♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange ♻️ Fees 0.4 - 0.8%!

[examplens]

But it is better to split the coins and not transfer coins with an unclear history to a centralized exchange.
The time has passed when you can transfer any coins from wallets to the exchange.

AML checks are complete bullshit. And this is a matter in the crypto ecosystem that urgently needs to be regulated.
A few days ago, I checked the Ethereum address, coins withdrawn from one exchange (CEX), and I got "risky funds" as a result. So what should I do next with them?

i want to know the possible means you can make a coins to land at exchange without transferring it from a wallet to an exchange, I think i demand for more clarification from you.

Is this a rhetorical question, or are you really asking?

[snowpega]

Binance Exchange asks for information and declarations several times a year. I expect that this is a very bad exchange. If this service has a refund without providing documents, then it sounds very good. This exchange also frequently requests information about withdrawals.

I agree mate with you that it frusturate a lot when exchanges ask for these kinds of user information, and it really frustrated me when Binance exchange asked me two times for the same thing, but we have to agree with the fact that we have to provide fund information to the trusted exchange we are using because there can be many cases that can be untracked/uninformed if exchanges don't ask any inquiry. These cases can be of money lundering or black money cases, and you also know that these kinds of money are illegal from the agecy point of view. I think we have seen such a case recently on the forum; a big known platform, Exch, was down by agencies, and I think their funds were also frozen by the agencies. So, if we are using any such kind of platform, we should provide information to the trusted platform in such cases.

In my point of view, in the case of this exchange, Exchange will ask such an inquiry question from its suspected users to keep Exchange safe for future purposes from angencies. What do you think?

They get information from blockchain analysis companies and other parties that deal with AML checks. There are certain services that trigger higher risk scores than others. For example, if you use a mixer and then deposit into a CEX, chances are you will trigger some of their alarms and they will want to you know more information about you and your money. Similar things can happen if the money originates from addresses from sanctioned individuals, services or entire countries. Even crypto from gambling and online casinos can be considered "dirty" by certain parties.

Yes, buddy, I got the idea about this from an old friend of mine when I was facing that issue. Actually, I told him the whole situation I was facing at that time. He helped me very well to reach out of this frusturating problem that time. Other than that, I also thank you for confiming me about such information. 

[zasad@]

But it is better to split the coins and not transfer coins with an unclear history to a centralized exchange.
The time has passed when you can transfer any coins from wallets to the exchange.

Till date people are still transferring coins from wallet to exchange, since it's not a mixer where you can mix your coins to different wallets, i want to know the possible means you can make a coins to land at exchange without transferring it from a wallet to an exchange, I think i demand for more clarification from you.

You have several options.
Or you enter small transfers to the exchange, exchange, withdraw from the exchange and repeat the cycle.
You can exchange your sonnets for monero and enter them to the exchange. But you should also take risks. I will not give you a perfect advice. You can use CCE.Cash if they guarantee the return of coins in case of refusal of the KYC procedure

AML checks are complete bullshit. And this is a matter in the crypto ecosystem that urgently needs to be regulated.
A few days ago, I checked the Ethereum address, coins withdrawn from one exchange (CEX), and I got "risky funds" as a result. So what should I do next with them?

Up to 20% is a very good result. You don't have any stolen money, sanction coins, etc.
Here is my result 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220346.msg65362410#msg65362410

[OmegaStarScream]

Is there something wrong with the API or is the documentation just outdated? whenever I try to make a request, regardless of the endpoint used, I get an HTML page returned instead of a proper JSON response?

From my understanding, calling this should work, right?

Code:

https://cce.cash/api/v1/openapi/abbr/recent/prices

EDIT:

Okay, I now see this: https://cce.cash/apis/docs/SignatureRules#API%20request%20header%20parameter%20description

I imagine its why I cannot just request the above endpoint. I still don't understand what's mentioned in the above link though. Is it really necessary to add this level of complexity for people who want to use or test your API? I'm not even sure where to start using POSTMAN after reading this.

[Pmalek]

AML checks are complete bullshit. And this is a matter in the crypto ecosystem that urgently needs to be regulated.
A few days ago, I checked the Ethereum address, coins withdrawn from one exchange (CEX), and I got "risky funds" as a result. So what should I do next with them?

Of course they are. I will take it up a notch and say that they are a scam method where an exchange can freeze and confiscate the money of User A to seem important and law-abiding, but at the same time they put those same coins in their pool and send them to user B who uses their swap service. User A has to prove the legitimacy of his coins. The same coins that have already circulated and gone to User B. For the record, I am not talking about CCE.Cash here just so that there is no misunderstanding.

[malcovi2]

did anyone tried their services?

[Lucius]

Maybe someone has already mentioned it, but when I first visited the site, my browser warned me (Tor) that the site was attempting to perform canvas data extraction, which can identify the uniqueness of each user even without an IP address. Should such a feature even exist on a site like this?

Websites can request several configuration settings from your browser in order to help them printing the best page format for you
But by requesting your browser's specific abilities (here canvas is used for graphical rendering), websites could fingerprint your browser (if you have a unique configuration) across multiple sites. This is related to the Panopticlick (https://panopticlick.eff.org) method the EFF exposed, using other information sent by your browser to uniquely identify you, even without access to your IP address. The vast array of information sent makes it easy to end up with a very unique, thus identifiable, signature.

[Trêvoid]

So freeze transactions and require extensive personal informations ? , including identity documents and source of funds ?

https://cce.cash/terms-service

Clause 3.4

Clause 3.8.2

Clause 3.5

[SFR10]

Maybe someone has already mentioned it, but when I first visited the site, my browser warned me (Tor) that the site was attempting to perform canvas data extraction, which can identify the uniqueness of each user even without an IP address. Should such a feature even exist on a site like this?

I've seen some exchanges ^{[mostly those with accounts]} use various browser fingerprinting methods and considering that CCE Cash claims their system can flag suspicious transactions, I guess this might be one of the methods used for tracking suspicious activities ^{[without an account]}.

[CCECash]

Friends, hurry up to take part in our new raffle. There are not so many places left

♻️ CCE.Cash 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 $30 in BTC!

Stay tuned for the latest news.

[Woodie]

First off nice catchy name..CCE  very creative

Secondly, the CCE theme is a piece of art 🎭 🧩, colours equally do sit well with me as I don't like the bright stuff, you hit the sweet spot.

Btw, if it's no harm to your brand it would be nice to see you guys getting listed on Bestchange...like a crypto supports crypto relationship 

[Hamza2424]

I don't care about AML bots because I can use monero when sending to a centralized exchange.
The Bitcoin blockchain is very well analyzed by various security companies, so it is very dangerous to send Bitcoin to centralized exchanges without checking
Here is the sad experience of our colleague
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5540023.0

That was so unfortunate for apogio that he lost his funds to Godex which I also admired a lot because I took it as a good platform, but now it changes, we should either go for regulated sites just like he preferred bisq or avoid making big transactions because if any platforms do the same, at least we won't be losing big. Also it's one of the steps to be anoynmous that we make transactions in parts with long intervals.

[apogio]

we should either go for regulated sites just like he preferred bisq

Hi! Bisq is not regulated by an authority, but only by its own code and its decentralised nature.

Just to clarify my position, I 'd say that it's important to go either with:
1) fully regulated exchanges, doing KYC and providing full transparency.
2) proper decentralised exchanges that don't suddenly decide to ask for thing they didn't use to ask for.

[examplens]

Btw, if it's no harm to your brand it would be nice to see you guys getting listed on Bestchange...like a crypto supports crypto relationship 

Unfortunately, the business policy of BestChange has changed compared to some of the best days we've had here. Listing on Bestchange may be a good move for a business owner, but it is no longer a measure of quality. Impoverished management of user feedback, and they have listed some very obscure exchanges, which harms their reputation as a reliable aggregator.
Plus, I don't see them as no-KYC friendly.

[Lucius]

Maybe someone has already mentioned it, but when I first visited the site, my browser warned me (Tor) that the site was attempting to perform canvas data extraction, which can identify the uniqueness of each user even without an IP address. Should such a feature even exist on a site like this?

I've seen some exchanges ^{[mostly those with accounts]} use various browser fingerprinting methods and considering that CCE Cash claims their system can flag suspicious transactions, I guess this might be one of the methods used for tracking suspicious activities ^{[without an account]}.

It makes sense, I just wonder who today can make a transaction in BTC, for example, and be sure that some AML bot (or whoever) won't mark that transaction as suspicious. I have nothing against transactions being checked in the sense that transfers related to hacking or any illegal activity are prevented, but ordinary users should not be held responsible because someone did something wrong with the coins they currently have in the previous transactions.

[Woodie]

Btw, if it's no harm to your brand it would be nice to see you guys getting listed on Bestchange...like a crypto supports crypto relationship 

Unfortunately, the business policy of BestChange has changed compared to some of the best days we've had here. Listing on Bestchange may be a good move for a business owner, but it is no longer a measure of quality. Impoverished management of user feedback, and they have listed some very obscure exchanges, which harms their reputation as a reliable aggregator.
Plus, I don't see them as no-KYC friendly.

Wish those guys would be getting this kind of honest feedback from the community to fix things especially that their real users could be coming from this very forum. And for BC having been on the forum, am sure once in a while they do lurk around, maybe the mention of their name brings them here via the TG bot...

All well then CCE will have to make a name for themselves, like real men 😅

[DireWolfM14]

I had the chance to poke around CCE yesterday, and found a couple of things I'd like to bring up.

First, not a huge deal, but I noticed the text that pops up when you hover over a button is always in Chinese, regardless of what language is used when loading the site:



Second, I notice there's a ID tag that displays when making an exchange, but no Letter of Guarantee.  Again, not the biggest deal, but it could help prevent people from sending their funds to spoof sites, which are sure to pop up sooner or later.  I would like to see an LoG that's signed by a PGP key or a Bitcoin address staked here on the forum and another third-party site like GitHub, perhaps.  Just an additional measure of safety, but people would need to be proactive and use it for it to have any meaningful impact.

[CCECash]

I had the chance to poke around CCE yesterday, and found a couple of things I'd like to bring up.

First, not a huge deal, but I noticed the text that pops up when you hover over a button is always in Chinese, regardless of what language is used when loading the site:



Second, I notice there's a ID tag that displays when making an exchange, but no Letter of Guarantee.  Again, not the biggest deal, but it could help prevent people from sending their funds to spoof sites, which are sure to pop up sooner or later.  I would like to see an LoG that's signed by a PGP key or a Bitcoin address staked here on the forum and another third-party site like GitHub, perhaps.  Just an additional measure of safety, but people would need to be proactive and use it for it to have any meaningful impact.

Thanks for finding this issue! You're absolutely right - the hover tooltip should respect the site's current language setting. We'll fix this as soon as possible. Thanks for your support.

[SFR10]

I just wonder who today can make a transaction in BTC, for example, and be sure that some AML bot (or whoever) won't mark that transaction as suspicious.

Probably the government agencies are the only ones who can make sure that their transactions remain safe from these various AML tools ^{[e.g. I assume that's what they also do when they sell a portion of the confiscated Bitcoins]}.
^{- BTW, I totally agree with the rest of your post, they need to come up with something that doesn't lead to collateral damages (especially in cases that victims have no way of proving the SOF).}

[Hamza2424]

Hi! Bisq is not regulated by an authority, but only by its own code and its decentralised nature.

Just to clarify my position, I 'd say that it's important to go either with:
1) fully regulated exchanges, doing KYC and providing full transparency.
2) proper decentralised exchanges that don't suddenly decide to ask for thing they didn't use to ask for.

I know it is not regulated by any authority, but I liked your suggestion so I mentioned in my last reply here. I know alot about Bisq and its peer to peer nature and how anoynmous a person can be if using it. Thanks for the clarification though, we should stick to the option 2 and keep option 1 the last one if we are privacy-conscious.