What do you want to see in casino reviews?

[Hamphser]

Intents such are potential scamming out users is something that would really be bust up in the end of the day or something that could be known in the end of the line. There's no way that the community wont really be able to make out notice with those stuffs on which we know that when it comes to scams then we are really that highly allergic into it on which on the time that we do notice that theres something odd
then the community would really be able to spot it away. It is really just that when it comes to bonus then they arent that literally scam thing but rather they are just traps been set out for the users to have
some engagement and trapping themselves and busting up their bankroll on the time that they do play gambling but on a legit way of course but if the terms and other conditions been set out
is something that totally no that balanced then expect that you would really be getting those kind of criticisms.

Various casinos also use bonuses for each account as additional funds or free some slots for new users, of course it cannot be claimed as a way to cheat but only a strategy to find new users, so I do not agree with the opinion on criticism about the misuse of bonuses to cheat gamblers because all casinos have bonus programs, if they criticize a casino there must be specific evidence for a trustworthy and accountable review of a particular casino, there is a special board for discussion regarding Scam Accusations if we have research expertise on casinos, if someone finds indications of a casino that is cheating then report it to the board to investigate with a community that already understands research and analysis.

It is really just that a personal type of approach when it comes to this on which they do have that kind of generalization in speaking about bonuses on which the thing you have said is true
that we cant really be able to say things that it is really cheating technically but rather those people are really that pertaining about into that deceptive kind of approach on what these bonuses could offer.
They would really be telling that it was a trap or something like this. Any odd things or shady stuffs should really be reported or should really be complained. As much as possible if things could be resolved out
on between you and the platform then its good but if its something that do talks about not being getting any responses then this is the time that you would really be reaching out into the community.

[1714847965]

1714847965

[Hirose UK]

~snip~

Not all casino site reviews can be trusted because there are many sites that provide fake reviews on sites for money. i find this forum a good and reliable source for reviews.  Because when a casino site's ANN is opened here, many people learn to use it, analyze it and ask different questions, so here you will get an honest review from different forum users. and besides, you can ask yourself various questions that you want to know. thus it is possible to find a good casino site from here.

There are lots of gambling sites out there that actually use fake review systems to gain trust and also rating point of view which for gamblers, they pay several people to be able to have lots of accounts that can provide positive reviews.
This is normal thing that happens and we have encountered it for long time, in fact similar things are not only on gambling sites but on various platforms which aim to promote and get more users.

In the gambling industry itself, all of us members here are very lucky because there are lots of threads that can be studied to get information about the reviews of each member, even here many people want each other and recommend the best.
Moreover, there are also several places that are clearly trustworthy and have good reputation in providing ratings and reviews of all existing crypto gambling sites, this will be very helpful for all gamblers, especially those who are members of the forum.

[Mahanton]

~snip~

Not all casino site reviews can be trusted because there are many sites that provide fake reviews on sites for money. i find this forum a good and reliable source for reviews.  Because when a casino site's ANN is opened here, many people learn to use it, analyze it and ask different questions, so here you will get an honest review from different forum users. and besides, you can ask yourself various questions that you want to know. thus it is possible to find a good casino site from here.

There are lots of gambling sites out there that actually use fake review systems to gain trust and also rating point of view which for gamblers, they pay several people to be able to have lots of accounts that can provide positive reviews.
This is normal thing that happens and we have encountered it for long time, in fact similar things are not only on gambling sites but on various platforms which aim to promote and get more users.

In the gambling industry itself, all of us members here are very lucky because there are lots of threads that can be studied to get information about the reviews of each member, even here many people want each other and recommend the best.
Moreover, there are also several places that are clearly trustworthy and have good reputation in providing ratings and reviews of all existing crypto gambling sites, this will be very helpful for all gamblers, especially those who are members of the forum.

Faking reviews could really be easy specially on askgamblers and other rating sites on which making new accounts is really just that easy as 1.2.3...People could really just that make some false accusations too on trying out to break someones reputation or in competition and this is why its not really that something reliable if we do speak about real feedbacks. This is why it would really be that best that we should really be checking out
real time feedbacks specially if its a crypto related site on which it would really be that best that checking out this community first before making any decisions specially when making some deposit.

Reviews should really be transparent and something not biased. On this forum we do have those known review/guide sites which could really be trusted. Same goes with having those ANN and the
feedbacks by the users and community on which you could really be able to tell that it is really something that you could trust with.

[paxmao]

~snip~

Not all casino site reviews can be trusted because there are many sites that provide fake reviews on sites for money. i find this forum a good and reliable source for reviews.  Because when a casino site's ANN is opened here, many people learn to use it, analyze it and ask different questions, so here you will get an honest review from different forum users. and besides, you can ask yourself various questions that you want to know. thus it is possible to find a good casino site from here.

There are lots of gambling sites out there that actually use fake review systems to gain trust and also rating point of view which for gamblers, they pay several people to be able to have lots of accounts that can provide positive reviews.
This is normal thing that happens and we have encountered it for long time, in fact similar things are not only on gambling sites but on various platforms which aim to promote and get more users.

In the gambling industry itself, all of us members here are very lucky because there are lots of threads that can be studied to get information about the reviews of each member, even here many people want each other and recommend the best.
Moreover, there are also several places that are clearly trustworthy and have good reputation in providing ratings and reviews of all existing crypto gambling sites, this will be very helpful for all gamblers, especially those who are members of the forum.

Faking reviews could really be easy specially on askgamblers and other rating sites on which making new accounts is really just that easy as 1.2.3...People could really just that make some false accusations too on trying out to break someones reputation or in competition and this is why its not really that something reliable if we do speak about real feedbacks. This is why it would really be that best that we should really be checking out
real time feedbacks specially if its a crypto related site on which it would really be that best that checking out this community first before making any decisions specially when making some deposit.

Reviews should really be transparent and something not biased. On this forum we do have those known review/guide sites which could really be trusted. Same goes with having those ANN and the
feedbacks by the users and community on which you could really be able to tell that it is really something that you could trust with.

There is always a question of trust, but reviews done by the public in general are always like that. You would need to have either a system of verification of the players or  have "professional" reviews only by a trusted third party (it can be just people from the site hosting reviews, no need for a big four audit in here). But that is indifferent to the content of the review itself, it should start by a check of T&Cs, which should be our first concern.

[Obari]

Personally I’ve also read and written some reviews myself and I always try my best to give in a very comprehensive and detailed as well as a sincere review when posting my reviews because I believe it helps the company make adjustments as well as make improvements on where they’re slagging and lacking behind and it also helps users make decisions on the usage of a particular service.

I personally love to see detailed reviews and not just some scanty writes and I prefer reading reviews that aren’t similar and I wouldn’t advise any casino to give details on what a review should write when giving their reviews but they should feather increase review pas and be more selective on reviews as I believe this will encourage writing more comprehensive reviews.

[delfastTions]

In my opinion, before starting any work on reviewing specific casinos, it is worth asking yourself the question of how much time I can really devote, first of all, to the real game in this casino and how much time I will spend on compiling a review in such a way that it would be objective  and interesting for your readers and other players.  If you think about it, it becomes clear that it will take quite a lot of time. 
But whether the reviewer has this time or does not have enough time, this is a question of self-organization of your work.  When there is not enough time, you have to turn to other hired workers, who need to be paid because the flow of information is already a real business.  In my opinion, individual reviews from a particular author, which come out from time to time, are not particularly interesting for readers.  I don't think they have a large number of subscribers.  In my opinion, if you are going to engage in this kind of information business, you need to create a website and assemble a fairly large team of workers.  And accordingly, do a lot of reviews. 
By the way, this will cost quite a lot for the organizer of such a business initially, until the moment when he receives income from advertising and promotion.  But then the reviews will cease to be objective.

[Quidat]

In my opinion, before starting any work on reviewing specific casinos, it is worth asking yourself the question of how much time I can really devote, first of all, to the real game in this casino and how much time I will spend on compiling a review in such a way that it would be objective  and interesting for your readers and other players.  If you think about it, it becomes clear that it will take quite a lot of time. 
But whether the reviewer has this time or does not have enough time, this is a question of self-organization of your work.  When there is not enough time, you have to turn to other hired workers, who need to be paid because the flow of information is already a real business.  In my opinion, individual reviews from a particular author, which come out from time to time, are not particularly interesting for readers.  I don't think they have a large number of subscribers.  In my opinion, if you are going to engage in this kind of information business, you need to create a website and assemble a fairly large team of workers.  And accordingly, do a lot of reviews. 
By the way, this will cost quite a lot for the organizer of such a business initially, until the moment when he receives income from advertising and promotion.  But then the reviews will cease to be objective.

Asking yourself on how much time you could devote or money you do tend to spend then it would really be just that normal that you wont really be thinking up first with those things but rather you would really be focusing yourself on trying out to make those verification first whether it is really that something that you could really be able to deal with or something that you would really be just simply skipping out. There are ones who do easily believe with some few positive feedbacks without having those verification whether those words are true or really just that been simply being created by those people who are really just that trying to make the site look legit but there's some hidden agenda behind those positive  words. Just like been said that you wont really be having any problems.

I do agree into those points above that when it comes to reviews then it should really be that transparent as much as possible. It is something that having those real time feedbacks and comments
basing up with real time experiences by the author or writer itself rather than on making out those words without having any basis. Actually we dont really need those review sites
because with this forum alone then it would really be that enough and sufficient that you can choose up the legit ones.

[delfastTions]

In my opinion, before starting any work on reviewing specific casinos, it is worth asking yourself the question of how much time I can really devote, first of all, to the real game in this casino and how much time I will spend on compiling a review in such a way that it would be objective  and interesting for your readers and other players.  If you think about it, it becomes clear that it will take quite a lot of time. 
But whether the reviewer has this time or does not have enough time, this is a question of self-organization of your work.  When there is not enough time, you have to turn to other hired workers, who need to be paid because the flow of information is already a real business.  In my opinion, individual reviews from a particular author, which come out from time to time, are not particularly interesting for readers.  I don't think they have a large number of subscribers.  In my opinion, if you are going to engage in this kind of information business, you need to create a website and assemble a fairly large team of workers.  And accordingly, do a lot of reviews. 
By the way, this will cost quite a lot for the organizer of such a business initially, until the moment when he receives income from advertising and promotion.  But then the reviews will cease to be objective.

Asking yourself on how much time you could devote or money you do tend to spend then it would really be just that normal that you wont really be thinking up first with those things but rather you would really be focusing yourself on trying out to make those verification first whether it is really that something that you could really be able to deal with or something that you would really be just simply skipping out. There are ones who do easily believe with some few positive feedbacks without having those verification whether those words are true or really just that been simply being created by those people who are really just that trying to make the site look legit but there's some hidden agenda behind those positive  words. Just like been said that you wont really be having any problems.

I do agree into those points above that when it comes to reviews then it should really be that transparent as much as possible. It is something that having those real time feedbacks and comments
basing up with real time experiences by the author or writer itself rather than on making out those words without having any basis. Actually we dont really need those review sites
because with this forum alone then it would really be that enough and sufficient that you can choose up the legit ones.

That’s exactly what I’m talking about about how much personal time you really need to spend in order to thoroughly understand this or that casino.  And it looks like you need to spend quite a lot of time.  In addition, not only the author of the review loses time, but also money, simply because he will basically lose.  Another serious question that concerns all players is the question of how easy it is to transfer money from a casino deposit to your personal wallet.  This check usually requires quite a significant amount of money.  There is also a possible issue of communication with the casino support and it is already quite long.  As a result, we come to the conclusion that it is quite difficult to make a truly high-quality and objective casino review.  And this is only for one specific casino.
 And what many call a casino review is actually just episodic personal impressions.  Very inaccurate and fragmentary information.

[rodskee]

~snip~

Not all casino site reviews can be trusted because there are many sites that provide fake reviews on sites for money. i find this forum a good and reliable source for reviews.  Because when a casino site's ANN is opened here, many people learn to use it, analyze it and ask different questions, so here you will get an honest review from different forum users. and besides, you can ask yourself various questions that you want to know. thus it is possible to find a good casino site from here.

There are lots of gambling sites out there that actually use fake review systems to gain trust and also rating point of view which for gamblers, they pay several people to be able to have lots of accounts that can provide positive reviews.
This is normal thing that happens and we have encountered it for long time, in fact similar things are not only on gambling sites but on various platforms which aim to promote and get more users.

In the gambling industry itself, all of us members here are very lucky because there are lots of threads that can be studied to get information about the reviews of each member, even here many people want each other and recommend the best.
Moreover, there are also several places that are clearly trustworthy and have good reputation in providing ratings and reviews of all existing crypto gambling sites, this will be very helpful for all gamblers, especially those who are members of the forum.

Faking reviews could really be easy specially on askgamblers and other rating sites on which making new accounts is really just that easy as 1.2.3...People could really just that make some false accusations too on trying out to break someones reputation or in competition and this is why its not really that something reliable if we do speak about real feedbacks. This is why it would really be that best that we should really be checking out
real time feedbacks specially if its a crypto related site on which it would really be that best that checking out this community first before making any decisions specially when making some deposit.

Reviews should really be transparent and something not biased. On this forum we do have those known review/guide sites which could really be trusted. Same goes with having those ANN and the
feedbacks by the users and community on which you could really be able to tell that it is really something that you could trust with.

There is always a question of trust, but reviews done by the public in general are always like that. You would need to have either a system of verification of the players or  have "professional" reviews only by a trusted third party (it can be just people from the site hosting reviews, no need for a big four audit in here). But that is indifferent to the content of the review itself, it should start by a check of T&Cs, which should be our first concern.

or maybe this forum is the perfect way to learn about reviews in casino by asking this forum
directly ? isnt the better way because there are so many fake reviews here and there that we cannot
even distinguish who is right and who is wrong , so for me this community is the perfect and the best
way knowing what is the casino is.
reviews can be given by random people and even shill account that normally happening these days .

[EarnOnVictor]

~snip~

Not all casino site reviews can be trusted because there are many sites that provide fake reviews on sites for money. i find this forum a good and reliable source for reviews.  Because when a casino site's ANN is opened here, many people learn to use it, analyze it and ask different questions, so here you will get an honest review from different forum users. and besides, you can ask yourself various questions that you want to know. thus it is possible to find a good casino site from here.

There are lots of gambling sites out there that actually use fake review systems to gain trust and also rating point of view which for gamblers, they pay several people to be able to have lots of accounts that can provide positive reviews.
This is normal thing that happens and we have encountered it for long time, in fact similar things are not only on gambling sites but on various platforms which aim to promote and get more users.

In the gambling industry itself, all of us members here are very lucky because there are lots of threads that can be studied to get information about the reviews of each member, even here many people want each other and recommend the best.
Moreover, there are also several places that are clearly trustworthy and have good reputation in providing ratings and reviews of all existing crypto gambling sites, this will be very helpful for all gamblers, especially those who are members of the forum.

Faking reviews could really be easy specially on askgamblers and other rating sites on which making new accounts is really just that easy as 1.2.3...People could really just that make some false accusations too on trying out to break someones reputation or in competition and this is why its not really that something reliable if we do speak about real feedbacks. This is why it would really be that best that we should really be checking out
real time feedbacks specially if its a crypto related site on which it would really be that best that checking out this community first before making any decisions specially when making some deposit.

Reviews should really be transparent and something not biased. On this forum we do have those known review/guide sites which could really be trusted. Same goes with having those ANN and the
feedbacks by the users and community on which you could really be able to tell that it is really something that you could trust with.

There is always a question of trust, but reviews done by the public in general are always like that. You would need to have either a system of verification of the players or  have "professional" reviews only by a trusted third party (it can be just people from the site hosting reviews, no need for a big four audit in here). But that is indifferent to the content of the review itself, it should start by a check of T&Cs, which should be our first concern.

or maybe this forum is the perfect way to learn about reviews in casino by asking this forum
directly ? isnt the better way because there are so many fake reviews here and there that we cannot
even distinguish who is right and who is wrong , so for me this community is the perfect and the best
way knowing what is the casino is.
reviews can be given by random people and even shill account that normally happening these days .

Of course, forums have been one of the best considerations to learn facts and know the truth and I've mentioned this many times on this forum. You can imagine how we expose many companies and also be thorough with our defence and criticism as the case may be between companies and the customers. All we want is fairness. No one has the right whatsoever to cheat another and even come here to advertise or maybe the case is mentioned here, it must surely attract the truth from us. I see this in most other forums I've participated in as well, though they might not be as disciplined as we are here, but certainly, the iota of the truth could still be derived from a few readings, which is enough to deliver the true gist for the person making the search.

Review is always good, but many are just being evil about it. It shows the right path for anyone no matter how new you are to the system, but the way it has been falsely propagated just because of the money collected from the reviewed companies is the issue. For this, everyone can only embrace the forums and reviewing site that allows true people to drop their comments and opinions. Anything aside this is rubbish and I urge everyone to avoid such.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Personally I’ve also read and written some reviews myself and I always try my best to give in a very comprehensive and detailed as well as a sincere review when posting my reviews because I believe it helps the company make adjustments as well as make improvements on where they’re slagging and lacking behind and it also helps users make decisions on the usage of a particular service.

I personally love to see detailed reviews and not just some scanty writes and I prefer reading reviews that aren’t similar and I wouldn’t advise any casino to give details on what a review should write when giving their reviews but they should feather increase review pas and be more selective on reviews as I believe this will encourage writing more comprehensive reviews.

Sorry but first, learn to make use of "comma" in your texts, it not only makes reading and understand easier, but it also adds good credibility level to your posts, I hope you take this advice serious.

You are right and I agree with you, and one thing I've discovered is that, most people do not take their time to write reviews, they always do it too in a hurry and as such, the reviews lack most of the time lack their real essence, reviews are not something that should be rushed, it's better not to write a review about a casino at all, than to rush it and leave the real essence of the review behind.

Personally, I believe that reviews doesn't necessarily have to be very long to make sense, there are actually some really shot reviews that makes sense, because the writer was hitting the nail on the head all through.
So, for me, instead of writing a full book as review, and every thing said there will be garbage, it's better to write a few words, in those few words, point out what you like and would love it to remain, point out what you don't like, as well as issues you would like to be fixed,  suggest how best to fix those issues, suggest new features that you think will make the casino much better than it is at that moment, and then conclude.
Writing reviews shouldn't be like some writing a document for a company project..

[bayu7adi]

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

There is another thing that makes me interesting, namely Comparison. Everyone likes comparing the features in casino A and the features in casino B. Apart from that, I think reading the table is more effective for people who want to choose their favorite casino, yes it saves more time and also immediately gets the gist of what they want.

Reviews in the form of detailed writing must still be embedded, even if the reader does not read everything, but it is important for those who have discovered which points the reader will consider.

[LUCKMCFLY]

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

There is another thing that makes me interesting, namely Comparison. Everyone likes comparing the features in casino A and the features in casino B. Apart from that, I think reading the table is more effective for people who want to choose their favorite casino, yes it saves more time and also immediately gets the gist of what they want.

Reviews in the form of detailed writing must still be embedded, even if the reader does not read everything, but it is important for those who have discovered which points the reader will consider.

Also this agrees with what he says, the comparisons with casinos are something that goes very well for these things, you can say and intuit that it is one of the things that are most worth doing because we always have experiences in several casinos , but of course comparisons are made in an impartial way, where it is really noticeable that things are different, I could say that when it comes to doing something like this, you have to be very careful too, because here in the forum There are representatives of the casinos and well, something that is a lie or something, they are not going to like it, being a reviewer is not something so easy, in fact, each thing that is analyzed, each criterion should be supported with image capture, this to Let there be no doubt, this way things can happen in favor of the things one wants to see, because many reviewers create a table where they mark which ones they comply with or do not comply with.

The graphics will always give you a better view of everything, with the graphics the person does not even read many times, it catches his attention, he becomes interested and reads, because that is how it works, when there are many screenshots things can be more interesting and this can generate much more interest, but not only in the purchase between casinos, each criterion they take to highlight which is the best casino, because they demonstrate it in that way , there is no other way , I have always seen that the f+ágico drawing and all this Well, they have a good impact like that.

Now, just as there are good reviewers, I avoid a lot of shilling and this takes away the interest of many players, so you have to be as careful as possible , since you Cannot trust any account but do what is necessary to ensure that the accounts that are of reviewers that are Impactful and that they are reliable, that is known once and for all because as a Player you determine when someone is Advertising a casino , that has a lot to do with this.

[Shamm]

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

There is another thing that makes me interesting, namely Comparison. Everyone likes comparing the features in casino A and the features in casino B. Apart from that, I think reading the table is more effective for people who want to choose their favorite casino, yes it saves more time and also immediately gets the gist of what they want.

Reviews in the form of detailed writing must still be embedded, even if the reader does not read everything, but it is important for those who have discovered which points the reader will consider.

everyone of us here knows that sometimes we need to compare two things in order to to know who is the best like in casino. As a gambler we have the power to choose where we gonna put our deposit so we need to compare one casino into another and I'd then if we got an  answer then we gonna go for deposit. Cause but one thing for sure many of us here want a casino that have many bonuses and their customer services is good.  Once a casino have that kind of practice then a lot of gamblers will choose them and play with them.

[Dunamisx]

Personally I’ve also read and written some reviews myself and I always try my best to give in a very comprehensive and detailed as well as a sincere review when posting my reviews because I believe it helps the company make adjustments as well as make improvements on where they’re slagging and lacking behind and it also helps users make decisions on the usage of a particular service.

I personally love to see detailed reviews and not just some scanty writes and I prefer reading reviews that aren’t similar and I wouldn’t advise any casino to give details on what a review should write when giving their reviews but they should feather increase review pas and be more selective on reviews as I believe this will encourage writing more comprehensive reviews.

Additional to this, people want honesty, in making reviews, the public want to hear the general opinions we all have towards a particular gambling platform, the gambling platform as well are also interested in seeing how acceptable is the service they are offering to us, at the end, everything is to ensure that there's an effective communication and realization of the benefits and reasons for the creation of any gambling platform and to see that they keep to this diligence in what they provides as gambling services.

[Zadicar]

Personally I’ve also read and written some reviews myself and I always try my best to give in a very comprehensive and detailed as well as a sincere review when posting my reviews because I believe it helps the company make adjustments as well as make improvements on where they’re slagging and lacking behind and it also helps users make decisions on the usage of a particular service.

I personally love to see detailed reviews and not just some scanty writes and I prefer reading reviews that aren’t similar and I wouldn’t advise any casino to give details on what a review should write when giving their reviews but they should feather increase review pas and be more selective on reviews as I believe this will encourage writing more comprehensive reviews.

Additional to this, people want honesty, in making reviews, the public want to hear the general opinions we all have towards a particular gambling platform, the gambling platform as well are also interested in seeing how acceptable is the service they are offering to us, at the end, everything is to ensure that there's an effective communication and realization of the benefits and reasons for the creation of any gambling platform and to see that they keep to this diligence in what they provides as gambling services.

Transparency and honesty just like on what mentioned above on which this is the most important thing of all. On the time that the community would be seeing something odd or unusual
then expect that they would be able to point out that very minimal detail into something big as long it do talks or pertains about fairness issues then it would really be that needed to be cleared up.
This is the beauty on having this kind of community is that whenever they do see those kind of biased reviews then they would be able to make out such words that it isnt really just that right
or getting in line on what they are currently seeing or experiencing.

Real time experiences are being noted and as a review/guide site then everything should really be listed and should be mentioned without having those lacking information
on which this is something needed for the community to know at least so that they would be having the idea on what they are tending to deal with.

[Hamphser]

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

There is another thing that makes me interesting, namely Comparison. Everyone likes comparing the features in casino A and the features in casino B. Apart from that, I think reading the table is more effective for people who want to choose their favorite casino, yes it saves more time and also immediately gets the gist of what they want.

Reviews in the form of detailed writing must still be embedded, even if the reader does not read everything, but it is important for those who have discovered which points the reader will consider.

everyone of us here knows that sometimes we need to compare two things in order to to know who is the best like in casino. As a gambler we have the power to choose where we gonna put our deposit so we need to compare one casino into another and I'd then if we got an  answer then we gonna go for deposit. Cause but one thing for sure many of us here want a casino that have many bonuses and their customer services is good.  Once a casino have that kind of practice then a lot of gamblers will choose them and play with them.

If you are someone whose in torn in between other platforms on which you do really believe that it is really something that looks interesting then it would really be just that depending on you whether you would really be making up some comparison or would really be trying to check out those facts and some complaints if ever it was available so that you would really be that making yourself wary about on the situations in between. When it comes to review then everything should really be not bias on which this is what we do really prefer rather than on seeing those who are just simply that trying out to decieve people then its not something that we could be able to trust on. When it comes to review sites then its not really that usually getting that much attention and this is why we dont see such sites on existence or if there's one then
they are really just that few because people would really be just simply checking out informations specially into this forum.

[Furious 7]

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

There is another thing that makes me interesting, namely Comparison. Everyone likes comparing the features in casino A and the features in casino B. Apart from that, I think reading the table is more effective for people who want to choose their favorite casino, yes it saves more time and also immediately gets the gist of what they want.

Reviews in the form of detailed writing must still be embedded, even if the reader does not read everything, but it is important for those who have discovered which points the reader will consider.

It can indeed be a good choice because sometimes for some of the reviews we see actually it provides more information to be compared between each other and by looking at the actual reviews if in the end it is a review given honestly it will be very helpful for those of us who are not yet part of the casino and want to try to be in it.
 
I personally for real reviews the most important thing is trust and security because however when someone writes a review and it is good enough then i think it can be used as a good consideration that indeed the casino is an honest site.
Nowaday there are quite a lot of casino sites where we cant trust all of them because surely of all these casinos not all of them can be trusted so when we want to try a new site then indeed rather than us in the end being wary then the review can be a pretty good reference even though the problem of experience is likely to be different later.
 

[wiss19]

Faking reviews could really be easy specially on askgamblers and other rating sites on which making new accounts is really just that easy as 1.2.3...People could really just that make some false accusations too on trying out to break someones reputation or in competition and this is why its not really that something reliable if we do speak about real feedbacks. This is why it would really be that best that we should really be checking out
real time feedbacks specially if its a crypto related site on which it would really be that best that checking out this community first before making any decisions specially when making some deposit.

Reviews should really be transparent and something not biased. On this forum we do have those known review/guide sites which could really be trusted. Same goes with having those ANN and the
feedbacks by the users and community on which you could really be able to tell that it is really something that you could trust with.

I wonder if people still use review websites such as TrustPilot to check the authenticity of a platform after so much awareness within the community that these websites are not trustworthy since the reviews are easily manipulated because anyone can create a bunch of free email addresses from free email service providers and then create accounts on these platforms and post fake reviews and feedback.

It must be complete newbies that might use such websites or services before joining a platform because it's newbies that don't do much research before they get involved in a casino platform, especially if the platform is offering a lucrative bonus or something to new users.

[Odusko]

Personally, I’ve also read and written some reviews myself and I always try my best to give in a very comprehensive and detailed as well as a sincere review when posting my reviews because I believe it helps the company make adjustments as well as make improvements on where they’re slagging and lacking behind and it also helps users make decisions on the usage of a particular service.

I personally love to see detailed reviews and not just some scanty writes and I prefer reading reviews that aren’t similar and I wouldn’t advise any casino to give details on what a review should write when giving their reviews but they should feather increase review pas and be more selective on reviews as I believe this will encourage writing more comprehensive reviews.

Quite right on that, I have read one or two of your reviews and I can say that you always take time to cover all the aspects that can help the casinoo to adjust and also point out the unique features of the casino that can help improve the overall experience of the gamblers and for that, it is better to stand at a point that can help both the casino and the gambler alike.

Against what most of the third-party review sites offer where all their energy and attention are drawn and thrown to what the casino can offer alone without mentioning what the player's experiences are and how satisfied they are with the casino, their reviews are like a promotion to the casino and that can easily mislead us into making the wrong decisions as gamblers and making them a representative of the casino rather than being just and fair to both side.