How many times all-in save your bankroll?

[alegotardo]

I knew that most of us here experienced doing an all-in bet whenever when we are already down significantly amount of our bankroll and already get tired to slowly earn back your losses.

I’ve done this several times and I manage to save my bankroll to profit/breakeven greater than suffering a total loss. I usually use the craps or mines to do the all-in bet to have a potential profit greater than x2 while I have more lifeline for my bet rather than a straight bet with x2 multiplier.

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

It has certainly saved me several times.
I'm the type of player who doesn't like to suffer from several small defeats when the remaining balance is insignificant. I prefer to bet everything I have at once and resign myself to a possible defeat and then go do something else, but then the sites are very mean to me... they make me win just to cheer me up again and then slowly suck me away my profits... another all-in and again a win... I've done this three times in a row and in the end I lost everything again

This type of all-in is the best there is, as it gives us a second chance when we are already resigned to defeat. Several times I've thought that the site manipulated the results just to make me win and make me play some more

[1714476497]

1714476497

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I knew that most of us here experienced doing an all-in bet whenever when we are already down significantly amount of our bankroll and already get tired to slowly earn back your losses.

I’ve done this several times and I manage to save my bankroll to profit/breakeven greater than suffering a total loss. I usually use the craps or mines to do the all-in bet to have a potential profit greater than x2 while I have more lifeline for my bet rather than a straight bet with x2 multiplier.

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

Not a regular gambler though, but actually, I usually have gotten to that stage where I just go all in with my entire bankroll, simply because I've lost most part of my bankroll and already tired of playing, and just wanna either loss everything at ones so that I could rest, or win back all I've lost in one game, so that I could find motivation to keep playing..

But unfortunately, the several times I've tried or did the all bet bet, I usually end up losing it all, that is, the entire remaining balance in my bankroll, though this have never been a problem to me, since I even tend to like it as it allows me time to rest from possibly the long hours I've spent playing.

Yeah, In this regard of all in bets, I've never been lucky to say I won just when I bet everything, I mostly lose, but this have never bothered me in any way.
And yeah, the games are most slot or casino games, no game name in particular.

[Hirose UK]

In fact, using all the money have for just one bet is not recommended attitude because when mistake occurs, all the money will be lost and in the end disappointment is the condition we experience.
But some gamblers always do this when they are desperate for player or gambler who always loses and go all in to try their last luck because if they succeed it means big win.

But I myself think everything is the same, whether it casino games or sports betting, both have experiences that are not much different when it comes to betting amounts.
But I don't think I done it for long time when betting all in and only bad results always happen so since then I thought to damn with betting all in and prioritized fun and satisfaction in playing and betting more.

[Poker Player]

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

The bankroll is there precisely to prevent you from having to do that. When you get down to half or less of your initial bankroll what you have to do is to downgrade or reduce the size of the bet. If you are making $1 bets and you have a starting bankroll of $100, the moment you reach $50 you have to go down to $0.50 bet. That's what we do in poker to avoid the risk of bankruptcy and I have had no problem for many years to go down a level but the anxious ones that look for emotions and don't understand well what a bankroll is for instead of reducing the size of the bet continue playing with the same one and go all in, for that you better not even use a bankroll.

[Outhue]

I knew that most of us here experienced doing an all-in bet whenever when we are already down significantly amount of our bankroll and already get tired to slowly earn back your losses.

I’ve done this several times and I manage to save my bankroll to profit/breakeven greater than suffering a total loss. I usually use the craps or mines to do the all-in bet to have a potential profit greater than x2 while I have more lifeline for my bet rather than a straight bet with a x2 multiplier.

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

If you are looking for the fastest destruction through gambling, do the all-in gambling strategy, and you will see what will happen, this is the most stupidly risky gambling strategy that I know, its not what it.

It's good for desperate people, who want to get punished one way or the other, I will surely recommend doing such a thing, but not a good thing for someone who wants to be responsible with gambling.

The question I will ask such people is what are they running after? Life isn't this hard why would anyone want to just ruin everything with just one decision? A smart gambler will want more chances when gambling, they will manage their bankroll and use the slow down method when their bankroll keeps going down.

With your bankroll, the lower the money you risk the more the rounds you can keep going, and with the more chances you have you can eventually still win before you run out of money, compare it to going all in.

[Finestream]

I knew that most of us here experienced doing an all-in bet whenever when we are already down significantly amount of our bankroll and already get tired to slowly earn back your losses.

I’ve done this several times and I manage to save my bankroll to profit/breakeven greater than suffering a total loss. I usually use the craps or mines to do the all-in bet to have a potential profit greater than x2 while I have more lifeline for my bet rather than a straight bet with x2 multiplier.

I could not count anymore but one thing I'm sure is that every time I go all in, I loss most of the time. I guess that's just the outcome of being indiscipline in gambling, bankroll are suppose to be manage seriously that it will grow or last longer, but whenever we think of "all-in", this is just a desperate more which over 50% we lost most of the time.

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

Any kind of game but I'll get easily frustrated with casino games, quick results that put me in a losing streak, that will trigger me to all in sometimes.

[OceanBit]

Personally, I've never tried going all-in, it's too risky. I prefer to stick to smaller bets to minimize potential losses and to manage my bankroll. It's important to find a strategy that works best for you and for you to track your progress.

[Agbamoni]

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

Virtua gambling on sports or dog racing. This has been the only period i have gone all in before. And the reason for going all in was because i see no use of the money left ater i have lost so much so i made a conclusion that if i needed to lost then let it be. I tried to hit a strong odd with the last amount and luckily i won the bet. Which brought me back to my bankroll added with some little profit. Although it did not end there. I continued gambling again gradually but this time lower risk and low amount so i won't get to lose everything again. I'll stop the story here lol i don't say how it all ended that day

[Rampagoe004]

I knew that most of us here experienced doing an all-in bet whenever when we are already down significantly amount of our bankroll and already get tired to slowly earn back your losses.

I’ve done this several times and I manage to save my bankroll to profit/breakeven greater than suffering a total loss. I usually use the craps or mines to do the all-in bet to have a potential profit greater than x2 while I have more lifeline for my bet rather than a straight bet with x2 multiplier.

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

When I lose my money, I will also go all-in but using small bets. I will not make a deposit to go all-in to recover my losses. I usually like to play on Mines, Tower master, and Blaze. I often win my all-in bets on Blaze. But that doesn't mean I can always win all-in. Sometimes I also experience defeat and I lose all my money. It is better not to hope for an all-in win because you will still lose your money. Maybe you will even lose more.

[slaman29]

Never counted, but my experience is mainly on Freebitco.in site. Obviously allin saved me many times. But you only need to lose 1 time to make it all worthless And believe me I only resort to allin more and more rare these days. I get older and wiser. Now I have set target to lose, and never deposit anything more once gone.

I actually allin several times even on Sportsbet.io and on Blackjack.fun. You can even look at both ANN threads and you will see proof of it, I just can't dig it up. All the times here ended up losing everything in the end, so you know from my experience you don't allin to save anything if you're wise.

Unless, you are like me as you're playing with money you can afford to lose

[TopTort777]

During my gambling experience, all-in never saved my bankroll, in fact most of all-ins ended loosing I rarely go all-in, and do that usually when most of the bank is lost and I am about to finish gambling session. My all-ins are sort of a "put and dot and pause gambling for today". Besides, most of my all-ins were extremely risky, with little chance win. Saving bankroll means that user has already lost quite a lot. Doing all-in in such case means betting with somewhere close to x3-x5 win chance. That is really hard to win this. That is why I think there will be little examples when all-ins saved users.

[moneystery]

i understand that many gamblers go all in to be able to return the capital they have and some of them succeed in doing that, but others end up losing badly and ultimately regretting their decision. and because the risk is too big, i prefer not to go all in to restore my bankroll. i'm not really sure that when i go all in whether it will actually win or not, so i prefer to play it safe and not go all in to restore my bankroll.

[Coin_trader]

Been there done that. I’m doing this whenever I use a small bankroll because I have a shorter allowance for my losses if I play slowly on low bankroll. I never done this with a huge bankroll but I manage to recover one time from 4500$ down to 2000$ profit through the use of my remaining 500$ bet that I keep rollover play for consecutive bet on Blackjack.

All-in bet is not advisable in general because you are letting the casino to easily beat you due to the house edge. It’s better to play slowly to farm more wager for VIP benefits rather than all-in and risk everything your bankroll without getting enough wager volume.

Simply waste of money but you save time in fairness. 

[Strongkored]

All in is not my style even though I have done it a few times in dice and slot games as well as sports betting but that is more when I feel bored and also quite disappointed with the results so I want to finish the game session at that time, and so far everything has gone badly because it is the end of the game and never I feel like I can increase my bankroll.
I see several players who can produce good things when doing all-in, but I doubt that it will always go well because it could be just a coincidence and of the many who do it, only a few can produce good results, and often they are all in is a form of frustration seeing disappointing results.

[angrybirdy]

i understand that many gamblers go all in to be able to return the capital they have and some of them succeed in doing that, but others end up losing badly and ultimately regretting their decision. and because the risk is too big, i prefer not to go all in to restore my bankroll. i'm not really sure that when i go all in whether it will actually win or not, so i prefer to play it safe and not go all in to restore my bankroll.

I haven't experience that kind of betting strategy too, and I also decided not to follow that steps because I might ended up broken If I do that, I'm not a risk taker either. when I gamble, I always first think about all the moves I will make so that I am not like the other people I gamble with who make wrong decisions because of their impulsiveness, They are much focused on the last money they have. For me, if you are in doubt about the actions you are going to take, it is better not to continue because if luck does not approach you, you may have used up all the money you have. No matter what type of gambling, it is difficult to lose all your money because you are taking a huge risk.

[Su-asa]

In fact, using all the money have for just one bet is not recommended attitude because when mistake occurs, all the money will be lost and in the end disappointment is the condition we experience.
But some gamblers always do this when they are desperate for player or gambler who always loses and go all in to try their last luck because if they succeed it means big win.

But I myself think everything is the same, whether it casino games or sports betting, both have experiences that are not much different when it comes to betting amounts.
But I don't think I done it for long time when betting all in and only bad results always happen so since then I thought to damn with betting all in and prioritized fun and satisfaction in playing and betting more.

You are right, using the whole money you have for a single bet is always dangerous, even if the previous performance of the games are good there's still a possibility of lose in them because that's what makes it called gambling, if they are something that's sure it wouldn't have been called gamble/bets. As long as you can not afford to lose your whole money on anything called bet you shouldn't try it at all as it will ruin your career unless opportunity meets you again in future. There are people that bets with their life savings and they ended up taking their own life by themselves because they can't take the shame of poverty. If gamble is a thing of fun I don't think one should do it if they know it will not end well for them.

[coin-investor]

What game is your favorite to do this and what’s your record so far if you can still track it?

Many times I did this, there were times out of frustration and desperation, because you have a long losing run and you just want to call it a day and get several days off and I just want zero bankrolls there were times I got lucky, and recover half of my losses, every time I recover a portion of my losses I just call it a day, it's better to have some than nothing at all

The best game to do this for me is Crash and Dice, these are the times when you don't care and just want it to be over and accept the outcome, I do this when I'm tired because it has become a roller coaster outcome of you win you lose then you lose, you just want to end the cycle so it will be over and you know if you're lucky or not on that given session.

[Chibit01]

In fact, using all the money have for just one bet is not recommended attitude because when mistake occurs, all the money will be lost and in the end disappointment is the condition we experience.
But some gamblers always do this when they are desperate for player or gambler who always loses and go all in to try their last luck because if they succeed it means big win.

But I myself think everything is the same, whether it casino games or sports betting, both have experiences that are not much different when it comes to betting amounts.
But I don't think I done it for long time when betting all in and only bad results always happen so since then I thought to damn with betting all in and prioritized fun and satisfaction in playing and betting more.

You are right, using the whole money you have for a single bet is always dangerous, even if the previous performance of the games are good there's still a possibility of lose in them because that's what makes it called gambling, if they are something that's sure it wouldn't have been called gamble/bets. As long as you can not afford to lose your whole money on anything called bet you shouldn't try it at all as it will ruin your career unless opportunity meets you again in future. There are people that bets with their life savings and they ended up taking their own life by themselves because they can't take the shame of poverty. If gamble is a thing of fun I don't think one should do it if they know it will not end well for them.

staking all your money is something I see as a uncalculated risk assessment which is very wrong from as a gambler you don't stake all your resources in a game because this is a game of luck you don't just have to believe and depend on luck by staking all your money...

It is very dangerous in using all your money to stake a single game that you know is probably going for win or lose...

We should also understand that no one controls this game to even tell or advice you play a game with all your money it is very wrong for me so comrade what you are saying is absolutely right......

[Julien_Olynpic]

I think the All-in game is too risky. To practice this at all, and even more so to practice it often enough. I don't know why people resort to this strategy. This may be acceptable in trading, where the player does not lose his bet if he uses a stop loss. In gambling, the player irreversibly loses his funds in case of loss. There is no way for you to prevent your losses. And in general, the All-in strategy is crazy enough to use. In fact, this is a type of martingale and this is what strategists use within the framework of martingale. And we all know that martingale inevitably leads to the loss of all funds at a distance.

[bitbollo]

as much as it "may" save my bankroll, I have to say that it is still a huge risk and it is more the "damage" than the real gain...
it certainly has been useful in some cases, but in the end this is just a desperate move that is far away from the fundamental concept of money management! I don't think that crazy moves are really useful for gambling.