⚽️🔥🟢 GOOD SPORT BETTING MAUAL & THE BEST SPORT BETTING TIPS 🟢🔥⚽️

[cafter]

And every gambling game, no matter the type, still require luck, sports betting, casino games, poker, card games, slot machines, skill based, knowledge based, luck based all still need the gambler to be lucky to win, though the level of luck required for each of this varies from one another.

You know, the whole luck thing is a bit tricky to argue. I mean, when you're in the gambling scene, luck isn't the first thing on your mind, at least from a realistic standpoint. That's because if you truly believe that your skills and knowledge can keep you winning, luck becomes more like a fleeting guest at the party. It shows up now and then, but your skills? They're your constant companions in this game.

It's not tricky if you are a gambler you would understand that we can't win if we are not lucky, with all the skills we have... No matter how much knowledge and skill we have, in the end, we all gamble... do you think you need the knowledge and skill to play all in with two aces in your hands? What knowledge and skill can do for you if some team has a bad night/week/month? I guess you need to play many hands with two aces to understand that "luck" is very important in poker, that river card can make a big difference, and if you are not lucky you will lose even with great cards.

In case of sports betting, there is the element of luck, which can occur in the form of unexpected events such as player injury or an unexpected upset.
But, having a good understanding of the sport will help you make better bets in the long run. Both skill and knowledge can help you make better long-term profits, but luck still plays a role in individual results.

The answer to the question “which is better?” depends on the context and time frame in which you are gambling. For example, over a few hands of play, luck may win out over skill and knowledge. On the other hand, over a longer series of plays, skill may win out over knowledge.

[mak013]

And every gambling game, no matter the type, still require luck, sports betting, casino games, poker, card games, slot machines, skill based, knowledge based, luck based all still need the gambler to be lucky to win, though the level of luck required for each of this varies from one another.

You know, the whole luck thing is a bit tricky to argue. I mean, when you're in the gambling scene, luck isn't the first thing on your mind, at least from a realistic standpoint. That's because if you truly believe that your skills and knowledge can keep you winning, luck becomes more like a fleeting guest at the party. It shows up now and then, but your skills? They're your constant companions in this game.

It's not tricky if you are a gambler you would understand that we can't win if we are not lucky, with all the skills we have... No matter how much knowledge and skill we have, in the end, we all gamble... do you think you need the knowledge and skill to play all in with two aces in your hands? What knowledge and skill can do for you if some team has a bad night/week/month? I guess you need to play many hands with two aces to understand that "luck" is very important in poker, that river card can make a big difference, and if you are not lucky you will lose even with great cards.

You`re right that all your analyze can be broken by "river card" but anyway, if you play a lot you see that two aces winrate more than winrate 10 and 5. And the weak team mostly lose when it play against strong team.
With the analyze and strategy you can influence the result of the poker game or predict the result of the match.
I mostly bet matches with the odd more than two, so it is enough to predict one result of two to get profit.

[Richbased]

8. Set up a budget, never play with money you can't afford. and when you go into gambling, always go into it with the mentality that the money is gone, then it won't hurt you if you lose and  when you lose, because we all are losing time to time, but we just need to win enough to cover the losses.

Setting a budget like you stated is very important as when one set an amount that should be used for gambling, as soon as the money gets exhausted then you relax and use the other money you have for some other personal stuffs. If one can conveniently take this bold step and be disciplined enough to keep to it; then half of addiction on gambling will be solved and you won't be too emotional when a bet is lost.

Moreover, setting a budget makes you avoid unnecessary expenses as everything you're doing will be implemented according to the budget you've set for yourself

[angrybirdy]

8. Set up a budget, never play with money you can't afford. and when you go into gambling, always go into it with the mentality that the money is gone, then it won't hurt you if you lose and  when you lose, because we all are losing time to time, but we just need to win enough to cover the losses.

Setting a budget like you stated is very important as when one set an amount that should be used for gambling, as soon as the money gets exhausted then you relax and use the other money you have for some other personal stuffs. If one can conveniently take this bold step and be disciplined enough to keep to it; then half of addiction on gambling will be solved and you won't be too emotional when a bet is lost.

Moreover, setting a budget makes you avoid unnecessary expenses as everything you're doing will be implemented according to the budget you've set for yourself

It's more like self-discipline and fixing the emotional state of gambling. I totally agree on setting a budget for this, since sports bettors are more likely to chase their losses which tend to lose again their money. if continues, chances are being a gambling addict and broke. I've read an article saying that one of the best advice in sports betting is to "Gamble no more than 1% of household income" In that way, it helps an individual lower their risk of experiencing any harm from gambling and this will save you from succumbing to the temptation to overextend your finances which can result in debt and other major personal and financial issues.

[fullhdpixel]

It's not tricky if you are a gambler you would understand that we can't win if we are not lucky, with all the skills we have... No matter how much knowledge and skill we have, in the end, we all gamble... do you think you need the knowledge and skill to play all in with two aces in your hands? What knowledge and skill can do for you if some team has a bad night/week/month? I guess you need to play many hands with two aces to understand that "luck" is very important in poker, that river card can make a big difference, and if you are not lucky you will lose even with great cards.

In case of sports betting, there is the element of luck, which can occur in the form of unexpected events such as player injury or an unexpected upset.
But, having a good understanding of the sport will help you make better bets in the long run. Both skill and knowledge can help you make better long-term profits, but luck still plays a role in individual results.

The answer to the question “which is better?” depends on the context and time frame in which you are gambling. For example, over a few hands of play, luck may win out over skill and knowledge. On the other hand, over a longer series of plays, skill may win out over knowledge.

Luck in sports betting wouldn't go against you every time, so it's true that one with enough knowledge and experience about a certain sport can actually be profitable in the long run because luck may favor the opponent one day, you might be wrong two or three times out of 10, but the remaining 7 bets will surely be wins if you have knowledge and know what you are doing and that will keep you profitable in the long run which is what makes sports betting better than gambling games.

One thing that might be a concern is the odds that you are choosing for your winning bets because losing $100 in a bet and then winning a $100 bet with 1.5 odds would give you $150 in total which means that you won't get all your money back, so total odds of your winning bets will need to bring you enough money that should cover your lost money and give you some profit on top of that.

[rahmad2nd]

~~

13. Have fun! If you don't have fun. STOP!

Now this maybe sound confusing, but it's much easier then you think, I been in the sportbetting business for many years.
Farm your way up, start low and safe as I said. Bet $20 and try to make it to $100-$150 in two different bets instead of try to make $20 to $150 in a single bet, it's to risky and much harder then the other way that you research a game and bet $20 and settle down with a 2x-3x odds I would prefer a double and then do it again, and that $20 will turn into $150 in a much easier way.
Then it's up to you how high you want to go and how much you want to spend on each bet, but this amounts is normally what I use. I normally make a cash out when I reach over $100 and then I try to go high with the remaining balance.

- This is what works for me and this is just my opinions.
- Sorry for bad English or bad writing or repeating.
- This thread can come and be edited time to time and people can feel free to share their own advices also.
- If you have any questions you can reply in the thread or PM me.

Good luck out there!

It seems, if this is what you do, it's exactly the same as what I did. in sports betting specifically on football, I prefer single bets. of the several leagues that I follow, I only choose the ones that I think are worthy and ideal for betting on. You don't need much, 3 games is enough. if it's more than that, maybe 5 matches. the rest, I ignore. or, just monitor the match results then check the results and analyze again even though they are not included in the betting options.
This is important, because at any time I can use the data and statistics in the next week's bets perhaps. the point is as you wrote in your long list, I am not inclined towards one betting option. for example, 1x2. if that is the ideal choice, I am willing to take that bet. but always go through the selection process first, never once do I not involve research and analysis. in fact, it can happen repeatedly. because at any time there are many things that we do not expect.

Well, for me personally, I don't really like odds below @ 1.5+. at least, @1.7+ in general. example, Mainz vs Bayern. because the odds are not ideal for me with @1.3+, correct me if I'm wrong. there are many options that I can choose from. after I did research many times and analyzed it. I believed at that time Bayern would score at least 3 goals, and yep, as predicted. So, the ideal option that I chose at that time was the -1.5 handicap option with odds @1.8+ being the ideal choice. well, that's more or less my betting style.

So, like I said. just 3 matches, which is usually my choice and that's enough.
As for the parlay option, it is the same as the single bet that I made. the concept is, I don't choose many matches, let alone bet with odds below @1.3+, or @1.5+. there are many options, it can be Under/Over, both teams to score, handicap, or others and all kinds of things. if it's not ideal for me, I don't hesitate to ignore it. every bet I make, the results vary. if lucky, 3 bets, 3 wins.
Of all the types of betting or gambling that I do, football is the most consistent and done with discipline. For me, the results were not that disappointing.

[Hirose UK]

~snip~

~snip~

Luck in sports betting wouldn't go against you every time, so it's true that one with enough knowledge and experience about a certain sport can actually be profitable in the long run because luck may favor the opponent one day, you might be wrong two or three times out of 10, but the remaining 7 bets will surely be wins if you have knowledge and know what you are doing and that will keep you profitable in the long run which is what makes sports betting better than gambling games.

One thing that might be a concern is the odds that you are choosing for your winning bets because losing $100 in a bet and then winning a $100 bet with 1.5 odds would give you $150 in total which means that you won't get all your money back, so total odds of your winning bets will need to bring you enough money that should cover your lost money and give you some profit on top of that.

In sports betting luck actually only plays small role in achieving a win.
So it can be confirmed that the most dominant factor in winning sports betting is how much knowledge and experience a gambler has about the world of sports he is betting on.
For example gambler who always observes football and has a lot of knowledge or experience in football will be able to more easily predict the outcome of the match.
Even though it is still prediction the predictions he makes will provide greater chance of winning because he carries out analysis and predictions based on real knowledge that he has learned.

If we only talk about things like that then not only in sports betting but in casino games it will also be the same.
Remember that gambling is not place to make profit so don't think too long about getting a win that can cover all losses.
If you only think about how to cover losses then you will never be able to do it because you will have more losses than wins.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip~

Not at all, what I'm saying is not a bubble , I gave the example of the World Cup and that game in particular only because I thought it was appropriate to give it as an example of how all this started, clearly here things became known since CR7 left to this Country to make its fútbol, not bad, it is doing very well and I think it is an excellent way to be able to see what it is made of, if it had been left in the MU they would have burned it, now the burned one is a failure Ten Hag , this is what many are basically realizing. Now, things are About how to do so that they can have a good job because it happens on its own and I could see how some people waste great opportunities. I actually think that for now they are going to continue going to football. Saudi, and I don't think it's bad, because some players need more football just like us who are their fans, so that they can continue showing us their good football, a football that can make a difference, I think something, the more stars there are They continue to go and it is more Beneficial for Arabia and as long as they continue to treat their players badly, things are going to continue being like this, there will come a time when young players and your stars will not want to go to Madrid or Barcelona, they will want to go to Arabia , because they are more valued in every sense and even in monetary terms, that is something that cannot be covered under any circumstances.

But who loses here? Europe? Maybe, because when there are no longer incentives that make them take the best players, a UCL will no longer matter to them , in Saudi football they have Their own UCL, and little by little things are going to change, so yes, The one that will lose the most here will be Europe , will the quality of football go down ? No , but Maybe it won't go up any More , and the Next matches we'll probably see are Saudi football, so they shouldn't be so radical and harsh with the world's greatest players , they need respect and Recognition.

You made a fascinating argument concerning football's changing dynamics. The World Cup - isn't it football's pinnacle? Then CR7 moved to Saudi, which changed everything. Game-changer! Football has long been centered in Europe, but that's changing

Players desire respect, recognition, and a good salary. Saudi offers that and more. Beyond money, it's about worth and respect. Europe, especially Madrid and Barcelona, has dominated for years. But dominance ends, right? It doesn't. Adapt or change or they'll fall behind

Europe's UCL is iconic! If Saudi produces its own version with stars, fans, and money, Europe may lose its sheen. Big, big wake-up call. Europe must step up, respect, and value players. Otherwise, Saudi Arabia may be football's future

Well, upon seeing the greatest representatives of UEFA , they Strongly Reject Saudi football, they asked for access to the UCL where they can become a league more open to football, and in the presidency of Europe it was a resounding No, where they said that It was supposed to only be countries in Europe, which seems a bit exclusive to me, they should consider the teams that are very famous, but it doesn't matter if they are in Europe or not , if you are a player or have a good team you should Win with the best, I don't mind. It seems like the Selfishness that occurs, but it is repayable, I wouldn't say anything else because I know how bad they are for the European games, their clubs are fascinating, but on a personal level I don't and Wouldn't give my back to the Arabian clubs, I know They are raising their level so in this order of disneys things can happen for or against these teams, for me the act they had in Qatar was very brilliant, as I always say , what the Arabs did with Argentina that is like a pinch that everyone should give themselves , plus Argentina is the Champion, which means that even now the best football in the world is in South America and not in Europe, that is something that is widely Recognized.

  In every football game there are different stories, and I think that this is manifested worldwide, there are some teams that are always favorites and end up being eliminated, and the teams that we least think can do differently, well they do. Now football is changing a lot and it's because the teams are moving up in level, and that's something that's happening a lot in South America, and now imagine Saudi Arabia has better travel resources for players, so they can learn things about Europe, South America , because normally the highest level of football is in Europe, but it is because in Europe there is a mix, there are the players who are from South America and the Europeans, so that is where it increases, what a shame if the young promises decide to prefer go to Arabia than to Europe?

[Russlenat]

In case of sports betting, there is the element of luck, which can occur in the form of unexpected events such as player injury or an unexpected upset.
But, having a good understanding of the sport will help you make better bets in the long run. Both skill and knowledge can help you make better long-term profits, but luck still plays a role in individual results.

The answer to the question “which is better?” depends on the context and time frame in which you are gambling. For example, over a few hands of play, luck may win out over skill and knowledge. On the other hand, over a longer series of plays, skill may win out over knowledge.

Injuries can strike at any moment, but when you're analyzing a game, you're working with the data you have to predict the outcome. You don't factor in injuries; you just make your call.

Now, if injuries do happen, and you bet on the affected team, your chances of winning are pretty low. But remember, it's just one loss. Success as a sports bettor isn't about winning every single bet – that's impossible. It's about winning more than you lose, and in the end, making a profit. That's what you should aim for to keep things realistic.

But here's the thing, none of this will work if you don't have the discipline. Winning isn't just about picking more winners than losers; it's also about managing your bankroll smartly. That's crucial for your success.

[Ojima-ojo]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

[mak013]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

[BabyBandit]

~snip~

Not at all, what I'm saying is not a bubble , I gave the example of the World Cup and that game in particular only because I thought it was appropriate to give it as an example of how all this started, clearly here things became known since CR7 left to this Country to make its fútbol, not bad, it is doing very well and I think it is an excellent way to be able to see what it is made of, if it had been left in the MU they would have burned it, now the burned one is a failure Ten Hag , this is what many are basically realizing. Now, things are About how to do so that they can have a good job because it happens on its own and I could see how some people waste great opportunities. I actually think that for now they are going to continue going to football. Saudi, and I don't think it's bad, because some players need more football just like us who are their fans, so that they can continue showing us their good football, a football that can make a difference, I think something, the more stars there are They continue to go and it is more Beneficial for Arabia and as long as they continue to treat their players badly, things are going to continue being like this, there will come a time when young players and your stars will not want to go to Madrid or Barcelona, they will want to go to Arabia , because they are more valued in every sense and even in monetary terms, that is something that cannot be covered under any circumstances.

But who loses here? Europe? Maybe, because when there are no longer incentives that make them take the best players, a UCL will no longer matter to them , in Saudi football they have Their own UCL, and little by little things are going to change, so yes, The one that will lose the most here will be Europe , will the quality of football go down ? No , but Maybe it won't go up any More , and the Next matches we'll probably see are Saudi football, so they shouldn't be so radical and harsh with the world's greatest players , they need respect and Recognition.

You made a fascinating argument concerning football's changing dynamics. The World Cup - isn't it football's pinnacle? Then CR7 moved to Saudi, which changed everything. Game-changer! Football has long been centered in Europe, but that's changing

Players desire respect, recognition, and a good salary. Saudi offers that and more. Beyond money, it's about worth and respect. Europe, especially Madrid and Barcelona, has dominated for years. But dominance ends, right? It doesn't. Adapt or change or they'll fall behind

Europe's UCL is iconic! If Saudi produces its own version with stars, fans, and money, Europe may lose its sheen. Big, big wake-up call. Europe must step up, respect, and value players. Otherwise, Saudi Arabia may be football's future

Well, upon seeing the greatest representatives of UEFA , they Strongly Reject Saudi football, they asked for access to the UCL where they can become a league more open to football, and in the presidency of Europe it was a resounding No, where they said that It was supposed to only be countries in Europe, which seems a bit exclusive to me, they should consider the teams that are very famous, but it doesn't matter if they are in Europe or not , if you are a player or have a good team you should Win with the best, I don't mind. It seems like the Selfishness that occurs, but it is repayable, I wouldn't say anything else because I know how bad they are for the European games, their clubs are fascinating, but on a personal level I don't and Wouldn't give my back to the Arabian clubs, I know They are raising their level so in this order of disneys things can happen for or against these teams, for me the act they had in Qatar was very brilliant, as I always say , what the Arabs did with Argentina that is like a pinch that everyone should give themselves , plus Argentina is the Champion, which means that even now the best football in the world is in South America and not in Europe, that is something that is widely Recognized.

  In every football game there are different stories, and I think that this is manifested worldwide, there are some teams that are always favorites and end up being eliminated, and the teams that we least think can do differently, well they do. Now football is changing a lot and it's because the teams are moving up in level, and that's something that's happening a lot in South America, and now imagine Saudi Arabia has better travel resources for players, so they can learn things about Europe, South America , because normally the highest level of football is in Europe, but it is because in Europe there is a mix, there are the players who are from South America and the Europeans, so that is where it increases, what a shame if the young promises decide to prefer go to Arabia than to Europe?

As a football enthusiast I am not so worried if some players choose money before heart, in the end it's the individualist that chooses what he wants to look and not the net worth of the league. 
But I get your point for sure.

[Kasabus]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

Really? do those high odds actually win often? I mean, I get it, lower leagues are probably easier to predict, especially if it's a league in your own country. But I don't think bookmakers set odds that are too different from other leagues; they want action on both sides, after all. It's just my personal views, no offense. If you're making a profit with that approach, cool, but some proof would help convince the rest of us!

[Fivestar4everMVP]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

You are absolutely correct, from my personal experience with sports betting, low league matches are always the best type of matches to catch up high odds, the only down side is that, most of the time, it is pretty difficult to correctly predict the outcome of such matches, that is, it is hard to know the team that would win or lose the match before the game begins. But then, i guess this is just normal afterall, as we all must have already known that one thing with gambling is that, the higher the odds, the lower the chances of winning. Low league clubs or teams are sometimes hard to analyze, making it pretty difficult to arrive at a correct outcome of the match, but regardless of this, it's always worth a try.

[mak013]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

Really? do those high odds actually win often? I mean, I get it, lower leagues are probably easier to predict, especially if it's a league in your own country. But I don't think bookmakers set odds that are too different from other leagues; they want action on both sides, after all. It's just my personal views, no offense. If you're making a profit with that approach, cool, but some proof would help convince the rest of us!

Match it going right now: Football. Hans Women vs Sudeva Delhi Women.  Women. India. Delhi
The bet i`ve made - Sudeva Delhi Women(-1,5). The odd was 2.7
It is just real time example. Yesterday i`ve made 4 bets with the odds between 2.2 and 4.1. Three times i won. The main problem in such leagues is to find information about teams. If you analyze your country low level leagues - it is much easier but you can`t find lots of matches for everyday betting.

[BabyBandit]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

You are absolutely correct, from my personal experience with sports betting, low league matches are always the best type of matches to catch up high odds, the only down side is that, most of the time, it is pretty difficult to correctly predict the outcome of such matches, that is, it is hard to know the team that would win or lose the match before the game begins. But then, i guess this is just normal afterall, as we all must have already known that one thing with gambling is that, the higher the odds, the lower the chances of winning. Low league clubs or teams are sometimes hard to analyze, making it pretty difficult to arrive at a correct outcome of the match, but regardless of this, it's always worth a try.

Well said! I like to see around in the lower leagues to, but I always have the term "rigged" in my head when I does at the same time, but that's something I just has to accept. 

[Latviand]

Really? do those high odds actually win often? I mean, I get it, lower leagues are probably easier to predict, especially if it's a league in your own country. But I don't think bookmakers set odds that are too different from other leagues; they want action on both sides, after all. It's just my personal views, no offense. If you're making a profit with that approach, cool, but some proof would help convince the rest of us!

If we're talking just a plain win or lose odd, I don't think that we're going to be seeing a possibility that those high odds as the likely winner because I've been there and the underdogs are always given the higher odds compared to the favorite team and I don't think that they're ever going to show you any proof that it's a profitable move even in lower leagues because as I've said, the most likely team to win are given the lower odds while the others have higher to attract gamblers to waste more money in hopes that they can multiply it quickly with those odds. My sport betting advice would be to just bet on both sides, you're either losing a little or you're winning a bit smaller but at the least you're safer.

[mak013]

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

You are absolutely correct, from my personal experience with sports betting, low league matches are always the best type of matches to catch up high odds, the only down side is that, most of the time, it is pretty difficult to correctly predict the outcome of such matches, that is, it is hard to know the team that would win or lose the match before the game begins. But then, i guess this is just normal afterall, as we all must have already known that one thing with gambling is that, the higher the odds, the lower the chances of winning. Low league clubs or teams are sometimes hard to analyze, making it pretty difficult to arrive at a correct outcome of the match, but regardless of this, it's always worth a try.

Yep. It is difficult to analyze because no one interest who is ill in sixth league(for example). It becomes a problem to find places of the teams sometimes. But the odd is high enough to get profit even with such information. Sometimes i lose about 5 times in line but as the result - i get profit per week/month. I can suppose that sometime i will lose for a week, but the month anyway will be profitable.

PS

Match it going right now: Football. Hans Women vs Sudeva Delhi Women.  Women. India. Delhi
The bet i`ve made - Sudeva Delhi Women(-1,5). The odd was 2.7

I won.

[Youngkhngdiddy]

You are absolutely correct, from my personal experience with sports betting, low league matches are always the best type of matches to catch up high odds, the only down side is that, most of the time, it is pretty difficult to correctly predict the outcome of such matches, that is, it is hard to know the team that would win or lose the match before the game begins. But then, i guess this is just normal afterall, as we all must have already known that one thing with gambling is that, the higher the odds, the lower the chances of winning. Low league clubs or teams are sometimes hard to analyze, making it pretty difficult to arrive at a correct outcome of the match, but regardless of this, it's always worth a try.

 Even when we know that the smaller odds as the higher chance of winning we shouldn’t fail to realize that gambling is base in luck and team performance, we have see instances where the higher odds beat the lower odds, I like to play bet on this low leagues because of their odds, you will notice that even the best team in the league carries a good odd, because they know that the league is full with average players and anything can happen. I tend to focus on the best team in the small leagues then add some top league teams too to boost the odds.
 It advisable to play safe though so that you don’t get burn, check the stats of the team so that you can make better options on the team you want to choose, this will help you know when a team is inform and their previous stats against the opposition team.

[Mahanton]

The best advice for a sports bettor is to only play on a reputable sportsbook site that offers you a wide range of features that help you to not lose everything and be able to take home some things out of your balance both in winning and in cutting games.


E.g like cashout features or the one or two games cut deductions and payment on the remaining won games, this way if both are applied, in your betting process, you end up not losing everything and being able to have a balance to continue playing with even though you did not win the entire bets but you take away little amount to continue your wager with, I think to me that is the most incredible features of late.

It isn`t about sport betting. It is advice for all the gambling. We can modify your advice for sport betting and it can look so:
Choose the spotsbook with a huge quatity odds and matches, include low leagues with live bets.
As for me it is necessary to have an opportunity to bet low leagues matches - we often can catch high odd here.

You are absolutely correct, from my personal experience with sports betting, low league matches are always the best type of matches to catch up high odds, the only down side is that, most of the time, it is pretty difficult to correctly predict the outcome of such matches, that is, it is hard to know the team that would win or lose the match before the game begins. But then, i guess this is just normal afterall, as we all must have already known that one thing with gambling is that, the higher the odds, the lower the chances of winning. Low league clubs or teams are sometimes hard to analyze, making it pretty difficult to arrive at a correct outcome of the match, but regardless of this, it's always worth a try.

Well said! I like to see around in the lower leagues to, but I always have the term "rigged" in my head when I does at the same time, but that's something I just has to accept. 

The thing i dont like on betting on lower leagues is that the possible of rigging up those games which its really that been known and there are really indeed situations that did really happen on this part.
This is why i do always choose up with those known and big leagues rather than on to those small ones on which you could  somewhat assure yourself that you are really making bets which are unlikely to be rigged up
or would be fixed which means that your bets are really that indeed totally fair. We cant really be that so sure but it is really that unlikely to happen i should say.

When it comes to this point on OP:
1. Always do some kind of research about the game and teams you gonna bet on.

You should be and there's nothing that could beat out on knowing on the teams that you are tending to bet on, because having that awareness and knowledge about on a specific team or player
would really be giving out that kind of edge whether you should really be betting against or go along with it. Its up to your own jurisdiction or control basing up
on what you had analyzed and this is something that it is relevant.