Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?

[JayJuanGee]

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

Surely that is individual specific, and yeah, if you over do it, then you will pay financially and perhaps psychologically.

If you are brand new to investing and you only have around 3-ish weeks of back up funds, then maybe you have already been employing a system like that for years before you got involved in bitcoin, so you are already used to it and you can build your bitcoin investment practices and improve you cashflow management systems and/or practices based on your already having some experience.  

If you are barely new to the working world, then you may have more that you need to learn, so you might have to error on keeping some kind of a cash cushion to see how it works.  So maybe if you always had your parents paying for everything, then you are not used to having and/or managing expenses, and parents might help out their kids in this regard, and so you might know how much you may or may not be able to rely on your parent for emergency back up, but if they already told you what they want you to do, they might not be willing to help you if it appears to them that you are not following their guidelines.

You build on what you have, and if you had not really given much consideration to what you have, then you might have to write it down and to organize your thinking on the topic, yet there are some folks who don't want to write anything down, so they think that they can manage their situation based on their memory, which I would consider to be more prone towards making mistakes and surely a person might have to learn by making mistakes if he is not proactive in regards to trying to figure out his various limits and atttept to account for his cashflows and to project them out for 3 to 6 months or even some folks might be advantaged by projecting out 18 months or longer, even though the more important projections will be in the coming few months, but it might be important to have some ideas regarding how future cashflow projections might work out.. and yeah, some folks will be better at it than others, and my own assumption is that 97% or more of normal adults (perhaps older than 18 years) would already have these various math and common sense skills, even though some younger folks might still be learning some of these matters and also trying to figure out their own emotions and hormones and the extent to which they might need to interact with others (such as their peers) to help to figure out some of these kinds of matters that might largely revolve around figuring out their discretionary income and the extent that they are able to invest 4-10 years or longer, which surely the less real world experience that a person has (such as a student or someone living with their parents), then they may have to use their imagination and/or need to experiment with some of the matters in order to learn their limits or to put what they know into practice to see if they might understand what they are doing or if they might have to ask some questions to someone, whose judgment they trust.

I see a lot of posts from various members talking about bitcoin investment theories and cash flow management theories, yet sometimes it can be difficult to know the extent to which they are actually putting their own ideas (or their own interpretation of ideas) into some kind of a meaningful practice... so yeah, with practice we might already know that we are going to make some mistakes, and some kinds of mistakes might be more tolerable than other kinds of mistakes.. .yet putting ideas into practice is likely amongst the best of ways to figure out one's own limitations in light of his own particular circumstances.

By the way, a person who is a student might have several topics that they need to study, and so maybe they dedicate a few hours a week to personal finances and financial management.  Similar things can be true of a person who is in the working world.  Some jobs might require 40-60 hours per week, yet there still can be downtime and there can be time that guys can dedicate to learning their own approach to bitcoin and/or their cashflow management practices.  Sometimes it is not easy to fit in the learning and the practice and the adjustments from time to time that will hopefully be based upon ongoing learning.

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

It would be difficult for JayJuanGee to tell you where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains because he doesn't know how good your discretionary income is, and for him not to tell you the amount that will take you out of the game, you are responsible to figure out your own level of aggressive because you know the size of your discretionary income and the amout you can comfortably use to accumulate bitcoin so that it won't take you out of the game. Being over aggressive is when you are accumulating bitcon with the amount of money that's way more above your discretionary income. So for you not to overdo your aggressive level and take yourself out of the game, always use your discretionary income to accumulate bitcoin and on no count should you use the money meant for your weekly or monthly expenses to accumulate bitcoin.

That is a fair point.

Let's say that your discretionary income tends to be $500 per month, so you consider that you can invest $100 per week, but if you make a mistake and you end up not having enough discretionary income then you might be kind of screwed and maybe you had an emergency fund to bail you out so your emergency fund only had $1k, but then you ended up using $500 to buy bitcoin, and so then you only had $500 left because you had to cover your expenses and then perhaps some kind of a real emergency hit simultaneously and you deplete your emergency fund.. and yeah of course, some folks choose to not keep much if any emergency fund, which sometimes might work out, until it doesn't.

If the mistake is small, then hopefully the guys learn from it, but if the guy had been accumulating bitcoin for 3 years, and then he has to tap into his bitcoin, and perhaps even use all of his BTC during a price drop, he might never be able to replace those BTC and to get them that cheap ever again.. so then maybe it takes him 7 years just to build his BTC holdings back to where it was, and he largely lost 7 years because he could have had double the bitcoin that he had 7 years earlier.. if he had been taking adequate precautions... and some folks are able to partially recover from their mistakes and some folks really overdo their mistake in great ways and might even compound one mistake after another, so that they turn a bad situation into even a worse situation by trying to take additional chances to try to win back their earlier position.

Maybe the TLDR would involve recognizing that each of us has to figure out the border upon which we are investing as aggressive as we can without over doing it.  Of course, if we suffer from a situation in which there were negative consequences either financially or psychologically, then that would be a sign that maybe we over did it... and likely positive or negative financial circumstances are more concrete to measure, yet if we are setting our matters up in such a way that we are contributing to our being really nervous about our set up, then we are likely overdoing it whether it results in negative financial outcomes or not.  We could set up a situation in an overly risky way, but then we end up getting lucky, so we did not suffer negative financial or psychological consequences even though we put our bitcoin at risk through our chosen behaviors.  So we could still end up being lucky even though we over did it and we engaged in bad practices.  

Sometimes the consequences for our overdoing it will be negligible or it could be somewhat damaging or it could be extremely damaging, yet I still consider that we have to figure out our threshold and even how risky that we are personally ready, willing and/or able to be.  There could be some situation where we purposefully decide to throw an additional $1k of our emergency funds into bitcoin (maybe that is 1 month of our expenses), and maybe we ONLY have 3 months in our emergency funds, so then we end up with only 2 months of emergency funds.  We may or may not end up getting lucky, so we have to consider for ourselves if we had overdone it or not and ultimately it is our choice, and if we continue to take a lot of risks it is likely to end up back firing on us, yet if we take risks once in a while (within reason), we might consider that as an acceptable way to carry out our investing and have a bit of spice once in a while from our perspective while realizing that our spice could end up blowing up on us and cause regrets.

[Nightwatchmare]

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

one thing you should understand is that there is nothing like been "aggressive enough to see good gains" when it comes to long term holding of bitcoin, just be consistence in buying bitcoin with your discretionary income you will reach your accumulating target and then hold it for 4 to 10 years or longer. Been "too aggressive to the point it turn risky" is when you start accumulating bitcoin with the funds made for handling your basic needs and expenses or when you start buying bitcoin with your emergency fund after you must have exusted your back up all the name of buying the dips, so no matter aggressive you want don't overdo it just as JJG had said earlier only buy bitcoin aggressively within your level don't go above your level.

Aggressive buying in Bitcoin accumulation is when you exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy. The rate of aggressiveness depends on the amount that you can be able to top up your DCA buying and this is where investors that doesn't understand financial management gets it wrong. In aggressive buying investors need to be smart, they should know if they can afford to buy aggressively, if it will affect their planned budget for their other expenses it is better to stick to their regular DCA accumulation. But if they can pull funds from their other expenses to buy the dip without affecting them negatively then it's a smart move.

Investors doesn't need to "exceed their regular amount for buying Bitcoin in their DCA strategy before they could be seen as investors who are buying aggressively. If you are consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin and even if you don't exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy, you are accumulating Bitcoin aggressively because you are always active in accumulating Bitcoin, and you can never be compared to investors who aren't consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin. The concept of aggressive buy in Bitcoin investment is all about accumulating Bitcoin consistently and persistent, so if you are accumulating Bitcoin with $5 every week, you are aggressively investing in Bitcoin because that is your own level of aggressively. It's when you increase your regular $5 for buying Bitcoin to $10; that's when you are being over aggressive, and it will take you out of the game if you don't stop it early.

[Mr_Brilliant$]

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

one thing you should understand is that there is nothing like been "aggressive enough to see good gains" when it comes to long term holding of bitcoin, just be consistence in buying bitcoin with your discretionary income you will reach your accumulating target and then hold it for 4 to 10 years or longer. Been "too aggressive to the point it turn risky" is when you start accumulating bitcoin with the funds made for handling your basic needs and expenses or when you start buying bitcoin with your emergency fund after you must have exusted your back up all the name of buying the dips, so no matter aggressive you want don't overdo it just as JJG had said earlier only buy bitcoin aggressively within your level don't go above your level.

True bruh, because a lot of people don’t really separate Aggressive from been Reckless.. The truth is, if you’re consistent and disciplined, your stack will grow naturally without you even noticing.. The real danger is when somebody is trying to force the growth, using money that is meant for rent, food, or emergency just because they don’t wanna miss  dip... That one will always lead to regret, because life is not predictable, and once those needs come up, you will end up selling your Bitcoin at the wrong time…. Long term play don’t need pressure, jst simply patience and consistency is enough...

At the same time, I also believe aggressive has its own meaning depending on your financial level…. If you do earn small, your aggressive might still look small compared to another person that earn bigger income…. But the key point is that everybody should know their limit… Bitcoin is not running anywhere, so don’t excessively pressure or kill yourself just because you want to go aggressive.. The best way is jst to balance your hustle, buy steadily, safeguard your life needs, and let time do its work…..

[Gallar]

Investors doesn't need to "exceed their regular amount for buying Bitcoin in their DCA strategy before they could be seen as investors who are buying aggressively. If you are consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin and even if you don't exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy, you are accumulating Bitcoin aggressively because you are always active in accumulating Bitcoin, and you can never be compared to investors who aren't consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin. The concept of aggressive buy in Bitcoin investment is all about accumulating Bitcoin consistently and persistent, so if you are accumulating Bitcoin with $5 every week, you are aggressively investing in Bitcoin because that is your own level of aggressively. It's when you increase your regular $5 for buying Bitcoin to $10; that's when you are being over aggressive, and it will take you out of the game if you don't stop it early.

Maybe what you said is true. But I think the level of aggressiveness of someone investing in bitcoin cannot be equated with buying with the DCA method. Because the DCA method is periodic purchases, which means not buying large amounts at one time. While the aggressive purchase of bitcoin is buying bitcoin with a large enough nominal at one time or at an unspecified time. In my personal opinion, it's like that. Although basically it is true that everyone has a different level of aggressiveness in nominal terms. But still a normal DCA purchase strategy cannot be said to be an aggressive purchase. And in my personal opinion being aggressive when investing in bitcoin is not a problem, as long as the funds it uses are cold money or discretionary funds. Because in my opinion that is the most important point.

[Miramax12]

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

Surely that is individual specific, and yeah, if you over do it, then you will pay financially and perhaps psychologically.

If you are brand new to investing and you only have around 3-ish weeks of back up funds, then maybe you have already been employing a system like that for years before you got involved in bitcoin, so you are already used to it and you can build your bitcoin investment practices and improve you cashflow management systems and/or practices based on your already having some experience.  

If you are barely new to the working world, then you may have more that you need to learn, so you might have to error on keeping some kind of a cash cushion to see how it works.  So maybe if you always had your parents paying for everything, then you are not used to having and/or managing expenses, and parents might help out their kids in this regard, and so you might know how much you may or may not be able to rely on your parent for emergency back up, but if they already told you what they want you to do, they might not be willing to help you if it appears to them that you are not following their guidelines.

You build on what you have, and if you had not really given much consideration to what you have, then you might have to write it down and to organize your thinking on the topic, yet there are some folks who don't want to write anything down, so they think that they can manage their situation based on their memory, which I would consider to be more prone towards making mistakes and surely a person might have to learn by making mistakes if he is not proactive in regards to trying to figure out his various limits and atttept to account for his cashflows and to project them out for 3 to 6 months or even some folks might be advantaged by projecting out 18 months or longer, even though the more important projections will be in the coming few months, but it might be important to have some ideas regarding how future cashflow projections might work out.. and yeah, some folks will be better at it than others, and my own assumption is that 97% or more of normal adults (perhaps older than 18 years) would already have these various math and common sense skills, even though some younger folks might still be learning some of these matters and also trying to figure out their own emotions and hormones and the extent to which they might need to interact with others (such as their peers) to help to figure out some of these kinds of matters that might largely revolve around figuring out their discretionary income and the extent that they are able to invest 4-10 years or longer, which surely the less real world experience that a person has (such as a student or someone living with their parents), then they may have to use their imagination and/or need to experiment with some of the matters in order to learn their limits or to put what they know into practice to see if they might understand what they are doing or if they might have to ask some questions to someone, whose judgment they trust.

I see a lot of posts from various members talking about bitcoin investment theories and cash flow management theories, yet sometimes it can be difficult to know the extent to which they are actually putting their own ideas (or their own interpretation of ideas) into some kind of a meaningful practice... so yeah, with practice we might already know that we are going to make some mistakes, and some kinds of mistakes might be more tolerable than other kinds of mistakes.. .yet putting ideas into practice is likely amongst the best of ways to figure out one's own limitations in light of his own particular circumstances.

By the way, a person who is a student might have several topics that they need to study, and so maybe they dedicate a few hours a week to personal finances and financial management.  Similar things can be true of a person who is in the working world.  Some jobs might require 40-60 hours per week, yet there still can be downtime and there can be time that guys can dedicate to learning their own approach to bitcoin and/or their cashflow management practices.  Sometimes it is not easy to fit in the learning and the practice and the adjustments from time to time that will hopefully be based upon ongoing learning.

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

It would be difficult for JayJuanGee to tell you where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains because he doesn't know how good your discretionary income is, and for him not to tell you the amount that will take you out of the game, you are responsible to figure out your own level of aggressive because you know the size of your discretionary income and the amout you can comfortably use to accumulate bitcoin so that it won't take you out of the game. Being over aggressive is when you are accumulating bitcon with the amount of money that's way more above your discretionary income. So for you not to overdo your aggressive level and take yourself out of the game, always use your discretionary income to accumulate bitcoin and on no count should you use the money meant for your weekly or monthly expenses to accumulate bitcoin.

That is a fair point.

Let's say that your discretionary income tends to be $500 per month, so you consider that you can invest $100 per week, but if you make a mistake and you end up not having enough discretionary income then you might be kind of screwed and maybe you had an emergency fund to bail you out so your emergency fund only had $1k, but then you ended up using $500 to buy bitcoin, and so then you only had $500 left because you had to cover your expenses and then perhaps some kind of a real emergency hit simultaneously and you deplete your emergency fund.. and yeah of course, some folks choose to not keep much if any emergency fund, which sometimes might work out, until it doesn't.

If the mistake is small, then hopefully the guys learn from it, but if the guy had been accumulating bitcoin for 3 years, and then he has to tap into his bitcoin, and perhaps even use all of his BTC during a price drop, he might never be able to replace those BTC and to get them that cheap ever again.. so then maybe it takes him 7 years just to build his BTC holdings back to where it was, and he largely lost 7 years because he could have had double the bitcoin that he had 7 years earlier.. if he had been taking adequate precautions... and some folks are able to partially recover from their mistakes and some folks really overdo their mistake in great ways and might even compound one mistake after another, so that they turn a bad situation into even a worse situation by trying to take additional chances to try to win back their earlier position.

Maybe the TLDR would involve recognizing that each of us has to figure out the border upon which we are investing as aggressive as we can without over doing it.  Of course, if we suffer from a situation in which there were negative consequences either financially or psychologically, then that would be a sign that maybe we over did it... and likely positive or negative financial circumstances are more concrete to measure, yet if we are setting our matters up in such a way that we are contributing to our being really nervous about our set up, then we are likely overdoing it whether it results in negative financial outcomes or not.  We could set up a situation in an overly risky way, but then we end up getting lucky, so we did not suffer negative financial or psychological consequences even though we put our bitcoin at risk through our chosen behaviors.  So we could still end up being lucky even though we over did it and we engaged in bad practices.  

Sometimes the consequences for our overdoing it will be negligible or it could be somewhat damaging or it could be extremely damaging, yet I still consider that we have to figure out our threshold and even how risky that we are personally ready, willing and/or able to be.  There could be some situation where we purposefully decide to throw an additional $1k of our emergency funds into bitcoin (maybe that is 1 month of our expenses), and maybe we ONLY have 3 months in our emergency funds, so then we end up with only 2 months of emergency funds.  We may or may not end up getting lucky, so we have to consider for ourselves if we had overdone it or not and ultimately it is our choice, and if we continue to take a lot of risks it is likely to end up back firing on us, yet if we take risks once in a while (within reason), we might consider that as an acceptable way to carry out our investing and have a bit of spice once in a while from our perspective while realizing that our spice could end up blowing up on us and cause regrets.

It is something a lot of us have to figure out the hard way, i think the line between smart aggression and recklessness usually becomes clearer with experience, for me it comes down to understanding why i am a move if it's based on research. but if i am jumping in because of FOMO hype or pressure from others even indirectly that's a red flag, the moment emotion outweighs logic it gets dangerous. also knowing your own risk tolerance is the key, so many people can stomach wild volatility others can't sleep at night if they are overexposed., but if you are constantly stressed or second guessing you have probably crossed your personal line. at the end of the day, surviving the game is more important than hitting a home run every time, some times playing it a bit safer keep you in the long run where the real gains are made

[HajiBagi]

As in had i know, very painful something. Indecisiveness of many kind, that's why DCA that can buy any time is not only advisable to newbies but everyone.
Trading is more or less like a business that requires capital and daily energy that newbies don't have, while investing requires just  your capital and little or no energy.
People successfully doing trading and investing their profit might not be so many, but successfully trading and Investing profit is a great move but that's not for newbies (as in trading). Because newbies usually do not have the required knowledge and might be wasting hard earned money.

I believe trading is not only highly risky for beginners, but even for professionals, most fail or lose money. Therefore, I don't think trading is the right choice for growing our money. Instead of increasing it, our money could end up depleted and nothing left. Trading is inherently dangerous, and I don't think we should get caught up in it. Quite a few people experience stress from trading crypto. Therefore, it's better to invest in Bitcoin, as investing in Bitcoin doesn't require market analysis. Investing in Bitcoin simply requires accumulation using the DCA strategy. So, the bottom line is, it doesn't need to be complicated. The most important thing is patience, and there's a definite possibility of success in investing in Bitcoin.

In addition to being extremely risky for those who want to make quick money, trading also makes it clear that there is no way to make quick money. As a newbie, you should not allow yourself to be deceived by traders into believing that you can make quick money. Bitcoin has been the best investment for many years, and we will continue to see more evidence that buying bitcoin is the best.

The reason why some novices believe they cannot purchase bitcoin is because, in my opinion, the price has no bearing on investing in it. If you understand bitcoin and have a solid plan for how to purchase it, you will succeed. Bitcoin requires many things, but patience is the best thing that can assist investors in their bitcoin journey.

[Alonso_]

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

Surely that is individual specific, and yeah, if you over do it, then you will pay financially and perhaps psychologically.

If you are brand new to investing and you only have around 3-ish weeks of back up funds, then maybe you have already been employing a system like that for years before you got involved in bitcoin, so you are already used to it and you can build your bitcoin investment practices and improve you cashflow management systems and/or practices based on your already having some experience.  

If you are barely new to the working world, then you may have more that you need to learn, so you might have to error on keeping some kind of a cash cushion to see how it works.  So maybe if you always had your parents paying for everything, then you are not used to having and/or managing expenses, and parents might help out their kids in this regard, and so you might know how much you may or may not be able to rely on your parent for emergency back up, but if they already told you what they want you to do, they might not be willing to help you if it appears to them that you are not following their guidelines.

You build on what you have, and if you had not really given much consideration to what you have, then you might have to write it down and to organize your thinking on the topic, yet there are some folks who don't want to write anything down, so they think that they can manage their situation based on their memory, which I would consider to be more prone towards making mistakes and surely a person might have to learn by making mistakes if he is not proactive in regards to trying to figure out his various limits and atttept to account for his cashflows and to project them out for 3 to 6 months or even some folks might be advantaged by projecting out 18 months or longer, even though the more important projections will be in the coming few months, but it might be important to have some ideas regarding how future cashflow projections might work out.. and yeah, some folks will be better at it than others, and my own assumption is that 97% or more of normal adults (perhaps older than 18 years) would already have these various math and common sense skills, even though some younger folks might still be learning some of these matters and also trying to figure out their own emotions and hormones and the extent to which they might need to interact with others (such as their peers) to help to figure out some of these kinds of matters that might largely revolve around figuring out their discretionary income and the extent that they are able to invest 4-10 years or longer, which surely the less real world experience that a person has (such as a student or someone living with their parents), then they may have to use their imagination and/or need to experiment with some of the matters in order to learn their limits or to put what they know into practice to see if they might understand what they are doing or if they might have to ask some questions to someone, whose judgment they trust.

I see a lot of posts from various members talking about bitcoin investment theories and cash flow management theories, yet sometimes it can be difficult to know the extent to which they are actually putting their own ideas (or their own interpretation of ideas) into some kind of a meaningful practice... so yeah, with practice we might already know that we are going to make some mistakes, and some kinds of mistakes might be more tolerable than other kinds of mistakes.. .yet putting ideas into practice is likely amongst the best of ways to figure out one's own limitations in light of his own particular circumstances.

By the way, a person who is a student might have several topics that they need to study, and so maybe they dedicate a few hours a week to personal finances and financial management.  Similar things can be true of a person who is in the working world.  Some jobs might require 40-60 hours per week, yet there still can be downtime and there can be time that guys can dedicate to learning their own approach to bitcoin and/or their cashflow management practices.  Sometimes it is not easy to fit in the learning and the practice and the adjustments from time to time that will hopefully be based upon ongoing learning.

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

It would be difficult for JayJuanGee to tell you where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains because he doesn't know how good your discretionary income is, and for him not to tell you the amount that will take you out of the game, you are responsible to figure out your own level of aggressive because you know the size of your discretionary income and the amout you can comfortably use to accumulate bitcoin so that it won't take you out of the game. Being over aggressive is when you are accumulating bitcon with the amount of money that's way more above your discretionary income. So for you not to overdo your aggressive level and take yourself out of the game, always use your discretionary income to accumulate bitcoin and on no count should you use the money meant for your weekly or monthly expenses to accumulate bitcoin.

That is a fair point.

Let's say that your discretionary income tends to be $500 per month, so you consider that you can invest $100 per week, but if you make a mistake and you end up not having enough discretionary income then you might be kind of screwed and maybe you had an emergency fund to bail you out so your emergency fund only had $1k, but then you ended up using $500 to buy bitcoin, and so then you only had $500 left because you had to cover your expenses and then perhaps some kind of a real emergency hit simultaneously and you deplete your emergency fund.. and yeah of course, some folks choose to not keep much if any emergency fund, which sometimes might work out, until it doesn't.

If the mistake is small, then hopefully the guys learn from it, but if the guy had been accumulating bitcoin for 3 years, and then he has to tap into his bitcoin, and perhaps even use all of his BTC during a price drop, he might never be able to replace those BTC and to get them that cheap ever again.. so then maybe it takes him 7 years just to build his BTC holdings back to where it was, and he largely lost 7 years because he could have had double the bitcoin that he had 7 years earlier.. if he had been taking adequate precautions... and some folks are able to partially recover from their mistakes and some folks really overdo their mistake in great ways and might even compound one mistake after another, so that they turn a bad situation into even a worse situation by trying to take additional chances to try to win back their earlier position.

Maybe the TLDR would involve recognizing that each of us has to figure out the border upon which we are investing as aggressive as we can without over doing it.  Of course, if we suffer from a situation in which there were negative consequences either financially or psychologically, then that would be a sign that maybe we over did it... and likely positive or negative financial circumstances are more concrete to measure, yet if we are setting our matters up in such a way that we are contributing to our being really nervous about our set up, then we are likely overdoing it whether it results in negative financial outcomes or not.  We could set up a situation in an overly risky way, but then we end up getting lucky, so we did not suffer negative financial or psychological consequences even though we put our bitcoin at risk through our chosen behaviors.  So we could still end up being lucky even though we over did it and we engaged in bad practices.  

Sometimes the consequences for our overdoing it will be negligible or it could be somewhat damaging or it could be extremely damaging, yet I still consider that we have to figure out our threshold and even how risky that we are personally ready, willing and/or able to be.  There could be some situation where we purposefully decide to throw an additional $1k of our emergency funds into bitcoin (maybe that is 1 month of our expenses), and maybe we ONLY have 3 months in our emergency funds, so then we end up with only 2 months of emergency funds.  We may or may not end up getting lucky, so we have to consider for ourselves if we had overdone it or not and ultimately it is our choice, and if we continue to take a lot of risks it is likely to end up back firing on us, yet if we take risks once in a while (within reason), we might consider that as an acceptable way to carry out our investing and have a bit of spice once in a while from our perspective while realizing that our spice could end up blowing up on us and cause regrets.

It is something a lot of us have to figure out the hard way, i think the line between smart aggression and recklessness usually becomes clearer with experience, for me it comes down to understanding why i am a move if it's based on research. but if i am jumping in because of FOMO hype or pressure from others even indirectly that's a red flag, the moment emotion outweighs logic it gets dangerous. also knowing your own risk tolerance is the key, so many people can stomach wild volatility others can't sleep at night if they are overexposed., but if you are constantly stressed or second guessing you have probably crossed your personal line. at the end of the day, surviving the game is more important than hitting a home run every time, some times playing it a bit safer keep you in the long run where the real gains are made

I think we’re over exaggerating and over emphasizing on this Scenario, it’s just as simple of knowing when to stop if we’re choosing to be aggressive and knowing when to be aggressive financially, I think there is nothing absolutely wrong if we want to be aggressive and there are times we can be aggressive and there are also times we might not be aggressive, it depends on when we have more discretionary income to be more aggressive, because there is no way we can be aggressive when we don’t have a discretionary income, and we should be also smart and intelligent enough to know when is the right time to be aggressive and when it’s not the right time to be aggressive.

[Finebone]

I think we’re over exaggerating and over emphasizing on this Scenario, it’s just as simple of knowing when to stop if we’re choosing to be aggressive and knowing when to be aggressive financially, I think there is nothing absolutely wrong if we want to be aggressive and there are times we can be aggressive and there are also times we might not be aggressive, it depends on when we have more discretionary income to be more aggressive, because there is no way we can be aggressive when we don’t have a discretionary income, and we should be also smart and intelligent enough to know when is the right time to be aggressive and when it’s not the right time to be aggressive.

The truth is that buying Bitcoin aggressively is not a bad idea if you are doing it from your discretionary income, it is very good, especially if you are still far away in your accumulation journey,  where the problem usually lies is doing it outside your discretionary income, because by doing that it smells troubles in your ability to hold for a very long time.
Another thing is over doing it without sorting out your basic needs first.

[Tmoonz]

Emergency funds is for solving emergency situations and not for investments. Bitcoin investment is done with a discretionary income and not with an emergency funds.

Right, suppose you are doing DCA and want to invest in Bitcoin regularly but after a few months you suddenly lose your job or you are admitted to the hospital due to an accident. At that moment you need money. So what will you do? You will definitely leave the DCA and when you do not have money, you will also want to withdraw your saved money you held for a few months because you need it. If you had an emergency fund, you could have used that money to get your treatment. Then your Bitcoin investment would not have been interrupted. You would not have to withdraw your Bitcoin. You can say that an emergency fund is not for investment but to support your investment so that it is not interrupted in any way.

You can also invest with an emergency fund when you see that Bitcoin has taken a dip but you will receive your salary or rent with in 2-3 days or you could not withdraw money from the bank for some reason which will reach you in 1 or 2 days. If you use it to buy Bitcoin during such a time gap, It would be appropriate for investment.

I am not always comfortable with the idea of using our emergency funds to do anything other than what it is meant for let alone considering to use it to a Bitcoin dip, it might sound ok to an extend using the emergency funds to take advantage of the dip market with the hope of replenishing it soon but to me it doesn't really pull me out to do that if found in such condition because that seems to be impulsive decision and which you never made any preparations for, I prefer that the emergency funds should be used for the real emergency, while making proper plans for buying the dip intentionally if it so pleases you.

[Loyang]

I think we’re over exaggerating and over emphasizing on this Scenario, it’s just as simple of knowing when to stop if we’re choosing to be aggressive and knowing when to be aggressive financially, I think there is nothing absolutely wrong if we want to be aggressive and there are times we can be aggressive and there are also times we might not be aggressive, it depends on when we have more discretionary income to be more aggressive, because there is no way we can be aggressive when we don’t have a discretionary income, and we should be also smart and intelligent enough to know when is the right time to be aggressive and when it’s not the right time to be aggressive.

The truth is that buying Bitcoin aggressively is not a bad idea if you are doing it from your discretionary income, it is very good, especially if you are still far away in your accumulation journey,  where the problem usually lies is doing it outside your discretionary income, because by doing that it smells troubles in your ability to hold for a very long time.
Another thing is over doing it without sorting out your basic needs first.

To buy aggressively, we have to depend on our financial situation. If we buy without depending on our financial situation, then we may put our holdings in danger later. For example, if we invest with our emergency money, then if we need that amount of money, then we may have to sell our holdings. So it is better to be aggressive depending on our financial situation.

Let me tell you in a little simpler language. As you said, invest aggressively with discretionary income. If you invest with the entire amount of your discretionary income, then you will not be able to create an emergency fund. If your emergency fund is already created, then if you invest with your entire amount of discretionary income and then you have any kind of financial crisis, then you will have to take money from your emergency fund. But it is never right to take money from your emergency fund for these small financial crises. So it is always better to invest 5 to 25% of your discretionary income

[ruykeri]

Of course, each of us is responsible for our own level of aggressiveness, and we should not let pressure from online or groups affect our choices in that there is nothing wrong with being aggressive as long as we do not end up overdoing it.  If we overdo it, then we have to suffer the consequences, and it might be 10 years down the road that we realize that we cannot turn back the clock an hopefully we did what we were able to do without overdoing it and taking ourselves out of the game due to our own overly aggressive screw up(s).

if I may ask, how does someone really decide where to draw the line between being aggressive enough to see good gains and being too aggressive to the point it turns risky?

one thing you should understand is that there is nothing like been "aggressive enough to see good gains" when it comes to long term holding of bitcoin, just be consistence in buying bitcoin with your discretionary income you will reach your accumulating target and then hold it for 4 to 10 years or longer. Been "too aggressive to the point it turn risky" is when you start accumulating bitcoin with the funds made for handling your basic needs and expenses or when you start buying bitcoin with your emergency fund after you must have exusted your back up all the name of buying the dips, so no matter aggressive you want don't overdo it just as JJG had said earlier only buy bitcoin aggressively within your level don't go above your level.

Aggressive buying in Bitcoin accumulation is when you exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy. The rate of aggressiveness depends on the amount that you can be able to top up your DCA buying and this is where investors that doesn't understand financial management gets it wrong. In aggressive buying investors need to be smart, they should know if they can afford to buy aggressively, if it will affect their planned budget for their other expenses it is better to stick to their regular DCA accumulation. But if they can pull funds from their other expenses to buy the dip without affecting them negatively then it's a smart move.

Investors doesn't need to "exceed their regular amount for buying Bitcoin in their DCA strategy before they could be seen as investors who are buying aggressively. If you are consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin and even if you don't exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy, you are accumulating Bitcoin aggressively because you are always active in accumulating Bitcoin, and you can never be compared to investors who aren't consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin. The concept of aggressive buy in Bitcoin investment is all about accumulating Bitcoin consistently and persistent, so if you are accumulating Bitcoin with $5 every week, you are aggressively investing in Bitcoin because that is your own level of aggressively. It's when you increase your regular $5 for buying Bitcoin to $10; that's when you are being over aggressive, and it will take you out of the game if you don't stop it early.

I don't understand what you mean by aggressive investing. Actually, what I mean by aggressive investing is that if someone is investing more than 70% of their discretionary income, then they can be called aggressive investors. And if someone is investing 90% or more of their discretionary income, they can be called over-aggressive investors. Now, who is investing aggressively will depend on their income. So it is a personal decision. The person who is investing will understand for himself whether he is actually investing aggressively or investing normally  with discretionary income by DCA  .

However, I think that in the beginning of investing in Bitcoin, one should invest a little aggressively. So that Bitcoin can be bought with money equal to one year's income in 4 years. This will make it easier to reach the over-accumulation stage. Along with this investment, it is necessary to form an emergency fund and a reserve fund. This way, the Bitcoins that he has accumulated can be retained. And after investing for a long time like this, if he thinks that now I will use this Bitcoin to live my next life, then he can quit his job and through sustainable withdrawal, he can gradually sell Bitcoin and leave for the rest of his life.

[Rhow]

I think we’re over exaggerating and over emphasizing on this Scenario, it’s just as simple of knowing when to stop if we’re choosing to be aggressive and knowing when to be aggressive financially, I think there is nothing absolutely wrong if we want to be aggressive and there are times we can be aggressive and there are also times we might not be aggressive, it depends on when we have more discretionary income to be more aggressive, because there is no way we can be aggressive when we don’t have a discretionary income, and we should be also smart and intelligent enough to know when is the right time to be aggressive and when it’s not the right time to be aggressive.

You cannot be aggressive if you only have discretionary income. It is natural to invest aggressively while looking at the market while investing. If you can analyze the market properly, then you can buy aggressively when the price falls. But if you only have discretionary income but no funds, then you should not invest aggressively. The money left after fulfilling your needs is discretionary income. But if you do not arrange any funds, then you can never be successful in investing, it is wrong to think of aggressive investment.

We may suddenly face financial crisis. So if we cannot deal with that situation, then we have to sell our investments. Which prevents us from being successful investors. We have to continue investing after facing any situation. So first create a fund from discretionary income and then think of aggressive investment.

[Stormisover]

Investors doesn't need to "exceed their regular amount for buying Bitcoin in their DCA strategy before they could be seen as investors who are buying aggressively. If you are consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin and even if you don't exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy, you are accumulating Bitcoin aggressively because you are always active in accumulating Bitcoin, and you can never be compared to investors who aren't consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin. The concept of aggressive buy in Bitcoin investment is all about accumulating Bitcoin consistently and persistent, so if you are accumulating Bitcoin with $5 every week, you are aggressively investing in Bitcoin because that is your own level of aggressively. It's when you increase your regular $5 for buying Bitcoin to $10; that's when you are being over aggressive, and it will take you out of the game if you don't stop it early.

Maybe what you said is true. But I think the level of aggressiveness of someone investing in bitcoin cannot be equated with buying with the DCA method. Because the DCA method is periodic purchases, which means not buying large amounts at one time. While the aggressive purchase of bitcoin is buying bitcoin with a large enough nominal at one time or at an unspecified time. In my personal opinion, it's like that. Although basically it is true that everyone has a different level of aggressiveness in nominal terms. But still a normal DCA purchase strategy cannot be said to be an aggressive purchase. And in my personal opinion being aggressive when investing in bitcoin is not a problem, as long as the funds it uses are cold money or discretionary funds. Because in my opinion that is the most important point.

You are wrong here mate and I don't agree with you Buying with a larger amount doesn't only necessarily defines aggressive purchases of Bitcoin, some one that is consistent in their DCA purchases of Bitcoin can also be considered to be aggressive in purchasing Bitcoin, the idea is that the amount you might be considering to be a small amount can be seen to be big in the eyes of another person and while everyone has a different level of aggressiveness, so you can't generalize that aggressive buying of Bitcoin is only limited to buying with a larger amount.

[Bigjoe33]

Bitcoin is low guys should endeavor to buy more now , anyone of us could buy aggressively if they have more discretion fund Bitcoin may be expensive tomorrow and people will start complaining that it's too expensive. Bitcoin has already Hit an ATH of $124k and we hoped to see $150k by the end of this year even though we are not sure yet but there is still more buying opportunity now than tomorrow. Last year Bitcoin was less than $60k this Year it was $124k, who knows what the price will be by 2026 and more years to come by then we will see that we have made a big mistake yesterday by not taking advantage of the buying opportunity. Today is that yesterday we will remember tomorrow , so let's embrace BTC now and accumulate more. up BTC....!! happy new month guy's.

Yea, accumulation of Bitcoin in the dip period is a cool one. By the time it appreciates, aggressive buyers would have gotten something tangible added to their portfolio. But off course, this will depend on the level of your discretionary saved up or an extra income saved specially in preparation for dips. I wouldn't support buying to stack up and increase portfolio with normal income which will affect your need to settle basic necessities or unexpected expenditures that will emanate later. An investor buying in dips must have prepared for it or has an extra income saved up for the purpose. This is to avoid panic buying and suffer later..

[Sim_card]

Maybe what you said is true. But I think the level of aggressiveness of someone investing in bitcoin cannot be equated with buying with the DCA method. Because the DCA method is periodic purchases, which means not buying large amounts at one time. While the aggressive purchase of bitcoin is buying bitcoin with a large enough nominal at one time or at an unspecified time. In my personal opinion, it's like that. Although basically it is true that everyone has a different level of aggressiveness in nominal terms. But still a normal DCA purchase strategy cannot be said to be an aggressive purchase.

It seems that you don't understand what it means to buy bitcoin aggressively with your discretionary income and you are taking it to be a lump sum purchase. Don't get it twisted, you can DCA aggressively too, you can buy at the dip aggressively it all depends on the investor financial situation playing out at that moment and how he chooses to be aggressive with hia bitcoin accumulation journey.

Aggressive buying bitcoin means that you are buying with a larger amount from your discretionary income weekly/monthly or occasionally. For example, if my discretionary income is $100 and I choose to buy bitcoin with $80 every week with DCA, I am buying aggressively. Somwone who is using $50 and below to buy bitcoin when he has a discretionary income of $100 is not buying aggressively.

Therefore it is not buying once with all your discretionary income that is aggressive buying. Some people will have a $100 dollar discretionary income and prefer to use only $30 for their regular DCA and keep like $50 weekly to buy aggressively whenever there's a dip with the $50 that they have been keeping aside. But I don't like being aggressive during the dip. I love buying aggressively with DCA provided that the money is available.

It's when you over buy aggressively beyond your discretionary income that it becomes a big problem to you.

[ndutndut]

Emergency funds is for solving emergency situations and not for investments. Bitcoin investment is done with a discretionary income and not with an emergency funds.

Right, suppose you are doing DCA and want to invest in Bitcoin regularly but after a few months you suddenly lose your job or you are admitted to the hospital due to an accident. At that moment you need money. So what will you do? You will definitely leave the DCA and when you do not have money, you will also want to withdraw your saved money you held for a few months because you need it. If you had an emergency fund, you could have used that money to get your treatment. Then your Bitcoin investment would not have been interrupted. You would not have to withdraw your Bitcoin. You can say that an emergency fund is not for investment but to support your investment so that it is not interrupted in any way.

You can also invest with an emergency fund when you see that Bitcoin has taken a dip but you will receive your salary or rent with in 2-3 days or you could not withdraw money from the bank for some reason which will reach you in 1 or 2 days. If you use it to buy Bitcoin during such a time gap, It would be appropriate for investment.

I am not always comfortable with the idea of using our emergency funds to do anything other than what it is meant for let alone considering to use it to a Bitcoin dip, it might sound ok to an extend using the emergency funds to take advantage of the dip market with the hope of replenishing it soon but to me it doesn't really pull me out to do that if found in such condition because that seems to be impulsive decision and which you never made any preparations for, I prefer that the emergency funds should be used for the real emergency, while making proper plans for buying the dip intentionally if it so pleases you.

Everyone's approach to this will be different. It's certainly a good idea to set aside emergency funds for emergencies, not divert them to other things. But it's also important to know how much you're saving for emergency funds? Is it equivalent to six months of income? Emergency funds should also have a limit, so it's best not to keep too much money in the emergency fund.

If the strategy is to use monthly income and allocate it for needs, emergency funds, and Bitcoin DCA, once the emergency fund is sufficient for the next six months, if you have any extra money the following month, don't save it for the emergency fund; instead, divert it to wait for a Bitcoin price drop. By this, I mean that we shouldn't focus so much on the emergency fund that we miss out on Bitcoin's declining momentum.

[Bigjoe33]

Investors doesn't need to "exceed their regular amount for buying Bitcoin in their DCA strategy before they could be seen as investors who are buying aggressively. If you are consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin and even if you don't exceed your regular amount for buying Bitcoin in your DCA strategy, you are accumulating Bitcoin aggressively because you are always active in accumulating Bitcoin, and you can never be compared to investors who aren't consistent and persistent in accumulating Bitcoin. The concept of aggressive buy in Bitcoin investment is all about accumulating Bitcoin consistently and persistent, so if you are accumulating Bitcoin with $5 every week, you are aggressively investing in Bitcoin because that is your own level of aggressively. It's when you increase your regular $5 for buying Bitcoin to $10; that's when you are being over aggressive, and it will take you out of the game if you don't stop it early.

Maybe what you said is true. But I think the level of aggressiveness of someone investing in bitcoin cannot be equated with buying with the DCA method. Because the DCA method is periodic purchases, which means not buying large amounts at one time. While the aggressive purchase of bitcoin is buying bitcoin with a large enough nominal at one time or at an unspecified time.

Your points are not disputed, but think about it this way, someone who accumulates Bitcoin consistently using the DCA strategy, buying at least up to 5-10% of his income from his discretionary funds, and someone who waits only for dips and buys aggressively from his income using up to 50%, who buys aggressively and who would acquire more Bitcoin in the long run?

Secondly, you know that what Mr A might call aggressive buying can be what Mr B would use as little fraction for accumulating Bitcoin using the DCA. It all depends on the income supply and discretionary income made available by the investor as income differs. So my investment using DCA through discretionary might be someone elses Aggressive buying. So we can't not really say that the level of aggressiveness of someone investing in Bitcoin cannot be equated with buying with the DCA just as you stated above. A consistent DCA Bitcoin accumulator can in a LONG RUN outbuy an investor that only operates in the Dip.

[Dunamisx]

Over time now, I've got to learn on so many things regarding investment, we should not be influenced by our decision base on what others are doing , instead we should sit more tight to discover on how we could also adopt a strategy that may best fit in for our investment and then work on it until we made it a reality, many have been so entangled by what others are doing and they don't seem to understand what is ahead of them or expected of them to do at some point while investing.

That is why before we can invest, we have to learn more and more, understand the nature of the markets and have the ability to hold and make right decisions that could contribute more to our interest than being on losses, we may think all these don't count, but at last, they do, since the decisions made by us today will always be a reflection of what we see tomorrow, because there is no magic in what we do, but we have to be intended for making the right choice investing.

[Pandorak]

As in had i know, very painful something. Indecisiveness of many kind, that's why DCA that can buy any time is not only advisable to newbies but everyone.
Trading is more or less like a business that requires capital and daily energy that newbies don't have, while investing requires just  your capital and little or no energy.
People successfully doing trading and investing their profit might not be so many, but successfully trading and Investing profit is a great move but that's not for newbies (as in trading). Because newbies usually do not have the required knowledge and might be wasting hard earned money.

I believe trading is not only highly risky for beginners, but even for professionals, most fail or lose money. Therefore, I don't think trading is the right choice for growing our money. Instead of increasing it, our money could end up depleted and nothing left. Trading is inherently dangerous, and I don't think we should get caught up in it. Quite a few people experience stress from trading crypto. Therefore, it's better to invest in Bitcoin, as investing in Bitcoin doesn't require market analysis. Investing in Bitcoin simply requires accumulation using the DCA strategy. So, the bottom line is, it doesn't need to be complicated. The most important thing is patience, and there's a definite possibility of success in investing in Bitcoin.

The fact is that not everyone has the patience and willingness to hold on. People are just looking for quick ways to make money, and they use that as their main excuse, until they end up losing money when trading in the market. It must be realized that trading is not an easy path to profit. The risk of failure is high, and psychological pressure often drains energy and capital. Not everyone is prepared to face such a big risk.

Initially, they may have seen Bitcoin prices as too expensive, and when they saw prices drop, it turned some people into traders. Since they were lucky enough to buy Bitcoin when prices fell, they would try to outsmart the market and sell it as soon as they saw Bitcoin prices rise slightly. But we know that the end result for these people is regret.

There is no point in making any analysis. Once you have a basic understanding of Bitcoin and how to accumulate it, you are ready. Buy when your discretionary income is available, use the DCA method to accumulate it, invest with a long-term goal, and hold it for at least 4-10 years or more to maximize profits.

[jems]

Over time now, I've got to learn on so many things regarding investment, we should not be influenced by our decision base on what others are doing , instead we should sit more tight to discover on how we could also adopt a strategy that may best fit in for our investment and then work on it until we made it a reality, many have been so entangled by what others are doing and they don't seem to understand what is ahead of them or expected of them to do at some point while investing.

That is why before we can invest, we have to learn more and more, understand the nature of the markets and have the ability to hold and make right decisions that could contribute more to our interest than being on losses, we may think all these don't count, but at last, they do, since the decisions made by us today will always be a reflection of what we see tomorrow, because there is no magic in what we do, but we have to be intended for making the right choice investing.

Early self-awareness is crucial for determining your future, and I believe that choosing the best investment is one of the most important things to develop.
However, the most difficult aspect isn't the awareness itself or the planning involved, but rather the consistency in implementing the initial plans. This is always a challenge for investors, regardless of whether they understand the market situation. However, when significant movements occur, there can be fluctuations between fear and fear. So, I believe that factors beyond the technical aspects of investing are also crucial, such as self-control.