I believe it's helpful to clarify a few things.
You already did in the original topic, so what is the point of starting a new topic for the same thing? what purpose does it serve? Are you that insecure 1miau? didn't you just claim that
I’m not someone who likes to create unnecessary drama
This topic is the textbook definition of "unnecessary drama".
where mikeywith pushed islamist propaganda but got very angry when this was called out by me.
After a very heated interaction, I thought we would agree to disagree and avoid each other to prevent both of us wasting time for this.
1miau you made a mistake, and instead of fixing it you are now adding more lies to your story, it's like you are digging a bigger whole for no reason, I was not angry, you were, my posts and so are yours are still there, people can judge for themselves, you started the insults publically, you sent me a PM full of hate, keep in mind that up to this point, I have not insulted you even once, and I am still not mad at you.
I’ve put mikeywith on my distrust list due to this incident until further evaluation.
Yes, so a DT member like yourself decides his trust list and feedback based on political opinions?
The recent accusation of mikeywith against me
But you did not deny any of my accusations against you, did you? You edited your trust list based on political reasons, you removed positive feedback you left due to political reasons, you tagged another forum member (right after he showed disagreement to your post in P&S), you even said
5. I'm allowed to tag any troll and I already gave digaran a pass way back in 2022 when I came over him but didn't bother to "poke" the troll digaran.
This means if it was not for the political disagreement, you would have not tagged him.
Anyway, this old tactic of attacking someone who exposed you just to discredit them so that their claims become less important is just silly, you keep losing credibility, and you are better off defending yourself than attacking me, unless, of course, you have nothing to defend yourself with.
Of course DT will also have a look at possible abuses but there has to be valid proof
If using the trust system to punish those who disagree with your political point of view is not abuse -- I don't know what is. and as for valid proof, everything you did was mentioned in the
main topic