Do we need more influencial women in crypto to help the gender embrace it?

[betswift]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency?

Of course there eee many women who are bitcoin investors aside the few that you have listed, but having the name of more women listed in the table of the top investor does change anything. Because naturally women don't like online investment but physical investment. They want to be in full /total control of their finances, and they are  security conscious or minded so they don't have that spirit of a man in the of investment. So even if more women are listed here to attract more women investors the female gender may never take it seriously even though I know many will still buy buy it wouldn't make no much difference.

Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

Like I said there is no need. Those that will invest will do and those who will not invest will not also invest. That doesn't change the fact that men are still leading in anything financial system.

Why there's so much talks about what gender like this and like that in speaking about adoption on which we know that this something really that having that inevitable movement yet recognition and attention is really that becoming bigger and bigger as years passing. Doesn't matter on what are the age and gender into those people who do engage with cryptocurrency. This has been created for some obvious reason on which making up that p2p and other utilities on which other projects that offers. People are really just that putting up too much focus on gender and really that believing that women couldn't be able to handle crypto investment.

We do know that there are women investors on this space, it isn't really that obvious just because there's no way on telling on whose behind into those addresses that making up some crypto transactions or simply talking about decentralized and anonymity aspects.

Totally agree.
It depends on the person in question, not on his or her age and definitely not on the gender.
The space is full of wonders without that cut of man / woman 

[Antotena]

Just to add from what alastantiger said, I think Bitcoin’s popular enough now that it doesn’t need any pushy tactics to attract people. Just letting it grow naturally seems like the best way to keep its development moving in the right direction.

When you check the top 100 list of richest people, you are going to count a lot of men before you see women among the group and the women wealth are supported by men and some got their wealth from their husbands they divorce as a result of settlement from court. This is to show you that women aren't into finance like the way men are expose and women don't really like complex things like the way Bitcoin is design.

I remember FTX case, Sam entrusted millions of Bitcoin and other coins to her girlfriend Caroline to trade but what did she do with the money, she was liquidated and that's because she doesn't understand how the market work or should I say she was ignorant of the crypto space and did some silly move that backfire to the company, the only SBF crime was entrusting Alameda research into her hands and she messed up everything.

[terrific]

Girls don't know that impermanent loss is only temporary. Don't get everyone winded up about it.

Them hearing the 'loss' is already considered a loss that they have to dodge just like what volatility means to them. Majority of them want is security and assurance for which if they're short term, they won't get it here.

[Miles2006]

I will agree with what’s stated at the last paragraph probably we’ve not heard their names yet the crypto space keep growing with large population but how do you know what gender. It’s so rare seeing topics like this I guess you just wanted more female gender to engage and create influence, creating a big name is not so easy mostly in crypto space.

When you check the top 100 list of richest people, you are going to count a lot of men before you see women among the group and the women wealth are supported by men and some got their wealth from their husbands they divorce as a result of settlement from court. This is to show you that women aren't into finance like the way men are expose and women don't really like complex things like the way Bitcoin is design.

This is not an issue like I mean if they get a clear understanding about bitcoin they might invest even if they don’t have the money or they depend entirely on their husbands money. In situations like this i don’t like generalizing opinions, no doubt most women don’t choose investments like bitcoin due to the risk.

[stomachgrowls]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency?

Of course there eee many women who are bitcoin investors aside the few that you have listed, but having the name of more women listed in the table of the top investor does change anything. Because naturally women don't like online investment but physical investment. They want to be in full /total control of their finances, and they are  security conscious or minded so they don't have that spirit of a man in the of investment. So even if more women are listed here to attract more women investors the female gender may never take it seriously even though I know many will still buy buy it wouldn't make no much difference.

Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

Like I said there is no need. Those that will invest will do and those who will not invest will not also invest. That doesn't change the fact that men are still leading in anything financial system.

Why there's so much talks about what gender like this and like that in speaking about adoption on which we know that this something really that having that inevitable movement yet recognition and attention is really that becoming bigger and bigger as years passing. Doesn't matter on what are the age and gender into those people who do engage with cryptocurrency. This has been created for some obvious reason on which making up that p2p and other utilities on which other projects that offers. People are really just that putting up too much focus on gender and really that believing that women couldn't be able to handle crypto investment.

We do know that there are women investors on this space, it isn't really that obvious just because there's no way on telling on whose behind into those addresses that making up some crypto transactions or simply talking about decentralized and anonymity aspects.

Totally agree.
It depends on the person in question, not on his or her age and definitely not on the gender.
The space is full of wonders without that cut of man / woman 

I do agree on what had been said above in regarding on why people do really always talk about women for them not to be having the rights on dealing up with something just because it is really just that good or available only for men? Cryptocurrency is indeed for anyone and there's no right for other people to stop someone on dealing up with crypto. It will really be just that depending on you whether you do deal
with it or not. Embracing  adoption is a common approach because this is something revolutionary in terms of payment option or in overall about investing purposes on just simply holding it up.  Just like on what lanatsa said above that recognition is something that becoming bigger and bigger as we do go in year by year because it does really give out that kind of chance or opportunity to make profits without having that
involving too much or actions to be made, not unless if you will be dealing up with trading then its something that not all will really be that good at it and have more risk if you dont really know on what you are really that doing.  Just let that adoption go because its something that cant be stopped or something that will really be that becoming small. It is really getting that much attention nowadays and year by year
it will really be that increasing even more and this is something which is a common approach to have.

[passwordnow]

We need more Cathie Wood. Those women that owns huge establishments and have got the real influence in the niche that they are working on. The industries that they are part of and anything they say is being heard of the flock. But this community doesn't really discriminate any gender. Everyone is welcome as long as they want to be part of it. Like what we are here in the community, this forum is open to everybody. We're all in it together and I have seen I think few if there is to none discriminatory issues that have been brought in here. It's actually an upper hand if there will be women that discusses about cryptocurrencies, the web 3 space and blockchain. They will be the voice of those women that aren't heard and they will be the ones to uplift themselves on this society that we are all in even if there will be folks that will continue to discriminate.

[Cryptomultiplier]

There are women who are good Bitcoin investors as neighbors or as wives to the men who invest in and have a core interest in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general, but unless you mean female influencers on this platform, they may not be able to share that information because it is obviously not a gender based dominant investment platform and the topic of cryptocurrency and Bitcoin is what we discuss often and keep abrest with.  

I got googling and founded a whole lot of women/females who are into cryptocurrency hardcore and have made real impacts in the real world of influencing and being good role models to other females.

There's the story about Gracy Chen, who happens to be a female and is one of the best known women in crypto. She was of course recently appointed the new CEO of Bitget.
Let's check out Kathleen Breitman  who is another female and an influential crypto lady. She is a co-founder of the Tezos altcoin platform.
There's are so many women/female influencers both on or off this platform and the Internet is happy to share that information with any person looking for motivation, mostly that gender, but one must be willing  to type in the magic words.

[uneng]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency? Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

In fact, more people need to adopt Bitcoin if they want to get out from the rigged financial system's game. It's not Bitcoin which needs anything, rather it's people who need Bitcoin if they want to thrive and protect their money. Moreover, if we are talking about male or female adopters, it's not really important, as every of them are human beings with needs, dreams and goals in life. There is no reason to make such distinctions, and I fear that if someone is adopting Bitcoin just because an influential personality told them to do so, they are doing this for the wrong reasons...

Part of being a Bitcoin adopter is about being skeptical about influential people dictating tendencies in society, as it's pretty likely these people are in service of the powerful ones on the backgrounds who wish to enslave society for personal gains and overcontrol.

[danadc]

It is a good idea to use more women to worship , Remember the cigarette and alcoholic beverage advertisements, they always refer to women in bathing suits, going to beaches, having a good time in their car, women sell yes, when they are pretty they sell more, but in the world economy it can also give the result, so that bitcoin can be one of the largest adoptions in the world.

Yes, I see it as a good idea , in addition many Women now Fight for causes that are not so good, for certain acceptances that do not make sense, bitcoin does make sense.

[BADecker]

Do we need more influencial women in crypto to help the gender embrace it?


If more influential Bitcoin men embraced their wives more often, maybe more influential women would get into Bitcoin.