Less Regulations Coming!

[zasad@]

@zasad@. Similar to your argument, this article is also arguing that if the Clarity act will not be approved and signed into law, they speculate that it will be okay. This is headshaking, I reckon. How can they predict that there will be no Gensler 2.0 hehehehre. I predict that he will become the secretary of treasury if the next president is an anticrypto Democrat.



Wall Street may finally get a clearer crypto rulebook it has spent years waiting for when Washington passes a market structure bill on Tuesday. But even if it doesn’t, financial institutions are unlikely to stop building in the digital assets business.

The Senate’s expected vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY) could give banks, brokers and asset managers more certainty about how they can trade and build products around digital assets. While passage could accelerate that work and bring more traditional firms into the market, failure may be less of a roadblock than it once would have been.

Read in full https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/09/14/even-if-clarity-fails-wall-street-s-crypto-push-is-unlikely-to-stop

If you want my comments, I can provide them.
The experts' job is to publish opinions, while CoinDesk's job is to compile those opinions into articles and sell paid subscriptions. Everyone is busy working and making a profit, regardless of whether the bill passes. It’s an ideal system
In all seriousness, I want to get the results of the Senate hearings on the Clarity Act.

__
BREAKING: US Senate Fails to Advance Crypto CLARITY Act, Here’s What It Means
https://cryptopotato.com/breaking-us-senate-fails-to-advance-crypto-clarity-act-heres-what-this-means/

[bbc.reporter]

@zasad@. Yes, this is a bad and sorrowful occurrence for the future of the cryptospace in America. We also can expect that on their midterm elections, this will be much Democrats that will have the victory.

In any case, this article implies that there was frustration from the Republicans because the Democrats were taking the bill hostage. However, it is headshaking that the Democrats were making it appear that the Republicans did not want to be bipartisan heheheheeh.



Senator Cynthia Lummis' disappointment was already palpable the day before the U.S. Senate shot down the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. She stood on a stage at a crypto event in Washington and talked about how she'd worked on the bill for more than five years — the bulk of her career as a senator.

But the Democrats said they were making an effort to continue talks down to the wire, and they were rebuffed by Republicans who shut down the negotiation and proceeded with the vote. (The vote didn't have to happen on Tuesday afternoon, and it could have been shifted by Republican leaders if there were still a chance for negotiations.)

"Just as Democrats and Republicans were making progress to address ethics concerns, Republican leadership ended talks and forced a vote," said Democrat Senator Ruben Gallego in a statement after the Tuesday vote. "They were never serious about bipartisan negotiations."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters much the same on Tuesday.

“As you may have heard, there was a bipartisan deal on the table as recently as this afternoon to resolve all outstanding items including ethics," Schumer said. “Republican leadership walked into the room, broke up the bipartisan discussion and said, 'No, we’re done' and killed it."

For her part, Lummis argued that the counter offer she saw from Democrats on Monday was essentially the same position they'd taken before the Senate left on its August recess.

And in a statement after the vote, she blamed the Democrats, calling them "anti-American" (despite the fact that a handful of the no votes came from her fellow Republicans).

"This afternoon, Senate Democrats proved they were never truly serious about protecting consumers and preserving American leadership," she said. "I sat at the table with Senate Democrats working in good faith to get this done while they played games."

Meanwhile, the Democrats who voted no will blaze into the final weeks of the midterm election season criticizing the crypto dealings of the president, and the Republicans will accuse Democrats of destroying U.S. innovation (while hoping that the crypto industry’s campaign funds spend millions opposing their political foes).

Read in full https://www.coindesk.com/news-analysis/2026/09/15/there-were-many-conductors-in-the-derailment-of-the-crypto-industry-s-clarity-act

[zasad@]

bbc.reporter, and I agree with cz
https://x.com/cz_binance/status/2100075501662679311
"Interesting summary 👇. If there is any silver lining, stablecoins (can) continue to have yield.

There will always be set backs along the way, but technology advance continues. Onwards."

That means the time for this bill has not yet come. However, if the process drags on into 2027, the market will still take shape through regulators and judicial practice.
I don't see any other buyers of US Treasuries in the market.