, it's incredibly fulfilling. Until that happens, though, you might want to think twice about challenging yourself with parlay bets because the chances of winning are pretty slim. Anything that looks too attractive usually has a slim chance of winning.

Single bets are the way to go, really. It's the best and simplest betting strategy. You choose a few games, put in some effort to analyze them, and it's not all just luck. That's what keeps us in the game – the challenge. When people talk about a bankroll, it should be something significant, something for the long-term journey, not just an overnight gambling session.

[BabyBandit]

-snip-

Yeah, parlay can be a real sucker bets, but you don't have to take it to the extreme and wipe out your bankroll. That'd be crazy unless your entire bankroll is exclusively for parlay bets, which would probably lead you to bankruptcy sooner or later. Parlay bets offer a tempting jackpot, but remember, it's all in good fun. You might want to throw a few bucks into a parlay, but your main focus should be on the specific sports you've spent time analyzing – that's where you stand a decent chance of winning.

Multi or parlay bets are of course very tempting for gamblers - but the success rate of winning is very low, especially if the gambler chooses more than 5 games. Parlays are fine as long as the gambler has a budget limit to try their luck - but the main focus in betting should be on the initial plan they have analyzed.

I'm not sure about parlays at all - it's just a quicker way to lose money than betting on a single game. Sometimes the teams we put on the betting slip are convincing – but generally they are very disappointing even though they are favorites in their respective matches. If I want to bet - it's only on one match instead of multi or parlay.

Winning parlay bets is often seen as a measure of how good you are at gambling. Some say it's like throwing your money away, but if you can come up with a different outcome, it's incredibly fulfilling. Until that happens, though, you might want to think twice about challenging yourself with parlay bets because the chances of winning are pretty slim. Anything that looks too attractive usually has a slim chance of winning.

Single bets are the way to go, really. It's the best and simplest betting strategy. You choose a few games, put in some effort to analyze them, and it's not all just luck. That's what keeps us in the game – the challenge. When people talk about a bankroll, it should be something significant, something for the long-term journey, not just an overnight gambling session.

Very good said to be honest IMO. Both about paralay and single bet, I normally often play a double like a small paralay, three games and more often result in at least one miss, but of course I do it anyway time to time when I have done good research and have feeling.

[Gozie51]

The advice written by the OP turns out to be almost the same as my experience and it is true that if a single bet has a greater chance of winning because we will only focus on that match and do research thoroughly and in depth compared to multi bets with more than 5 clubs selected, usually there is always 1 the club that lost even though it was the favorite club, as was the case at that time, of course someone has also explained it here, even in another thread I saw someone betting with a multi bet for 8 matches and 1 match was lost and that was Manchester City which was defeated by Arsenal.
I really appreciate OP's suggestion and it really does provide greater opportunities.

Something about betting only one match is not really about having all the time to analyze the match to be sure it won't disappoint, no, after all Manchester city lost 0:1 to arsenal in the analogy you made and that is a single match on its own of which someone would have bet only that and yet lose it.

The thing about betting a single game in soccer bet is that it reduces the probability of losing if you had bet on multiple games. In other words, if you close your eyes to randomly pick a single match, you have high chances of winning than if you also repeat same action in selection of multiple games like 8-10 to bet together. So that is a simple mathematics of the benefit of single bet.

[_BlackStar]

-snip-

Winning parlay bets is often seen as a measure of how good you are at gambling. Some say it's like throwing your money away, but if you can come up with a different outcome, it's incredibly fulfilling. Until that happens, though, you might want to think twice about challenging yourself with parlay bets because the chances of winning are pretty slim. Anything that looks too attractive usually has a slim chance of winning.

Single bets are the way to go, really. It's the best and simplest betting strategy. You choose a few games, put in some effort to analyze them, and it's not all just luck. That's what keeps us in the game – the challenge. When people talk about a bankroll, it should be something significant, something for the long-term journey, not just an overnight gambling session.

To be honest I'm not an active gambler even in sports betting - but I understand quite well how profitable that strategy can be. Single bet is certainly better than hoping for a big win from a parlay - but it's not wrong to hope for luck from it.

Single bet on the favorite team tends to be more likely to be won than a parlay bet in 3-5 tries – but each gambler has his own desires and beliefs that are difficult to change, even if it will harm him in long-term.

[babygun]

Winning parlay bets is often seen as a measure of how good you are at gambling. Some say it's like throwing your money away, but if you can come up with a different outcome, it's incredibly fulfilling. Until that happens, though, you might want to think twice about challenging yourself with parlay bets because the chances of winning are pretty slim. Anything that looks too attractive usually has a slim chance of winning.

Single bets are the way to go, really. It's the best and simplest betting strategy. You choose a few games, put in some effort to analyze them, and it's not all just luck. That's what keeps us in the game – the challenge. When people talk about a bankroll, it should be something significant, something for the long-term journey, not just an overnight gambling session.

I agree 100%; betting on value single bets is the best in the long term and the best chance on having a positive ROI. Betting on parlays can be more exciting and you can win a lot if you have luck, but most of the times, always 1 selection in your parlay will fail. I used to play parlays before and always had 3/4 or 2/3.

[wallet4bitcoin]

Totally agree with your points but I won't say you wait till the entire games are a go before you go check for your winnings. If you have a multiple ticket, I'll say you keep monitoring your tickets to know which is likey and if you can actually rebet those games leaving out the exact game that you percieve will not turn out as predicted.

i am speaking from an experiential point of view.