Bitcoin an opportunity like land

[Jegileman]

Its better for your regret to be not buying more than for it been not buying at all.

How's the price of land in your country?
Have you ever thought been in the time where land was cheap and bought alot?
Are you boarding the train(cheap) of Bitcoin holders or you want to wait for private jets?

I can ascertain to your point and that the price of land in the country is always on an upward trajectory year after year. This can be compared to bitcoin, whose price keeps increasing since when it was created. Unlike land, bitcoin always witness some corrections which causes some drop in price but ultimately at the end will still reclaim the value back after the correction.

To me, I will say land is more volatile than bitcoin in the sense that it only witnesses an increase in price continually and never has it been compromised to decrease in price after a new value of it has been claimed. They are both good investments and can make you benefit a lot. The distinct difference between them is that, bitcoin always set a new high price after four years while land is setting a new price year by year.

[1715458354]

1715458354

[South Park]

Its better for your regret to be not buying more than for it been not buying at all.

How's the price of land in your country?
Have you ever thought been in the time where land was cheap and bought alot?
Are you boarding the train(cheap) of Bitcoin holders or you want to wait for private jets?

I can ascertain to your point and that the price of land in the country is always on an upward trajectory year after year. This can be compared to bitcoin, whose price keeps increasing since when it was created. Unlike land, bitcoin always witness some corrections which causes some drop in price but ultimately at the end will still reclaim the value back after the correction.

To me, I will say land is more volatile than bitcoin in the sense that it only witnesses an increase in price continually and never has it been compromised to decrease in price after a new value of it has been claimed. They are both good investments and can make you benefit a lot. The distinct difference between them is that, bitcoin always set a new high price after four years while land is setting a new price year by year.

Regardless of the asset class the laws of supply and demand must be followed, if the price of real estate is increasing every single year where you live, this is either the result of massive inflation pushing the price of everything up, or that specific asset is going through a bubble which will burst at some point on the future, and if the scenario you are facing is the latter then this could be a great opportunity for you as that is the perfect moment to buy that kind of asset for a huge discount.

[TimeTeller]

Both are good investment, if you have both then you're lucky.

It is true that land as a property is such a good investment, however, the tax you're going to pay per month or per year is also a pain in the ass if you don't put anything in your land, like raising livestock on it or plants fruits and vegetables to generate more profits. Here in my country, land that are near the roads pitch much higher prices than those who are in a very high places like in farms near the forest.

While Bitcoin, if you bought some and hold for long term, it is all about waiting game until you hit the price where you're contented about selling it, no hassle at all. Though each of them has their own advantages, so either of them is a good investment in short.

Both opportunities are full of advantages but the benefits of lands depends on location. As you mentioned that land near to roads have more prices than near to forest but more expensive you buy more profitable you will be because the price of land near to road are getting expensive very fast.

Bitcoin is also good source for investment because one can buy bitcoin by using little by little money if he is unable to buy a whole bitcoin but in a case of land one cannot use little sum to buy it but whole portion of land should must be buy at once.

Profit can be easily achieved from both sources but it up to a person that from which source he can easily get profit and also it depends on market situations but bitcoin is more unstable whereas land is stable in price and also is increasing continuously without showing any decrease.

Let us put it this way, there are pros and cons in both investments. So as an investor, you need to weigh your situation here.
In both instances, the final decision depends on the person himself because he knows his financials better than people around him.
At the end of the day, you will be the one who can truly understand your needs and your financial capability.
You can gain valuable insights from others but it is all on you how you will choose your investment options.

[oktana]

In terms of the profit which you could gain from holding Bitcoin following past historical prices, buying a land is not comparable. Bitcoin wasn’t even here in year 2000, it came as late as 2008 and see what it’s done in such short time. Even those who bought lands from late 90s can’t compare. If you had Bitcoin from the onset, you could buy many acres of lands today. No doubt that land is still a good investment, same as stocks too. Also, the price of land greatly matters in the location. There are places that even $100k wouldn’t buy you a piece.

[Richbased]

Snip~~

Land has also became one of the major assets one can acquire because as years goes by that's how the value of land increases and since it's your land you can either decide to establish something that would be giving you proceeds in that land but however, I prefer Bitcoin investment to buying of land and maybe dumping it for the value to increase over the years because if you acquire some Bitcoin in your portfolio only you are aware of the amount you've hodl and you don't have any business with anyone as all you just need is patience to watch your investment grow from time to time unlike buying a land and leave it for the value to increase and maybe scammers can get to your land and sell it to another person and before you know it you're already making a case that will take you some money to win and even if you win you've still lost some money in the process but if you hold Bitcoin, no one can have access to it as not your key, not your coin so it's when you release your key to someone that they can know the amount you have in your portfolio.

[FinePoine0]

As the world's population increases, land is shrinking, as the population grows, families spread out and the amount of land shrinks, the price of land increases overnight. Just like the land that I used to get in the past in my country, now a small part of it is available at that price but not suitable for living. Homestead families need land to survive. And Bitcoin is needed to meet food demand and generate future income. So both are complementary to each other and fall into basic human needs. So basic needs must be given importance but it is best to hold bitcoins in DCA method for future. It would be the right and fundamental way if we accumulate bitcoins with the extra money we spend in illegal ways.

[Luzin]

Ever since I've known about land prices, they've always gone up. I have never read or heard of land prices going down from the purchase price. In my country, there are several factors that affect land prices. Among other things, the position of the land near the road, the land is in the city area, the land is in the economic center. Perhaps this is also true in other countries. Because land is an investment option besides gold for people who don't know crypto. Even I have a desire too if I have more money then land is another investment option that I need to have.

The small difference in land investment is the wider trust with less risk. Because land has a tangible form and everyone recognizes the price and existence of land as a valuable instrument. Here I got the data on the most expensive land prices. Of course the price of land in one country and each region is different and I believe this is in areas that have high value, not evenly distributed across all regions in one country.

Monaco - up to $100,000 per square meter.
Hong Kong - up to $72,000 per square meter.
Tokyo, Japan - up to $50,000 per square meter.
London, UK - up to $39,000 per square meter.
New York City, USA - up to $29,000 per square meter.

CMIIW

Source: https://www.quora.com/Where-is-the-worlds-most-expensive-land-sold

[rodskee]

There are still cheap lands here but those are from provincial areas but since I live in the city yes its indeed that the value of lands here is too high that I cannot even get another one now .


Also just Houses here now is Just getting Higher not because of bigger populations so I trust your comparison  to Buy More bitcoin than Lots and houses because eventually it will be more expensive owning one than Big house and lot.

[boyptc]

Land's value varies country to country. But if one thing is for sure, land as a source is limited and scarce and for that reason, the price and value appreciates and everyone knows that it is a good investment.

So if you hold BTC, make sure that you will take profit and gonna use it for better. And one of it is allocating it on other investments like real estate or land.

I have bought small piece before from a neighbor for some expansion and looking at its value appreciation yearly, I am more than with the ROI.

[Mate2237]

Here in my country, land that are near the roads pitch much higher prices than those who are in a very high places like in farms near the forest.

That happens in every country. The land that is close the tnt motorable road is very high to the one in the forest. As the Op said the land that was selling as the rate of $400 to $500 US dollar as of the present day dollar exchange rate in the country now they selling those lands, one piece of land or 1 acre of land is now $13,000,000 so those poor people in the society are edging out from the purchasion of land.

While Bitcoin, if you bought some and hold for long term, it is all about waiting game until you hit the price where you're contented about selling it, no hassle at all. Though each of them has their own advantages, so either of them is a good investment in short.

The difference between land Bitcoin is that land has no specific time to sell or buy buy Bitcoin does Bitcoin I every four years while land is no years. Bitcoin is much more higher than land in price. A acre of land is $13,000,000 while one Bitcoin is $60,000,000. Land is also appreciating day by day.

[pinggoki]

In a way, you're correct that in terms of demand, the land and bitcoin are the same, it's both growing everyday and it's the fact that it's not going to go down in prices anytime soon. I totally agree that we can use the current opportunity to invest as much as we can because it's only going to go up in the future despite the talks of volatility and uncertainty in the market prices, bitcoin for the long term could make someone rich if they just invest and trust the process which is the same with land except that land is growing much faster in value every year so you're lucky to have both of them.

[MFahad]

but when it comes to Bitcoin we have stuffs like staking wherein we will still have our Bitcoin and still earn extra profits through staking.

Bitcoin is not a POS coin. there is no way to stake Bitcoin and earn profit from it as per my current knowledge.  maybe you know something that I know. then would love to know that too.
We can convert our Bitcoins to other Stakable Atlcoins and stake them to earn rewards.

In my country, there's no housing crisis because the population has been decreasing for a few decades, so expecting even a house or a flat to rise in price (above inflation rate) isn't very realistic, let alone just a piece of land that doesn't have anything on it. Okay, looking at some data, it does seem that there's some growth in price (10% over a year, it seems), but the land market is very new in my country (it has existed for less than 2 years), and there's no completely reliable and trustworthy data.
Another thing is that my country's at war with another country, so the land you buy might get occupied by a foreign power or might be destroyed by military equipment and weapons. That also makes Bitcoin a lot more attractive, as it is digital.

Is that Ukraine you talking about? that's the only country coming in my mind when yousay War with another county. But how come the land market in Ukraine is only 2 years old? you sound like Ukraine was founded in 2 years ago. but in fact Ukrain has been there for around 31 years. then how come real estate business is only 2 years old there?

[EarnOnVictor]

When it comes to the Bitcoin of before, it is in fact an opportunity that lands cannot contest with, it could earn you thousands of multiple of the invested money in a very short time. Land can't achieve that even in 100 years, but yet, land is a very good investment, especially if lowly appreciated land becomes a choice place. We have seen countless of such before where some people could earn more than 50 times of money they used to purchase the land.

One thing about land is that it doesn't depreciate in most cases unless something bad just happens or it is confiscated from the person. But the truth is that things are changing with Bitcoin, and now, I think some lands are even better than Bitcoin, this is because Bitcoin has grown enough and though might continue to grow but it can't be in its huge multiples as before anymore. As for the risk involved, Bitcoin has higher risks, it has the entire risk of owning it on the internet and the fast depreciating risk during the bearish season. But for land, it is offline, once it is properly documented, no one will just come and steal your land from you.

In all, if one has the money, such can invest in the two, after all, it is still a good way to diversify one's portfolio.

[leonair]

Both are good investment, if you have both then you're lucky.

It is true that land as a property is such a good investment, however, the tax you're going to pay per month or per year is also a pain in the ass if you don't put anything in your land, like raising livestock on it or plants fruits and vegetables to generate more profits. Here in my country, land that are near the roads pitch much higher prices than those who are in a very high places like in farms near the forest.

While Bitcoin, if you bought some and hold for long term, it is all about waiting game until you hit the price where you're contented about selling it, no hassle at all. Though each of them has their own advantages, so either of them is a good investment in short.

Land is a physical asset that is very strong and profitable.  If you buy a land now it will give you several times more profit after 10 years because every country area is fixed but population is constantly increasing due to which land is needed to provide their accommodation so the price increases day by day with population growth.  On the other hand, the supply of Bitcoin is also a fixed amount, so with the increase in popularity day by day, its price increases a lot because even though its supply is fixed, many new people are attracted to invest here day by day, so the demand for Bitcoin is increasing a lot.  So if someone has both these assets then he must be very lucky

[jasonjm]

Both are very good investments for the long term. Property investment is not speculative and carries less risk compared to Bitcoin. On the other hand, the  ROI for BTC is way more than property.

It is always good to have your investments in mobile assets and property. These offline investments will help you get some passive income as well. Whenever you get the opportunity to buy gold, property or BTC, go ahead with the decision.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Buy now and don't start waiting for huge dip before entering. Trust me you would miss out.
There are people that sold their lands around 5 years ago and are regretting not keeping till date.
In the case of having a land, i believe leasing is better.

Investing is done to generate wealth so if you invested in an assets and you have gained then why are you regretting. You probably sold because you needed the money for something important so you shouldn't not be regretting your decision of selling but be contended with what you have and strategize another way to make investment in the future to profit. Unless you sold out of fear or in loss then that's when you can be regretting the decision but let us learn to let go of the habit of regretting our decision when we had a positive result from the decision.

Bitcoin is better than land but they're both important and quality investment because they don't only secure your wealth but also appreciate it. If I was giving an advice between the two assets, I'll recommend investing in Bitcoin and the profits can be used to purchase land. Most land are overpriced and not worth the amount they're selling it and I always believe there'll available land to purchase in the future because if you can't afford land in your environment, you can go elsewhere and buy as many as you can for a lesser price but If you miss buying Bitcoin cheap, you'll be buying it costlier in the future.

[Bd officer]

I am from Bangladesh, in our country land price varies from region to region. In particular, land prices in urban areas are very high, while land prices in rural areas are very low. But everyone sees land as a good medium to invest in my country. Bitcoin has not gained so much popularity in our country, few people have invested in Bitcoin keeping privacy. Where I live everyone is more interested in buying land.

For example, land prices have increased drastically within a few years. When I was young, my father bought some land for $150, which is worth $1000 today. Hope the price of this land will increase more in future.

However, I see Bitcoin as a good medium to invest in at the moment. I have invested some amount in Bitcoin still investing in DCA method. I find buying bitcoin easier than buying land. I need a lot of money to buy land, but I can buy bitcoin if I have some money. I don't have much money, so Bitcoin is the best investment for me.

[bbigtart]

Based on my personal experience, Bitcoin sells very quickly after reaching its target. If the original land takes a long time to sell, even if it is negotiated it ends up not producing a profit, maybe it's a different story if the land is in a strategic location.

However, what is certain is that both are equally good as investments, it's just that the land investment capital must be large, the land must be strategic, location, time, if the land goes up it won't be sold quickly. If the land investment is strategically located and develops rapidly in the future, its value will skyrocket to much higher. However, if you buy the land in a less strategic and undeveloped location, the price will be difficult to increase. However, if you invest in bitcoin, you can buy it using the DCA method, saving a little over a long period of time will add up to a lot. bitcoin goes up and down, bitcoin can also be sold quickly and of course bitcoin is an asset of the future. In essence, we must have these two investments.

[Shishir99]

In terms of the profit which you could gain from holding Bitcoin following past historical prices, buying a land is not comparable. Bitcoin wasn’t even here in year 2000, it came as late as 2008 and see what it’s done in such short time. Even those who bought lands from late 90s can’t compare. If you had Bitcoin from the onset, you could buy many acres of lands today. No doubt that land is still a good investment, same as stocks too. Also, the price of land greatly matters in the location. There are places that even $100k wouldn’t buy you a piece.

I don't want to disagree with whatever you have said. But the fact is, land prices are less volatile and the price of land never decreases. At least I have never seen decreasing the price of land. But, Bitcoin is volatile as heck. It could go up to 69K and then go back to 15K just like what happened after the last bull run. It never happens with the land price.

I know that it depends on the location. But, even if your land is on the rural side, the price won't decrease. Even if it does, the percentage is very much low. So, I don't want to understimate the land investment. It's a good investment like Bitcoin and Gold.

[Assface16678]

Both are very good investments for the long term. Property investment is not speculative and carries less risk compared to Bitcoin. On the other hand, the  ROI for BTC is way more than property.

It is always good to have your investments in mobile assets and property. These offline investments will help you get some passive income as well. Whenever you get the opportunity to buy gold, property or BTC, go ahead with the decision.

Exactly, if we can invest in both assets, property or land is a good investment for the long term, also because the price of the kand will increase depending on where the land is in the city or what the value will increase as time goes by. Also, property is a good asset, as it could be your settlement for life. While in cryptocurrency or bitcoin, although it is also good for long-term investment, we can't always be sure that it would exist, like the land is. Remember, there are only a limited number of bitcoins we could mine, so we are not sure what will happen if all bitcoins are mined, so as long as it exists and gives opportunity and profit, we could invest in it. In short, invest in both assets, as they could provide a good profit and income for the long term, and the more investment you make, the more income you will have.