What do you want to see in casino reviews?

[Haunebu]

The following are what I think is important points to review; Accepted crypto for deposit and withdrawals, wagering requirement, kyc procedures, the customer support (on how responsive they are) and overall user experience if it's a recommended one or the one to avoid.

The problem here is that many people just copy what some others stated in order to make it look like they actually wagered their own money implying that they fake their experiences cleverly.

This is why it's not easy differentiating between a legit and fake review in the crypto gambling world.

[1714874122]

1714874122

[1714874122]

1714874122

[1714874122]

1714874122

[SamReomo]

From casinos review I expect to see users gambling experience with own real money. If users gambles with play money, or funds provided by casino, then his review can be called 100% objective. When you really risk, you experience is always different from when you know. Behavious is different, user is more cautios not to make a mistake, gamblers reads everything with more attention to details.

I guess most of the reviews are paid review these days but as a reviewer we should try our best to highlight pros and cons of a casino. Most of the casinos have many pros but they have some cons as well which most reviewers don't highlight because they are being paid for the review.

However, some reviewers share both positive and negative aspects of a casinos without caring about the payments that they might receive for the review. So far, I haven't noticed any gamblers who reviewed a casino by putting their own money.

But, I agree that if someone plays with his own funds then there might be a different story in a review then with the funds that are provided by the casinos.

[dunfida]

From casinos review I expect to see users gambling experience with own real money. If users gambles with play money, or funds provided by casino, then his review can be called 100% objective. When you really risk, you experience is always different from when you know. Behavious is different, user is more cautios not to make a mistake, gamblers reads everything with more attention to details.

I guess most of the reviews are paid review these days but as a reviewer we should try our best to highlight pros and cons of a casino. Most of the casinos have many pros but they have some cons as well which most reviewers don't highlight because they are being paid for the review.

However, some reviewers share both positive and negative aspects of a casinos without caring about the payments that they might receive for the review. So far, I haven't noticed any gamblers who reviewed a casino by putting their own money.

But, I agree that if someone plays with his own funds then there might be a different story in a review then with the funds that are provided by the casinos.

A must thing to be done and this is why it wont really be that simple  on finding out those kind of platforms who do have this kind of standard when reviewing out on a certain site on which they do really reach out on a certain extent just for them to deliver out on whats good and whats really that bring that easiest to understand.

[Hispo]

The following are what I think is important points to review; Accepted crypto for deposit and withdrawals, wagering requirement, kyc procedures, the customer support (on how responsive they are) and overall user experience if it's a recommended one or the one to avoid.

The problem here is that many people just copy what some others stated in order to make it look like they actually wagered their own money implying that they fake their experiences cleverly.

This is why it's not easy differentiating between a legit and fake review in the crypto gambling world.

It would be easier if the biggest casinos of the industry and perhaps some medium sized casinos got together a funded their own review webpage, which would be managed by some trusted and neutral third party. In that imaginary webpage for casino reviews people would only be able to log in or sign up using their casino accounts and some date of the user's activity would be visible, like the total wager accumulated, the most played games by the user and also the total time invested in gambling.
Have you ever since how reviews in the videogame platform Steam work? Only people who have bought the game can leave a review and after publishing the review, anyone can see how much each one of those who left their opinion has spent within the game itself.

It there was something like that for review sites, specially for casinos, people would not need to venture into traps like the review pages of 1xbit and other shady casinos or trustpillot, which is completely messed up with shill and alternative accounts. 

[alastantiger]

I read casino reviews and I have participated in writing a couple of them myself. I like them very much because they serve as a starting point to understanding casinos.

Some of the casinos I have read their reviews include lucky creek casino, 888casino, HellSpin. These reviews are absolutely very helpful as it has saved me a lot of stress. I have ended up making the decision to play at some and avoiding some of them totally.

Some of the things I would want to see when reading a review are- sign up requirements (KYC or non-kyc), type of kyc documents required, restrictions, withdrawal processes.

[Yatsan]

Well ofcourse genuine and honest reviews, however it has a tendency to be manipulated and tampered by the gambling site itself if it is literally site reviews. Best way is to check if there is a community particularly for that gambling site or to directly ask players in game for their insighys however some won't be that vocal about it 'coz majority are often unresponsive when  asked. Last option is to check and see it for yourself.

From casinos review I expect to see users gambling experience with own real money. If users gambles with play money, or funds provided by casino, then his review can be called 100% objective. When you really risk, you experience is always different from when you know. Behavious is different, user is more cautios not to make a mistake, gamblers reads everything with more attention to details.

I think you are referring to pictures and other things to proof the legitimacu of reviews but again some of it won't be a legitimate review from your fellow gambler. So maybe, it is the quantity which would also be a factor to consider.

From casinos review I expect to see users gambling experience with own real money. If users gambles with play money, or funds provided by casino, then his review can be called 100% objective. When you really risk, you experience is always different from when you know. Behavious is different, user is more cautios not to make a mistake, gamblers reads everything with more attention to details.

I guess most of the reviews are paid review these days but as a reviewer we should try our best to highlight pros and cons of a casino. Most of the casinos have many pros but they have some cons as well which most reviewers don't highlight because they are being paid for the review.

However, some reviewers share both positive and negative aspects of a casinos without caring about the payments that they might receive for the review. So far, I haven't noticed any gamblers who reviewed a casino by putting their own money.

But, I agree that if someone plays with his own funds then there might be a different story in a review then with the funds that are provided by the casinos.

A must thing to be done and this is why it wont really be that simple  on finding out those kind of platforms who do have this kind of standard when reviewing out on a certain site on which they do really reach out on a certain extent just for them to deliver out on whats good and whats really that bring that easiest to understand.

Well, this forum could also be a platform to check feedbacks and opinion about a gambling site especially if it is a web 3.0 casino or gambling site. Others are with reddit, telegram chanels, and more but yes it won't be easy especially if the gambling platform you are checking is not yet that popular. Engaging to reputable ones would still be an option.

[paxmao]

The following are what I think is important points to review; Accepted crypto for deposit and withdrawals, wagering requirement, kyc procedures, the customer support (on how responsive they are) and overall user experience if it's a recommended one or the one to avoid.

The problem here is that many people just copy what some others stated in order to make it look like they actually wagered their own money implying that they fake their experiences cleverly.

This is why it's not easy differentiating between a legit and fake review in the crypto gambling world.

Reputation is the most important element and it is possibly the most difficult to "review". Think of the crypto "ICO" fever  few years ago, there is a problem with proving legitimacy and it was tried over and over - verifying the team, escrow for funds, limits to max and min funding, projects analysed in depth... and still quite a few slipped through the cracks with easy.

[Obari]

Greetings to all forum users!
1. Do you read casino reviews?

Yes I do read casino reviews mostly on trustpilot and ever since I became a member of this forum I’ve had better understanding of reviews and I think reviews are always very essential for marketing of any service even for casinos and I must say that I always reviews but on play stores and AppStore’s before installing any app but casino apps.

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

Yeah I find every review about a brand I want to use very useful but good and bad and I think I pay more attention to the negative reviews because that’s were the major truth lies

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

A well attractive tittle and I think it will interest me more if the review is written sincerely as most times I try to be in the writers mood while reading and most times, negative reviews are more catchy to the eyes as I would want to know why a negative review

[8rch7]

I am expected with honest reviewed and casino platform not hidden yet when any reviewer talk the true about their gambling or casino platform, most important I want to know with review in some casino is the several list points below

• required KYC or not
• need raise limit turn over or not when withdrawing fund
• withdrawing and deposit are instant or not
• how many coins support for deposit or withdraw, some casino allowed with bitcoin only
• Fee cost withdrawal fund

Its some important points I want to see in the review, most important about KYC required or not because when winning huge amount not face suspend account later when trying to withdraw.

[dansus021]

Do you read casino reviews? No I do read casino review sometime but usually I just go and I do usually find new casino from signature campaign too hehe
What should a casino review contain to make you read it? I don't know since Im rarely read the review I Just go direct to the website and test the water with small deposit maybe 10$ or try their free game first. Review from my friend is actually a good rather than read someone review.

[EarnOnVictor]

First, these days, you should be careful of where to derive your information from, otherwise, you will be misinformed by many sources that have collected money to dissipate the information to people. This is why you do not go to review sites that wlll not allow people to share their opinions freely. If you go to the review sites that will allow people to share their opinions, you should be further sensitive about it to know whether or not the reviewing site is genuine or if they just make what you see up. You can start by researching about the review site itself to have more knowledge about them. You can also post your review and know how they act on it to further test them. There was a review issue I posted about a company years back, could you believe the review site never posted it? It was about options trading to show you how review sites could connive with some companies.

Now, if I have attested to the sincerity of the site, I then move further to only unbiased reviews. The reason is that it is all reviews that are worth reading but it is not all reviews that are worth believing. Some allegations are baseless while some reviewers might even be paid by rival companies. So, I stay alert while reading reviews and disregard many of them based on my final verdicts. However, what I love to read mostly in reviews of casinos are the customer care service, security, the withdrawal experience and the stability/reliability of the betting platform. Others are secondary and might be a peculiar issue (if exist at all) to others, so I don't give them much thoughts.

[kojektea]

I'm not sure about casino reviews unless I play there in person. The ones I often play at are usually casinos with a long lifespan, they are much more trustworthy than new casinos. Please bring a little money to a new casino just to try or get the event. When I first entered the casino, I was always fooled by lots of fake reviews. Finally, I was convinced by my own reviews by jumping straight in. I know this is a risk, but I don't want to continue being exposed to unfair casinos.

[bakasabo]

From casinos review I expect to see users gambling experience with own real money. If users gambles with play money, or funds provided by casino, then his review can be called 100% objective. When you really risk, you experience is always different from when you know. Behavious is different, user is more cautios not to make a mistake, gamblers reads everything with more attention to details.

Well, I believe you meant to say that, when a reviewer is playing or gambling with the money given to him or her by the casino to test the casino out, the reviewer's review may or will be biased.
Well, I think this is actually true, it is actually one thing for the reviewer to make sure he or she have played rigorously on the casino he or she is writing a review about, and it's another thing for the reviewer to also make sure that he or she actually played on the casino with his or her money.

But in all of this though, I think the biggest scam will be, righting a review on casinos the reviewer have never played on, or possibly played on for just a few days for the sole purpose of that review, this is why I personally still prefer to only read reviews on casinos from forums like this one, it's like what I've said before, reviews on this forum beats reviews on any other review platforms out there, and this is because, reviews on this forum are completely based on personal experiences.

Reviews on the forum are also more true, because review on other platforms are mostly two types: 1) negative review when a gambler had an issue (even waiting 10 minutes instead of 5 is an issue and reason to write a negative review) 2) positive review made by team or someone who won a tiny amount (persons makes a registration, gets a bonus, wins, withdraws $1. what kind of positive review can that be?).

Forums is different. People share here not only few sentences, but add pictures and their reviews are more full (review platforms usually limit reviews with number of words or review size). I love reading large posts and reviews on the forum. I usually skip 1-2 liners, but a wall of text for me shows that review or post was written from heart.

[Crypt0Gore]

Reviews consist of lies and truth, and the crazy part is that some casinos have their ways of getting rid of those truth reviews if it's really going to affect their reputation.

I would rather not look into a reviews much, and I can only find out if it's a scam casino or not, everything else is left for me to find out by experimenting the casino myself.

Forget reviews, if you have to do it make sure you use this forum, there are good casinos on here, enough to fill your gambling fantasy for you, there is no room for scam casinos on this forum, this is why it's the right place to find them.

[tbterryboy]

Nowadays there are many fake reviews existing. The reason why I don't really rely solely on review sites since i'm not certain if it's real and not just made to create false information for the specific casino. Anyway, what I like to read is a review based on the real experience of a gambler.

The following are what I think is important points to review; Accepted crypto for deposit and withdrawals, wagering requirement, kyc procedures, the customer support (on how responsive they are) and overall user experience if it's a recommended one or the one to avoid.

I think that is due to the strong competition right now, so many have became desperate doing what they can, only to stand out. Fortunately there are people who notice this and wants to go against with it. One of it might be the OP because he didn't rush on creating his casino review site, but he wants to make sure first that people are going to love it.

The suggestions you gave there are too common and almost all casino review sites has it. However again, it only boils down to how accurate they are on providing those information. But, I also like it if they allow real-time gamblers to post their own feedback on the casinos that are listed on their platform.

[Odusko]

Do you read casino reviews? No I do read casino review sometime but usually I just go and I do usually find new casino from signature campaign too hehe
What should a casino review contain to make you read it? I don't know since Im rarely read the review I Just go direct to the website and test the water with small deposit maybe 10$ or try their free game first. Review from my friend is actually a good rather than read someone review.

Your mindset is good though, but you also have to know that sometime, it necessary to checkout some extra infos, about a casino, although signature campaign may not be a true reflection because there is a different between the company and the signature campaign participants, because those wearing signature may not be directly representing the casino, but just promoting the site by wearing the signature.
But if it review campaign,  that one is different from from signature campaign entirely.

[8rch7]

All right, for user active in bitcointalk forum and have been popular with many kinds of gambling site not really need to see casino review because many of them have experienced playing with several casino, less for beginner and new comer in bitcointalk forum need to read all review although waste time depend read term of service only with casino want to create account. Little difficult how to find honest review because some casino not support with play store application if available there we can read all honest review under application available on play store.
Actually read with term of service and see how long casino gambling operation likely enough to know trusted casino or not, read all reviewer about casino waste our time.

[Dunamisx]

However, some reviewers share both positive and negative aspects of a casinos without caring about the payments that they might receive for the review. So far, I haven't noticed any gamblers who reviewed a casino by putting their own money.

When we are making review and want it to be the honest one, we must talk about both the good and the bad side of what we have observed from the casino, they are paying for the review in other to make the reviewer make an honest review for them regardless of what they may see, as long as it concerns the feedback expected for them to work on and improve the quality of their service to gamblers.

[YOSHIE]

1. Do you read casino reviews?

Not very often, but once reading reviews for a particular casino, usually I read casino reviews that talk too much about bonuses and earnings, just wanting to prove the negatives and positives about people's experiences.

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

useful, but only certain parts are useful.
For example:
Games, bonuses and negative and positive casino actions.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

as in general, licenses and so on related to casinos.

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

Sure, not right now, maybe another time.

5. Additionally, please share any thoughts you have on the topic of casino reviews.

Next time, if there is free time and opportunity, I will show it.

[Sandra_hakeem]

Why won't any sane gambler find casino reviews interesting?.. look, it's not even about your interest mostimes,..why? Cus there's every tendency that you agree to try out a casino that you don't like, just for them bonuses and an unusual liberation.... E.g; some casino's withdrawal fees could possibly hit hard on the nerves and gamblers would still trade that comfortably for the fame and reliability of the casino...alot of peeps would still use Thier route comfortably, as long as Thier funds are safe..
Them reviews are basically about thier modus operandi, T/C's, serenity and odds too.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰