Pakhitheboss and his alternative accounts

[lovesmayfamilis]

I am surprised about the behavior of the rest of the DT users. I don't remember seeing them being this silent after presenting solid evidence in front of them. Do they expect this user to come up with some kind of explanation? It's been 16 days, zero explanation, he wanted to pay people to help him, threats to others, and more cheating were found, what else do you need?

Many are silently watching, realizing that this user is unlikely to be able to provide evidence of his "loyalty to the forum and the truthfulness of his actions." It seems that he wants more attention, which is delaying his confession. But the more we discuss his inattention to this topic, the more we flatter his vanity about how important he is, counting the days of his absence. He has several tags from DT, and he is inactive; is it worth spending so much time on him?

[nutildah]

OK, I have tagged all 3 accounts. I was kinda hoping pakhitheboss would at least continue posting, but that doesn't appear to be the case. He should still pay back his loan to shasan as that is the honorable thing to do. I can't help but think that his reputation is still salvageable if he wanted it to be.

Kudos to Shishir99 for his investigation -- another trust system manipulator has been flushed.

Rest assured, this time tomorrow the DT update for the week will have occurred and will show which of us have distrusted these users.

DT1 only updates once a month and DT2 updates continuously. I suppose you are referring to LoyceV's Trust list viewer, which is for all forum members, not just DT.

[Shishir99]

He has several tags from DT, and he is inactive; is it worth spending so much time on him?

For some reason, the campaign manager does not agree with these tags and he expects this user to come back and reply and he expect the negative tags will be turned into neutral. The person in question has zero defense and offered money to the forum users to help him debunk the accusation. Clearly, these tags are not enough for the manager to remove him from the campaign because he is a dream user of any manager. I am not the guy who found the main connection. Someone sent me information and asked me to check further. I usually transfer these things to nutildah or someone like him, but I thought this evidence was enough this time.

The reason I spent time is, that he was too aggressive towards the forum members. Whoever had arguments with him got attacked personally. Zwei, AHOYBRAUSE, Apocollapse, Amphenomenon, and many more members were attcked. He was mocking us (especially if someone was from my country). So, I wanted to see what the community thinks about this member.

[Timelord2067]

He has several tags from DT, and he is inactive; is it worth spending so much time on him?

For some reason, the campaign manager does not agree with these tags and he expects this user to come back and reply and he expect the negative tags will be turned into neutral. The person in question has zero defense and offered money to the forum users to help him debunk the accusation. Clearly, these tags are not enough for the manager to remove him from the campaign because he is a dream user of any manager. I am not the guy who found the main connection. Someone sent me information and asked me to check further. I usually transfer these things to nutildah or someone like him, but I thought this evidence was enough this time.

The reason I spent time is, that he was too aggressive towards the forum members. Whoever had arguments with him got attacked personally. Zwei, AHOYBRAUSE, Apocollapse, Amphenomenon, and many more members were attcked. He was mocking us (especially if someone was from my country). So, I wanted to see what the community thinks about this member.

Just one of the five UID's has been online today - none of them have come here to say anything of substance:

I have been out of the scene because of some reason. Be ready to get fucked!

The weekly DT update list still hasn't come out, but hopefully at least a few of use have distrusted them on the basis of their merit swapping etc evidence.

[Z_MBFM]

I am surprised about the behavior of the rest of the DT users. I don't remember seeing them being this silent after presenting solid evidence in front of them. Do they expect this user to come up with some kind of explanation? It's been 16 days, zero explanation, he wanted to pay people to help him, threats to others, and more cheating were found, what else do you need?

Many are silently watching, realizing that this user is unlikely to be able to provide evidence of his "loyalty to the forum and the truthfulness of his actions." It seems that he wants more attention, which is delaying his confession. But the more we discuss his inattention to this topic, the more we flatter his vanity about how important he is, counting the days of his absence. He has several tags from DT, and he is inactive; is it worth spending so much time on him?

He or she id dead. It seems that he has no ability to provide any valid proof. He has already taken too long.  Now this is the proof that all the allegations leveled against him are proved to be truth. All proofs of op are valid enough. So he undoubtedly deserves the Red Tag

[Timelord2067]

Follow the money/merit/trust.

Well, that could be because we are from the same local board and there are just a few active users in the Indian board. (Rikafip's dashboard)
On top of that, we don't have a merit source for our local board and we just try to contribute to keep the board alive.
The identical number of merits could just be a coincidence.

Somehow, I doubt that.

Anatomy of pakhitheboss' DT Trust.

Vispilio

2021-06-24

A high-calibre member and owner of Ferox. He taught as well as helped me a lot in running the Bounty Campaign.

pakhitheboss receives trust feed back (above) then sends (below) to this user:

Vispilio

2022-01-20

Managed 3 bounty campaigns for us with great professionalism and strong work ethics, thoroughly reliable both in crypto and business relationships.

shasan

2022-09-16

Reference

Gave me a Non collateral loan twice. Helped me when I needed the money most.

They then send, then receive from shasan

shasan

2023-03-18

Reference

Loan repaid on time as usual.

At the same time pakhitheboss takes out a loan from shasan, they DT trust shasan, Vispilio and elevates (the later being one of the five above)

Hi, shasan!

New loan request:

[Week 2015]

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: neutral) (324 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2023-02-25_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Removed Hhampuz (Trust: +127 / =3 / -0) (4311 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. NEW Vispilio (Trust: +3 / =3 / -2) (1123 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. JSRAW (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1492 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW shasan (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (1018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW elevates (Trust: awaiting update) (61 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW elevates (Trust: awaiting update) (61 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

In [Week 240]  pakhitheboss DT Trusts Heisenberg_Hunter

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (544 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2023-08-19_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Vispilio (Trust: +1 / =3 / -2) (1223 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1254 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. shasan (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (1172 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. elevates (Trust: neutral) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. elevates (Trust: neutral) (334 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

One week later - [Week 241] Heisenberg_Hunter DT trusts pakhitheboss

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (545 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2023-08-26_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Vispilio (Trust: +1 / =3 / -2) (1223 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1254 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. shasan (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (1173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. elevates (Trust: neutral) (335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (1254 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. elevates (Trust: neutral) (335 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Neither leaves any Trust Feedback to explain this reciprocal DT.

Jumping forward to [Week269], Heisenberg_Hunter removes their DT

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (731 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2024-03-09_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Vispilio (Trust: +1 / =3 / -2) (DT1 (-9) 1347 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. shasan (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (1242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Removed Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

One week later, [Week 270] Heisenberg_Hunter now distrusts pakhitheboss who likewise removes their DT trust of Heisenberg_Hunter and "elevates"

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (733 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2024-03-16_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Vispilio (Trust: +1 / =3 / -2) (DT1 (-9) 1347 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Removed Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. shasan (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (1248 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Removed elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1265 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[Week 295] sees Bitcoin Smith added to their DT Trust while distrusting two users - one of whom has now left negative trust feedback in the last week.

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (822 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2024-09-07_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +29 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (53) 12287 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (812 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Vispilio (Trust: +1 / =3 / -3) (1406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. icopress (Trust: +63 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 8801 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. shasan (Trust: +21 / =0 / -0) (1292 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. NEW ~AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (789 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW ~Learn Bitcoin (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. BC.GAME (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (125 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW Bitcoin Smith (Trust: neutral) (319 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (789 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Learn Bitcoin (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (975 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Unsurprisingly, in [Week 309] pakhitheboss adds the other three UID's to their trust list and at the same time distrusts Shishir99 (the OP of this thread).

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (850 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2024-12-14_Sat_05.28h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +32 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (52) 12462 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. holydarkness (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1060 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (838 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Vispilio (Trust: +1 / =3 / -3) (1411 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. icopress (Trust: +67 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 9363 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. shasan (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (1307 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. NEW Bitcoin Smith (Trust: neutral) (337 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. NEW ~Shishir99 (Trust: neutral) (272 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (890 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~Learn Bitcoin (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1016 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (838 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. BC.GAME (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Bitcoin Smith (Trust: neutral) (337 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW Etranger (Trust: +1 / =0 / -1) (1323 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. NEW Bureau (Trust: neutral) (279 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. WEB503 (Trust: neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (890 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Learn Bitcoin (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1016 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Just two weeks ago in [Week 314] pakhitheboss quietly adds Etranger to their DT Trust list (and is added by icopress)

Trust list for: pakhitheboss (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (876 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2025-01-18_Sat_04.28h)
Back to index

pakhitheboss Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (55) 12553 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. holydarkness (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1104 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (852 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Vispilio (Trust: +2 / =3 / -2) (1417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. NEW JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (1627 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. icopress (Trust: +63 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (26) 9721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. shasan (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (1317 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Bitcoin Smith (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (359 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. NEW Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -1) (1368 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. NEW @Whale (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

pakhitheboss Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Shishir99 (Trust: neutral) (279 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (1018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~Learn Bitcoin (Trust: +3 / =4 / -0) (1029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


pakhitheboss's judgement is Trusted by:
1. TheUltraElite (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (852 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (1627 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW icopress (Trust: +63 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (26) 9721 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. BC.GAME (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (153 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Bitcoin Smith (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (359 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Etranger (Trust: +3 / =0 / -1) (1368 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. elevates (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Bureau (Trust: neutral) (279 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. WEB503 (Trust: neutral) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. @Whale (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (115 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~pakhitheboss's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. AHOYBRAUSE (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (1018 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Learn Bitcoin (Trust: +3 / =4 / -0) (1029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Then, less than a week later,

2025-01-24 this thread is started:

Link to the profiles;

elevates
pakhitheboss
Bureau

Well, that could be because we are from the same local board and there are just a few active users in the Indian board. (Rikafip's dashboard (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231446.msg64976528#msg6497652Cool)
On top of that, we don't have a merit source for our local board and we just try to contribute to keep the board alive.
The identical number of merits could just be a coincidence.

Your own DT Trust list follows a similar pattern [Week 97], [Week 235], [Week 270],

(as does the others).

Follow the money/merit/trust

[AB de Royse777]

Heisenberg_Hunter worked for me in many occasions and I never found him greedy about money. He is more into his creativity rather than quick earning. All these merits in questions from him are because I believe he was/is a merit source for his specific local so obviously many others were trying to impress him to earn merit. I am not asking anyone to make a conclusion about him but personally I would like to think that he is clean.

Cheers,

[Shishir99]

Heisenberg_Hunter worked for me in many occasions and I never found him greedy about money. He is more into his creativity rather than quick earning. All these merits in questions from him are because I believe he was/is a merit source for his specific local so obviously many others were trying to impress him to earn merit. I am not asking anyone to make a conclusion about him but personally I would like to think that he is clean.

Cheers,

I also shared my personal opinion about Heisenberg_Hunter. I do not doubt him at all because I understand that when a merit source is assigned to a small local board and has to spend all his merit allocation on the local board, it is obvious that he will become the top merit fan of most of the users of that local board. I did not know about his design service, but yesterday, I checked his last twenty posts and figured out he is a good designer.

I don't want to start slandering other mentioned forum members unless there is some evidence. Trust inclusions and exclusions are not considered evidence.

@memehunter, I am writing this here because you left positive feedback on my profile because of this thread. I know there are a lot of people posting this kind of feedback to scam busters/spam busters. But, I believe this is incorrect use of the feedback system. You are still too young in DT network. Such feedback may earn DT exclusions. You should remove the feedback from my profile because I don't think this deserves positive feedback.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

@memehunter, I am writing this here because you left positive feedback on my profile because of this thread. I know there are a lot of people posting this kind of feedback to scam busters/spam busters. But, I believe this is incorrect use of the feedback system. You are still too young in DT network. Such feedback may earn DT exclusions. You should remove the feedback from my profile because I don't think this deserves positive feedback.

You should ~memehunter yourself if you think so. Otherwise it will look like you are trying to present yourself in a good light but you like the tag and want it to remain visible by default on your profile.

[JeromeTash]

I am waiting for just one thing before I can drop my tag on his profile, and if it hasn't been created yet at that time, I will personally create a trust flag as well.

What type of trust flag are you thinking about?

Type 1. I am hoping he honours and pays back Shasan's loan. If he doesn't, Shasan can as well create a type 3.

I am surprised about the behavior of the rest of the DT users. I don't remember seeing them being this silent after presenting solid evidence in front of them.

You can't push everyone on DT to send negative feedback whenever you want.

I think my reason for not sending feedback yet is clear (shasan's loan), probably others are banking on that too. Some may have not followed the full accusation thread, but it's quite clear that the accused has been caught pants down and has probably failed to defend himself.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

I think my reason for not sending feedback yet is clear (shasan's loan), probably others are banking on that too. Some may have not followed the full accusation thread, but it's quite clear that the accused has been caught pants down and has probably failed to defend himself.

Normally he is paying his loan in weekly installments, as far what I can see in the history of him posting in the lending thread. Obviously he didn't post there for about 2,5 weeks now . Wonder if Shasan is in contact with him or if this conversation also kind of went down the drain.

Hope this will get settled!!

[yahoo62278]

I am waiting for just one thing before I can drop my tag on his profile, and if it hasn't been created yet at that time, I will personally create a trust flag as well.

What type of trust flag are you thinking about?

Type 1. I am hoping he honours and pays back Shasan's loan. If he doesn't, Shasan can as well create a type 3.

I am surprised about the behavior of the rest of the DT users. I don't remember seeing them being this silent after presenting solid evidence in front of them.

You can't push everyone on DT to send negative feedback whenever you want.

I think my reason for not sending feedback yet is clear (shasan's loan), probably others are banking on that too. Some may have not followed the full accusation thread, but it's quite clear that the accused has been caught pants down and has probably failed to defend himself.

Pretty sure when I left the 1st feedback shasans loan was in jeopardy. My apologies to shasan but the community is more important than his loans.

[Shishir99]

You should ~memehunter yourself if you think so. Otherwise it will look like you are trying to present yourself in a good light but you like the tag and want it to remain visible by default on your profile.

I did not build my trust list yet. I have been thinking of building it, but I was trying to keep myself out of these dramas. But as you can see, I am pretty much involved now. I don't have any plan to look for people's mistakes. I guess I read a post from a DT1 member a long time ago about why he wiped out his trust list, reading that post, I decided not to build my trust list. Unfortunately, I am not going to change that anytime soon. My ~ won't kick him out of the DT network. Otherwise, I would ~JG a few weeks ago. But as I said, I don't want to be in dramas. I created this thread for a reason which I explained in another post in this thread.

[pawanjain]

Your own DT Trust list follows a similar pattern [Week 97], [Week 235], [Week 270],

You must be kidding. I am nowhere in the story above about all the trust - distrust blah blah blah.
All I know is, I trust Heisenberg_Hunter because  I have known him for quite some time and we share kinda same thoughts.
So it kinda makes sense if he trusts me too. I can't really do anything about who adds me to their trust list wherther its elevates or Heisenberg or anybody else for that matter.
But I haven't added anyone else other than Heisenberg_Hunter and few other well known forum members.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I did not build my trust list yet. I have been thinking of building it, but I was trying to keep myself out of these dramas. But as you can see, I am pretty much involved now. I don't have any plan to look for people's mistakes. I guess I read a post from a DT1 member a long time ago about why he wiped out his trust list, reading that post, I decided not to build my trust list. Unfortunately, I am not going to change that anytime soon. My ~ won't kick him out of the DT network. Otherwise, I would ~JG a few weeks ago. But as I said, I don't want to be in dramas. I created this thread for a reason which I explained in another post in this thread.

That's what I tell my fellow members of the local forum, that I don't know what I do sometimes getting into trouble in the Reputation section. And anyway, here I am.

The consequence should not matter. Exclude who you need to exclude, just as you should write the feedback you think you should write regardless of whether it is shown. If you do it right over time your feedback will show up and your inclusions and exclusions will carry weight.

[memehunter]

@memehunter, I am writing this here because you left positive feedback on my profile because of this thread. I know there are a lot of people posting this kind of feedback to scam busters/spam busters. But, I believe this is incorrect use of the feedback system. You are still too young in DT network. Such feedback may earn DT exclusions. You should remove the feedback from my profile because I don't think this deserves positive feedback.

This statement of yours reflects how sincere you are regarding the accurate application of tags. You could have easily slept over it but you chose to make it public. I am impressed by your approach. Now regarding the tag, I have clearly referenced it with how I felt. Unless someone proves to me that this is the wrong reason for giving a positive tag (I am always open to a convincing argument as well), you deserve this for making this wonderful forum more awesome.

[Zwei]

@memehunter, I am writing this here because you left positive feedback on my profile because of this thread. I know there are a lot of people posting this kind of feedback to scam busters/spam busters. But, I believe this is incorrect use of the feedback system. You are still too young in DT network. Such feedback may earn DT exclusions. You should remove the feedback from my profile because I don't think this deserves positive feedback.

You should ~memehunter yourself if you think so. Otherwise it will look like you are trying to present yourself in a good light but you like the tag and want it to remain visible by default on your profile.

nah, it doesn't look that way to me.
if he liked the tag, he would not have said anything, and he definitely would not have asked @memehunter to remove it.

@memehunter, I am writing this here because you left positive feedback on my profile because of this thread. I know there are a lot of people posting this kind of feedback to scam busters/spam busters. But, I believe this is incorrect use of the feedback system. You are still too young in DT network. Such feedback may earn DT exclusions. You should remove the feedback from my profile because I don't think this deserves positive feedback.

This statement of yours reflects how sincere you are regarding the accurate application of tags. You could have easily slept over it but you chose to make it public. I am impressed by your approach. Now regarding the tag, I have clearly referenced it with how I felt. Unless someone proves to me that this is the wrong reason for giving a positive tag (I am always open to a convincing argument as well), you deserve this for making this wonderful forum more awesome.

i don't care if you keep or remove the positive feedback, but if you really believe he's sincere, you should respect his request to remove it, or at least change it to a neutral.

[Timelord2067]

Your own DT Trust list follows a similar pattern [Week 97], [Week 235], [Week 270],

You must be kidding. I am nowhere in the story above about all the trust - distrust blah blah blah.

Keep digging that hole for yourself - Pawanjin, Cheater on Hhampuz campaign (Duelbits). Need any DT member attention

Why this guy (pawanjain) still can join on any signature campaign when he admitted by himself he was cheating the campaign with his alt?

Numerous alts independently identified by others. (credit amongst others @cheater detector @morvillz7z @Slow death @Joel_Jantsen )

I agree, juggling with 20ish accounts at a time must be mentally and physically wearying.

Wait what ? I seriously have no idea about the accounts nikjain422,Sahyadri
Might be alt accounts of crptotrader007 or somebody else.

This and hasmukh_rawal are the only 2 accounts I hold.

[yahoo62278]

Your own DT Trust list follows a similar pattern [Week 97], [Week 235], [Week 270],

You must be kidding. I am nowhere in the story above about all the trust - distrust blah blah blah.

Keep digging that hole for yourself - Pawanjin, Cheater on Hhampuz campaign (Duelbits). Need any DT member attention

Why this guy (pawanjain) still can join on any signature campaign when he admitted by himself he was cheating the campaign with his alt?

Numerous alts independently identified by others. (credit amongst others @cheater detector @morvillz7z @Slow death @Joel_Jantsen )

I agree, juggling with 20ish accounts at a time must be mentally and physically wearying.

Wait what ? I seriously have no idea about the accounts nikjain422,Sahyadri
Might be alt accounts of crptotrader007 or somebody else.

This and hasmukh_rawal are the only 2 accounts I hold.

Since 5 years have passed I am not going to tag the user, but I will say I do not support the answers pawanjain gave in the accusation thread.

I cannot change the past. Besides, All those accounts you mentioned are inactive since a long time anyway.

Nobody is perfect bud. I have made mistakes in my past but what matters is how you learn from the mistakes and improve yourself. I had faced time when I had no job and my financial status was so low that I had to walk miles to save a few bucks.Signature campaigns helped me a lot in handling my expenses and I thank the forum for that with all my heart.

I was just listening to a guy named charlie kirk the other day talk about something similar to this. Is it ok to rob a bank because you have no money? Is it ok to steal becuase you have no food? The answer is no, you are breaking the rules period and nothing makes that ok.

I am not advocating that anyone tag this user, he should have been tagged in the past though.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I was just listening to a guy named charlie kirk the other day talk about something similar to this. Is it ok to rob a bank because you have no money? Is it ok to steal becuase you have no food? The answer is no, you are breaking the rules period and nothing makes that ok.

I am not advocating that anyone tag this user, he should have been tagged in the past though.

I don't want to defend anyone, but if money is lying on the road and no one takes it, simply because it's someone else's, do you believe this is possible and no one will use it?

The forum allows alternative accounts. But these alternative accounts are not allowed to cheat. What does the forum do to prevent cheating? Nothing. Only people who catch cheaters sometimes prevent them from breaking these rules.

If it were impossible to register hundreds of alternative accounts, there would be no temptation to milk the forum. At least not everyone can change their IP, device, MAC address, and everything that is not allowed for cheating on other sites.

I don't believe that people will be honest just because the word "forbidden" is written somewhere. They will take advantage of the opportunity where there are loopholes. Poverty and greed give birth to the desire to break the rules; those who are not in great need will follow the rules, but there will be very few of them. However, since the forum does not prohibit anything globally, the mistakes of those who are inattentive to their alternatives and allow detection of your own judged fairly.