The SportsBet.io Gang

[Rating Place]

Sorry for being a little off topic but this shows how Sportsbet works. Sportsbet had a Trustpilot rating of 1.4 prior to the last week. They added 20 five star reviews in the last week and are up to 3.3. https://trustpilot.com/review/sportsbet.io

[yahoo62278]

Sorry for being a little off topic but this shows how Sportsbet works. Sportsbet had a Trustpilot rating of 1.4 prior to the last week. They added 20 five star reviews in the last week and are up to 3.3. https://trustpilot.com/review/sportsbet.io

How many people actually pay attention to Trust Pilot? How many other sites might be paying users to post fake reviews or make multiple accounts to make a fake review and boost stats?

I'm not saying this is what sportsbet does, but seems like the focus is on1 site when they all possibly engage in activity like this. People should check out the reviews here in their thread and check the reputation of the site reps, not believe bs ratings sites which can be manipulated to the moon and back.

[Igebotz]

Sorry for being a little off topic but this shows how Sportsbet works. Sportsbet had a Trustpilot rating of 1.4 prior to the last week. They added 20 five star reviews in the last week and are up to 3.3. https://trustpilot.com/review/sportsbet.io

How many people actually pay attention to Trust Pilot? How many other sites might be paying users to post fake reviews or make multiple accounts to make a fake review and boost stats?

I'm not saying this is what sportsbet does, but seems like the focus is on1 site when they all possibly engage in activity like this. People should check out the reviews here in their thread and check the reputation of the site reps, not believe bs ratings sites which can be manipulated to the moon and back.

Are people still taking Trustpilot ratings seriously in 2024? If you're looking for a site review, Trustpilot is the worst place to go because most of the reviews don't reflect the reputation of these sites, and most of the negative ratings come from competitors. You can easily manipulate reputable sites to your own preferences with only 50 emails and a VPN, not saying we should throw it out completely, but I wouldn't suggest anyone to rely exclusively on Trustpilot reviews before using any site.

Stake.come sitting on 3.8 tells you all you need to know about trustpilot reviews- everyone knows they're the most reliable casino out there.

[JollyGood]

If we comment about Trust Pilot then basically it means even though any review for any company can be genuine it also means any review could also be manipulated and be fake. That is why Trust Pilot cannot be trusted. I am not stating Sportsbet are behind fake reviews but even they were, they would not be the only company out there doing it.

Back to this thread, the OP claimed he created his "JCLadisav" alt-account to make unsubstantiated complaints about Hhampuz because he was scared of using he real account as he thought he would face hostile posts. That was the excuse he gave before.

After that there was no need for him to keep using the JCLadisav account but he continues to post about casinos while not using any of his real/other accounts.

[examplens]

If we comment about Trust Pilot then basically it means even though any review for any company can be genuine it also means any review could also be manipulated and be fake. That is why Trust Pilot cannot be trusted. I am not stating Sportsbet are behind fake reviews but even they were, they would not be the only company out there doing it.

I don't remember when I read real feedback on Trustpilot. It all came down to a bunch of fake reviews in both directions. Someone who is angry with a service can drop the rating very easily.
Although many say that Trustpilot is irrelevant, it obviously has a certain influence, otherwise, companies would not generate fake positive feedback.

[yahoo62278]

If we comment about Trust Pilot then basically it means even though any review for any company can be genuine it also means any review could also be manipulated and be fake. That is why Trust Pilot cannot be trusted. I am not stating Sportsbet are behind fake reviews but even they were, they would not be the only company out there doing it.

I don't remember when I read real feedback on Trustpilot. It all came down to a bunch of fake reviews in both directions. Someone who is angry with a service can drop the rating very easily.
Although many say that Trustpilot is irrelevant, it obviously has a certain influence, otherwise, companies would not generate fake positive feedback.

It has the most influence I suppose on users that may not be members of this community. Users that are new to Bitcoin and just looking around at places they might be able to gamble or something and they go check TP once they find a site. Most of us here know and realize, like the last few people have said, that 1 in every 20 reviews you read on TP are true and the rest are from competitors or paid people.

I haven't visited TP in awile, do they have a disclaimer anywhere stating that users should do their own due diligence? Not to blindly believe in a review they read?

[Rating Place]

I wasn’t trying to say that Trust Pilot is a legitimate source even though their global rank is very high. Sportsbet does reply to negative feedback at TP where players are legitimate and that is interesting to look at.

[Igebotz]

I haven't visited TP in awile, do they have a disclaimer anywhere stating that users should do their own due diligence? Not to blindly believe in a review they read?

There are no such things as far as I know, and they wouldn't want to sound like they're not conducting sufficient checking to counteract false reviews, as they stated.They want us to believe that whatever is stated on their platforms is sufficient for everyone to make decisions; no own investigation is required.

I wasn’t trying to say that Trust Pilot is a legitimate source even though their global rank is very high. Sportsbet does reply to negative feedback at TP where players are legitimate and that is interesting to look at.

The SB TP admin is quite active- not easy dealing with both legitimate and troll reviews.

[JollyGood]

I don't remember when I read real feedback on Trustpilot. It all came down to a bunch of fake reviews in both directions. Someone who is angry with a service can drop the rating very easily.
Although many say that Trustpilot is irrelevant, it obviously has a certain influence, otherwise, companies would not generate fake positive feedback.

Not that long ago Trust Pilot was heavily relied upon by many individuals and companies but it lost reputation after it became associated with far too many fake reviews. It still can be a source of good genuine reviews but it will need to change in order to remain relevant. As you stated, it still has a degree of influence otherwise The irony is in the word trust.

It has the most influence I suppose on users that may not be members of this community. Users that are new to Bitcoin and just looking around at places they might be able to gamble or something and they go check TP once they find a site. Most of us here know and realize, like the last few people have said, that 1 in every 20 reviews you read on TP are true and the rest are from competitors or paid people.

Apart from members here, I am sure people use online searches to study whether Trust Pilot can be trusted and then probably end up deciding to not take it too seriously after realising how easy it is to manipulate the service they offer.

[Smartvirus]

Sorry for being a little off topic but this shows how Sportsbet works. Sportsbet had a Trustpilot rating of 1.4 prior to the last week. They added 20 five star reviews in the last week and are up to 3.3. https://trustpilot.com/review/sportsbet.io

How many people actually pay attention to Trust Pilot? How many other sites might be paying users to post fake reviews or make multiple accounts to make a fake review and boost stats?

I'm not saying this is what sportsbet does, but seems like the focus is on1 site when they all possibly engage in activity like this. People should check out the reviews here in their thread and check the reputation of the site reps, not believe bs ratings sites which can be manipulated to the moon and back.

I don’t know what it is with Sportsbet.io but it seems good to have them making headlines which is good for them. One thing I find odd though is the light at which it’s often directed. Well, I wouldn’t expect anything much different from this thread as it’s title already speaks loud of what narrative it’s directed but,
I gamble on Sportsbet.io and even ran into issues due to withdrawal or even gambling with funds I already had on the site. I had to engage their live support and I can say, their support at the time was very helpful. They not only helped to solve the issue, they explained to me what the issue was, what actions I took to have caused this problems and proposed a way to avoid feature occurrences.
What was the issue?
Bumping fee to an unconfirmed deposit transaction. It gets flagged!

With this experience, it ain’t difficult for them to get a positive pilot study review from me. This is a share interest am sure to have with a couple of gamblers here and out.

Talking about pilot study, well, it ain’t entirely reliable and wether or not the company lets out some disclaimer on how this study is met, one has to trust in their abilities to participate in this review and relate it to what could be done from the other end which you know nothing of. It’s simply reviews and a lot of shillings operations are done on these in recent times. I don’t see Sportsbet.io in these shades but, I wouldn’t want to talk about that. However, the forum does a better job at it because, accounts to these reviews are readily visible and it’s a sticking your neck out in some way.