If someone is genuinely interested in a token, they might well purchase a small portion from the pool themselves. Moreover, they will publish posts and perform other useful activities for free or for a purely symbolic reward. If, however, someone demands a reward in Chambi, which is a significant equivalent in tokens, for useful activities, they are likely indifferent to the project and will sell the tokens after completing the work. This will drive down the token price. And when token sales to the pool exceed our modest purchases, the price will drop significantly. In my opinion, we might as well just throw money in the trash. Our goal is to find enthusiasts, not to feed indifferent people.
Look at the past bounty campaigns of many projects. They gave away a lot of tokens, but ultimately, the price plummeted, and all the reward recipients left the projects.
Indeed you have an exceptional way of thinking, I honestly haven't taught of it this way, there saying that if you do things thesame way you get same result. And this is exactly what has been happening with the bounty campaign, giving it to people without the vision of the community would totally end in disgrace.
My suggestion is, if we want to run a bounty campaign, then the participants must come from the community, those who knows the Aim of this community, each participants would also engage in the long-term holding challenge. While for the distribution, each participants would have a minimum of 5 new wallets where the reward would be distributed evenly to those 5 wallets, so imagine we have 10 participants that would be 50 wallets holding Chamby.
Poll
