Would you tag these users?

[LoyceMobile]

The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

I didn't get angry, I got even

To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account.

[borovichok]

The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

I didn't get angry, I got even

To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account.

Bad posting is a process and not an habit but it's good to know that I'm wearing an inappropriate tag and the person who left it hasn't said anything yet in his defense. (Left him multiple messages)

When I came back to the forum the first security step I took was signing a message from my 2017 oldstaked BTC address ( compromised )to a new one , I still have my original email, haven't changed it yet.

Ps: I've left Stake so LoyceV doesn't see my posts to something else.

[Shishir99]

But when it comes to this jvanname guy and all that "trading-related matters", I do think he's too risky to deal with.  His behavior within the community has been consistently antagonistic and disrespectful, and I believe that it justifies a negative trust rating.  Would you personally engage in a trade with him, knowing his history of hostile interactions with other forum members?

Probably I wouldn't deal with that stupid troll. I guess nobody would do any deal with this guy if they saw his post history. But this guy did not offer any service which could be the reason for that tag. I agree with what you have said except the guy deserves the negative feedback. If he had offered any service and behave like this, I would say ignore that troll and go on.

Bad posting is a process and not an habit but it's good to know that I'm wearing an inappropriate tag and the person who left it hasn't said anything yet in his defense. (Left him multiple messages)

When I came back to the forum the first security step I took was signing a message from my 2017 oldstaked BTC address ( compromised )to a new one , I still have my original email, haven't changed it yet.

Ps: I've left Stake so LoyceV doesn't see my posts to something else.

You are supposed to create a thread in the reputation board and ask other DT members to justify the tag he left. Either he should backup his feedback with a proper evidence, or he should remove the feedback. If he do not respond, people should start excluding him.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL.

I didn't get angry, I got even

To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account.

The result for this specific user is shit-posting. Let's see what you and other think about the following posts.

Example response to topic: My 10 Year ( and some days) Bitcointalk Anniversary

It is nice to read part of your journey to Bitcoin and how you ended up at this forum. Well, it certainly was the future more than 10 years ago and here it is Bitcoin is still going strong today (albeit with a much higher price attached).

I wonder how many of those very early year (2009-2011) poker players or other gamblers used Bitcoin when it was worth below $1 and won/loss bets. Some may have held on to their winnings and made a fortune. Others could have lost something worth less than $50 at the time but now worth $millions.

This was made on 23rd response to yahoo62278
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5477454.msg63311867#msg63311867

Example response to topic: People on this site are questioning my education because they are stupid.

Signing your posts with Ph.DD is simply pure gold and clearly rattled the OP

Well, now that his so-called superior intellect has been challenged by your Ph.DD I guess he literally does not know what to do or where to turn when confronted with your own DD intellect.

On a serious note, it is very sad to see the way he has been pretending to be a member of a university staff with the sole intention of misusing his name (probably out of spite/revenge).

Response number 81 to Vod
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5480424.msg63468017#msg63468017

Example response to topic: Should Ratimov aka Symmetrick be in DT1?

I echo your words, I have never seen an account of that level of prominence implode the way the Ratimov account did. Though accounts will continue to go down the same path, it might never happen again to another prominent account (or one near that level).

Be careful there you do not want to get a reputation for being a regular latecomer. I wonder, what is it that is happening around you that stops you from joining the party on time?

Response number 452 to The Sceptical Chymist
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5468454.msg63453981#msg63453981

There are many similar posts [I echo, I support, it's a nice part: then write some lines which contains backscratching to make the target user happy to continue their support] and even you will find such type of posts in topics which are bumped even from 5 to 10 page back from a board.

I wonder we have another user who had the same mentality as JollyGood. He would had a neutral feedback something like:

BEWARE: "JollyGood" cannot be trusted. There are serious accusations of this account using AI to post and constantly shit-posting, backscratching. I will remove the feedback if further information is presented.

[decodx]

Bad posting is a process and not an habit <...>

Well, I'm not sure I'd agree with that. You've been pumping out posts like crazy since signing up for that money-making campaign.  You started off with a modest 30+ posts a week, but before long you raced up to 100+ a week - all to get the biggest payout possible.  Its not a hobby now; it's a deliberate effort, a desperate try to make max money from your account.


source: https://ninjastic.space/user/borovichok

And I'm sorry to say, I scrolled through a couple of pages of your recent posts, and they're all nothing but low-quality drivel.  It's not about bad English or grammar - it is the lack of substance, the generic rambling that doesn't contribute anything.

But when it comes to this jvanname guy and all that "trading-related matters", I do think he's too risky to deal with.  His behavior within the community has been consistently antagonistic and disrespectful, and I believe that it justifies a negative trust rating.  Would you personally engage in a trade with him, knowing his history of hostile interactions with other forum members?

Probably I wouldn't deal with that stupid troll. I guess nobody would do any deal with this guy if they saw his post history. But this guy did not offer any service which could be the reason for that tag. I agree with what you have said except the guy deserves the negative feedback. If he had offered any service and behave like this, I would say ignore that troll and go on.

That troll is the owner (or developer) of a crypto project - Circcash. He actively promotes his services to the community, and any stakeholder of that shitcoin, whether an investor or miner, is indirectly in a financial relationship with him.  Moreover, he has made direct requests for financial contributions for his services in multiple posts:

I am not going to do anything for you until you pay me because you are stupid. And this is not a scam because you have requested my services before I told you that my services are not free. Pay me at https://github.com/sponsors/jvanname because I am not going to do anything for you otherwise.

[borovichok]

Bad posting is a process and not an habit <...>

Well, I'm not sure I'd agree with that. You've been pumping out posts like crazy since signing up for that money-making campaign.  You started off with a modest 30+ posts a week, but before long you raced up to 100+ a week - all to get the biggest payout possible.  Its not a hobby now; it's a deliberate effort, a desperate try to make max money from your account.

You believe whatever you want to believe but that's not my problem, we are deviating from the main point, I got an inappropriate red tag for using AI ( according to Jolly) and it almost 48hrs and no single evidence to back up his claims. This is wrong use of the system. I've not committed any scam here or defrauded anyone. I want him to reconsider his tag, it's the right thing to do.

[Igebotz]

Has JollyGood reacted to this thread? I'll send him a PM with a link. He should understand what is going on here. He has in the past revised some of his feedback, and this could be another.

[Shishir99]

Has JollyGood reacted to this thread? I'll send him a PM with a link. He should understand what is going on here. He has in the past revised some of his feedback, and this could be another.

No. He hasn't reacted in this thread. But I have a feeling that he has seen this thread and monitoring it closely because he is pretty much active on this board. I have noting against him but he seems like dancing around and spreading negative feedback left and right. LOL. I am wondering where I have seen these words and didn't even realize that I started to use it. I had disagreement with BitcoinGirl.Club because of JollyGood. 70% of his feedbacks are correct and it helps the forum. But the rest 30% is like it's his personal note book and best usage of incorrect feedback. I hope he will try to improve himself.

[digaran]

No honey, he won't try to improve himself, the only way to get rid of him is to get rid of the people paying him to shitpost around here. 😉

[jvannameIsFraud]

You are a f@#$ing piece of s@#$. DO YOU EXPECT ME TO BE F@#$ING NICE WITH YOU WHEN YOU ARE OVER HERE CALLING CIRCCASH A S@#$COIN? NO. I WILL NOT BE NICE TO YOU YOU FOOL!

LOLOLOLOL, go read shitcoiin means

https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/glossary/shitcoin
What Is a Shitcoin?

A shitcoin is a cryptocurrency with zero or close to zero value and no utility. The term shitcoin is used in a pejorative way to refer to altcoins that try to gain benefit from the success of other cryptocurrencies without offering value on their own.

[ineedhelpplease]

The only thing I've been wondering about is why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this or did he manually go through his posts (I would feel tired going through all that and i'm sure many people would too) to find his point of inactivity and see that he updated his address.

[LoyceV]

why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this

You're looking for ninjastic.space/addresses?author=borovichok.

[borovichok]

why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this

You're looking for ninjastic.space/addresses?author=borovichok.

I didn't know changing old staked wallet address was a red tag offence, didn't read it anywhere.

M first ever staked wallet address

Code:

1jJLycZNJZc6eE79c8qpo3dmwaPH6DJd1

[FatFork]

I didn't know changing old staked wallet address was a red tag offence, didn't read it anywhere.

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

[Shishir99]

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

I guess you have missed what this user offered. He said that his posts are not AI-generated. JollyGood didn't gather any evidence before he tagged that user. We have seen many false positive reports when we check AI content. Everyone should have their investigation before they conclude. The user refuses the allegation. Now, if you have evidence of AI posting, show them. I have checked the post-JollyGood used as a reference and it's a human text.



The main argument is, can you leave negative feedback for shitposting or AI-generated content? You shouldn't do it. If you see a shitpost, report it to the moderator and they will handle it. Leaving negative for shitposting or AI content isn't the proper use of the feedback system.

Now I could see JollyGood's typical behavior. If he has nothing in his defense, he silently watches the discussion. Seems like he doesn't give it a fuck. It's like, I did what I did. If you can do something, go on. I wasn't expecting that from you, my friend.

[borovichok]

I didn't know changing old staked wallet address was a red tag offence, didn't read it anywhere.

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

Where is the AI-generated content? It's been days and no one has come out yet, and the mentioned post JollyGood tagged me for is 100% human, so I think that's why he hasn't come out yet.

You're on DT, and you think like this? If you think my posts aren't good enough, report them to a moderator, and if I'm found guilty of spamming and shitposting, I get a temp or parmban according to the rules; it's not a red tag violation. It DT abuse.

[ineedhelpplease]

why in the world did he go through years of borovichok's posts to see that the account potentially switched hands from that stake your address thread. Is there some sort of simpler tool designed for this

You're looking for ninjastic.space/addresses?author=borovichok.

Thanks! I've used the site before but was unaware that existed.

[FatFork]

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

I guess you have missed what this user offered. He said that his posts are not AI-generated. JollyGood didn't gather any evidence before he tagged that user. We have seen many false positive reports when we check AI content. Everyone should have their investigation before they conclude. The user refuses the allegation. Now, if you have evidence of AI posting, show them. I have checked the post-JollyGood used as a reference and it's a human text.

First things first, I didn't actually tag anyone here.  I was just trying to clear up where the confusion came from.  I agree, it's real important that we don't go accusing people without proof.  And we should definitely look more into things before pointing fingers.  If someone gets wrongly accused, they can always speak up to defend themselves.  At the end of the day, its up to all of us to decide whether or not we trust what someone says.

We talked before about those AI detecting tools and how unreliable they can be sometimes.  They can flag human-generated content as AI-generated.  Or the other way around too.  But just cause someone figured out how to trick the system doesn't prove they aren't using AI or some other techniques to pump out content fast.

The main argument is, can you leave negative feedback for shitposting or AI-generated content? You shouldn't do it. If you see a shitpost, report it to the moderator and they will handle it. Leaving negative for shitposting or AI content isn't the proper use of the feedback system.

Now I could see JollyGood's typical behavior. If he has nothing in his defense, he silently watches the discussion. Seems like he doesn't give it a fuck. It's like, I did what I did. If you can do something, go on. I wasn't expecting that from you, my friend.

It's plain as day that the user in question is a shameless shitposter.  I think we can all agree on that.  Does he deserve a negative tag for all the excessive shitposting?  I suppose that's up to each person to decide for themselves and, personally, I might start a reputation thread first to see what others make of it before going the negative tag route.  But the fact is, he's already received a few neutral warnings, but those obviously didn't work.  The negative did.  So there's that.

[borovichok]

It's plain as day that the user in question is a shameless shitposter.  I think we can all agree on that.  Does he deserve a negative tag for all the excessive shitposting?  I suppose that's up to each person to decide for themselves and, personally, I might start a reputation thread first to see what others make of it before going the negative tag route.  But the fact is, he's already received a few neutral warnings, but those obviously didn't work.  The negative did.  So there's that.

Your takes are quite poor for someone on DT. It's evident that you have no idea how the DT works, and you're only there cause you're  forum cop. You've made roughly 3 posts in this thread and haven't expressed any opinion of your own; you're merely padding your post count for signature reward. I made it here without a signature, and I'm sure I'll make it without one in the future. If my post does not interest you, please ignore my profile. You have him on your Trust list, so I'm not shocked you don't have anything to say about him.

It's been days now and he hasn't come out clean. I don't need his apology I just want him to remove those notes and put my account on ignore for the sake of his sanity.

[examplens]

Where is the AI-generated content? It's been days and no one has come out yet, and the mentioned post JollyGood tagged me for is 100% human, so I think that's why he hasn't come out yet.

Can we interpret this as an admission that sometimes you still use AI to write posts, but the one JollyGood accuses you of was 100% written by a human?

I went through a little history of your posts, and I have to agree with most of the previous comments directed at you. What you have written so far is pure spam and shitposting. I wouldn't be surprised if someone found AI-generated posts in your history.
What is interesting to me is that reading what you write in this thread and the one in Meta that you opened about the same thing, you seem to know how to write meaningful posts. So I ask the question, why did you spam so wildly with meaningless posts (ok, I know the signature rewards) and why you didn't write in your own words opinion on the topic even then?

It's been days now and he hasn't come out clean. I don't need his apology I just want him to remove those notes and put my account on ignore for the sake of his sanity.

Maybe we should ask him to give you his forum account password, so you can change his feedback yourself, the way you think is appropriate.

Regarding Jollygood's feedback on @borovichok, if there is not enough evidence, then there should not be a negative tag.
Also, to return to the main of this thread, it seems that negative feedback on all four cases is excessive. It's just my opinion.