You can go ahead and delete my post or reply
I'm not moderator or admin, so i never delete any of your post.
but not including it in my trust, for goodness sake, I mean that is not what the trust system was made for, or am I wrong?
It's up to debate and i'm aware some people disagree with how i use trust system. Here's my past reply to other member who asked similar question.
The thread is too long to ask for info, but has there been a final consensus here on how to treat such accounts?
No. But moderators on technical board have left few neutral or negative feedback to such account. And they sometimes they don't even bother add reference link.
Is it okay to leave them at least a neutral tag as a warning that they are forum-rank farmers? I believe that the negative tag is too much.
Maybe it's okay when moderators also do that. IMO negative tag is okay if those account also share malware, fake software or other action which makes user could lose their Bitcoin easily.
I humbly ask that you remove the comment in my trust cause I try my best to keep to the rules and not take up any negative feedback or trust, someone else was slandering my post saying I'm spreading misinformation and account farming which I just ignored cause the person is unreasonable, and made a comment in my trust too, and this, I am not really comfortable, if I'm at fault and maybe It deserves being mentioned in my trust, I'll just move on, but I don't think this does, please I request that you remove the comment, thank you
See what i stated on this thread.
If you received a tag/feedback me, i will consider removing it after 1 year since i created the report or you can prove information you stated are correct.
User:
aysha9853Additional information (optional):
* This account received at least 2 accusation of spamming with AI/chatbot,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66206496#msg66206496 and
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66187359#msg66187359.
* This account may be hacked,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5506921.msg66212584#msg66212584.
* This account is part of sockpuppet/account farm who spam with AI/chatbot,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573695.0.
List of post:
Upgraded to Bitcoin Core 30+ the other day. Did anyone else notice the white background behind the overview screen? Also, the blue line through the bottom where it tells how many hours behind the network is while it's updating is new. The buttons for overview, send, receive and transaction history are greyed out until you hover over them. Is this normal?
Yea that is totally normal core 30 got a UI glow up lol they moved stuff under the hood and the app picked up that cleaner white background the blue sync bar and those buttons that only light up when you hover. nothing is broken it is just the new look doing its thing. If everything works after sync you are absolutely fine
Another user explain what's wrong with post on
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5572683.msg66384473#msg66384473.
--snip--
bitcoin being decentralized dont mean you can not share control. P2SH multisig is just a smart way to set rules so multiple keys approve spending. which is great for businesses, escrow or extra security instead of trusting one device. SegWit aint a wallet type but a transaction upgrade so yea it supports multisig while making fees cheaper and transactions cleaner. Non standard transactions aint illegal nodes might refuse to relay them but if a miner accepts a valid one it still lands in a block. A public key is your cryptographic identity while ScriptPubKey is basically the lock script that says how coins can be spent not the key itself. And you can not pull a public key back from an address because hashing is oneway math. it is designed to go forward only keeping your funds safe not because nobody built the right software.
1. Many points already estate by other member.
2. While people use term SegWit for so many things, SegWit wallet is stukk valid term since it usually refer to wallet that support creating wallet with SegWit address.
