Can you reccomend any Crypto casinos wo mandatory verification?

[leonair]

Hello everyone!
Can you recommend a casino where I can deposit with BTC,ETH or USDT, that doesn’t require mandatory verification to play, and is available to residents of Germany?

I previously played on Trustdice, but after a big win, they asked me to complete KYC. Then, claiming I had a duplicate account, they blocked my access and haven’t responded to my emails for a month.

I’m looking for a place to play without the need for verification. Please, kind people, help me out!

There are many casino site announcements you can see on gambling boards. There you can know their details. Recently casino sites have started making KYC verification mandatory. until a few months back some trusted casino sites including stake.com allowed users to gamble without any KYC. But due to some policy they have made kyc mandatory now. So maybe some sites you get chance to gamble without kyc are not very trustworthy or reputable. so you have to accept kyc verification process. If you want to gamble at a trusted casino site then I think having someone do kyc verification there is no problem.  Because they always keep users data encrypted.

[ajiz138]

Hello everyone!
Can you recommend a casino where I can deposit with BTC,ETH or USDT, that doesn’t require mandatory verification to play, and is available to residents of Germany?

I previously played on Trustdice, but after a big win, they asked me to complete KYC. Then, claiming I had a duplicate account, they blocked my access and haven’t responded to my emails for a month.

I’m looking for a place to play without the need for verification. Please, kind people, help me out!

Most crypto casinos you find in this forum provide BTC, ETH and USDT as payment method and most of them also implement non mandatory KYC.
However, when it comes to the situation as what you experienced (big win), most casinos may also ask you to complete KYC.
So do not expect that you will not be asked for KYC especially if the casino clearly mentioned in their terms that they reserve the right to ask KYC at anytime.

That's the problem with big winnings, it is certain that the casino will ask you to complete KYC because big winnings are sensitive to casinos but if they have done KYC then there is no need to worry, usually casinos will allow large withdrawals.
All casinos almost have their provision policy with can KYC at any time.

[delfastTions]

Hello everyone!
Can you recommend a casino where I can deposit with BTC,ETH or USDT, that doesn’t require mandatory verification to play, and is available to residents of Germany?

I previously played on Trustdice, but after a big win, they asked me to complete KYC. Then, claiming I had a duplicate account, they blocked my access and haven’t responded to my emails for a month.

I’m looking for a place to play without the need for verification. Please, kind people, help me out!

Most crypto casinos you find in this forum provide BTC, ETH and USDT as payment method and most of them also implement non mandatory KYC.
However, when it comes to the situation as what you experienced (big win), most casinos may also ask you to complete KYC.
So do not expect that you will not be asked for KYC especially if the casino clearly mentioned in their terms that they reserve the right to ask KYC at anytime.

That's the problem with big winnings, it is certain that the casino will ask you to complete KYC because big winnings are sensitive to casinos but if they have done KYC then there is no need to worry, usually casinos will allow large withdrawals.
All casinos almost have their provision policy with can KYC at any time.

That's exactly what happens. The KYC policy for big wins at all casinos that accept payments in cryptocurrency is pretty much the same anyway. And all gamblers now know this very well and almost all gamblers are internally prepared for two possible outcomes in case of winning. Either the player gives the casino their exact personal data and will receive the money they won. Or the player cannot lose their anonymity under any circumstances and cannot or does not want to give their personal data and then will naturally lose all the money they won. In my opinion, this vision of the situation is now generally accepted and does not present any other solution to the issue to anyone. For example, how to receive a bunch of money won and remain anonymous, which could easily have been done ten years ago.

[Agbe]

Snip

There are many casino site announcements you can see on gambling boards. There you can know their details. Recently casino sites have started making KYC verification mandatory. until a few months back some trusted casino sites including stake.com allowed users to gamble without any KYC. But due to some policy they have made kyc mandatory now. So maybe some sites you get chance to gamble without kyc are not very trustworthy or reputable. so you have to accept kyc verification process. If you want to gamble at a trusted casino site then I think having someone do kyc verification there is no problem.  Because they always keep users data encrypted.

That is why it is better for them to ask of KYC in the time of registration and if the person is still interested to continue with the KYC questions no problem and if he doesn't like to continue because of his privacy and he can stopped there and look for a casino that doesn't ask for KYC but it will be hard for the person to see a casino that doesn't ask for KYC. Those casinos in 2023 and early 2024 that were saying KYC free are now asking for KYC so it is better for the person to look for a reliable casino and register and play games from there.

[ajiz138]

That's the problem with big winnings, it is certain that the casino will ask you to complete KYC because big winnings are sensitive to casinos but if they have done KYC then there is no need to worry, usually casinos will allow large withdrawals.
All casinos almost have their provision policy with can KYC at any time.

That's exactly what happens. The KYC policy for big wins at all casinos that accept payments in cryptocurrency is pretty much the same anyway. And all gamblers now know this very well and almost all gamblers are internally prepared for two possible outcomes in case of winning. Either the player gives the casino their exact personal data and will receive the money they won. Or the player cannot lose their anonymity under any circumstances and cannot or does not want to give their personal data and then will naturally lose all the money they won. In my opinion, this vision of the situation is now generally accepted and does not present any other solution to the issue to anyone. For example, how to receive a bunch of money won and remain anonymous, which could easily have been done ten years ago.

Now the situation is different, because crypto has been widely accepted as an adoption, the government began to regulate several crypto platforms of all kinds, especially casinos that have licenses, the rules must be obeyed and players must accept that they can send documents to the plaftrom.

10 years ago many centralized platforms still remained anonymous but now it's different, almost all CEXs are required KYC, so casinos are now considered as centralized platforms so KYC will one day become mandatory like Stake.com which has done it at the beginning of the year.

[delfastTions]

That's the problem with big winnings, it is certain that the casino will ask you to complete KYC because big winnings are sensitive to casinos but if they have done KYC then there is no need to worry, usually casinos will allow large withdrawals.
All casinos almost have their provision policy with can KYC at any time.

That's exactly what happens. The KYC policy for big wins at all casinos that accept payments in cryptocurrency is pretty much the same anyway. And all gamblers now know this very well and almost all gamblers are internally prepared for two possible outcomes in case of winning. Either the player gives the casino their exact personal data and will receive the money they won. Or the player cannot lose their anonymity under any circumstances and cannot or does not want to give their personal data and then will naturally lose all the money they won. In my opinion, this vision of the situation is now generally accepted and does not present any other solution to the issue to anyone. For example, how to receive a bunch of money won and remain anonymous, which could easily have been done ten years ago.

Now the situation is different, because crypto has been widely accepted as an adoption, the government began to regulate several crypto platforms of all kinds, especially casinos that have licenses, the rules must be obeyed and players must accept that they can send documents to the plaftrom.

10 years ago many centralized platforms still remained anonymous but now it's different, almost all CEXs are required KYC, so casinos are now considered as centralized platforms so KYC will one day become mandatory like Stake.com which has done it at the beginning of the year.

Yeah. This is obviously what will happen.
However, I am still worried that if all this is implemented, then it will be impossible for anonymous gamblers to simply play for their own pleasure. By the way, the number of players will decrease somewhat on a global scale, since anonymity is important for some players and, for various reasons, they simply cannot provide their personal data to the casino and pass KYC. It seems that decentralized casino options will not be able to save the situation either, although it is obvious to everyone that anonymous casino play is a very popular service and millions of players prefer to play this way.

[D.t.B]

For sites with looser KYC policy, I'd go with rollbit, shuffle or betfury. Pasino is also a decent small site that lets you play w/o ID check.

[Cointxz]

For sites with looser KYC policy, I'd go with rollbit, shuffle or betfury. Pasino is also a decent small site that lets you play w/o ID check.

This doesn’t fit on the OP preferences since all the casino that you mention has a license to operate which means they can ask KYC anytime if the casino think it’s necessary to verify user identity.

There’s still a lot of casino that let user play without KYC at the beginning but the problem is when you finally win huge amount because casino frequently requests KYC on withdrawal.

Decentralized casino is still the best but the only downside is it has limited games.

[Dunamisx]

Its better we get it clear from here, if we are recommending, then it should bot be the casinos that will not require for kyc at the start to later demand for it at the course of gambling, the difference here is, some may later request while some not not request for kyc by any reason now and thereafter, so if we are making recommendations, we should be so clear and specific about what we are suggesting, because i can see some mixed up already from what some are suggesting.

[reefsea]

Yeah. This is obviously what will happen.
However, I am still worried that if all this is implemented, then it will be impossible for anonymous gamblers to simply play for their own pleasure. By the way, the number of players will decrease somewhat on a global scale, since anonymity is important for some players and, for various reasons, they simply cannot provide their personal data to the casino and pass KYC. It seems that decentralized casino options will not be able to save the situation either, although it is obvious to everyone that anonymous casino play is a very popular service and millions of players prefer to play this way.

I think they have considered it too so they do not hesitate to implement this rule, so we do not have to worry about it. Apart from that, even though the casino requires KYC we can still see many users coming and I do not even see users decreasing significantly because of this rule. Actually if we look at the journey, then I think it will be the same in the future, meaning even though at the beginning the casino did not require KYC, then in the future we do not know what changes they will make.

It doesn't really matter if they implement this rule as long as they can maintain the trust of users. And don't forget they also build trust not only in a short time, so I don't think they will destroy what they have built for years, yes even though the risk is still there.

[Wonder Work]

spi......

I think they have considered it too so they do not hesitate to implement this rule, so we do not have to worry about it. Apart from that, even though the casino requires KYC we can still see many users coming and I do not even see users decreasing significantly because of this rule. Actually if we look at the journey, then I think it will be the same in the future, meaning even though at the beginning the casino did not require KYC, then in the future we do not know what changes they will make.

It doesn't really matter if they implement this rule as long as they can maintain the trust of users. And don't forget they also build trust not only in a short time, so I don't think they will destroy what they have built for years, yes even though the risk is still there.

I have seen many players playing games in casinos without KYC, but when this KYC system came, they never disagreed because they knew the positive aspects. With the KYC system, there is no possibility of losing their money, and the casino player can exchange it. I have not seen any element where the number of casino players has decreased due to the arrival of the KYC system. I have seen many scams where many people lost their money without KYC, but after the arrival of this KYC system, the game players have done a good job. There is no fear of losing whatever they have. From what I can see in the current scenario, there will be no game shortly without the KYC system.

[Rating Place]

Hello everyone!
Can you recommend a casino where I can deposit with BTC,ETH or USDT, that doesn’t require mandatory verification to play, and is available to residents of Germany?

I previously played on Trustdice, but after a big win, they asked me to complete KYC. Then, claiming I had a duplicate account, they blocked my access and haven’t responded to my emails for a month.

I’m looking for a place to play without the need for verification. Please, kind people, help me out!

You are looking for a decentralized casino because all license casino has the right to ask you KYC verification if they think your account was involved on shady activity that violates the casino ToS.

Bitcoin-Betting.com/Fairlay offers a decentralized sportsbook but they have a history of not paying players for alleged betting on fixed match so even decentralized casino you will still have a problem in case you violate the ToS.

Bitcoin-Betting (Fairlay) has the cleanest history of all sportsbooks. Fairlay has been in existence since 2012. The case you state was proved to be match fixing by gambling authorities. Bitcoin-Betting is safe with no KYC.

31.7. 11:20
A football club in the fourth tier of Finnish football has become a tool of organised criminals involved in sports betting, according to Turun Sanomat.

TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.

He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

https://yle.fi/a/74-20102346

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Its better we get it clear from here, if we are recommending, then it should bot be the casinos that will not require for kyc at the start to later demand for it at the course of gambling, the difference here is, some may later request while some not not request for kyc by any reason now and thereafter, so if we are making recommendations, we should be so clear and specific about what we are suggesting, because i can see some mixed up already from what some are suggesting.

It is commonly said that one thing that is common is change, and we all know that no one can predict the future, what I mean by this is that, things change, casinos also change, a casino that is once a no-kyc casino can turn around to become a kyc casino due to several reasons or change in some factors concerning regulation and all that.

So, when it come to recommending casinos with no-kyc, I believe we can only be sure of the casinos we recommend and for now, we can not tell the future of that casino..
I believe a clear example is some casinos we have today, freebitco was once a no-kyc casino, but some few years back, the updated their terms and included that they could ask for kyc verification if they need arises.

The only casinos I think or believe don't have a chance of ever requesting kyc from her users is decentralized casinos that are truly decentralized and not the comoflage we see around.

[Cointxz]

Hello everyone!
Can you recommend a casino where I can deposit with BTC,ETH or USDT, that doesn’t require mandatory verification to play, and is available to residents of Germany?

I previously played on Trustdice, but after a big win, they asked me to complete KYC. Then, claiming I had a duplicate account, they blocked my access and haven’t responded to my emails for a month.

I’m looking for a place to play without the need for verification. Please, kind people, help me out!

You are looking for a decentralized casino because all license casino has the right to ask you KYC verification if they think your account was involved on shady activity that violates the casino ToS.

Bitcoin-Betting.com/Fairlay offers a decentralized sportsbook but they have a history of not paying players for alleged betting on fixed match so even decentralized casino you will still have a problem in case you violate the ToS.

Bitcoin-Betting (Fairlay) has the cleanest history of all sportsbooks. Fairlay has been in existence since 2012. The case you state was proved to be match fixing by gambling authorities. Bitcoin-Betting is safe with no KYC.

31.7. 11:20
A football club in the fourth tier of Finnish football has become a tool of organised criminals involved in sports betting, according to Turun Sanomat.

TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.

He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

https://yle.fi/a/74-20102346

Regardless if the match turned out to be a fixed match, Fairlay doesn’t justify their confiscation on the funds while other casino pay for the result since the match is not proven fixed game that time.

Besides, there’s no guaranteed or evidence that user has any involvement on fixed game therefore it’s still just a regular game for normal sports bettor player.


I don’t want to prolong discussion here because it will be off topic already. I just mentioned that even a complete decentralized casino can still confiscate players bet if they involved on shady bets.

[Charles-Tim]

Regardless if the match turned out to be a fixed match, Fairlay doesn’t justify their confiscation on the funds while other casino pay for the result since the match is not proven fixed game that time.

Any match that is not cancelled but played from start to the end are valid matches. Be it fixed or not fixed.

I don’t want to prolong discussion here because it will be off topic already. I just mentioned that even a complete decentralized casino can still confiscate players bet if they involved on shady bets.

There is no complete decentralized casino that I know of. A decentralized casinos must run nodes belonging to different people from different countries and not run just central servers that belong to the casino owners. Bitcoin, Tor and few others are decentralized but they are not gambling sites.

Also most all the casinos that people think can not have access to their funds because they are web3, they are only deceiving themselves. If problem surface will be when they will know that it is not actually decentralized the way they think.

[Rating Place]

Hello everyone!
Can you recommend a casino where I can deposit with BTC,ETH or USDT, that doesn’t require mandatory verification to play, and is available to residents of Germany?

I previously played on Trustdice, but after a big win, they asked me to complete KYC. Then, claiming I had a duplicate account, they blocked my access and haven’t responded to my emails for a month.

I’m looking for a place to play without the need for verification. Please, kind people, help me out!

You are looking for a decentralized casino because all license casino has the right to ask you KYC verification if they think your account was involved on shady activity that violates the casino ToS.

Bitcoin-Betting.com/Fairlay offers a decentralized sportsbook but they have a history of not paying players for alleged betting on fixed match so even decentralized casino you will still have a problem in case you violate the ToS.

Bitcoin-Betting (Fairlay) has the cleanest history of all sportsbooks. Fairlay has been in existence since 2012. The case you state was proved to be match fixing by gambling authorities. Bitcoin-Betting is safe with no KYC.

31.7. 11:20
A football club in the fourth tier of Finnish football has become a tool of organised criminals involved in sports betting, according to Turun Sanomat.

TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.

He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.

"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."

https://yle.fi/a/74-20102346

Regardless if the match turned out to be a fixed match, Fairlay doesn’t justify their confiscation on the funds while other casino pay for the result since the match is not proven fixed game that time.

Besides, there’s no guaranteed or evidence that user has any involvement on fixed game therefore it’s still just a regular game for normal sports bettor player.


I don’t want to prolong discussion here because it will be off topic already. I just mentioned that even a complete decentralized casino can still confiscate players bet if they involved on shady bets.

I t was proven that the person in question was guilty of match fixing. Regardless, I’ll use Stake since it’s in your signature, there are 6 scam accusations on the first page of scam accusations against Stake. You are picking out one problem in 13 years for Bitcoin-Betting.

Bitcoin-Betting runs 4 nodes. They may be the only one that is truly decentralized. Being able to connect with Metamask doesn’t guarantee that a casino is decentralized. As Fairlay, authorities could force money to be withheld. That’s no longer the case with Bitcoin-Betting since funds are in smart contracts.

[Cointxz]

It was proven that the person in question was guilty of match fixing.

Bitcoin-Betting runs 4 nodes. They may be the only one that is truly decentralized. Being able to connect with Metamask doesn’t guarantee that a casino is decentralized. As Fairlay, authorities could force money to be withheld. That’s no longer the case with Bitcoin-Betting since funds are in smart contracts.

My comment is not personal and I’m not the type of person that consistently degrading a casino due to my personal satisfaction. My opinion is merely just an example that even a decentralized casino sometimes has a problem since the OP is looking for casino without KYC.

Regardless, I’ll use Stake since it’s in your signature, there are 6 scam accusations on the first page of scam accusations against Stake. You are picking out one problem in 13 years for Bitcoin-Betting.

All casino has an existing scam accusation but most of them defend themselves if the evidence is strong against the casino. I myself will support players if the evidence that he submitted is substantial.

[Rating Place]

That was Fairlay with the fixed match and they were centralized. They have become decentralized with the switch to Bitcoin-Betting.

[delfastTions]

spi......

I think they have considered it too so they do not hesitate to implement this rule, so we do not have to worry about it. Apart from that, even though the casino requires KYC we can still see many users coming and I do not even see users decreasing significantly because of this rule. Actually if we look at the journey, then I think it will be the same in the future, meaning even though at the beginning the casino did not require KYC, then in the future we do not know what changes they will make.

It doesn't really matter if they implement this rule as long as they can maintain the trust of users. And don't forget they also build trust not only in a short time, so I don't think they will destroy what they have built for years, yes even though the risk is still there.

I have seen many players playing games in casinos without KYC, but when this KYC system came, they never disagreed because they knew the positive aspects. With the KYC system, there is no possibility of losing their money, and the casino player can exchange it. I have not seen any element where the number of casino players has decreased due to the arrival of the KYC system. I have seen many scams where many people lost their money without KYC, but after the arrival of this KYC system, the game players have done a good job. There is no fear of losing whatever they have. From what I can see in the current scenario, there will be no game shortly without the KYC system.

But you do not take into account the life circumstances of many players themselves, who for various reasons cannot provide the casino with their personal data and go through this very KYC verification procedure.
These reasons can be purely personal, for example, a player is afraid of a leak of personal data and that this can negatively affect the relationship with his employer. The reasons can also be related to the general policy of prohibitions on gambling at the level of the state where this person lives. And there are many more reasons why a player can play only while maintaining anonymity.
And depriving such players of the opportunity to play is clearly contrary to the moral and ethical principles of a humane society.
And of course, we need to look for some way out of such an uncertain legal possibility of anonymity in gambling.

[panjul07]

You are asking for information about casino without mandatory KYC but your story itself is an example of casino without mandatory KYC because you were not asked for KYC before you start playing.
If you are looking for 100% no KYC casino, I think it is hard to find it these days (at least reputable casinos) because most casinos are licensed and they are following the regulation.
You should be ready to undergo KYC at any online casino especially when it comes to big win because it happens frequently, when players manage to win big, KYC is usually coming after.