Mempool Observer Topic

[joker_josue]

@bitmover is it possible to create a line, which marks the point where the image was last posted?

It would be an easier way to understand the evolution that has occurred since the bot's last post.

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 42 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 39 sat/vB
• hourFee: 37 sat/vB
• economyFee: 37 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 21 sat/vB

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 41 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 41 sat/vB
• hourFee: 41 sat/vB
• economyFee: 41 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 24 sat/vB

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 41 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 40 sat/vB
• hourFee: 38 sat/vB
• economyFee: 38 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 25 sat/vB

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

     

• fastestFee: 41 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 40 sat/vB
• hourFee: 38 sat/vB
• economyFee: 38 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 25 sat/vB

We can say that the fee rate challenge is becoming to be more of nothing to threat the network users as before since we can even achieve having this fear and even as low as 30 sats/vbyte as transaction fees, there's more to expect coming subsequently and we hope to see the fee coming as low as ever before with time, the best we could just do now is to check on the mempool to see the fee rates before performing any transaction, this will be for our own good and benefits when we set target on when the mempool is less busy and make our transactions.

[nutildah]

     

• fastestFee: 41 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 40 sat/vB
• hourFee: 38 sat/vB
• economyFee: 38 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 25 sat/vB

America waking up and fees are still below 45 sat/byte. Good job FeeBuddy!



Almost affordable!  

Feel like I should encourage FeeBuddy when he reports good news, kind of like how I threaten ChartBuddy when he reports bad news.

[franky1]

encourage/threaten??
they display fees changes, not sway/control/cause fee changes

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 57 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 54 sat/vB
• hourFee: 50 sat/vB
• economyFee: 50 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 25 sat/vB

[fillippone]

When dealing with fees, I tend to use the minimum fees plus a certain percentage to allow for sudden increases, it would be nice to have a graph for the economy fees, superimposed on the mean fee graph (and maybe the half-hour fee as an upper band).
Do you think it would disrupt the image readability?

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 40 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 39 sat/vB
• hourFee: 37 sat/vB
• economyFee: 37 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 25 sat/vB

[franky1]

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 37 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 35 sat/vB
• hourFee: 33 sat/vB
• economyFee: 33 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 24 sat/vB

[philipma1957]

encourage/threaten??
they display fees changes, not sway/control/cause fee changes

lighten 🆙

[nutildah]

Its true franknbeans, the bots control the prices and fees, not the other way around. They also have emotions and are capable of interpreting my text.

See look, FeeBuddy is clearly smiling in this picture:



The only bot around here that doesn't have feelings is JJG -- he can only approximate emotions through his relatively crude algorithms, but they are unconvincing & don't pass the Turing test.

[bitmover]

When dealing with fees, I tend to use the minimum fees plus a certain percentage to allow for sudden increases, it would be nice to have a graph for the economy fees, superimposed on the mean fee graph (and maybe the half-hour fee as an upper band).

I am using data that comes from an API, which uses block data and not mempool data. So I can`t do that now.

However, You can see that most of the times the Average fee is very close the the Hour Fee. It is sometimes higher and sometimes lower...

Its true franknbeans, the bots control the prices and fees, not the other way around. They also have emotions and are capable of interpreting my text.

See look, FeeBuddy is clearly smiling in this picture:

Beautiful picture. Sadly, he can`t use an avatar yet!

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 33 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 32 sat/vB
• hourFee: 32 sat/vB
• economyFee: 32 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 24 sat/vB

[nutildah]

See look, FeeBuddy is clearly smiling in this picture:

Beautiful picture. Sadly, he can`t use an avatar yet!

Thanks! When the time is right, I'm sure I can make (generate) you a better one, and with 2 full legs    (I guess the 2nd leg is just hidden behind the pile of coins, maybe)

BTW, great work on FeeBuddy. He's tied with ChartBuddy for being my favorite bot.

[stompix]

I'm willing to bet anything that the line at 20sat/b is Viabtc and they tx screwing the minimum!
With the 30sat/b barrier not being broken once by any other pool that's for sure just them distorting the graphs.

Its true franknbeans, the bots control the prices and fees, not the other way around. They also have emotions and are capable of interpreting my text.
See look, FeeBuddy is clearly smiling in this picture:

$468.16 to inscribe 
Now imagine the outrage here is somebody would be doing this, if fees go any lower I'm wondering what troll level this move would be ranked ...

[joker_josue]

Its true franknbeans, the bots control the prices and fees, not the other way around. They also have emotions and are capable of interpreting my text.

See look, FeeBuddy is clearly smiling in this picture:

Beautiful picture. Sadly, he can`t use an avatar yet!

Look, if we could adjust that image, so that the results would appear on that screen, whenever the bot posted?
Of course the image had to be bigger, but it would be really cool to see.

[FeeBuddy]

     

• fastestFee: 53 sat/vB
• halfHourFee: 48 sat/vB
• hourFee: 44 sat/vB
• economyFee: 44 sat/vB
• minimumFee: 25 sat/vB