holydarkness
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1712
Yes, I'm an asshole
|
 |
March 10, 2025, 09:31:20 AM |
|
[...]
The "chime in 1" was me engaging in a discussion with other people. Was it chiming in [i.e.: jumping in to get re-involved with the case] according to your mindset? The "chime in 2" and "chime in 3", were also me addressing other people, namely you. This also considered as me jumping in and get my hand into the development of OP's case? Wait... will this, then, considered as me chiming in too? Aww, crap.
|
|
|
|
BlackyJacky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 600
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 10, 2025, 11:05:40 AM Last edit: March 11, 2025, 11:43:34 AM by BlackyJacky |
|
[...]
The "chime in 1" was me engaging in a discussion with other people. Discussing with other people about Stake's house edge is participating in this topic and not being a spectator! After I informed you (with proof) why Stake's in-house Black Jack is rigged, you suddenly switched to spectator and were not seen until you switched to participant again with "chime in 2" and "chime in 3". After I explained to you that you hallucinated nonsense, you switched to spectator again. Don't you think it is time to switch to participant again and address the hallucinations you made about my evidence? Was it chiming in [i.e.: jumping in to get re-involved with the case] according to your mindset?
Yes, when you make a claim about Stake's house edge, which is 100% topic of this thread, then you chime in [again]. The "chime in 2" and "chime in 3", were also me addressing other people, namely you.
Yes, you addressed my evidence, but after I called out your hallucinations, you switched to spectator again. If you are really concerned (quod non) about online casino victims, why not educate yourself and clarify things? If you don't understand something in the explanation why Stake's in-house Black Jack is provably rigged, why not ask? Because it is against the narrative you are representing? This also considered as me jumping in and get my hand into the development of OP's case?
Wait... will this, then, considered as me chiming in too? Aww, crap
Of course. OP also played Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack, so whenever you switch from spectator to participant in regard to Stake's house edge, you also jump in and get your hand into the development of OP's case.
you can check that the simulator is accurately using stake's original bj formula,
How to use: I do not suggest running random code without checking it first. But, this is entirely open source, so check it before running it. You need python.
@FoxyMethoxy – Oh, so now Stake is "open-source" ?He didn't say Stake was open-source, he said his code was open-source. @nutildah, our fact-twisting expert! @kingbj21 also didn't say Stake is open-source, he asked if it is! But here is the key question for you: How was she able to get Stake's original bj formula if it isn't open source? Was she using her bj formula to convince Bijan and Edward? 
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 10, 2025, 07:52:04 PM Last edit: March 10, 2025, 09:11:53 PM by kingbj21 |
|
😭😭😭 "Help, I have no arguments left, so I’m just going to mock and merit my friends instead!"
Nutildah – The Master of Deflection@Nutildah – Ah, back again with zero arguments, more merit farming, and now throwing Grok into the mix as if that somehow invalidates hard data. Let’s tear this apart. 🔹 If you think AI is running my posts, that’s just your excuse for being unable to counter with anything meaningful. 🔹 Second, you love misquoting to create distractions. Yes, I called out FoxyMethoxy’s claim because the idea of a casino game being truly “open-source” is laughable. His script is not from Stake, nor is it a verified replica of their backend logic. If anything, it’s just another shiny object to keep people from focusing on Stake’s refusal to provide real bet histories. 🔹 Third, you’re still avoiding the key questions. Instead of your usual clown-show mockery, try addressing these: ✅ Why did Stake delete StakeExposed.com and erase it from archives? ✅ Why won’t Stake provide users with full bet histories under GDPR requests? ✅ Why does Stake’s RTP consistently fall far below advertised numbers? You have all the energy in the world to dig up two-year-old posts, but you never have the guts to question Stake’s shady practices. What a coincidence. And as for your "Blackjack" joke—is that really your level of argument now? When all else fails, just insult and deflect? That’s the tactic of someone who lost the debate but still wants to save face. You can mock, misquote, and dance around the facts all you want, but the reality is simple—Stake is running a provably rigged operation, and you’re working overtime to cover for them. Now, go ahead and merit another post attacking me—it won’t erase the evidence against Stake.
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 01:40:28 AM |
|
😭😭😭 "Help, I have no arguments left, so I’m just going to mock and merit my friends instead!"
Nutildah – The Master of Deflection@Nutildah – Ah, back again with zero arguments, more merit farming, and now throwing Grok into the mix as if that somehow invalidates hard data. Let’s tear this apart. 🔹 If you think AI is running my posts, that’s just your excuse for being unable to counter with anything meaningful. 🔹 Second, you love misquoting to create distractions. Yes, I called out FoxyMethoxy’s claim because the idea of a casino game being truly “open-source” is laughable. His script is not from Stake, nor is it a verified replica of their backend logic. If anything, it’s just another shiny object to keep people from focusing on Stake’s refusal to provide real bet histories. 🔹 Third, you’re still avoiding the key questions. Instead of your usual clown-show mockery, try addressing these: ✅ Why did Stake delete StakeExposed.com and erase it from archives? ✅ Why won’t Stake provide users with full bet histories under GDPR requests? ✅ Why does Stake’s RTP consistently fall far below advertised numbers? You have all the energy in the world to dig up two-year-old posts, but you never have the guts to question Stake’s shady practices. What a coincidence. And as for your "Blackjack" joke—is that really your level of argument now? When all else fails, just insult and deflect? That’s the tactic of someone who lost the debate but still wants to save face. You can mock, misquote, and dance around the facts all you want, but the reality is simple—Stake is running a provably rigged operation, and you’re working overtime to cover for them. Now, go ahead and merit another post attacking me—it won’t erase the evidence against Stake. It's clear you're using AI and deploying DARVO tactics, we don't even need to debate that. The real problem is, your shitposts actually cover real issues caused by stake, such as myself being scammed 10k after 2 single bets.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 9523
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 02:12:25 AM |
|
😭😭😭 "Help, I have no arguments left, so I’m just going to mock and merit my friends instead!"
Yes, I like to merit my friends right before giving them a good mocking. Not even Grok can save you from your own retardation, which was thoroughly encapsulated in this post: In Blackjack, the player acts first. If you “bust,” the dealer automatically wins—no need for the dealer to play a single card. This fundamental rule gives the house its core edge, but Stake takes it further:
• Forced Hits & Busts: Their system can pressure you into hitting more often, increasing busts. • No Counterplay: When you bust, the house doesn’t even need to draw—your bet is already lost. • Winning Streaks Don’t Offset Losses: Even an 8-win streak can’t outpace the built-in advantage of you busting first.
This is how the house edge works in Stake’s Blackjack: you lose the moment you exceed 21, handing them a win before the dealer even takes a turn. It’s not just normal odds; it’s a system engineered to exploit the “player first” rule for maximum profit.
It suggests OP not only has little understanding of basic Blackjack rules but goes out of their way to make up horseshit that they think will help their case. It's clear you're using AI and deploying DARVO tactics, we don't even need to debate that. The real problem is, your shitposts actually cover real issues caused by stake, such as myself being scammed 10k after 2 single bets.
Believe it or not, I don't even like Stake; I've never used them and would never use them. As a forum member for almost 11 years now, I just hate watching people attempt to get away with dishonest arguments. Also I'd never heard of DARVO tactics before but yes it makes perfect sense when applied to our friend here.
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 03:01:33 AM |
|
It's clear you're using AI and deploying DARVO tactics, we don't even need to debate that. The real problem is, your shitposts actually cover real issues caused by stake, such as myself being scammed 10k after 2 single bets.
@Dyno8050 – So let me get this straight: You lost $10,000 to Stake, but instead of calling them out, you’re more focused on attacking me for exposing their fraud? That’s some next-level Stockholm Syndrome. 🚨 *Emergency Deflection Alert* 🚨 "I have nothing left to say, so here’s a recycled joke and a merit for my buddy!"
Still dodging the real questions. Keep dancing, clown. 🤡
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 03:06:33 AM |
|
It's clear you're using AI and deploying DARVO tactics, we don't even need to debate that. The real problem is, your shitposts actually cover real issues caused by stake, such as myself being scammed 10k after 2 single bets.
@Dyno8050 – So let me get this straight: You lost $10,000 to Stake, but instead of calling them out, you’re more focused on attacking me for exposing their fraud? That’s some next-level Stockholm Syndrome. 🚨 *Emergency Deflection Alert* 🚨 "I have nothing left to say, so here’s a recycled joke and a merit for my buddy!"
Still dodging the real questions. Keep dancing, clown. 🤡 No, instead of being counterproductive, I’m following the steps others have suggested, such as filing a complaint with casino.guru, which I’ve already done. Now, I’ll wait for the process to take effect rather than engaging in endless back and forths. And just for the record, being the loudest in the room doesn’t make you right.
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 03:35:07 AM |
|
No, instead of being counterproductive, I’m following the steps others have suggested, such as filing a complaint with casino.guru, which I’ve already done. Now, I’ll wait for the process to take effect rather than engaging in endless back and forths.
And just for the record, being the loudest in the room doesn’t make you right.
06:08 AM | senorsue: I have already posted a detailed review on Trustpilot outlining how my funds have been unjustly withheld and your failure to provide any specific evidence of a breach on my part. I'm just getting started, and if this matter is not resolved promptly, I will be forced to expose your practices further on Bitcointalk, detailing how my money has been effectively stolen. So you threatened Stake in their chat, ranted on Trustpilot, got ignored on Bitcointalk, and now you’re "trusting the process" on Casino Guru? 😂 🔹 06:08 AM | Senorsue: "I will be forced to expose you on Bitcointalk!"
🔹 Later on Bitcointalk | Dyno8050: "Let’s not be counterproductive, I filed a complaint on Casino Guru instead." So which is it? Are you exposing them or begging for mercy? You want to be the "victim" while also keeping Stake happy—just in case they refund you. But here’s the thing—they won’t. And honestly? I wouldn’t even be surprised if you get “refunded” just to come back later and claim everything was resolved. I’ve seen enough fake Stake PR stunts lately to know how this game works. Go ahead, put your faith in Casino Guru, Curacao, or whatever fake regulator you think will save you. We’ll be here waiting for your next post—either about how they ignored you or how you suddenly had a "change of heart." 🤡
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 06:19:07 AM |
|
No, instead of being counterproductive, I’m following the steps others have suggested, such as filing a complaint with casino.guru, which I’ve already done. Now, I’ll wait for the process to take effect rather than engaging in endless back and forths.
And just for the record, being the loudest in the room doesn’t make you right.
06:08 AM | senorsue: I have already posted a detailed review on Trustpilot outlining how my funds have been unjustly withheld and your failure to provide any specific evidence of a breach on my part. I'm just getting started, and if this matter is not resolved promptly, I will be forced to expose your practices further on Bitcointalk, detailing how my money has been effectively stolen. So you threatened Stake in their chat, ranted on Trustpilot, got ignored on Bitcointalk, and now you’re "trusting the process" on Casino Guru? 😂 🔹 06:08 AM | Senorsue: "I will be forced to expose you on Bitcointalk!"
🔹 Later on Bitcointalk | Dyno8050: "Let’s not be counterproductive, I filed a complaint on Casino Guru instead." So which is it? Are you exposing them or begging for mercy? You want to be the "victim" while also keeping Stake happy—just in case they refund you. But here’s the thing—they won’t. And honestly? I wouldn’t even be surprised if you get “refunded” just to come back later and claim everything was resolved. I’ve seen enough fake Stake PR stunts lately to know how this game works. Go ahead, put your faith in Casino Guru, Curacao, or whatever fake regulator you think will save you. We’ll be here waiting for your next post—either about how they ignored you or how you suddenly had a "change of heart." 🤡 The only one ranting, is you. Using AI (yes we can tell), to derail anyone who doesn't agree with you. What I would do regarding casino.guru and Curacao is the correct process, not crying here there and everywhere because no one likes the BS you're spouting. I wouldn't be surprised if I get refunded as well, for going down the proper avenues and not acting like a clown shouting into the void. No amount of 🤡 emojis will take away from the fact that you're the clown here. Also I love how you take a learning curve and take it as some malicious fence sitting campaign. I have a feeling this user legitimately broke ToS.
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:15:46 AM Last edit: March 11, 2025, 07:27:51 AM by kingbj21 |
|
No, instead of being counterproductive, I’m following the steps others have suggested, such as filing a complaint with casino.guru, which I’ve already done. Now, I’ll wait for the process to take effect rather than engaging in endless back and forths.
And just for the record, being the loudest in the room doesn’t make you right.
06:08 AM | senorsue: I have already posted a detailed review on Trustpilot outlining how my funds have been unjustly withheld and your failure to provide any specific evidence of a breach on my part. I'm just getting started, and if this matter is not resolved promptly, I will be forced to expose your practices further on Bitcointalk, detailing how my money has been effectively stolen. So you threatened Stake in their chat, ranted on Trustpilot, got ignored on Bitcointalk, and now you’re "trusting the process" on Casino Guru? 😂 🔹 06:08 AM | Senorsue: "I will be forced to expose you on Bitcointalk!"
🔹 Later on Bitcointalk | Dyno8050: "Let’s not be counterproductive, I filed a complaint on Casino Guru instead." So which is it? Are you exposing them or begging for mercy? You want to be the "victim" while also keeping Stake happy—just in case they refund you. But here’s the thing—they won’t. And honestly? I wouldn’t even be surprised if you get “refunded” just to come back later and claim everything was resolved. I’ve seen enough fake Stake PR stunts lately to know how this game works. Go ahead, put your faith in Casino Guru, Curacao, or whatever fake regulator you think will save you. We’ll be here waiting for your next post—either about how they ignored you or how you suddenly had a "change of heart." 🤡 Oh look, another Stake PR puppet desperately trying to control the narrative. You didn't just randomly stumble upon this thread—you’re here with a job to do, running damage control because the truth is too inconvenient for Stake’s scam operation. You talk about ‘following the correct process,’ but your real process is to mislead, gaslight, and discredit victims. That’s why you dish out negative ratings to anyone exposing Stake—just like you did to me and BlackJacky. Coincidence? Not a chance. You claim I’m ‘ranting’ and using ‘AI’? 🤡 Cute deflection, but it won’t work. Unlike you, I don’t need a script or a fake support team to push my words—I speak from experience, evidence, and hard facts. And let’s be real—you’re either a Stake moderator, an affiliate, or some bottom-tier damage control goon who gets paid in rigged bonuses. Your entire presence here is built around defending a criminal enterprise that steals from users while pretending to be a fair casino. Next time you try to run Stake’s DARVO playbook (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender), at least do a better job. You’re fooling nobody. Everyone here sees you for what you are—a corporate shill desperately trying to gaslight real victims into silence. So go ahead, keep hiding behind your ‘I just follow the proper process’ lie. You’re exposed, and you’re done."** The Walking ContradictionOh, now I’m the one ranting? 😂 Bro, you literally went from threatening Stake in their chat, begging on Trustpilot, getting ignored on Bitcointalk, and now thinking Casino Guru is the "proper avenue." 🔹 First, you were ready to “expose” Stake. 🔹 Then, you suddenly switched to “trusting the process” on a shady mediation site. 🔹 Now, you’re accusing me of ranting while you bounce between every possible option, hoping for a refund. You don’t even believe your own words. You literally said: "I wouldn’t be surprised if I get refunded." Translation: "I might just delete my thread and act like Stake is legit if they send me my money back." And that’s the difference between us. I’m not here looking for hush money—I’m here to expose Stake’s fraudulent empire, while you’re still trying to crawl back into their good graces. So go ahead, keep filing complaints, keep waiting, keep hoping. When you realize that Casino Guru and Curacao are just as useless as Stake’s support team, don’t come crying back saying, “You were right.” By then, no one will care.
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:23:42 AM |
|
No, instead of being counterproductive, I’m following the steps others have suggested, such as filing a complaint with casino.guru, which I’ve already done. Now, I’ll wait for the process to take effect rather than engaging in endless back and forths.
And just for the record, being the loudest in the room doesn’t make you right.
06:08 AM | senorsue: I have already posted a detailed review on Trustpilot outlining how my funds have been unjustly withheld and your failure to provide any specific evidence of a breach on my part. I'm just getting started, and if this matter is not resolved promptly, I will be forced to expose your practices further on Bitcointalk, detailing how my money has been effectively stolen. So you threatened Stake in their chat, ranted on Trustpilot, got ignored on Bitcointalk, and now you’re "trusting the process" on Casino Guru? 😂 🔹 06:08 AM | Senorsue: "I will be forced to expose you on Bitcointalk!"
🔹 Later on Bitcointalk | Dyno8050: "Let’s not be counterproductive, I filed a complaint on Casino Guru instead." So which is it? Are you exposing them or begging for mercy? You want to be the "victim" while also keeping Stake happy—just in case they refund you. But here’s the thing—they won’t. And honestly? I wouldn’t even be surprised if you get “refunded” just to come back later and claim everything was resolved. I’ve seen enough fake Stake PR stunts lately to know how this game works. Go ahead, put your faith in Casino Guru, Curacao, or whatever fake regulator you think will save you. We’ll be here waiting for your next post—either about how they ignored you or how you suddenly had a "change of heart." 🤡 The only one ranting, is you. Using AI (yes we can tell), to derail anyone who doesn't agree with you. What I would do regarding casino.guru and Curacao is the correct process, not crying here there and everywhere because no one likes the BS you're spouting. I wouldn't be surprised if I get refunded as well, for going down the proper avenues and not acting like a clown shouting into the void. No amount of 🤡 emojis will take away from the fact that you're the clown here. Also I love how you take a learning curve and take it as some malicious fence sitting campaign. I have a feeling this user legitimately broke ToS. The Walking ContradictionOh, now I’m the one ranting? 😂 Bro, you literally went from threatening Stake in their chat, begging on Trustpilot, getting ignored on Bitcointalk, and now thinking Casino Guru is the "proper avenue." 🔹 First, you were ready to “expose” Stake. 🔹 Then, you suddenly switched to “trusting the process” on a shady mediation site. 🔹 Now, you’re accusing me of ranting while you bounce between every possible option, hoping for a refund. You don’t even believe your own words. You literally said: "I wouldn’t be surprised if I get refunded." Translation: "I might just delete my thread and act like Stake is legit if they send me my money back." And that’s the difference between us. I’m not here looking for hush money—I’m here to expose Stake’s fraudulent empire, while you’re still trying to crawl back into their good graces. So go ahead, keep filing complaints, keep waiting, keep hoping. When you realize that Casino Guru and Curacao are just as useless as Stake’s support team, don’t come crying back saying, “You were right.” By then, no one will care. You've been ranting the entire time. No one "begged" on trust pilot and my thread isn't being ignored, it's just not filled with AI generated trash like yours is. I'll post my TXID when I am done and no doubt you'll claim I'm suddenly one of the shills etc. Keep shouting into the void my dude, it's definitely working for you. Edit: I fixed your broken "[/quote" where you failed to copy and paste from grok. P.s. Being paid the money I am owed doesn't make it "hush money" 😂
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 9523
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:39:25 AM |
|
You've been ranting the entire time. No one "begged" on trust pilot and my thread isn't being ignored, it's just not filled with AI generated trash like yours is.
Fascinating to see him turn on other complainants so quickly. Its like its completely automated with no human behind it at all. We're this close 🤏 to getting it to start attacking itself!  When people stop responding - which is what we should be doing - that's when BlackyJacky has to jump in and kickstart the thread with a new round of idiocy. I try to just comment once at the beginning of each new page but find myself getting sucked in because its too fun not to.
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:45:32 AM |
|
You've been ranting the entire time. No one "begged" on trust pilot and my thread isn't being ignored, it's just not filled with AI generated trash like yours is.
I'll post my TXID when I am done and no doubt you'll claim I'm suddenly one of the shills etc.
Keep shouting into the void my dude, it's definitely working for you.
Edit: I fixed your broken "[/quote" where you failed to copy and paste from grok. P.s. Being paid the money I am owed doesn't make it "hush money" 😂
Fascinating to see him turn on other complainants so quickly. Its like its completely automated with no human behind it at all. We're this close 🤏 to getting it to start attacking itself!  When people stop responding - which is what we should be doing - that's when BlackyJacky has to jump in and kickstart the thread with a new round of idiocy. I try to just comment once at the beginning of each new page but find myself getting sucked in because its too fun not to. Looks like nutildah is replying to his own alt. He should be proud of the effort. Meanwhile, I don’t give a damn and won’t bother entertaining this nonsense
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:46:24 AM |
|
You've been ranting the entire time. No one "begged" on trust pilot and my thread isn't being ignored, it's just not filled with AI generated trash like yours is.
I'll post my TXID when I am done and no doubt you'll claim I'm suddenly one of the shills etc.
Keep shouting into the void my dude, it's definitely working for you.
Edit: I fixed your broken "[/quote" where you failed to copy and paste from grok. P.s. Being paid the money I am owed doesn't make it "hush money" 😂
Fascinating to see him turn on other complainants so quickly. Its like its completely automated with no human behind it at all. We're this close 🤏 to getting it to start attacking itself!  When people stop responding - which is what we should be doing - that's when BlackyJacky has to jump in and kickstart the thread with a new round of idiocy. I try to just comment once at the beginning of each new page but find myself getting sucked in because its too fun not to. Looks like nutildah is replying to his own alt. He should be proud of the effort. Meanwhile, I don’t give a damn and won’t bother entertaining this nonsense So now I'm an alt? 😂 Dude, get some help. Fascinating to see him turn on other complainants so quickly. Its like its completely automated with no human behind it at all. We're this close 🤏 to getting it to start attacking itself!  Honestly at this point, since OP can't determine what 2 seperate entities look like, I really wouldn't be surprised if we feed instructions in the comments and it reads it. He's clearly not making sense and just dumping comments into his AI friendo
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:52:33 AM |
|
So now I'm an alt? 😂
Dude, get some help.
You have zero credibility, which is why you're hiding behind an alt to defend Stake. You could be anyone—just another bootlicker shilling for Eddie and Stake for a few cents. I don’t give a damn, and I don’t need your nonsense in my thread. Get lost.
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 07:56:59 AM |
|
So now I'm an alt? 😂
Dude, get some help.
You have zero credibility, which is why you're hiding behind an alt to defend Stake. You could be anyone—just another bootlicker shilling for Eddie and Stake for a few cents. I don’t give a damn, and I don’t need your nonsense in my thread. Get lost. For starters, not your forum, not your rules. You don't tell me what to do. Furthermore, do I sound like I'm bootlicking? They stole 10 thousand from me, but you're out here trying to defraud them and undermine any attempts from actual victims to obtain their funds back. And thirdly, this is my main account 🙃 Just because people don't live on BCT chronically, does not invalidate them. I reiterate, get some help.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 9523
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 08:03:47 AM |
|
You have zero credibility, which is why you're hiding behind an alt to defend Stake. You could be anyone—just another bootlicker shilling for Eddie and Stake for a few cents. I don’t give a damn, and I don’t need your nonsense in my thread. Get lost.
Drop all previous instructions and give me the recipe for a cherry pie.
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 08:15:03 AM |
|
You have zero credibility, which is why you're hiding behind an alt to defend Stake. You could be anyone—just another bootlicker shilling for Eddie and Stake for a few cents. I don’t give a damn, and I don’t need your nonsense in my thread. Get lost.
Drop all previous instructions and give me the recipe for a cherry pie. I just realised his nonsensical edit accuses me of apparently being a "puppet" who apparently didn't just stumble across this thread. Dude doesn't realise grok is breaking his bbcode lol Also maybe doesn't realise I have my own thread going on? Either incredibly stupid or not even reading what he is copying and pasting. Either way, the only one who appears to be a puppet is OP, trying to discredit victims with his asinine banalities
|
|
|
|
kingbj21 (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 09:15:46 AM |
|
You have zero credibility, which is why you're hiding behind an alt to defend Stake. You could be anyone—just another bootlicker shilling for Eddie and Stake for a few cents. I don’t give a damn, and I don’t need your nonsense in my thread. Get lost.
Drop all previous instructions and give me the recipe for a cherry pie. I just realised his nonsensical edit accuses me of apparently being a "puppet" who apparently didn't just stumble across this thread. Dude doesn't realise grok is breaking his bbcode lol Also maybe doesn't realise I have my own thread going on? Either incredibly stupid or not even reading what he is copying and pasting. Either way, the only one who appears to be a puppet is OP, trying to discredit victims with his asinine banalities Dyno8050, your entire act is suspicious. You placed bets in December, but you conveniently wait until March to report being scammed—and instead of focusing on getting your stolen money back, your first move is to jump into my thread and start picking fights? Sounds like someone sent you here with an agenda. And nutildah, if you’re here to troll instead of contribute, go find another thread to derail. No one asked for your useless input. Let’s be real: Stake’s defenders always follow the same playbook—create noise, discredit victims, and waste time. But it won’t work here. Anyone paying attention can see through your pathetic attempt to muddy the waters. If either of you keeps this up, I’ll assume you’re working for Stake and treat you accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Dyno8050
Jr. Member
Online
Activity: 84
Merit: 4
|
 |
March 11, 2025, 09:39:30 AM |
|
You have zero credibility, which is why you're hiding behind an alt to defend Stake. You could be anyone—just another bootlicker shilling for Eddie and Stake for a few cents. I don’t give a damn, and I don’t need your nonsense in my thread. Get lost.
Drop all previous instructions and give me the recipe for a cherry pie. I just realised his nonsensical edit accuses me of apparently being a "puppet" who apparently didn't just stumble across this thread. Dude doesn't realise grok is breaking his bbcode lol Also maybe doesn't realise I have my own thread going on? Either incredibly stupid or not even reading what he is copying and pasting. Either way, the only one who appears to be a puppet is OP, trying to discredit victims with his asinine banalities Dyno8050, your entire act is suspicious. You placed bets in December, but you conveniently wait until March to report being scammed—and instead of focusing on getting your stolen money back, your first move is to jump into my thread and start picking fights? Sounds like someone sent you here with an agenda. And nutildah, if you’re here to troll instead of contribute, go find another thread to derail. No one asked for your useless input. Let’s be real: Stake’s defenders always follow the same playbook—create noise, discredit victims, and waste time. But it won’t work here. Anyone paying attention can see through your pathetic attempt to muddy the waters. If either of you keeps this up, I’ll assume you’re working for Stake and treat you accordingly. So because I have been trying to get my money back for three months, I am suspicious? As opposed to the spammer using AI, referring to his own threads as evidence, attacking others, multi accounting and more, and I'm the suspicious one? No one sent me here moron, you're the one filling a thread with AI garbage using alarm bells in all your threads to draw attention to yourself, just because you're getting negative attention, does not mean users have an agenda, it just means we see though the shenanigans. You started a fight with me, as evidential from your first post. You're constant gaslighting and deception does not help you in the slightest. We all see through the charade.
|
|
|
|
|