What do you want to see in casino reviews?

[livingfree]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

But it will take time, I think that everyone has answered it already and there's no need for that much reference to these reviews. As long as they are legit and real, that's all what matters to the viewers.

We all need honest gamblers or reviewers giving their feedback to the actual experience they've got.

[mak013]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

But it will take time, I think that everyone has answered it already and there's no need for that much reference to these reviews. As long as they are legit and real, that's all what matters to the viewers.

We all need honest gamblers or reviewers giving their feedback to the actual experience they've got.

Mostly we see a huge quantity of the referral links and some review, that tell us nothing about casino and sometimes promote scam casino. The other way is that all reviews looks the same and there is no information that can help the gambler to choose one of it.
It would be better to spend some time and research casino threads here. We can see the review, how the support works, and gamblers feedback.

[RapTarX]

I hardly have read casino reviews; I don't use any unknown casinos TBH. Bitcointalk always remains the best source of information for me when picking up a casino. Nevertheless, I found gamblingbro.com as the best casino review as they want to give a better insight and real experience to their audience. Take an hour or two to check them out. Since they don't use any affiliate links (I guess), they are unlikely to be biased while writing a review for any casino.
I just had a look at your platform and read one review. TBH, it seems you are just another casino review platform with nothing different or unique information. That's where GamblingBro has some creativity and advantages over other casino review platforms.

[Hamphser]

I hardly have read casino reviews; I don't use any unknown casinos TBH. Bitcointalk always remains the best source of information for me when picking up a casino. Nevertheless, I found gamblingbro.com as the best casino review as they want to give a better insight and real experience to their audience. Take an hour or two to check them out. Since they don't use any affiliate links (I guess), they are unlikely to be biased while writing a review for any casino.
I just had a look at your platform and read one review. TBH, it seems you are just another casino review platform with nothing different or unique information. That's where GamblingBro has some creativity and advantages over other casino review platforms.

This forum is indeed the best place for you to seek off with those informations that we are really that tending to seek off on which it would really be just that be worth because we do see that comments and suggestions or reactions of people out of this forum are really that real and not something biased but of course you should see on a specific user whether he could be trusted or not but in overall when community feedbacks do really give out on the same sentiment then it would be that safe to presume or assuming out that the information is really that legit. This is why im not really that a fan of reading up review sites.
If ever there would really be those review sites then the most common preference that we wanted to see is into those review sites which arent biased and having those good way on reviewing specially in depth review ones into those casinos that they are trying out to feature. People would be finding out to be odd if ever there would really be some shit review.

[Dunamisx]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

Why will a gambling casino make a review and still refuse to implement on what had been reviewed about concerning their platform, everyone has a general experience in gambling, but the purpose of starting of review is to help them know what and where they are to improve on in what they offer, some other gamblers as well will as well renders their own suggestions from general gambling as contributions to help the one they are reviewing about.

[Woodie]

~snip~

There are a lot of experienced gamblers on this forum, so I decided to ask you what you would like to see in casino reviews.

I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this and answer these questions:

1. Do you read casino reviews?

Definitely read reviews as they help with me making a decision if I play with that casino/sportsbook and ensure not to be caught unaware for something a player has gone through...

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

Very useful, and for examples these are embedded in announcement threads of some casino sites here on the forum and they carry some weight...

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

Photo's to show proof of deposits, game history , withdraw s and a few words on the whole gaming experience

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

Seeing this site is similar to your username here on bitcointalk , this makes me think you trying to drive traffic over there..will take a look anyway to see your version of a review

[fapar]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

But it will take time, I think that everyone has answered it already and there's no need for that much reference to these reviews. As long as they are legit and real, that's all what matters to the viewers.

We all need honest gamblers or reviewers giving their feedback to the actual experience they've got.

How can you collect feedback from real players? Reviewers do not provide screenshots of their documents, their game accounts, their transactions, and the like. Any reviews on the Internet from unknown people will cause healthy skepticism and distrust. Now, if such reviews are made by a respected member of the gaming or any other community, his reviews carry a lot of weight. But there is always a small percentage of possible bias of the reviewer.

[Wiwo]

It would be better if there were real reviews from real gamblers. If the users are real then the feedback will be real too whether the feedback is positive or negative. If you write it yourself then the reviews might not be perfect.

I think we can achieve that if a casino will run a review campaign in a reliable platform like bitcointalk. At least know know those user hat will give a feedback and if we trust their reputation, we would believe that what they are saying is true. Probably that's the reason why some casinos had run a review campaign in the forum and campaign managers made sure to hire users that are reputable as well.

Well, the main problem or obstacle I see with that approach is that having review campaigns in this forum may certain my help for the administrators of the casino to improve their service and attract people who already participate in this forum to try their casino, but carrying out a review campaign here won't help much to catch the attention to gamblers who are outsiders of this forums and still consider themselves to be gamblers.
If someone who does not use this forum tried to find review webpages for casinos (or any service in general) this forum won't appear among the first results in the search engine, people will stumble first with webpages like Trustpilot (which are not as reliable, because of factors I have already mentioned some posts ago).
That is why we can see there is a big investment by casinos to get advertisement in services like Blockchain explorers and sometimes even in the webs of wallet providers or sellers of gift cards, they need to appeal to the average cryptocurrency user without only depending on reviews done with subsections of forums like this one. Whether we like it or not, this forum is not so attractive or massive as other social media are, this is a format one needs to get used to before fully engaging with.  

You are very correct with that Hispo because the forum is not a review platform even though what makes up for the forum reviews are the raw pour element and materials in the form of feedback and reflections of the experience of real gamblers, since if you search for reviews,  platforms like Trustpilot and the host of the other review platforms will show up,  and these platforms review even lack the real factual ingredients that make up for a %90 pour review work.

But then forum reviews still serve us the members of the forum and other forum visitors who may stumble on the forum one way or the other,  there are lots of channels through which information is calculated so we shouldn't give up I the tiniest means of information.

[Kavelj22]

I believe that this sector cannot be saved unless users become able to differentiate between sites sufficiently because there are many scam projects that cannot be easily distinguished and offer easy possibilities of deception.

Some good ideas you can practice when you are looking for a good casino:

Do your own research: Don't rely only on reviews and look for independent audits, community forums, and red flags like unrealistic bonuses or hidden fees or forced KYC for privacy caring.
Focus on established platforms: A good advice for beginners to stick to casinos with a verified track record and a good reputation within the community.
Attention to offers that are too good to be true: Like if a bonus seems suspiciously generous! Always choose the platform that prioritizes fair gameplay.
Share your experiences: Don't hesitate to leave honest reviews on platforms you trust as well as forums to help others.

[Odusko]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

Why will a gambling casino make a review and still refuse to implement on what had been reviewed about concerning their platform, everyone has a general experience in gambling, but the purpose of starting of review is to help them know what and where they are to improve on in what they offer, some other gamblers as well will as well renders their own suggestions from general gambling as contributions to help the one they are reviewing about.

The reall essence of reviews is to collect players experiences and also finding possible faults that can/should be fixed on the site and its services, and concerning the issues with implementations of the feedback from reviews the main cause of that is the platform at which the reviews are coming from, take for example, any casino that performs a review campaign here in this forum, have always implemented almost 90%-100% of all the suggestion solutions included in members reviews.
But that is not the same with those recommendations from third-party review sites, and since those third-party review sites are easily manipulated, it becomes obvious that the casino won't take the recommendations seriously.

[EarnOnVictor]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

I prefer the former to the latter as those reviewing sites handling it themselves can't be trusted. In fact, when I read what they write psychologically, I hardly see any of them that could be trusted. Many have been paid and are just writing in favour of their paymaster(s) as it could be more than one sponsor for them in most cases. It is best that we read reviews from human beings like us, this is how we can get to know the true experience they had with casinos or whatever companies they are reviewing. But we have to be reading insightfully as well because it is not all of them that are genuine.

Some reviews are even prepared by bots while some rival companies will send people to do their dirty work for them against their rivals. But most of them do not pass my radar undetected and I disregard many of the reviewers' plights too when they are not constructive enough. Above all, the user's experience is the best way to judge a casino, but still not the entire way to know what they truly are, so do your further research too.

[livingfree]

Mostly we see a huge quantity of the referral links and some review, that tell us nothing about casino and sometimes promote scam casino. The other way is that all reviews looks the same and there is no information that can help the gambler to choose one of it.
It would be better to spend some time and research casino threads here. We can see the review, how the support works, and gamblers feedback.

Yes, I have seen some of these reviews and they don't really offer something at all but just gives the possible experience of someone and what the features are. While someone who's looking for reviews and such, I agree that adding some research is a must.

Why will a gambling casino make a review and still refuse to implement on what had been reviewed about concerning their platform, everyone has a general experience in gambling, but the purpose of starting of review is to help them know what and where they are to improve on in what they offer, some other gamblers as well will as well renders their own suggestions from general gambling as contributions to help the one they are reviewing about.

Usually, it is not the casino per se that gives the review but someone who's an enthusiast with casinos or a gambler that really does reviews for every casino that he sees.

How can you collect feedback from real players? Reviewers do not provide screenshots of their documents, their game accounts, their transactions, and the like. Any reviews on the Internet from unknown people will cause healthy skepticism and distrust. Now, if such reviews are made by a respected member of the gaming or any other community, his reviews carry a lot of weight. But there is always a small percentage of possible bias of the reviewer.

If you have seen the forum and those reviews campaigns, those are paid ones to review them. But if you look for authentic gamblers that don't have any means to get anything in return of their review, there are those. Like for example, the scam accusations, that can be one basis from the real players based on their experience.

~snip~

It depends to the reviewer that you are reading if you are aware of some of the best reviewers here, we've got handful of them.

[Outhue]

Are there still real reviews online? Bots can generate reviews from any products or platforms online this days, reviews center or platform can also take money from companies to get rid of bad reviews from their products or platforms, I don't trust ant reviews online.

All you have to do is to be at the right place, for example, using bitcointalk forum to find the right casino suited for your need, how good a casino really is depends on your personal experience, but at least you will find out straight if the casino is a scam or not by using this forum.

Reviews about casinos are not really needed, find this forum and you will find the truth about any casino faster than using online search engines to look for probably fake reviews, you can't fake a review on here, because all the casinos have anns on this forum, where you can read about peoples experience on the platforms.

[davis196]

1. Do you read casino reviews?

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

5. Additionally, please share any thoughts you have on the topic of casino reviews.

Of course I read casino reviews. Every gambler with a brain must read casino reviews, before depositing money into a new crypto casino.
I'm extremely suspicious about positive casino reviews on Trustpilot(and sites similar to Trsutpilot), because those reviews seem fake.
I guess that the casino reviews on Bitcointalk.org are more trustworthy, especially if the guy, who wrote the review is a respected forum member with good trust rating and merit.
I've never used WolfBet, but I remember that there were scam accusations on the forum about this particular casino. I don't know anything about LTC Casino.

[Hirose UK]

If the reviews website don't really did their review on that particular casino that they are reviewing. It's best to consolidate and merge all of those legit and actual experiences of gamblers.

I prefer the former to the latter as those reviewing sites handling it themselves can't be trusted. In fact, when I read what they write psychologically, I hardly see any of them that could be trusted. Many have been paid and are just writing in favour of their paymaster(s) as it could be more than one sponsor for them in most cases. It is best that we read reviews from human beings like us, this is how we can get to know the true experience they had with casinos or whatever companies they are reviewing. But we have to be reading insightfully as well because it is not all of them that are genuine.

Some reviews are even prepared by bots while some rival companies will send people to do their dirty work for them against their rivals. But most of them do not pass my radar undetected and I disregard many of the reviewers' plights too when they are not constructive enough. Above all, the user's experience is the best way to judge a casino, but still not the entire way to know what they truly are, so do your further research too.

Trusting all the reviews from each casino review platform also cannot really be truly accurate because there are updates to various information which of course cannot be immediately received and included in the rating assessment for one of these casinos.
A better step is to find out for yourself various information about each experience of the gamblers who use the casino that we are researching regarding their trustworthiness and reputation.
Maybe this will take lot more time and can be bit of hassle, but the final results we get can be really real and indirectly we ourselves will judge whether the casino is worth using or not.

Some people still rely too much on casino review platforms to be able to research the casino they want to use and of course this is also less than satisfactory.
I believe that casino review platforms are the best at rating all the casinos out there but as gambler who is always betting, I can't really trust the results of casino review platform without researching it myself further.

So, that the biggest mistake that might be forgotten, that there are lots of statements about various reviews written by bots or some shill accounts that are spread quite widely.
We have to be really smart in distinguishing and looking for the various information needed to be able to draw conclusions about the casino we are researching.

[mak013]

Are there still real reviews online? Bots can generate reviews from any products or platforms online this days, reviews center or platform can also take money from companies to get rid of bad reviews from their products or platforms, I don't trust ant reviews online.

All you have to do is to be at the right place, for example, using bitcointalk forum to find the right casino suited for your need, how good a casino really is depends on your personal experience, but at least you will find out straight if the casino is a scam or not by using this forum.

Reviews about casinos are not really needed, find this forum and you will find the truth about any casino faster than using online search engines to look for probably fake reviews, you can't fake a review on here, because all the casinos have anns on this forum, where you can read about peoples experience on the platforms.

Yes, there are several sites with real reviews. But it is unreal to find real review in hundreds of fakes. The only purpose of these sites that may be useful for gamblers i can imagine is to know the casino names. After it the gambler have to visit this board and search for real information and feedback.

[Oilacris]

1. Do you read casino reviews?

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

5. Additionally, please share any thoughts you have on the topic of casino reviews.

1. No, i do just simply visit out casinos ANN thread and would be reading up those feedbacks directly in speaking about legitimacy
2. Useful if there are some information which you cant find out elsewhere.
3. As long it would be that honest and precise then its a go.
4. Dont have the time to read up, so its your own take whether you would really be that get convinced or not.
5. Casino reviews arent that much getting visited into this forum but it isnt that bad to read up for some time if you are searching for further details.

[TheUltraElite]

Yes, there are several sites with real reviews. But it is unreal to find real review in hundreds of fakes. The only purpose of these sites that may be useful for gamblers i can imagine is to know the casino names. After it the gambler have to visit this board and search for real information and feedback.

See the affiliate marketing for gambling is huge and that has a huge market which demands this too. Hence the number of websites providing reviews, gambling strategies and so on are immense and the side effect is that the quality of reviews and promotions there have become so low that you will find it difficult to navigate.

There are many sites that are actually working out the odds and calculating EV and the probability maths. Such sites are few and that is an important part of the reviews.

I already said about my view that bankroll investment feature should be included, I think this can be another addition.

[Chato1977]

Transparency , being real and not siding to Gambling site because of Money .

this is what the problem of many review sites nowadays actually this has been the trend for long now , that people do not trust reviews because of this attitude.

but if you can prove us wrong about your review then we might consider trusting your site.

[Eureka_07]

Greetings to all forum users!

I own a casino review website. I, like many people here, am already tired of the same type of basic casino reviews, which I have done myself, unfortunately.
<snip>

I do read casino reviews before depositing any amount. If I am convinced to the negative reviews, I would hold myself from playing to their site.
Useful reviews should contain first-hand experience narrative or any other ways to do it. It should also contain evidences to support all claims that the review author has written, otherwise, I won't find it useful, unless there are some reviews that tells the same thing (but has given supporting details to their claims).
Individual review, as I prefer, should have no referral link at all.

Welcome to the forum, best of luck!