EVO.io - Bridging the Gap Between Crypto and Play | Monthly Re-Deposit Bonuses!

[tbct_mt2]

Maybe I'm wrong in this post, but it seems to me that having two signature campaigns advertising the same casino is not very productive, since if there are 25 participants in the sports betting signature campaign and another 25 participants in the casino signature campaign, there will be fewer people advertising the casino and fewer people advertising sports betting, whereas if the casino makes a signature that has things about casino and sports betting and they put 50 participants, for example, then they will have more exposure.

If they have different products and want to advertise all these products, they can hire signature campaign participants and give these participants freedom to choose which product's signature set to wear. If the company are keen on advertise one product more than others, they can ask participants to subscribe which signature set to use, and the manager will approve or disapprove it with a cap of each signature set.

I don't see it as a big problem in marketing if they want to run signature campaign for some products.

I agree with you that if they want to run the campaign like this, they must consider a big enough participant number to have effects for different products.

[Perfectbaby]

Good idea, will look into it!

Sounds nice.

I think it would just created a new code to join with the already existing signature maybe anyone who is interested to wear sportsbook code can apply them while those who loves to wear for the casino can as well do that. Though the campaign duration can be extended instead of the already slated weeks with this the sportsbook would gain it's visibility over here in the forum as I believe there are lots of sport bettors who loves it more than the other games.

That’s a great idea, if they increase the number of participants, it would definitely increase visibility on the forum. I think they could handle it if they decided to welcome and implement that idea, so let’s just hope it happens in the future. By the way, the campaign I'm talking about that has a casino and sportsbook signature have a huge number of participants.

In other casino campaign they have different signature for both casino and sportsbetting , dividing their participants to wear each designs , this will help the popularization of each  offering .

this casino has a lot to bring in the future because they seems to be serious in anyway that will give them advertising .

good luck to the team and participants .

Maybe I'm wrong in this post, but it seems to me that having two signature campaigns advertising the same casino is not very productive, since if there are 25 participants in the sports betting signature campaign and another 25 participants in the casino signature campaign, there will be fewer people advertising the casino and fewer people advertising sports betting, whereas if the casino makes a signature that has things about casino and sports betting and they put 50 participants, for example, then they will have more exposure.

actually it is not two signature campaigns but 2 signatures available dividing the participants to wear , and since the signature will show same Name/banner am sure that its just same result as how it is doing now with their casino advertising .

Hey @btc78 you are twisting up everything here, we are talking about codes and nothing much more. The thing is the extend to sportsbook and casino there should be different code for it were the both sportsbook and casino would have separate codes then whichever any participants feels like to wear then they will apply it on their profiles and nothing much. Again, we are also suggesting that duration and applicant should be increased maybe few more users can be added to increase their visibility that's all.

[yahoo62278]

Good idea, will look into it!

Sounds nice.

I think it would just created a new code to join with the already existing signature maybe anyone who is interested to wear sportsbook code can apply them while those who loves to wear for the casino can as well do that. Though the campaign duration can be extended instead of the already slated weeks with this the sportsbook would gain it's visibility over here in the forum as I believe there are lots of sport bettors who loves it more than the other games.

That’s a great idea, if they increase the number of participants, it would definitely increase visibility on the forum. I think they could handle it if they decided to welcome and implement that idea, so let’s just hope it happens in the future. By the way, the campaign I'm talking about that has a casino and sportsbook signature have a huge number of participants.

In other casino campaign they have different signature for both casino and sportsbetting , dividing their participants to wear each designs , this will help the popularization of each  offering .

this casino has a lot to bring in the future because they seems to be serious in anyway that will give them advertising .

good luck to the team and participants .

I'm open for whatever the team wants to do, but so far nothing has been mentioned about making 2 separate campaigns. It's all up to their budget as to whether they want 2 campaigns or if they want to just get the sig codes tweaked. Really shouldn't be much speculation about it unless asked IMO.

[Perfectbaby]

Good idea, will look into it!

Sounds nice.

I think it would just created a new code to join with the already existing signature maybe anyone who is interested to wear sportsbook code can apply them while those who loves to wear for the casino can as well do that. Though the campaign duration can be extended instead of the already slated weeks with this the sportsbook would gain it's visibility over here in the forum as I believe there are lots of sport bettors who loves it more than the other games.

That’s a great idea, if they increase the number of participants, it would definitely increase visibility on the forum. I think they could handle it if they decided to welcome and implement that idea, so let’s just hope it happens in the future. By the way, the campaign I'm talking about that has a casino and sportsbook signature have a huge number of participants.

In other casino campaign they have different signature for both casino and sportsbetting , dividing their participants to wear each designs , this will help the popularization of each  offering .

this casino has a lot to bring in the future because they seems to be serious in anyway that will give them advertising .

good luck to the team and participants .

I'm open for whatever the team wants to do, but so far nothing has been mentioned about making 2 separate campaigns. It's all up to their budget as to whether they want 2 campaigns or if they want to just get the sig codes tweaked. Really shouldn't be much speculation about it unless asked IMO.

Yes we hope for their feedback as I believe the team would do everything possible to make sure they remained at the top, knowing how competitive the entire crypto gambling industry are exploring the best way to remain at the top, especially on the forum. Lot of those gambling sites that has remained visible here are all in one way holding a long marketing campaign as signature. But let's just keep our fingers crossed to watch what they would decide and of course you are here to serve them more better.

[Zoomic]

In other casino campaign they have different signature for both casino and sportsbetting , dividing their participants to wear each designs , this will help the popularization of each  offering .

this casino has a lot to bring in the future because they seems to be serious in anyway that will give them advertising .

good luck to the team and participants .

Having separate signatures for casino and sportsbook isn't something the project owners should bother much about. It is not a popular gesture in the forum. Infact, the only campaign known for this is duelbits, I don't know if others have followed. In terms of a particular campaign running two simultaneous signature campaigns is also rare. The casino I saw who did that till now is Rollbit. Me and you know how established and financially strong these two casinos are..Their standard shouldn't be used as a measuring yardstick for Evo. As a growing casino, Evo has other was to improve and be unique and not to compete in signature dualization.

[Crypto Library]

Having separate signatures for casino and sportsbook isn't something the project owners should bother much about. It is not a popular gesture in the forum. Infact, the only campaign known for this is duelbits, I don't know if others have followed. In terms of a particular campaign running two simultaneous signature campaigns is also rare. The casino I saw who did that till now is Rollbit. Me and you know how established and financially strong these two casinos are..Their standard shouldn't be used as a measuring yardstick for Evo. As a growing casino, Evo has other was to improve and be unique and not to compete in signature dualization.

At the end of the day, it all depends on their budget and they have the budget for that I think it will not be a bad idea.
Even then it can be done just increasing the campaign participants and also making multiple signatures but As for the dual signature campaigns, it will present a casino differently on the forum, as we've already seen this on Rollbit, I think it can attract community members in a different way or grab their attention more easily.
In case if I am the owner of the casino and I have budget shortage I will just divided the current participant in two part and and send them the two different signatures to wear.

[Zoomic]

In case if I am the owner of the casino and I have budget shortage I will just divided the current participant in two part and and send them the two different signatures to wear

To me, I don't consider that as an economic plan. If I am an owner of a project and I have budget short, I'll reduce the number of participants or slightly reduce pay and still maintain the number of participants in order to sustain the campaign more. The result of signature campaign is more on the long run and brand familiarity. This is why some casinos have been running signature campaigns no stop for two years. The idea is to make the brand last long in the forum and not to populate the forum.

[tbct_mt2]

To me, I don't consider that as an economic plan. If I am an owner of a project and I have budget short, I'll reduce the number of participants or slightly reduce pay and still maintain the number of participants in order to sustain the campaign more. The result of signature campaign is more on the long run and brand familiarity. This is why some casinos have been running signature campaigns no stop for two years. The idea is to make the brand last long in the forum and not to populate the forum.

With not too abundant budget for marketing, it's difficult to maximize effects from marketing campaign by signature. Companies have to analyze what they got from a campaign, but if they start with only intention for a campaign like 2 weeks, 1 month, they will end their campaign after that, because short term campaign won't bring good effects.

Many campaigns ended after several weeks and never restart, but it's understandable that if their budget for marketing is not big, it's hard to continue.

[kotajikikox]

At the end of the day, it all depends on their budget and they have the budget for that I think it will not be a bad idea.
Even then it can be done just increasing the campaign participants and also making multiple signatures but As for the dual signature campaigns, it will present a casino differently on the forum, as we've already seen this on Rollbit, I think it can attract community members in a different way or grab their attention more easily.

I do not think it is so bad if they do this. I can't think of any negative consequences if they do this unless like you said they do not have any budget for it. It will allow others to identify specific purposes of the platform without having to check it out just from signature campaigns. All these arguments and at the end of the day, it will be determined by the campaign managers and the platform.

To spread the EVO's name regardless of the campaign you are a part of around the forum is beneficial both to the platform and to us members. Whatever they decide, I would love to be a part of and help as much as I can.

[dzungmobile]

I do not think it is so bad if they do this. I can't think of any negative consequences if they do this unless like you said they do not have any budget for it. It will allow others to identify specific purposes of the platform without having to check it out just from signature campaigns. All these arguments and at the end of the day, it will be determined by the campaign managers and the platform.

To spread the EVO's name regardless of the campaign you are a part of around the forum is beneficial both to the platform and to us members. Whatever they decide, I would love to be a part of and help as much as I can.

Let they do their jobs naturally. If they see good benefits from the initial small campaign, they can consider to expand it. Other casinos do the same, they can expand their campaigns, and after short time or long time they can reduce budget for their campaigns, so they shrink campaigns back to initial ones.

Campaigns can be scaled up by seasons when companies see it's perfect season for gambling and gamblers are more active in that season according to past data.

Their current campaign has good pay rates and 15 total slots, it's not too small, but it's not big. It's good start and if they want to expand it in future, like next year when cryptocurrency market reaches to Euphoria phase, it's understandable.

[Wiwo]

In other casino campaign they have different signature for both casino and sportsbetting , dividing their participants to wear each designs , this will help the popularization of each  offering .

this casino has a lot to bring in the future because they seems to be serious in anyway that will give them advertising .

good luck to the team and participants .

Having separate signatures for casino and sportsbook isn't something the project owners should bother much about. It is not a popular gesture in the forum. Infact, the only campaign known for this is duelbits, I don't know if others have followed. In terms of a particular campaign running two simultaneous signature campaigns is also rare. The casino I saw who did that till now is Rollbit. Me and you know how established and financially strong these two casinos are..Their standard shouldn't be used as a measuring yardstick for Evo. As a growing casino, Evo has other ways to improve and be unique and not to compete in signature dualization.

Zoomic is right, considering the financial implications involved in running such extra services, only well-established casinos can afford to run that kind of promotion for now, and judging from this casino's existence and presence here on this forum, and even outside the forums, this is as it is new for them and also the budget for this campaign is just for 10 week's which means that both team and the campaign manager already agreed on the number of participants a d the length of the campaign.

To that point, you may be out of context to suggest there are separate signature designs that Carry casino advertising and another for sportsbooks, seems that will be above their budgets for now.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

At the end of the day, it all depends on their budget and they have the budget for that I think it will not be a bad idea.
Even then it can be done just increasing the campaign participants and also making multiple signatures but As for the dual signature campaigns, it will present a casino differently on the forum, as we've already seen this on Rollbit, I think it can attract community members in a different way or grab their attention more easily.

I do not think it is so bad if they do this. I can't think of any negative consequences if they do this unless like you said they do not have any budget for it. It will allow others to identify specific purposes of the platform without having to check it out just from signature campaigns. All these arguments and at the end of the day, it will be determined by the campaign managers and the platform.

To spread the EVO's name regardless of the campaign you are a part of around the forum is beneficial both to the platform and to us members. Whatever they decide, I would love to be a part of and help as much as I can.

Well, really not a bad idea to run two or even more signature ad campaigns at a time, with different designs of wearable signature ad, it's a very good idea and I did witnessed when rollbit did a similar thing when they launched a particular product I am no longer sure about it's title or name.

It's indeed a good way to attract people to the platform in a different way, people love things differently and when options are made available, who is not attracted in one way, will get attracted through the other way..

But on the other hand, it's money we are still talking about here, marketing is expensive, and requires to be run for a very long time for maximum impact, and running to campaigns at a time requires hiring two groups, and paying them weekly, if the casino is wealthy enough to handle it, it's still for their own benefit anyway, but it's better to run a single campaign and have it stay active for a very long time, than run two campaigns and close it within few months or weeks.

[Crypto Library]

To me, I don't consider that as an economic plan. If I am an owner of a project and I have budget short, I'll reduce the number of participants or slightly reduce pay and still maintain the number of participants in order to sustain the campaign more. The result of signature campaign is more on the long run and brand familiarity. This is why some casinos have been running signature campaigns no stop for two years. The idea is to make the brand last long in the forum and not to populate the forum.

I think you got my word wrongly because about the budget shortage I mean only about to increase the participants or launching the dual signature campaign.
But I won't say that you idea was bad because in my experience in campaign management I think for a successful signature campaign I think there is need to be long-term strategy suppose we divided the year in two or the quarter like and every different part of that period I will make the changes on the number of participant if the fact was budget the you already mentioned the idea.
And if the result is good and have the budget there was no issues to make increase the participants or launching dual signature campaigns.

[hd49728]

Well, really not a bad idea to run two or even more signature ad campaigns at a time, with different designs of wearable signature ad, it's a very good idea and I did witnessed when rollbit did a similar thing when they launched a particular product I am no longer sure about it's title or name.

It's indeed a good way to attract people to the platform in a different way, people love things differently and when options are made available, who is not attracted in one way, will get attracted through the other way..

Good or bad idea, it depends on budget available for it, and how long you can run campaigns with that budget. If the budget is feasible for one campaign running a long time like 3 months, it's better than use the same budget to run 2 campaigns and each campaign lasts for 1.5 month.

It depends on other things like your business developments, product developments, partnership and the general sentiment of market too. If the sentiment generally is bad, it's not cleverly budget usage for running mulitple campaigns. Campaign length is important for gaining considerable expected effects for their company.
I see discussions in this announcement thread tends to be derail from its main purpose. If it is about signature campaign, you can create a topic for its in Service discussion board, or discuss it in a current signature campaign thread, and inform the team about that thread for follow-up.

[panjul07]

To me, I don't consider that as an economic plan. If I am an owner of a project and I have budget short, I'll reduce the number of participants or slightly reduce pay and still maintain the number of participants in order to sustain the campaign more. The result of signature campaign is more on the long run and brand familiarity. This is why some casinos have been running signature campaigns no stop for two years. The idea is to make the brand last long in the forum and not to populate the forum.

With not too abundant budget for marketing, it's difficult to maximize effects from marketing campaign by signature. Companies have to analyze what they got from a campaign, but if they start with only intention for a campaign like 2 weeks, 1 month, they will end their campaign after that, because short term campaign won't bring good effects.

Many campaigns ended after several weeks and never restart, but it's understandable that if their budget for marketing is not big, it's hard to continue.

Even long campaign does not guarantee of success because advertisement alone is not enough as it is just tool to make people out there aware about the existency of the casino.
I've said many times in some different threads that advertisement such as signature campaign should be followed up by some other things on the site.
Because the target of a casino is real gamblers, so the casino should also provide some things that are mostly wanted by real gamblers.
Currently evo.io has less offers compared to other casinos, I can only see deposit bonus and weekly rebate as their own offers.
No other promotions like wagering contest, VIP program, or any other promotions as what I usually find in top casinos.

[Perfectbaby]

Even long campaign does not guarantee of success because advertisement alone is not enough as it is just tool to make people out there aware about the existency of the casino.
I've said many times in some different threads that advertisement such as signature campaign should be followed up by some other things on the site.
Because the target of a casino is real gamblers, so the casino should also provide some things that are mostly wanted by real gamblers.
Currently evo.io has less offers compared to other casinos, I can only see deposit bonus and weekly rebate as their own offers.
No other promotions like wagering contest, VIP program, or any other promotions as what I usually find in top casinos.

Yes you are correct if a casino is hosting contest like Bitcoin price predictions, art contest and many just as other casinos does it would boost to the exposure of the gambling site. Even though their campaign would have to be long term and of course long term is always better than just few months though this wouldn't also be guarantee but it Is giving the casino a sharper edges to be known and recognized here.

However, at evo.io team is there any contest about bitcoin prediction this month to end on January first week??  If yes, please share link let us make prediction to make Evo.io gain much exposure.

[AmoreJaz]

I think you got my word wrongly because about the budget shortage I mean only about to increase the participants or launching the dual signature campaign.
But I won't say that you idea was bad because in my experience in campaign management I think for a successful signature campaign I think there is need to be long-term strategy suppose we divided the year in two or the quarter like and every different part of that period I will make the changes on the number of participant if the fact was budget the you already mentioned the idea.
And if the result is good and have the budget there was no issues to make increase the participants or launching dual signature campaigns.

Sig campaign can help sustain the interest of the players. However, we all know that the effort will still be on the site itself. If the services are player-oriented, they will patronize the site. Thus, casinos should sustain the effort of offering such perks or rewards program in order for the players to continue using their services.
And such campaign should not only be one or couple of weeks only, because you can't guarantee that you will already get the interest of the community. Long-term campaign is a risk for the marketing team but in the long run, if they will see such progress, it can really be worthwhile of doing this activity.

[MJ.evo]

Our sportsbook is up and running, took us a while!

We will be having some promos for the weekend on English Premier League, stay tuned!

[Perfectbaby]

Our sportsbook is up and running, took us a while!

We will be having some promos for the weekend on English Premier League, stay tuned!

Hey MJ.evo,
Thank you for the effort so far to make sure the sportbook is implemented as you promised. For the promos on EPL, well, I would be glad to see it live.

Thank you for the efforts.

[Crypto Library]

Sig campaign can help sustain the interest of the players. However, we all know that the effort will still be on the site itself. If the services are player-oriented, they will patronize the site. Thus, casinos should sustain the effort of offering such perks or rewards program in order for the players to continue using their services.

What I think the purpose of the signature campaign is to gain visibility and reputation on the forum and a way to branding thier-selves. But players will only sustain when a player receives good service from that casino site so ultimately signature campaigns output wasn't just depends on a campaign managers it also depends on that casino site or the projects as you already mentioned some great factors. The campaign manager's strategies and ideas can make the casino visible to the players and not to force them play.

Our sportsbook is up and running, took us a while!

Great work!!!
The sportsbook look also good and Unique to me