✅ [UFC Stream] AnonBet.net - No-KYC Slots & Sports Betting with Bitcoin ✅

[anonbet.net]

Hello, everybody,

Our initial bad rap stemmed primarily from notblox1's thread and accusations. Understandably, a lot of users would be suspicious, but nobody was as quick to conclude we are definitely scammers while giving away money and having stolen nothing. We have placed a 24-hour ultimatum on the once-active notblox1 in their scam accusation thread. We invite you to follow how it goes - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5496943.msg64109328#msg64109328. We don't ask you to stay behind us, even though that is our end goal. We simply ask for the truth.

Thank you, decodx, for sharing your experience with us. We invite everybody else to come out, too. As of one hour ago, there were no pending withdrawals. Even though we have temporarily extended our window for approval to 72 hours, all of the withdrawals so far have been handled much quicker. The only ones who had to wait for around 30 hours were accounts that attempted to withdraw to the same address other accounts used, or deposited directly from an address another user had used for withdrawal. They have had their initial deposits sent back to them, but not the free spin profits.

We have removed the 20 free spins from our post as to not mislead anybody. You can still pay the demo slots with virtual money and reset them at any time. One of the dirtiest ways it was exploited was, people would play from, say 3, different accounts and collect their profits to their account. Then they would pick a, say football game, bet on team 1 from account 1, bet on team 2 from account 2 and bet on draw from account 3. Whichever account wins the bet, would then receive a minimal deposit, and withdraw the bet-scaled funds. Some were even craftier and combined multiple bets from more than 3 accounts. We saw this coming but we certainly underestimated how much it would cost us. Still, we paid out as it was our fault.

The issue cantsay is experiencing will be escalated to support. Do not hesitate to open tickets there, too

[notblox1]

We have placed a 24-hour ultimatum on the once-active notblox1 in their scam accusation thread.

What does once active mean?
That topic was created 4 days ago, I am going to continue with normal activity, and I dont like any ultimatums  
After you finally sent me requested coins manually I will wait to see if anyone else report that he could not withdraw coins, than I will consider removing my flag.
Negative feedback is a different story with doing latest reset of user balance to zero, and everything else happening on your casino.

[Bitinity]

By the way, @Anonbet.net I think there is a bug in your system, I had some balance in my account and after spinning for some time it got to $1 (which is the bet amount) but when I click on “play” I got an “insufficient funds” notification and the 1$ was still there.

Check if it’s a bug and try to fix it.

I have not created an account here and I'm wondering about the minimum bet of the slot game. Is this $1 ($0.1 per line for 10 lines) the minimum one without any option to reduce it? If it is true, this slot must be for medium to high roller players only because most other slot games even from 3rd party provider has lower minimum bet. In average, I can say that we can bet as low as $0.1 per spins in other slots no matter how many lines are in the games.
Now since the free spins bonus has been removed, what will be the thing to consider by players to play in this site? Is there any other attractive things offered by this site to make players come and play then stay as long as possible?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

By the way, @Anonbet.net I think there is a bug in your system, I had some balance in my account and after spinning for some time it got to $1 (which is the bet amount) but when I click on “play” I got an “insufficient funds” notification and the 1$ was still there.

Check if it’s a bug and try to fix it.

I have not created an account here and I'm wondering about the minimum bet of the slot game. Is this $1 ($0.1 per line for 10 lines) the minimum one without any option to reduce it? If it is true, this slot must be for medium to high roller players only because most other slot games even from 3rd party provider has lower minimum bet. In average, I can say that we can bet as low as $0.1 per spins in other slots no matter how many lines are in the games.
Now since the free spins bonus has been removed, what will be the thing to consider by players to play in this site? Is there any other attractive things offered by this site to make players come and play then stay as long as possible?

With the casino already getting a red tag here on the forum from a notable and respected user' notblox, I am wondering what or why any body will still be interested in signing up, depositing and playing on this casino.

First, I think we should already get used to the fact that it's only potential scam casinos that will around now and claim to offer kyc free gambling experience to gamblers, this I believe they do to attract gamblers, knowing fully well that gamblers hate being asked to pass kyc verification most especially at the time when they win and decide to withdraw funds.

If any one is still going to find this casino attractive to join after the have removed the sign up bonus/free spins offered to new users, it's going to be based on the fact they claim to be kyc free, but then, the chances are high that this casino may end up going pop in the future as soon as they gather enough money from gamblers.

[anonbet.net]

We have placed a 24-hour ultimatum on the once-active notblox1 in their scam accusation thread.

What does once active mean?
That topic was created 4 days ago, I am going to continue with normal activity, and I dont like any ultimatums  
After you finally sent me requested coins manually I will wait to see if anyone else report that he could not withdraw coins, than I will consider removing my flag.
Negative feedback is a different story with doing latest reset of user balance to zero, and everything else happening on your casino.

We again appeal everybody who has deposited or withdrawn to come forward and just share the fact! But as you said, we are at least happy there is nobody complaining about not withdrawing, as sure they would have if they existed

[decodx]

By the way, @Anonbet.net I think there is a bug in your system, I had some balance in my account and after spinning for some time it got to $1 (which is the bet amount) but when I click on “play” I got an “insufficient funds” notification and the 1$ was still there.

Check if it’s a bug and try to fix it.

The "bug" is that you actually have less than $1 available for betting, but due to rounding, the casino displays the closest amount. Try to reduce the number of lines so that your total bet amount is less than $1 and try to play again.

I have not created an account here and I'm wondering about the minimum bet of the slot game. Is this $1 ($0.1 per line for 10 lines) the minimum one without any option to reduce it? If it is true, this slot must be for medium to high roller players only because most other slot games even from 3rd party provider has lower minimum bet. In average, I can say that we can bet as low as $0.1 per spins in other slots no matter how many lines are in the games.

It's true. the minimum bet amount is $0.10 per line, but this does not mean that you have to play all ten lines for each spin. You can, for example, choose a single line and your bet per spin will be $0.10.

With the casino already getting a red tag here on the forum from a notable and respected user' notblox, I am wondering what or why any body will still be interested in signing up, depositing and playing on this casino.

First, I think we should already get used to the fact that it's only potential scam casinos that will around now and claim to offer kyc free gambling experience to gamblers, this I believe they do to attract gamblers, knowing fully well that gamblers hate being asked to pass kyc verification most especially at the time when they win and decide to withdraw funds.

If any one is still going to find this casino attractive to join after the have removed the sign up bonus/free spins offered to new users, it's going to be based on the fact they claim to be kyc free, but then, the chances are high that this casino may end up going pop in the future as soon as they gather enough money from gamblers.

I respect notblox's perspective and understand his motivation for cautioning others about this casino after his own negative experience.  However, if we're being fully honest, any new platform poses some level of risk - the possibility exists for users' funds to essentially disappear for a variety of reasons. 

That said, I successfully withdrew my winnings from AnonBet myself, and Im clearly not the only one who has done so without issue thus far...  even still, building a reputable brand and earning community trust takes time.  Just because some have had positive encounters doesn't necessarily make it an established or respectable company just yet.  Perhaps with more time and additional positive user experiences, concerns about this casino will subside.

[xLays]

We have placed a 24-hour ultimatum on the once-active notblox1 in their scam accusation thread.

What does once active mean?
That topic was created 4 days ago, I am going to continue with normal activity, and I dont like any ultimatums  
After you finally sent me requested coins manually I will wait to see if anyone else report that he could not withdraw coins, than I will consider removing my flag.
Negative feedback is a different story with doing latest reset of user balance to zero, and everything else happening on your casino.

We again appeal everybody who has deposited or withdrawn to come forward and just share the fact! But as you said, we are at least happy there is nobody complaining about not withdrawing, as sure they would have if they existed

It's good that the negative tag rating on your bitcointalk account has been removed and resolved, but even so, there will surely still be cautionary note that makes gamblers here think twice about using your site. Now, it would be better to focus on improving your website's design, especially for mobile users. Not gonna lie, your website looks bad.

[anonbet.net]

Hello, everybody,

As to Betinity's question, we thank decodx for answering correctly - the minimum bet per line is 0.10$ and thus the minimum spin cost is 0.10$ (playing only 1 line).

As to the issue Cantsay state they are experiencing, there could be a rounding reason for failure when transfering from your profile to the slots machine. For example, your bitcoin is worth 49.996$ so it displays as 50$ but it is actually not. We are soon going to fix this display issue but it is not really a bug. Another possible reason is the BTC rate might have changed so refreshing should show you the accurete amount you have. But this not happen when funds are already in the slots, the slots balance shows funds available but then doesn't spin. We are not sure what the case is exactly. We would appreciate if Cantsay would open a support ticket describing their issue and the browser they use. We don't know what their account is. Please make sure to use a Firefox-based browser.

Thank you, xLays, our team is already working on improving user interface!

[Poker Player]

Well, after a not so good start, you seem to be seriously trying to improve things. Keep going as it is to thank for serious projects without KYC, there are less and less of them left. If you manage to establish yourselves, this is a very good platform to make yourselves known.

[Yaunfitda]

Well, after a not so good start, you seem to be seriously trying to improve things. Keep going as it is to thank for serious projects without KYC, there are less and less of them left. If you manage to establish yourselves, this is a very good platform to make yourselves known.

Yeah, and that's why this community is great, and I do hope that even old and upcoming casinos will be like what this platform is, answering queries and trying to resolved issues as soon as they can and they really respond and didn't take the constructive criticism negatively.

So again, best of luck, and with this kind of attitude, hopefully you can attract more bettors in your casino.

[khaled0111]

The 20 free spins are off for now.
Hopefully not for long. But we would need to figure out ways to reduce the funds leakage. We would likely add a requirement to place a bet with the profit and only be able to withdraw if the bet wins.

To be honest with you, in such competitive market, I doubt there will be many gamblers interested in playing on your casino after your decision to pause the 20 free spins promotion. You need to make huge improvements on the design of your website, add more games..
To prevent users from abusing the free spins bonus, a high enough min deposit requirement plus a min of 1x rollover requirement should do it.
By the way, is your slot game provably fair?

[freedomgo]

The 20 free spins are off for now.
Hopefully not for long. But we would need to figure out ways to reduce the funds leakage. We would likely add a requirement to place a bet with the profit and only be able to withdraw if the bet wins.

To be honest with you, in such competitive market, I doubt there will be many gamblers interested in playing on your casino after your decision to pause the 20 free spins promotion. You need to make huge improvements on the design of your website, add more games..
To prevent users from abusing the free spins bonus, a high enough min deposit requirement plus a min of 1x rollover requirement should do it.
By the way, is your slot game probably fair?

It says there's a "funds leakage," so it must have been abused. Yes, they can't live without a spin bonus as most casinos have that promo to attract gamblers. I hope this will not take long to come back and that they can fix what needs to be fixed. This is actually one of the biggest challenges when running a promotion, as it could be abused if there are no strong internal controls in place. I've also seen similar problems with other casinos, which are way bigger than this one.

[avp2306]

The 20 free spins are off for now.
Hopefully not for long. But we would need to figure out ways to reduce the funds leakage. We would likely add a requirement to place a bet with the profit and only be able to withdraw if the bet wins.

To be honest with you, in such competitive market, I doubt there will be many gamblers interested in playing on your casino after your decision to pause the 20 free spins promotion. You need to make huge improvements on the design of your website, add more games..
To prevent users from abusing the free spins bonus, a high enough min deposit requirement plus a min of 1x rollover requirement should do it.
By the way, is your slot game probably fair?

It says there's a "funds leakage," so it must have been abused. Yes, they can't live without a spin bonus as most casinos have that promo to attract gamblers. I hope this will not take long to come back and that they can fix what needs to be fixed. This is actually one of the biggest challenges when running a promotion, as it could be abused if there are no strong internal controls in place. I've also seen similar problems with other casinos, which are way bigger than this one.

They didn't anticipate well those abuses that might happen to them that's why there's an huge issue has been raise up and that create huge trouble to them. There promotion create a huge failure since instead of they getting a good result or approach to the people it create serious problem which cause people to doubt their reputation as new casino in this forum. I guess there's a lot of things need to work out since for sure that issue happen to them it make people to think about playing on their casino and for sure many will pass on and stay on the casino where they are usually playing since either they are still doubting or they can't get something since the current promotions they release has been stop.

[freedomgo]

The 20 free spins are off for now.
Hopefully not for long. But we would need to figure out ways to reduce the funds leakage. We would likely add a requirement to place a bet with the profit and only be able to withdraw if the bet wins.

To be honest with you, in such competitive market, I doubt there will be many gamblers interested in playing on your casino after your decision to pause the 20 free spins promotion. You need to make huge improvements on the design of your website, add more games..
To prevent users from abusing the free spins bonus, a high enough min deposit requirement plus a min of 1x rollover requirement should do it.
By the way, is your slot game probably fair?

It says there's a "funds leakage," so it must have been abused. Yes, they can't live without a spin bonus as most casinos have that promo to attract gamblers. I hope this will not take long to come back and that they can fix what needs to be fixed. This is actually one of the biggest challenges when running a promotion, as it could be abused if there are no strong internal controls in place. I've also seen similar problems with other casinos, which are way bigger than this one.

They didn't anticipate well those abuses that might happen to them that's why there's an huge issue has been raise up and that create huge trouble to them. There promotion create a huge failure since instead of they getting a good result or approach to the people it create serious problem which cause people to doubt their reputation as new casino in this forum. I guess there's a lot of things need to work out since for sure that issue happen to them it make people to think about playing on their casino and for sure many will pass on and stay on the casino where they are usually playing since either they are still doubting or they can't get something since the current promotions they release has been stop.

I think that's understandable, as new casinos usually make mistakes, but as long as they pay what needs to be paid, their reputation is still intact. Pausing the bonus system because they found some issues is not really a big problem. Maybe some of their gamblers will leave, but eventually, when they come back with a better system, they can attract those gamblers again.

As gamblers, we don't stick with one casino only; we tend to shop among many to find good promotions that could help us increase our chances of winning. So, it's never too late for AnonBet.net to come back strong.

[avp2306]

The 20 free spins are off for now.
Hopefully not for long. But we would need to figure out ways to reduce the funds leakage. We would likely add a requirement to place a bet with the profit and only be able to withdraw if the bet wins.

To be honest with you, in such competitive market, I doubt there will be many gamblers interested in playing on your casino after your decision to pause the 20 free spins promotion. You need to make huge improvements on the design of your website, add more games..
To prevent users from abusing the free spins bonus, a high enough min deposit requirement plus a min of 1x rollover requirement should do it.
By the way, is your slot game probably fair?

It says there's a "funds leakage," so it must have been abused. Yes, they can't live without a spin bonus as most casinos have that promo to attract gamblers. I hope this will not take long to come back and that they can fix what needs to be fixed. This is actually one of the biggest challenges when running a promotion, as it could be abused if there are no strong internal controls in place. I've also seen similar problems with other casinos, which are way bigger than this one.

They didn't anticipate well those abuses that might happen to them that's why there's an huge issue has been raise up and that create huge trouble to them. There promotion create a huge failure since instead of they getting a good result or approach to the people it create serious problem which cause people to doubt their reputation as new casino in this forum. I guess there's a lot of things need to work out since for sure that issue happen to them it make people to think about playing on their casino and for sure many will pass on and stay on the casino where they are usually playing since either they are still doubting or they can't get something since the current promotions they release has been stop.

I think that's understandable, as new casinos usually make mistakes, but as long as they pay what needs to be paid, their reputation is still intact. Pausing the bonus system because they found some issues is not really a big problem. Maybe some of their gamblers will leave, but eventually, when they come back with a better system, they can attract those gamblers again.

As gamblers, we don't stick with one casino only; we tend to shop among many to find good promotions that could help us increase our chances of winning. So, it's never too late for AnonBet.net to come back strong.

Yeah its understandable nothing is perfect since there would be unforeseen circumstances that  might occurred. If there's an issue will happen then I guess its up for them now on how they could solve those issue since its important to see that those users will get paid. We all know that its  bad to see any pending cases which is unhandled by casino so if they want to run a good business and gain trust from people then I guess its more better to pay those users so they can avoid getting much negative attention to people.

Sometimes we maybe explore on other casino since we could able to see some appealing contest but we make sure that everything is fine with them since there are some instances that a casino will create or experience some issue due to the bonuses they implemented. If they act faster then provably that lots of people will be confident again to test out their casino since all gamblers are watching on how a casino will solve its users issues.

[Cantsay]

If they act faster then provably that lots of people will be confident again to test out their casino since all gamblers are watching on how a casino will solve its users issues.

The sure did have a rough start - if they want to gain the trust of the community ( which theirs is currently dwindling due to the scam thread that was created against them) they would have to work on their website interface, implement a new bonus (but with a stricter rule to help prevent abuses)that way people would know that they ain’t just idle about the whole thing but are indeed working to make everything better.

Their account has been offline for quite sometime now. - I remember during the first days of launching they were really hyperactive -but that has died down (probably because of the experience they had).

[DaNNy001]

If they act faster then provably that lots of people will be confident again to test out their casino since all gamblers are watching on how a casino will solve its users issues.

The sure did have a rough start - if they want to gain the trust of the community ( which theirs is currently dwindling due to the scam thread that was created against them) they would have to work on their website interface, implement a new bonus (but with a stricter rule to help prevent abuses)that way people would know that they ain’t just idle about the whole thing but are indeed working to make everything better.

Their account has been offline for quite sometime now. - I remember during the first days of launching they were really hyperactive -but that has died down (probably because of the experience they had).

But that bad experience they had was actually their fault because they maybe didn't properly prepared themselves for a big crowd or traffic that's on the forum to test out their service and the moment they launched it all chaos but like you say if they respond fast then they might resort the issue of their trust in the community but as it's stand , I don't think they are doing anything about the issue although I can't verify that for a certain.

I could remember few months back a popular casino bc.game had similar issues with their trust here on the forum due to maybe poor customer service response but they acted fasted and resolve every issue and accusations on their casino and today they are looking strong and active with alot of users gambling and partaking in their bonus offers.

[decodx]

If they act faster then provably that lots of people will be confident again to test out their casino since all gamblers are watching on how a casino will solve its users issues.

The sure did have a rough start - if they want to gain the trust of the community ( which theirs is currently dwindling due to the scam thread that was created against them) they would have to work on their website interface, implement a new bonus (but with a stricter rule to help prevent abuses)that way people would know that they ain’t just idle about the whole thing but are indeed working to make everything better.

Their account has been offline for quite sometime now. - I remember during the first days of launching they were really hyperactive -but that has died down (probably because of the experience they had).

These little startups don't always have a ton of resources, so things can get messy sometimes.  Their websites might look kinda crappy or have some issues, and maybe their bonus programs got gamed at first.  But you gotta give 'em credit for trying to make things right.  If they're working on the site and thinking about changing the bonuses, it shows they actually care what people think and 

Im not saying you should trust 'em completely right away.  But if folks make an effort to fix their mistakes that's usually a decent sign.  I'd be willing to give them another shot and see what happens.

What do you think?

[Maslate]

These little startups don't always have a ton of resources, so things can get messy sometimes.  Their websites might look kinda crappy or have some issues, and maybe their bonus programs got gamed at first.  But you gotta give 'em credit for trying to make things right.  If they're working on the site and thinking about changing the bonuses, it shows they actually care what people think and 

Im not saying you should trust 'em completely right away.  But if folks make an effort to fix their mistakes that's usually a decent sign.  I'd be willing to give them another shot and see what happens.

What do you think?

Sure, they should be given another chance as they are transparent with the gamblers. As you said, they are a startup company, and if we trust them, we need to give them a chance to recover and fix what needs to be done. Correct implementation is crucial, and they stopped when they saw some abuse in the system. So I am assuming that the damage has been controlled now, and they'll be coming back with a more secure bonus system for the public.

A bonus is supposed to be a win-win, but mostly in their favor. If the gamblers are the ones winning most of the time, then that is not effective for them. In short, there's something wrong with the implementation, as it's not normal for them to lose, or what they call "funds leakage."

[anonbet.net]

Yeah its understandable nothing is perfect since there would be unforeseen circumstances that  might occurred. If there's an issue will happen then I guess its up for them now on how they could solve those issue since its important to see that those users will get paid. We all know that its  bad to see any pending cases which is unhandled by casino so if they want to run a good business and gain trust from people then I guess its more better to pay those users so they can avoid getting much negative attention to people.

Sometimes we maybe explore on other casino since we could able to see some appealing contest but we make sure that everything is fine with them since there are some instances that a casino will create or experience some issue due to the bonuses they implemented. If they act faster then provably that lots of people will be confident again to test out their casino since all gamblers are watching on how a casino will solve its users issues.

But that bad experience they had was actually their fault because they maybe didn't properly prepared themselves for a big crowd or traffic that's on the forum to test out their service and the moment they launched it all chaos but like you say if they respond fast then they might resort the issue of their trust in the community but as it's stand , I don't think they are doing anything about the issue although I can't verify that for a certain.

Hello to both of you,

What issue/unhandled cases are you referring to? Everybody has been paid. Our platform is functioning and there have been no delayed payments in the last 72 hours (and even more).