Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board

[ABCbits]

You can go ahead and delete my post or reply

I'm not moderator or admin, so i never delete any of your post.

but not including it in my trust, for goodness sake, I mean that is not what the trust system was made for, or am I wrong?

It's up to debate and i'm aware some people disagree with how i use trust system. Here's my past reply to other member who asked similar question.

The thread is too long to ask for info, but has there been a final consensus here on how to treat such accounts?

No. But moderators on technical board have left few neutral or negative feedback to such account. And they sometimes they don't even bother add reference link.

Is it okay to leave them at least a neutral tag as a warning that they are forum-rank farmers? I believe that the negative tag is too much.

Maybe it's okay when moderators also do that. IMO negative tag is okay if those account also share malware, fake software or other action which makes user could lose their Bitcoin easily.

I humbly ask that you remove the comment in my trust cause I try my best to keep to the rules and not take up any negative feedback or trust, someone else was slandering my post saying I'm spreading misinformation and account farming which I just ignored cause the person is unreasonable, and made a comment in my trust too, and this, I am not really comfortable, if I'm at fault and maybe It deserves being mentioned in my trust, I'll just move on, but I don't think this does, please I request that you remove the comment, thank you

See what i stated on this thread.

If you received a tag/feedback me, i will consider removing it after 1 year since i created the report or you can prove information you stated are correct.

User: aysha9853

Additional information (optional):
* This account received at least 2 accusation of spamming with AI/chatbot, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66206496#msg66206496 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66187359#msg66187359.
* This account may be hacked, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506921.msg66212584#msg66212584.
* This account is part of sockpuppet/account farm who spam with AI/chatbot, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573695.0.

List of post:

Upgraded to Bitcoin Core 30+ the other day. Did anyone else notice the white background behind the overview screen? Also, the blue line through the bottom where it tells how many hours behind the network is while it's updating is new. The buttons for overview, send, receive and transaction history are greyed out until you hover over them. Is this normal?

Yea that is totally normal core 30 got a UI glow up lol they moved stuff under the hood and the app picked up that cleaner white background the blue sync bar and those buttons that only light up when you hover. nothing is broken it is just the new look doing its thing. If everything works after sync you are absolutely fine

Another user explain what's wrong with post on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5572683.msg66384473#msg66384473.

--snip--

bitcoin being decentralized dont mean you can not share control. P2SH multisig is just a smart way to set rules so multiple keys approve spending. which is great for businesses, escrow or extra security instead of trusting one device. SegWit aint a wallet type but a transaction upgrade so yea it supports multisig while making fees cheaper and transactions cleaner. Non standard transactions aint illegal nodes might refuse to relay them but if a miner accepts a valid one it still lands in a block. A public key is your cryptographic identity while ScriptPubKey is basically the lock script that says how coins can be spent not the key itself. And you can not pull a public key back from an address because hashing is oneway math. it is  designed to go forward only keeping your funds safe not because nobody built the right software.

1. Many points already estate by other member.
2. While people use term SegWit for so many things, SegWit wallet is stukk valid term since it usually refer to wallet that support creating wallet with SegWit address.

[OsaiEmma]

You can go ahead and delete my post or reply

I'm not moderator or admin, so i never delete any of your post.

but not including it in my trust, for goodness sake, I mean that is not what the trust system was made for, or am I wrong?

It's up to debate and i'm aware some people disagree with how i use trust system. Here's my past reply to other member who asked similar question.

The thread is too long to ask for info, but has there been a final consensus here on how to treat such accounts?

No. But moderators on technical board have left few neutral or negative feedback to such account. And they sometimes they don't even bother add reference link.

Is it okay to leave them at least a neutral tag as a warning that they are forum-rank farmers? I believe that the negative tag is too much.

Maybe it's okay when moderators also do that. IMO negative tag is okay if those account also share malware, fake software or other action which makes user could lose their Bitcoin easily.

I humbly ask that you remove the comment in my trust cause I try my best to keep to the rules and not take up any negative feedback or trust, someone else was slandering my post saying I'm spreading misinformation and account farming which I just ignored cause the person is unreasonable, and made a comment in my trust too, and this, I am not really comfortable, if I'm at fault and maybe It deserves being mentioned in my trust, I'll just move on, but I don't think this does, please I request that you remove the comment, thank you

See what i stated on this thread.

If you received a tag/feedback me, i will consider removing it after 1 year since i created the report or you can prove information you stated are correct.

Although I'll say I a kinda appreciate that the reason for my post deletion and pointing out my flaws was brought to my notice by leaving a comment in my trust, at least it made me pick up on my lapses and to make the appropriate corrections moving forward, with that being said, I have left a neutral comment on your profile, thanks again.

[LoyceV]

Although I'll say I a kinda appreciate that the reason for my post deletion and pointing out my flaws was brought to my notice by leaving a comment in my trust, at least it made me pick up on my lapses and to make the appropriate corrections moving forward

You're one of many accounts that recently hit the techboards with shitposts. Coincidentally (lol), they're almost exclusively from the same local board. You're on my Ignore list already, and I have a Good report against your posts. There is no "make appropriate corrections", the whole issue is lost on account farmers like yourself. You're only posting on the tech boards for post quota and Merit.

I have left a neutral comment on your profile

Your feedback is as pointless as your posts.

Update: OsaiEmma posted this, then removed it.

User: asrinur

I'll add this for my tag for "Shitposting on the tech boards":

you need to know for sure if the phon eis infected or not. yea the qr code scanning is much safer but if the phone is defo infected i dont think it would make much of a difference. if the phone isnt then the qr way is the best option for you

[AuchanX]

User: Assiduous

I am not fully aware of how to submit reports here. I am also not very knowledgeable about technical matters. But this person is going to the technical board and posting one after another randomly. I am just leaving two posts here. I want to know your opinion about it.He basically uses AI to create posts. Now my question is, if he is technically savvy, then why is he using AI? Isn't that confusing?

Your confusion is understandable, but there are a few important points to clear up.
First, myNode itself is not a public mining pool. It is primarily a personal Bitcoin full node with a privacy-focused ecosystem. Expecting Umbrel-style “easy pool support” can be misleading, because myNode is designed more for sovereignty than convenience.
Second, Datum is not a public pool either. Datum is a Stratum V2–based template server. When you use Datum, you are essentially generating your own block templates from your node and submitting work through a pool. So getting a share every 10–15 minutes is completely normal and mostly dependent on your hashrate, not a software problem.
Also keep in mind that Datum is still in beta and is not intended for solo mining or guaranteed payouts. It’s mainly for experimentation with Stratum V2, block template control, and future-oriented mining setups. If your goal is steady rewards, using established pools like ckpool or Braiins Pool makes much more sense.
Regarding Linux: while you don’t need to be an expert, myNode + Datum is not a beginner plug-and-play setup. Offering screen-sharing access to strangers is risky. It’s safer to rely on the official Datum GitHub documentation and existing myNode forum threads.
In short:
myNode ≠ public mining pool
Datum ≠ public pool, it’s a template server
Slow shares = normal for low/moderate hashrate
Traditional pools are better for consistent payouts
Hope this helps clarify things.

Use of P2SH multisignature wallets
Decentralization and anonymity do not mean single ownership only. P2SH multisig is mainly used where shared control is required, such as exchanges, escrow services, corporate treasuries, joint family funds, or even personal security (e.g. 2-of-3 where one key is kept as backup). P2SH actually improves privacy because the redeem script is not revealed until spending, so observers cannot know it is multisig beforehand.
SegWit and multisignature
SegWit is not a wallet type; it is a transaction format upgrade. SegWit fully supports multisignature. In fact, native SegWit multisig (P2WSH) and nested SegWit multisig (P2SH-P2WSH) are more efficient than legacy multisig because signatures are moved to the witness, reducing transaction size and fees and fixing transaction malleability.
Non-standard transactions
“Standard” rules are policy rules, not consensus rules. Miners and nodes can choose to relay or reject non-standard transactions to protect the network from spam. However, if a miner manually includes a valid (consensus-correct) but non-standard transaction in a block, the network will still accept it. So non-standard ≠ invalid.
ScriptPubKey vs Public Key
They are different. A Public Key is just cryptographic data. ScriptPubKey is a locking script that defines the conditions required to spend an output. It usually contains a hash of a public key (P2PKH) or a script hash (P2SH), not the public key itself. Think of ScriptPubKey as “the rule”, not the key.
Why public key cannot be derived from address
Bitcoin addresses are created using one-way hash functions (SHA-256 + RIPEMD-160). Hashing is intentionally irreversible. Even if you hash the same public key many times, the process from public key → address loses information. This is not a missing program problem; it is a fundamental property of cryptographic hash functions designed for security.

Other post

Lightning Network and Liquid Network are both part of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but they are not the same thing.
Lightning Network is a Layer-2 payment protocol on Bitcoin. It uses real BTC, and all balances are ultimately settled on the Bitcoin mainchain. No new asset is created; it simply enables faster and cheaper transactions while keeping Bitcoin’s trust-minimized nature.
Liquid Network, on the other hand, is a federated sidechain. BTC is locked on the mainchain and L-BTC is issued 1:1 in return. Although L-BTC is fully backed by BTC, it is not native BTC. The peg-in and peg-out process is controlled by a federation, which introduces a different trust model compared to Lightning.
Because of this, many Bitcoiners don’t consider Liquid an altcoin, but they also don’t treat L-BTC as the same as on-chain BTC. It’s closer to a Bitcoin-backed representation rather than Bitcoin itself.

[ABCbits]

User: Assiduous

I am not fully aware of how to submit reports here. I am also not very knowledgeable about technical matters. But this person is going to the technical board and posting one after another randomly. I am just leaving two posts here. I want to know your opinion about it.He basically uses AI to create posts. Now my question is, if he is technically savvy, then why is he using AI? Isn't that confusing?
--snip--

There's no specific/required way to make a report here, so what you did is fine. I believe he's not technical savvy and just another spammer who use AI/chatbot. Anyway, i already reported all of his posts again and let's hope moderator decide to permaban/nuke him.