Shouldn't there be a rule to prevent burst-posting or spam such as this?

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

The "report to moderator" button is there for a reason, moderators can't see through thousands of profiles alone, with the support of the community everything becomes more easy.

I think forum is missing Ratimov. I can not remember the number of his reports but it was 4 figure. There were not many active reporters like him. People have good and bad characters. That man was good at the reporting things.

[freedomgo]

At least leaving 5-10 minutes in-between his posts shows that he put a n some effort in constructing those posts, but in this case he posts less than 5 minutes on a multiple occasions, and that is unacceptable here in the forum.

There's no set standard for post timing like 5-10 minutes or lower. It probably comes down to the mods' judgment if they need to delete posts, even if they contain valuable content, or worse, give a temp ban to teach a lesson. If you look at it, there are also users who post with a long interval, sometimes hours, but their posts lack substance. So, we should weigh which is the bigger violation in that case.

[Wiwo]

At least leaving 5-10 minutes in-between his posts shows that he put a n some effort in constructing those posts, but in this case he posts less than 5 minutes on a multiple occasions, and that is unacceptable here in the forum.

There's no set standard for post timing like 5-10 minutes or lower. It probably comes down to the mods' judgment if they need to delete posts, even if they contain valuable content, or worse, give a temp ban to teach a lesson. If you look at it, there are also users who post with a long interval, sometimes hours, but their posts lack substance. So, we should weigh which is the bigger violation in that case.

I agree with you on that timing does not necessitate the quality of posts, but then having a member ditching out chunk of comments within 3-5 minutes Interval clearly state the obvious truth that there is no enough timing and efforts in creating such a comment regardless of the content and semetic  load the comment Carries.

Although not everyone who takes time Interval to make posts out in efforts in fact someone may put an hour interval on his post and still make low quality posts, it all depends on the background knowledge of the member regarding to the topic of discussion, that makes up for the content of his comment.

[freedomgo]

At least leaving 5-10 minutes in-between his posts shows that he put a n some effort in constructing those posts, but in this case he posts less than 5 minutes on a multiple occasions, and that is unacceptable here in the forum.

There's no set standard for post timing like 5-10 minutes or lower. It probably comes down to the mods' judgment if they need to delete posts, even if they contain valuable content, or worse, give a temp ban to teach a lesson. If you look at it, there are also users who post with a long interval, sometimes hours, but their posts lack substance. So, we should weigh which is the bigger violation in that case.

I agree with you on that timing does not necessitate the quality of posts, but then having a member ditching out chunk of comments within 3-5 minutes Interval clearly state the obvious truth that there is no enough timing and efforts in creating such a comment regardless of the content and semetic  load the comment Carries.

Although not everyone who takes time Interval to make posts out in efforts in fact someone may put an hour interval on his post and still make low quality posts, it all depends on the background knowledge of the member regarding to the topic of discussion, that makes up for the content of his comment.

I guess the post should just be reported and see what the mods say. Also, there's no need to create more threads with similar content; this is enough for raising awareness. It's better to report directly. It’s hard to give an opinion if it doesn’t align with the forum rules, and since I’ve read in the replies that the content of the post is good and not low quality, it’s up to the mods to decide if the reason to delete or ban the user for bursting is valid.

[Igebotz]

The "report to moderator" button is there for a reason, moderators can't see through thousands of profiles alone, with the support of the community everything becomes more easy.

I think forum is missing Ratimov. I can not remember the number of his reports but it was 4 figure. There were not many active reporters like him. People have good and bad characters. That man was good at the reporting things.

99 good, 1 bad, and society will condemn you for the 1 bad while forgetting about the 99 good. Rati will be miss forever; no one can get those figures; we only have those who believe reporting is not their job now.

[Lucius]

I think forum is missing Ratimov. I can not remember the number of his reports but it was 4 figure. There were not many active reporters like him. People have good and bad characters. That man was good at the reporting things.

You're forgetting one very important thing, which is that today you can't report posts that are several years old, and he was doing exactly that to achieve his goals (whatever they were). In addition, complaining about someone who built his "career" on this forum through nicely packaged plagiarism is completely pointless, there were many members who did an excellent job, and who did not shove all their "achievements" in everyone's noses.