Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board

[uchegod-21]

Username: lucolo

--snip--

Bitcoin Core offer wallet feature, although it doesn't have built-in swap with USDT though. And while Bitcoin Core require you to download 550GB+ blockchain, it fulfill other requirement stated by @purinZ14. But Unstoppable wallet is still good choice for @purinZ14 needs.

@purinZ14 had many requirements which bitcoin core didn't meet all. Bitcoin core met the requirement of security and decentralization but it is not a multi coin wallet. But in the other hand, Unstoppable is decentralized, secured (although<bitcoin core) and also multi coin. I think unstoppable is more appropriate to what purinZ14 wants.

I don't know why you say wrong topic.

This topic usually doesn't get users banned.

That's true. Although it's good enough if this thread can make user stop spread false/fake/unhelpful information.

If I'm called out here for spreading false information, I be careful when posting next in the technical board or stop posting. Because being called out here always will lead a user to people's ignore list.

[LoyceV]

This is disappointing from a self-made Hero Member:

Does syncing get harder over time as the blockchain gets longer?

Or has something happened to the protocol so it would be harder now?

It should, but the chain is not increasing as such a rate that will cause an significant lag in download time. Could be from the internet connection.

OP clearly explained he's using an HDD to sync Bitcoin Core with low "net usage". There's no point blaming his internet connection.

This guy is already on my ignore list, for obvious reasons:

Use the current version check the latest news section  of the forum for the torrent file,

So he's recommending to download https://bitcointalk.org/bitcoin-27.0.torrent when OP says his IBD is slow.

Those where the first 2 responses in this topic. I'm disappointed.

[KingsDen]

This is disappointing from a self-made Hero Member:

When I was new here, the technical support section was dominated by technically knowledgeable users. My going to the board was to ask questions and not to provide unsure and misleading answers. But these days, maybe because of the availablity of AI, people input Op questions to random AI tools, get answers, paraphrase same by any possible means and paste here as solutions to problems.

[ABCbits]

--snip--
This guy is already on my ignore list, for obvious reasons:

Use the current version check the latest news section  of the forum for the torrent file,

So he's recommending to download https://bitcointalk.org/bitcoin-27.0.torrent when OP says his IBD is slow.

Those where the first 2 responses in this topic. I'm disappointed.

Good catch. In addition, i notice promise444c5 sometimes got corrected by other member after posting inaccurate information.

[promise444c5]

Good catch. In addition, i notice promise444c5 sometimes got corrected by other member after posting inaccurate information.

Yes true ! I got corrected  alot ... since I'm being tagged here then I need to be more carful not to spread inaccurate information next time

[ABCbits]

User: obtainhigh

Additional information (optional):
* This user also perform SEO spam, which reported on It is allowed? SPAM.
* Based on his post and profile, this user spam goods/services called "Ob tain High" "High Fri ends". So i will remove mention of that on below quoted posts.
* This user also create similar unhelpful thread on mining boards, which not included on this post.
* This user also suspected using chatbot, which reported on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64299018#msg64299018.

List of post:

### **Latest Developments and Technical Discussions in Bitcoin: July 2024** ###

Stay Ahead with the Cutting-Edge of Bitcoin Technology!

Key Highlights from the Bitcoin Builders Conference:

1. Focus on Layer 2 Solutions: The Bitcoin Builders Conference, held on July 25-26, 2024, in Nashville, highlighted innovative projects on Bitcoin’s Layer 2 solutions, including Lightning Network advancements and interoperability projects. Learn more here.

2. Decentralized Identity Platform by MicroStrategy: MicroStrategy unveiled "MicroStrategy Orange," a decentralized ID platform on Bitcoin, emphasizing robust security and integration into enterprise solutions. This development aims to streamline identity verification processes using blockchain technology. Read the full article.


Technological Innovations and Proposals:

1. CoinShuffle for Enhanced Privacy: CoinShuffle, a decentralized coin mixing protocol, is gaining traction for enhancing transaction privacy on the Bitcoin network. This technology helps users obscure the origins of their transactions, contributing to greater anonymity. Details on CoinShuffle.

2. Replacing OP_CHECKMULTISIG with OP_CHECKSIGADD: A proposal to replace OP_CHECKMULTISIG with OP_CHECKSIGADD aims to simplify multisig transactions and improve Bitcoin’s scripting capabilities. This change is expected to make multisig operations more efficient and less resource-intensive. Read more about this proposal.


Research and Development Updates:

1. Increasing Bitcoin’s Mining Difficulty: The latest adjustment has increased Bitcoin's mining difficulty, reflecting the network's growing computational power. This change ensures the consistent issuance of new blocks despite the rising number of miners. Explore mining details.

2. The Politics of Bitcoin Development: An in-depth discussion with Christian Decker from Blockstream highlights the political dynamics influencing Bitcoin development, emphasizing the balance between innovation and community consensus. Read the interview.

Join the Technical Discussion!

We invite developers, researchers, and enthusiasts to share their insights, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest technical advancements in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Obtain --SNIP--

1. Bitcoin Builders website doesn't share discussion topic or research yet. So claim about focusing on L2 may be not accurate.
2. CoinShuffle isn't new technology. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=567625.0.
3. Replacing OP_CHECKMULTISIG with OP_CHECKSIGADD already proposed on May 2019 or earlier. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5140134.0.
4. It's known that Bitcoin difficulty almost always rising over time, so IMO it's not worth to mention.
5. Discussion about politic isn't really related with technical discussion.

### Bitcoin Technical Support: Common Issues and Solutions for Bitcoin Core, Nodes, and Transactions - July 2024 ###

Navigate Your Bitcoin Technical Challenges with Ease!

Up-to-Date Solutions for Bitcoin Core, Nodes, and More

Common Bitcoin Core Issues and Fixes:

1. Installation Problems:
Ensure you're downloading the correct version of Bitcoin Core for your operating system. Verify the release signatures using PGP to ensure the integrity of the files you download. For detailed steps on verifying and installing Bitcoin Core, visit Bitcoin Core Installation Guide.

2. Syncing Issues:
If your Bitcoin Core is taking too long to sync, check your internet connection and hardware capabilities. Running a full node requires sufficient bandwidth and storage. For more details on optimizing your node, refer to Full Node Requirements.

3. Transaction Verification Problems:
Bitcoin Core validates all information it receives to avoid delegating this task to third parties. Ensure your node is fully synced to validate transactions accurately. For further reading on how Bitcoin Core helps in transaction validation, check Bitcoin Stack Exchange.


Maintaining and Troubleshooting Bitcoin Nodes:

1. Running a Full Node:
Running a full node supports the Bitcoin network and ensures you don't have to trust anyone else for transaction validation. For comprehensive instructions on setting up and maintaining a full node, see Running a Full Node.

2. Node Connectivity Issues:
Ensure your node has proper network configurations to allow incoming connections. Opening port 8333 on your router can help improve connectivity. For more details, refer to the Network Configuration Guide.

3. Upgrading Your Node:
Stay updated with the latest Bitcoin Core releases to benefit from new features and security improvements. Always verify the new version before upgrading. For the latest release information, visit Bitcoin Core Releases.


Addressing Transaction Issues:

1. Stuck Transactions:
If a transaction is stuck, it may be due to low fees. Use Replace-by-Fee (RBF) or Child-Pays-for-Parent (CPFP) to increase the fee and speed up confirmation. Learn more about these methods on Replace-by-Fee Guide.

2. Transaction Privacy:
Enhance your transaction privacy by using CoinJoin and other mixing techniques. For more privacy tips, refer to Protect Your Privacy.

Join the Technical Support Discussion!

We invite users to share their experiences, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest solutions for Bitcoin technical issues. Your contributions are valuable!

Obtain --SNIP--

1. Full node software automatically perform transaction verification, so people wouldn't face such problem unless they manually create non-standard transaction.
2. Most mentioned suggestion are very generic, while asking the reader to visit either https://bitcoin.org and https://bitcoincore.org/ to find more detailed information about issue they may encounter while running full node.

[ABCbits]

User: obtainhigh

--snip--

I've reported all of his thread on technical board, but few of them still have "Unhandled" status. So i create this post explaining why those thread also contain false/fake/unhelpful information.

### **Top Bitcoin Mining Pools: Join the Best in 2024** ###

Explore the Leading Bitcoin Mining Pools and Enhance Your Mining Experience!

Leading Mining Pools of 2024:

1. F2Pool: F2Pool, also known as Discus Fish, is one of the earliest and most reputable mining pools, with a significant global presence. It supports a wide range of cryptocurrencies and employs a PPS+ payout scheme, offering a 3% bonus as a loyalty reward. The pool has a 2.5% fee and is known for its user-friendly interface and robust support. Learn more about F2Pool here.

2. Poolin: Poolin is celebrated for its innovation and competitive services. It offers various payout mechanisms and has a strong focus on security and reliability. With a user-friendly interface and support for multiple cryptocurrencies, Poolin is a preferred choice for many miners. Discover Poolin’s benefits here.

3. Antpool: Operated by Bitmain, Antpool is one of the most well-known mining pools. It provides stability, reliability, and supports various payout methods. Antpool’s detailed statistics help miners track performance effectively. Read about Antpool here.


Emerging Trends in Bitcoin Mining Pools:

1. Green Mining Initiatives: Environmental concerns are driving some mining pools to adopt eco-friendly practices. Pools that prioritize renewable energy sources and energy-efficient mining hardware are becoming more popular among environmentally conscious miners. More on green mining initiatives.

2. Decentralized Mining Pools: Decentralized mining pools aim to distribute control and rewards more evenly among participants, addressing concerns related to centralization. These pools offer a more democratic approach to Bitcoin mining. Details on decentralized pools.

3. Integration of Advanced Technologies: Advanced technologies like AI and Machine Learning are being integrated into mining pools to optimize operations, enhance efficiency, and increase profitability. These innovations are set to revolutionize the mining industry. Learn about technology integration here.


Choosing the Right Mining Pool:

1. Pool Hashrate: The hashrate indicates a pool’s computational power. Higher hashrates generally lead to more frequent block discoveries and consistent payouts. Consider the hashrate and how it aligns with your mining goals. Understand hashrate importance.

2. Payout Structure: Different pools use various payout structures, such as PPS, FPPS, and PPLNS. Choose one that aligns with your risk tolerance and preferences to maximize your rewards. Explore payout structures here.

3. Fees: Fees can significantly impact your overall earnings. Ensure you understand the fee structure and choose a pool with reasonable fees. Check fee structures here.

Join the Mining Pool Discussion!

We invite miners, experts, and enthusiasts to share their experiences, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest trends and innovations in Bitcoin mining pools. Your insights and discussions are highly valued!

Obtain --SNIP--

1. He doesn't mention criteria of choosing leading or top mining pools.
2. ALL link mentioned that thread are invalid, where all website show error message such as "Error 404!".
3. According to https://f2pool.io/mining/support/#fees-and-thresholds, F2Pool have fee 4% for FPPS and 2% for PPLNS. So claim on 2.5% is wrong.
4. There's no trend about decentralized Bitcoin mining pool, when P2pool and other similar pool no longer developed.

### Latest Bitcoin Mining Hardware: Top Picks and Innovations for July 2024 ###

Discover the Best Hardware for Bitcoin Mining in 2024!

Stay Ahead with Cutting-Edge Mining Equipment

Top Bitcoin Mining Hardware of 2024:

1. Bitmain Antminer S21 200T: Known for its efficiency, the Bitmain Antminer S21 200T boasts a hash rate of 200 TH/s with an energy consumption of 3500W. This miner is ideal for those looking to maximize their output with lower electricity costs, making it a popular choice for both small and large-scale mining operations. Learn more here.

2. MicroBT WhatsMiner M56S: Launched in 2023, the WhatsMiner M56S is designed for both home and industrial use. With a hash rate of 212 TH/s and a power consumption of 5550W, it offers a balanced approach to performance and efficiency. More details on WhatsMiner M56S.

3. Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hydro: With its water-cooled system, the Antminer S19 XP Hydro is both powerful and quiet. It provides a hash rate of 255 TH/s with an energy consumption of 5304W, making it one of the most efficient miners on the market. Discover the Antminer S19 XP Hydro.


Choosing the Right Mining Hardware:

1. Evaluate Your Needs: Depending on whether you're mining at home or in an industrial setting, your hardware needs will differ. High hash rate miners like the Antminer S21 are suited for industrial use, while models like the WhatsMiner M56S offer versatility for various environments.

2. Consider Power Consumption: Efficiency is key in mining. The lower the joules per terahash (J/TH), the better. For instance, the Antminer S19 XP Hydro's efficiency at 0.021 J/GH makes it a strong contender for those looking to minimize energy costs.


Upcoming Trends in Mining Hardware:

1. Hydro Cooling Systems: As seen in models like the Antminer S19 XP Hydro, hydro cooling is becoming a preferred method to reduce noise and improve cooling efficiency. This technology is likely to be integrated into more models moving forward.

2. Enhanced Security Features: Newer mining hardware is incorporating advanced security measures to protect against theft and ensure operational integrity. Strategic partnerships and secure data centers, as seen with ECOS's mining hosting services, are setting new standards.

Join the Hardware Discussion!

We invite miners, experts, and enthusiasts to share their insights, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest hardware developments in the Bitcoin mining ecosystem. Your contributions are highly valued!

Obtain --SNIP--

1. Looking at https://www.asicminervalue.com/efficiency/sha-256, Antminer S19 XP Hydro and WhatsMiner M56S are far from most efficient SHA-256 ASIC.
2. ALL link mentioned that thread are invalid, where all website show error message such as "Error 404!".
3. Recommendation on "Choosing the Right Mining Hardware:" is harmful due to the 1st point.

Analyzing Bitcoin Mining Speculation: Trends and Insights

Current Trends in Bitcoin Mining Speculation

Exploring Market Dynamics and Predictions for Bitcoin Mining

Notable Factors Influencing Bitcoin Mining Speculation:

1. Impact of the Mt. Gox Repayments: The upcoming distribution of Bitcoin to Mt. Gox creditors is expected to introduce significant market fluctuations. Approximately 140,000 BTC will be released, potentially increasing selling pressure. However, experts predict that fewer coins will be distributed than anticipated, which might mitigate the expected market impact. Read more here.

2. Bitcoin Halving 2024 Predictions: The next Bitcoin halving event is projected to significantly influence mining profitability by reducing rewards and emphasizing transaction fees. Historical patterns suggest a pre-halving surge in prices, followed by a post-halving dip and eventual recovery. This cyclical behavior attracts both speculators and long-term investors. Learn more about Bitcoin halving.

3. Regulatory Developments: Recent regulatory updates in major economies are reshaping the Bitcoin mining landscape. Enhanced clarity and compliance requirements are fostering a more stable and transparent environment for miners, potentially impacting speculative activities. Discover the regulatory impact.


Speculative Opportunities and Risks:

1. Technological Innovations: Advances in mining hardware, such as the development of more efficient ASIC rigs, are crucial for maintaining profitability. Miners investing in cutting-edge technology are likely to gain a competitive edge, influencing speculative strategies. Read about the latest hardware developments.

2. Market Volatility: The inherent volatility of Bitcoin prices creates both opportunities and risks for miners. Understanding and predicting price movements, especially around significant events like the Mt. Gox repayments and halving, is essential for speculative success. Learn more about market volatility.


Join the Discussion on Bitcoin Mining Speculation!

We invite miners, investors, and enthusiasts to share their insights, ask questions, and stay updated with the latest trends and developments in Bitcoin mining speculation. Your contributions are highly valued!

Obtain --SNIP--

1. There's no strong correlation between Mt. Gox repayments and Bitcoin mining.
2. ALL link mentioned that thread are invalid, where all website show error message such as "Error 404!".
3. Halving already happened few months ago, so statement "The next Bitcoin halving event.." are wrong.

[ABCbits]

User: DifDrama

Additional information (optional):
* This user sometimes make posts which doesn't make sense, where some of them got deleted. Although occasionally he also made helpful post and good question.
* This user previously accused of using chatbot, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5458725.msg62530440#msg62530440.

List of post:

This means the transaction is verified using a Merkle tree structure without broadcasting it to the public blockchain.

This post doesn't make sense, you don't need Merkle tree structure tree to verify transaction. Although it's worth to mention SPV wallet use Merkle tree structure to verify whether certain transaction actually included in a block.

I have 2 Internet providers,
one works OK the other one says "Your IP network is currently pending review"
everything is the same nothing is changes in the local network when it is swamped with the 2 Internet providers.

It's possible that the IP address range assigned by Internet provider B is flagged by bitnodes. io or other services due to previous activity or network behavior. This could result in your network being subject to additional scrutiny or review. If so, you need to contact Internet provider B's customer support.

Another user explain why it's bad suggestion.

If so, you need to contact Internet provider B's customer support.

This has to be one the dumbest pieces of advice I've read this year. Do you really think ISP B's customer support even know what a Bitcoin node is, let alone know about bitnodes?

Most likely the customers of this ISP have their computers infected and being used for DDoS attacks. This is the only way I think could trigger a residential ISP's addresses to be reviewed for malicious activity.

SegWit transactions enhance the security of the Bitcoin network by enforcing signature checks before any other checks.  This prevents certain types of attacks and makes the network more resistant to vulnerabilities that exploit transaction malleability. Besides, SegWit's introduction was a soft fork, meaning that it did not require a majority consensus of miners to activate.  This made the upgrade process smoother and allowed for a more gradual transition.
And here is a link for beginner to learn Segwit, hope it will be helpful.
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-segwit/

Another user made correction.

SegWit transactions enhance the security of the Bitcoin network by enforcing signature checks before any other checks.  This prevents certain types of attacks and makes the network more resistant to vulnerabilities that exploit transaction malleability. Besides, SegWit's introduction was a soft fork, meaning that it did not require a majority consensus of miners to activate.  This made the upgrade process smoother and allowed for a more gradual transition.
And here is a link for beginner to learn Segwit, hope it will be helpful.
https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-segwit/

The transaction malleability wasn't due to the failure of checking for signatures, but it segregated the signature from the actual transaction itself. This prevents the signature from being modified and thus being malleable.

It was anything but smooth. It was totally unnecessary for it to be dragged on for longer than it did. Segwit's activation requires miners to signal support for it as well and it definitely required a super majority of the miners to signal support for it to be activated. In fact, most if not all soft forks work in this manner. USAF was not materialized and it was definitely not activated by user signalling. Any forks should have consensus and majority support.

List of deleted posts which quoted by other member with corrections:

It's worth noting that intentionally creating many low-fee or feeless transactions can contribute to network congestion and may be seen as spam behavior, which is generally discouraged by the Bitcoin community.  As such, it's essential to use the Bitcoin network responsibly and pay appropriate fees for your transactions based on the current network conditions.

It doesn't congest the network in any meaningful way. If you attempt to broadcast a transaction with zero fee or a fee below the dynamic lower limit set by individual node's mempool settings, then nodes will simply not relay that transaction. Repeatedly try to do this, and nodes will simply blacklist your IP and ignore you.

Attempting to create a fake transaction without paying any fees and without it ever getting confirmed is not a practical scenario on the Bitcoin blockchain.

Correct. If the input is invalid, then the transaction is invalid and it will be rejected by EVERY node on the network.

While you might be able to create such a transaction and broadcast it,

Broadcast it to whom? Bitcoin nodes will simply reject it.

the likelihood of it being confirmed is close to zero.

It is exactly zero.  Invalid transacitons can not be confirmed.

Instead, it will likely remain in the mempool (the pool of unconfirmed transactions) until it eventually gets removed by nodes after some time.

No. That is incorrect. Fake, invalid, transactions never get into the mempool in the first place.  A transaction is verified BEFORE it is accepted into the mempool.

Further more, deliberately creating invalid or fake transactions . . . -snip- . . . may be against the terms of service of some wallets and exchanges.

How would a wallet or an exchange know that you created a fake transaction? Why would they care?

If you send Bitcoin to the address derived from this invalid private key (1NLqpZnW746xjdAgnrTb56V4uZJiV4jjrU), the funds will be associated with that address.  However, since the private key is not valid, you won't be able to sign transactions to spend or transfer those funds.  In essence, the funds sent to that address would be irrecoverable.

Am I right?

That string you listed is an address, not a private key. And also, its private key is not invalid. Even if the hex number is out of range it is converted into a valid private key by using modulo, as others here have pointed out (unless the number is 0 or a multiple of n). So no. Anybody will be able to retrieve any bitcoins sent to this address.

[ABCbits]

User: alecfisker

Additional information (optional):
* This user previously share shady/scam website, https://archive.fo/iVWtW.
* This user suspected using chatbot, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64405061#msg64405061.

List of post:

Good evening dear forum members,
I have 2 questions regarding Full Node and Electrum Server.

1) What can the owner of a full node see when I connect to his node?

2) What can the owner of an Electrum server see when I connect to his server?

Thank you very much and best regards

it depends how he will be looking at it, and what configuration on node was maid
can post more details about why such knowledge required
main difference is that electrum custodial solution, it host your wallet and have access to wallet file
stick to full node and use electrum for smaller amounts

Another user already mention wrong things with this reply.

main difference is that electrum custodial solution, it host your wallet and have access to wallet file

Electrum has access to your wallet file? What are you saying? Please don't post about something you don't have any information about.

Electrum is a non-custodial wallet. You keys are generated locally on your own device and no one has access to your wallet. Unless your device is compromised or some one has access to it, your electrum wallet would be secure.

Sorry for the late reply.

My friend did download bitcoin core and tried to attach the wallet but he said it wasn't recognised.
 He is the only person I thought new about computers but he told me after that he didn't verify the program and I think you are meant to? Would of that effected the outcome?

I have tried opening it in notepad and it comes up as two lines of Asian looking written or something foreign. 

Is it possible that wallet.dat file and crypto_key files are a android file for like a android wallet from 2010 or some type of cryptography? It's on a SD card from my late partners HTC phone.

When I attempted to do pywallet It was so hard to learn but I really had no idea what I was doing I would just copy and paste commands into the cmd to get it to do something. And it gave me back a few lines say it was encrypted and version?
And if pywallet is a scam does that mean I would have lost it if it is a bitcoin wallet?

Is walletrecoveryservices legitimate and completely trustworthy?

Thankyou I appreciate everyone's time. 

HTC wallet file will not open on windows, have to manage it from phone, open about phone dialog and check OS version name
than use tool to dump wallet data, once dump file ready it possible to copy to windows device for further processing
could help with password hashing farm access, text me private

1. HTC is name of smartphone brand, not cryptocurrency wallet.
2. There's no direct correlation between OS version/type on the HTC phone and attempting wallet recovery.

try heat up drive and check more data copy possible, than cool down and try again, in some cases it helps to have more time for reading before failure

While i've seen few people heat certain part of computer in attempt to repair, this post forget to mention it could cause more damage instead.

[LoyceV]

User: alecfisker

He has several scam tags against him already, and posts crap like this on the tech board:

for further processing could help with password hashing farm access, text me private

The tech boards need visible Trust feedback.

Even after pointing out he's wrong, this 2018-Newbie continues posting incorrect information:

Open the wallet.dat file with a text editor

Nonsense. It is a Berkeley/DB file, not a text file

That doesn't mean you can't open it in an editor. Takuma sato is correct: if you search for "name" you'll find addresses.

It definitely means you can not open it in a text editor

[ABCbits]

User: alecfisker

He has several scam tags against him already, and posts crap like this on the tech board:

for further processing could help with password hashing farm access, text me private

The tech boards need visible Trust feedback.

Yeah, i noticed he already several tags. Bitcoin Technical Support definitely need to show trust feedback, since it may be too late when someone report the post or moderator delete the post.

Even after pointing out he's wrong, this 2018-Newbie continues posting incorrect information:

Open the wallet.dat file with a text editor

Nonsense. It is a Berkeley/DB file, not a text file

That doesn't mean you can't open it in an editor. Takuma sato is correct: if you search for "name" you'll find addresses.

It definitely means you can not open it in a text editor

Not as bad as most post mentioned in this thread. Although it's problematic he remove part of reply which state to find "name" text among gibberish text shown by text editor.

[KingsDen]

What is the punishment for any user who has been severally called out here for giving false/fake information but they are unrepentant?

[ABCbits]

What is the punishment for any user who has been severally called out here for giving false/fake information but they are unrepentant?

Nothing much. I only expect their post may be deleted if someone report it and few members leave neutral tag/feedback.

[ABCbits]

I'm creating this post as reference reporting these posts to moderator.

User: Hinnenkamp

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

BIP49 mnemonic converter is not a widely known or standardized tool, because BIP49 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallet Generation for Segregated Witness Addresses) focuses on the generation rules of wallet addresses, not directly on the conversion of mnemonics. However, I can provide some general information and suggestions on mnemonic conversion.

Basic Concepts of Mnemonics

Mnemonic is a set of words used to recover private keys and addresses in a wallet address hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallet. These words are usually randomly selected from a preset word list so that users can remember and back up more easily. The BIP39 standard defines the rules for the generation, verification, and use of mnemonics, while BIP49 expands the generation rules for segregated witness addresses on this basis.

Need for mnemonic conversion

Although BIP49 does not directly involve the conversion of mnemonics, users may need to convert mnemonics for a variety of reasons, such as:

Language conversion: convert English mnemonics to other languages ​​(such as Chinese) to make them easier to remember or avoid language barriers.
Format conversion: Convert the mnemonic to a different format (such as a sequence, binary, etc.) to improve security or meet specific needs.

Conversion method

1. Language conversion:
If you need to convert English mnemonics to Chinese, you can find or create a Chinese-English mnemonic comparison table. Then, replace the English words with the corresponding Chinese words according to the comparison table. But please note that this method may not be supported by all wallets, and you need to ensure that the converted Chinese mnemonics are still valid when restoring the wallet.

Another method is to use wallet software that supports multi-language mnemonics, which usually allow users to choose the language of the mnemonics.

2. Format conversion:
Converting mnemonics to formats such as sequence or binary is usually for improved security. This can be achieved by writing a custom script or using an existing conversion tool. But please note that this conversion needs to be able to be reversed when restoring the wallet to ensure the validity of the mnemonics.

The assumption of the existence of a BIP49 mnemonic converter

Although there is no dedicated BIP49 mnemonic converter, you can use a general mnemonic conversion tool or method to meet your needs. These tools or methods may not be designed specifically for BIP49, but they can handle the basic conversion tasks of mnemonics.

Notes

When performing mnemonic conversion, be sure to ensure the security and reliability of the conversion process. Avoid using unverified conversion tools or methods.
The converted mnemonics should be kept properly and ensure that the wallet can be restored when needed.
If you have any questions or uncertainties about mnemonic conversion, please consult a professional blockchain or cryptocurrency expert.

In summary, although there is no dedicated BIP49 mnemonic converter, you can achieve the conversion needs of mnemonics through other methods. Please be careful and ensure the security and effectiveness of the conversion process.

1. Looking at https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0049.mediawiki, BIP49 isn't about mnemonic.
2. BIP 49 talks about derivation scheme for P2WPKH-P2SH from BIP-32, not BIP 39.
3. If he actually talks about BIP 39, then using language other than English isn't good idea due to less support and testing.
4. Changing mnemonic format can be seen as security by obfuscation, but using non-stadanrd format may bring complication when restoring access to the Bitcoin.


User: Bitcoin Fan Mr. A

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

Financial activities will drive Bitcoin to continuously advance toward the technological limits of cryptocurrencies. From a financial perspective, cryptocurrencies are destined to replace paper money as the mainstream currency due to their increasingly prominent functionalities.

Taking BTC and ETH as examples, the current Ordinals protocol has expanded Bitcoin's service capabilities with inscriptions and collectible ordinal numbers, as well as names containing words. There is immense future potential for speculation in this space.

As a result, the possibility of expanding storage fees for various sats we collect is a financial consideration worth discussing.

On the other hand, ETH's development is less concerning in terms of trading volume. ETH's functionality leans more towards replacing ballots, with potential use in various elections, including U.S. elections. This means ETH will not lack trading volume to generate transaction fees, which helps balance the relationship between ETH supply and miners.

1. Replacing fiat with cryptocurrency is far more than technical problem.
2. There's no thing such as "storage fee" on Bitcoin protocol. Those who add arbitrary data only pay transaction fee, where full node (expect pruned ones) forced to store it forever.
3. The topic talks about BTC, so mentioning ETH is somewhat off-topic. And using ETH for voting is impractical, since every voter need to own ETH and let everyone know who they're voting for.


User: programmer3666

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

I've been out of the mining game for a while and I'm considering getting back into it. I'm looking at getting a high-end desktop computer with a single powerful GPU (https://fenn.systems/build/njord-maxx/ with i9 & 4090).

Given the advancements in mining technology and the increasing difficulty of mining, is it still feasible to mine Bitcoin in 2024 with just this setup? How does this compare to miners with multiple GPUs? Are there any significant differences in profitability or efficiency?

I will suggest you explore cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum, Ergo, and Flux since they are more GPU-friendly at this present 2024 given the fact that you are considering using a high-end desktop, if that is the case I suggest an RTX 4090 because with a powerful GPU the profit in returns will be quite encouraging. Mining has become a competitive field lately, While a high-end GPU setup will look impressive enough to admire, it is very keen to align any hardware of choice with the right cryptocurrency to maximize profitability at the end of the day.

Besides one needs to be financially buoyant to acquire most of this hardware because as the year goes by things are becoming very expensive.

1. It's impossible to mine ETH with GPU, when ETH use PoS since 2022.
2. GPU mining is on decline, where ROI will take long time. For example, compare https://whattomine.com/ (current's estimation) with https://web.archive.org/web/20210104030921/https://whattomine.com/ (estimation on early 2021).

Bitcoin Client Software and Version Number: Knots 27.1
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
System Hardware Specs: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9850H CPU @ 2.60GHz   2.59 GHz
Description of Problem: Tor Win32 Service returns system error 1064
Any Related Addresses: None
Any Related Transaction IDs: None
Screenshot of the problem: https://imgur.com/a/Z34rGcl
Log Files from the Bitcoin Client: https://pastebin.com/EdQCibG3

I've followed this https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Setting_up_a_Tor_hidden_service

Tor Win32 Service is not running.

I've tried this: If you don't see any LISTENING output, it means that Tor service is not working properly and this issue may be related to Windows permissions on the folder you extracted. To fix it go to where you extracted the Tor Expert Bundle and check the top folder Properties > Security > Advanced and verify if in the Permissions tab you have SERVICE with Full Control, if not click Add, click on the link Select a Secure Entity and type SERVICE (all letters in UPPERCASE) then hit enter and select Full Control (Try to start the Tor service again in Windows Services, if it doesn't work, try adding SYSTEM and LOCAL SERVICE with Full Control on folder permissions and repeat the tests above).

Still nothing. Does it matter that the extracted torExpertBundle is in C:\ and the Bitcoin Data Directory is on a HardDrive?

The torrc file says:

Appreciate all help!

Based on the screenshot and log file presented. Try checking the torrc paths

Make sure all the supposed path are absolute path not just relative paths so it can help in avoiding issues with file locations.

Also try verifying issues with file configuration just open the torrc and make sure it is well configured for instance using this command line:

Log notice file C:\path\to\tor.log
DataDirectory C:\path\to\tor\data
ControlPort 9051
SocksPort 9050

Just make sure it is your actual directory structure.

 Or You can just reinstall the tor Service by following this process
using your CMD as Admin.

Delete the existing tor service by using this command
sc delete "Tor Win32 Service"

now try to recreate the service with the correct paths using this command

sc create "Tor Win32 Service" binPath= "\"C:\path\to\tor.exe\" --nt-service -f \"C:\path\to\torrc\""


Running tor as a local system account is also a possible option but it seems you already applied it in the initial recommendation.

1. Screenshot and log shared by @felimuno doesn't mention anything about path of torrc file.
2. Command to create the service seems to be invalid, since sc.exe on Windows 10 doesn't mention --nt-service.

Code:

PS C:\Windows\system32> sc.exe create
DESCRIPTION:
        Creates a service entry in the registry and Service Database.
USAGE:
        sc <server> create [service name] [binPath= ] <option1> <option2>...

OPTIONS:
NOTE: The option name includes the equal sign.
      A space is required between the equal sign and the value.
 type= <own|share|interact|kernel|filesys|rec|userown|usershare>
       (default = own)
 start= <boot|system|auto|demand|disabled|delayed-auto>
       (default = demand)
 error= <normal|severe|critical|ignore>
       (default = normal)
 binPath= <BinaryPathName to the .exe file>
 group= <LoadOrderGroup>
 tag= <yes|no>
 depend= <Dependencies(separated by / (forward slash))>
 obj= <AccountName|ObjectName>
       (default = LocalSystem)
 DisplayName= <display name>
 password= <password>

[nutildah]

I'm creating this post as reference reporting these posts to moderator.

User: Hinnenkamp

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

BIP49 mnemonic converter is not a widely known or standardized tool, because BIP49 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallet Generation for Segregated Witness Addresses) focuses on the generation rules of wallet addresses, not directly on the conversion of mnemonics. However, I can provide some general information and suggestions on mnemonic conversion.
...

I can tell right away that this one at least is AI generated.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 99.9% Fake
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected


As for the others, it is just incorrect information: not AI and not plagiarism, unless they were translated from another language.

[LoyceV]

User: Hinnenkamp

I can tell right away that this one at least is AI generated.

He created that long post 6 minutes after registration, and went offline right after that. It's obvious he can't type that much in 6 minutes, and indeed, it looks like chatbot diarrhea. I'm starting to think this is a flaw of the Merit system: users spam to earn Merit, and chatbots make that very easy nowadays. It looks like they use throwaway accounts: if it works, it works. If it doesn't work, go to the next one.
Chatbot spam at this level didn't exist yet when theymos created the Merit system.