Like I said on my previous post, I've ran free raffles exactly the same way (provably fair with the bitcoin block hash) on bitcointalk since 2022, at least one year before you released your tool (2023). So, if anything, I think maybe you were the one missing credits.

...
Anyways, other people feel free to give any constructive feedback.
I think this is a constructive feedback.
your old raffle doesn't run the same way (with share button encrypting parameters in the URL, prediction of current block, multiple winners, UI, etc etc)... You changed colors and size of inputs in the screen. You kept all features exactly the same way (even the flaws are the same, like the long URL to save parameters)
But the refusal to provide attribution, and the suggestion that the credit should go the other way is unfair. If you copy someone work you are expected to give them proper credit, not say it is your own work when questioned about it.
And I am not affraid to point out such behavial problems, this is why I am in your ignore list.The BitList raffle manager allows as many competitors and winners as you want.
That's one difference. Thanks.
That is not a difference, he removed one line of the code. The limitation was a parameter, which he removed.
&& document.getElementById("n_winners").value < 31) {